create a website

To answer or not to answer? A field test of loss aversion. (2012). Krawczyk, Michal.
In: Ekonomia journal.
RePEc:eko:ekoeko:29_106.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 21

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Framing effects on risk-taking behavior: evidence from a field experiment in multiple-choice tests. (2022). Balart, Pau ; Ezquerra, Lara ; Hernandez-Arenaz, Iigo .
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09748-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui, M. and Bleichrodt, H. and Paraschiv, C., 2007, “Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement,” Management Science Vol. 53, No. 10, p. 1659–1674.

  2. Alejos, E. and Paz, M. and Matías, G. and Javier, F., 2005, “On the strategic equivalence of multiple-choice test scoring rules: evidence from a field experiment,” DFAE-II WP Series No. 20, p. 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Andersen, S. and Harrison, G.W. and Lau, M.I. and Rutström, E.E., 2006, “Dynamic choice behavior in a natural experiment,” University of Central Florida Department of Economics Working Paper, p. 06–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H., 1995, “Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 110, No. 1, p. 73–92.

  5. Blavatskyy, P. and Pogrebna, G., 2006, “Loss Aversion? Not with Half-a-Million on the Table!,” IEW-Working Papers.

  6. Byrnes, J.P. and Miller, D.C. and Schafer, W.D., 1999, “Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin Vol. 125, No. 3, p. 367.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Camerer, C. and Babcock, L. and Loewenstein, G. and Thaler, R., 1997, “Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day At A Time*,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 112, No. 2, p. 407–441.

  8. Ert, E. and Erev, I., 2010, “On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk,” Harvard Business School Working Papers.

  9. Gächter, S. and Orzen, H. and Renner, E. and Starmer, C., 2009, “Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Vol. 70, No. 3, p. 443–446.

  10. Ganzach, Y. and Karsahi, N., 1995, “Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment, ” Journal of Business Research Vol. 32, No. 1, p. 11–17.

  11. Haigh, M.S. and List, J.A., 2005, “Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion ? An experimental analysis,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No. 1, p. 523–534.

  12. Hardie, B.G.S. and Johnson, E.J. and Fader, P.S., 1993, Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice, Marketing Science, p. 378–394.

  13. Harrison, G.W. and List, J.A. and Towe, C., 2007, “Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion,” Econometrica Vol. 75, No. 2, p. 433–458.

  14. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H., 1990, “Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem,” Journal of Political Economy Vol.?, No.?, p. 1325–1348.

  15. Kahneman, D., 2003, “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics†,” American Economic Review Vol. 93, No. 5, p. 1449–1475.

  16. Krawczyk, M., 2011, “Framing in the field: a simple experiment on the reflection effect, ” Discussion paper.

  17. List, J., 2003, “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 118, No. 1, p. 41–71.

  18. Micha Krawczyk To answer or not to answer? A field test of loss aversion De Martino, B. and Kumaran, D. and Seymour, B. and Dolan, R.J., 2006, “Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain,” Science Vol. 313, No.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Thaler, R.H. and Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. and Schwartz, A., 1997, “The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 112, No. 2, p. 647–661.

  20. Tom, S.M. and Fox, C.R. and Trepel, C. and Poldrack, R.A., 2007, “The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk,” Science Vol. 315, No. 5811, p. 515.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1992, “Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 297–323.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Accounting for structural patterns in construction of value functions: a convex optimization approach. (2019). Kadzinsky, Milosz ; Ghaderi, Mohammad .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:1634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Random expected utility and certainty equivalents: mimicry of probability weighting functions. (2017). Wilcox, Nathaniel.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:3:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-017-0042-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Tax Compliance and Loss Aversion. (2015). Ohlsson, Henry ; Nordblom, Katarina ; Engström, Per ; Persson, Annika ; Engstrom, Per.
    In: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
    RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:132-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A short-but-efficient test for overconfidence and prospect theory. Experimental validation. (2014). Antelo, Manel ; Calvo, Anxo ; Peon, David.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:54135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Reference-Dependent Preferences in Gulf of Mexico Shrimpers Fishing Effort Decision. (2014). Yue, Chengyan ; Keithly, Walter R. ; Ran, Tao .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:168257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Risk preferences and development revisited: A field experiment in Vietnam. (2013). Martinsson, Peter ; Vieider, Ferdinand M. ; Nam, Pham Khanh ; Truong, Nghi .
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2013403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. La rationalité à l’épreuve de l’économie comportementale. (2013). l'Haridon, Olivier ; Denant-Boèmont, Laurent ; Denant-Boemont, Laurent.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:201323.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Bargaining with subjective mixtures. (2013). Webb, Craig.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:52:y:2013:i:1:p:15-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Reining in excessive risk-taking by executives: the effect of accountability. (2013). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:75:y:2013:i:4:p:497-517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Bimodal Bidding in Experimental All-Pay Auctions. (2013). Thöni, Christian ; Thoni, Christian ; Ernst, Christiane .
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:4:y:2013:i:4:p:608-623:d:29431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment. (2013). l'Haridon, Olivier ; Brouwer, Werner ; Attema, Arthur ; ArthurE. Attema, ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Brouwer, Werner B. F., .
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:32:y:2013:i:6:p:1057-1065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Can prospect theory be used to predict an investor’s willingness to pay?. (2013). Klos, Alexander ; Langer, Thomas ; Erner, Carsten .
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:37:y:2013:i:6:p:1960-1973.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Shunning uncertainty: The neglect of learning opportunities. (2013). Zeckhauser, Richard ; Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:79:y:2013:i:c:p:44-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Catastrophic Medical Expenditure Risk. (2013). O'Donnell, Owen ; flores, gabriela.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4198.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Risk Attitude, Beliefs Updating and the Information Content of Trades: An Experiment. (2012). Lovo, Stefano ; Décamps, Jean-Paul ; BISIÈRE, Christophe.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:21946.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Catastrophic Medical Expenditure Risk. (2012). O'Donnell, Owen ; flores, gabriela.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20120078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories. (2012). Wakker, Peter ; Baillon, Aurelien ; Cabantous, Laure.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:44:y:2012:i:2:p:115-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Social comparison and risky choices. (2012). Sonnemans, Joep ; Linde, Jona.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:44:y:2012:i:1:p:45-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. What Does it Take for a Specific Prospect Theory Type Household to Engage in Risky Investment?. (2012). Hlouskova, Jaroslava ; Tsigaris, Panagiotis .
    In: Economics Series.
    RePEc:ihs:ihsesp:286.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Capital Income Taxation and Risk Taking under Prospect Theory. (2012). Tsigaris, Panagiotis ; Hlouskova, Jaroslava.
    In: Economics Series.
    RePEc:ihs:ihsesp:283.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Risk Attitude, Beliefs Updating and the Information Content of Trades: An Experiment. (2012). Lovo, Stefano ; Décamps, Jean-Paul ; BISIÈRE, Christophe.
    In: IDEI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ide:wpaper:20671.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. To answer or not to answer? A field test of loss aversion. (2012). Krawczyk, Michal.
    In: Ekonomia journal.
    RePEc:eko:ekoeko:29_106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Myopic loss aversion: Demystifying the key factors influencing decision problem framing. (2012). Hardin, Andrew M. ; Looney, Clayton Arlen .
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:117:y:2012:i:2:p:311-331.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Risk attitudes to low-probability climate change risks: WTP for flood insurance. (2012). van den Bergh, Jeroen ; Botzen, Wouter ; Botzen, W. J. W., ; van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:82:y:2012:i:1:p:151-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. (2012). Durbach, Ian N. ; Stewart, Theodor J..
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:223:y:2012:i:1:p:1-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Hedging one’s happiness – Should a sports fan bet on the opponent?. (2011). Stemmet, Bart.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization. (2011). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Driouchi, Ahmed ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:1:p:63-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Shunning Uncertainty: The Neglect of Learning Opportunities. (2011). Zeckhauser, Richard ; Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Scholarly Articles.
    RePEc:hrv:hksfac:5347068.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Loss evasion and tax aversion. (2011). Ohlsson, Henry ; Nordblom, Katarina ; Engström, Per ; Persson, Annika ; Engstrom, Per.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:uunewp:2011_017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Loss evasion and tax aversion. (2011). Ohlsson, Henry ; Nordblom, Katarina ; Engström, Per ; Persson, Annika ; Engstrom, Per.
    In: Working Paper Series, Center for Fiscal Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:uufswp:2011_011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Loss evasion and tax aversion. (2011). Ohlsson, Henry ; Nordblom, Katarina ; Engström, Per ; Persson, Annika ; Engstrom, Per.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0518.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Shunning Uncertainty: The Neglect of Learning Opportunities. (2011). Zeckhauser, Richard ; Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp11-044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. On probabilities and loss aversion. (2010). Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:3:p:243-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Interpersonal comparisons of utility for 2 of 3 types of people. (2010). Luce, R..
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:5-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. (2010). Baucells, Manel ; Villasis, Antonio .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:193-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. (2010). Kuilen, Gijs ; Praag, Bernard ; Booij, Adam .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:115-148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Investment horizon and the attractiveness of investment strategies: A behavioral approach. (2010). Erner, Carsten ; Zeisberger, Stefan ; Dierkes, Maik .
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:34:y:2010:i:5:p:1032-1046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Investment, Resolution of Risk, and the Role of Affect. (2010). van Winden, Frans ; Krawczyk, Michal ; Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. (2010). Gächter, Simon ; Herrmann, Andreas ; Johnson, Eric J..
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cdx:dpaper:2010-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Bimodal Bidding in Experimental All-Pay Auctions. (2009). Thöni, Christian ; Ernst, Christiane ; Thoni, Christian.
    In: University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2009.
    RePEc:usg:dp2009:2009-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Investment, Resolution of Risk, and the Role of Affect. (2009). van Winden, Frans ; Krawczyk, Michal ; Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:22246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Previous Outcomes and Reference Dependence: A Meta Study of Repeated Investment Tasks with Restricted Feedback. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:22194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Previous outcomes and reference dependence: A meta study of repeated investment tasks with and without restricted feedback. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:16096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A Parametric Analysis of Prospect Theorys Functionals for the General Population. (2009). van Praag, Bernard ; Kuilen, Gijs ; Booij, Adam S. ; van de Kuilen, Gijs .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. (2009). Kuilen, Gijs ; Booij, Adam S. ; van de Kuilen, Gijs .
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:30:y:2009:i:4:p:651-666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Financial instruments with sports betting components: Marketing gimmick or a domain for behavioral finance?. (2009). Kreuz, Claudia ; Breuer, Wolfgang ; Hauten, Guido .
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:33:y:2009:i:12:p:2241-2252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. A Parametric Analysis of Prospect Theorys Functionals for the General Population. (2009). van Praag, Bernard ; Kuilen, Gijs ; Booij, Adam S. ; van de Kuilen, Gijs .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Investment, Resolution of Risk, and the Role of Affect. (2008). van Winden, Frans ; Krawczyk, Michal ; Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20080047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Loss aversion in aggregate macroeconomic time series. (2008). Rosenblatt-Wisch, Rina.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:52:y:2008:i:7:p:1140-1159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. On the Paradigm of Loss Aversion. (2007). Zank, Horst .
    In: The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:man:sespap:0710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-27 13:26:23 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy