User talk:Adam Bishop: Difference between revisions
Justicwiki (talk | contribs) →hi adam: new section |
m Signing comment by Justicwiki - '→hi adam: new section' |
||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
== hi adam == |
== hi adam == |
||
hi adam. i am block in en.wiki that you are a admin in this wiki. i was blocked by other user mistake over 3 years ago instead of other user and exist many document in other admin users in report talk page. i had many unblock request but any of them not read and unjustic rule keep on to now. can you help me? i am many document show i havent and vandal edit and report document that show i was blocked instead of other user. thanks. |
hi adam. i am block in en.wiki that you are a admin in this wiki. i was blocked by other user mistake over 3 years ago instead of other user and exist many document in other admin users in report talk page. i had many unblock request but any of them not read and unjustic rule keep on to now. can you help me? i am many document show i havent and vandal edit and report document that show i was blocked instead of other user. thanks. {{unsigned2|21:10, 7 February 2019|Justicwiki}} |
Revision as of 21:11, 7 February 2019
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Land hemisphere.jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Margaret of Anjou statue Angers.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Christopher Columbus monument Madrid.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Église Saint-Similien Nantes2.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Cloître du Grand-Moûtier Fontevraud.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Fontevraud Priory of Saint Lazarus.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Fontevraud Priory of Saint Lazarus2.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Couvent de la Visitation Nantes1.jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Couvent de la Visitation Nantes2.jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiffel_Tower_at_twilight1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Grcampbell (talk) 05:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiffel_Tower_at_twilight2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Grcampbell (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiffel_Tower_base_at_twilight.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Grcampbell (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
Dear Adam Bishop,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiffel Tower at twilight1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
D4m1en (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiffel Tower at twilight2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
D4m1en (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Eiffel tower at night
Dear Adam Bishop,
I reported a copyrigt violation of your nighttime pictures of the Eiffel Tower because I honestly believe they are a copyrigtht violation according to French courts. I do not believe you took them from elsewhere on the Internet. I also believe that the previous decisions to keep by jcb were in error.
Please have a look at:
- Commons:FOP#France "However, an exception to this 70 year rule is that the French courts have ruled that night time pictures of the Eiffel Tower are still copyrighted as the lighting company owns the copyright over the lights."
- its various illuminations are subject to author’s rights as well as brand rights. Usage of these images is subject to prior request from the "Société d’Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel"
- it is no longer legal to publish contemporary photographs of the tower at night without permission in France and some other countries.]
Also a similar picture I reported at the same time has been deleted by a different admin: File:Eiffel Tower at the nightime.jpg.
I will take no further actions because I don't want to start a war about this, I just wanted to notify Wikimedia and the uploader of the risk. Please remember that you will be liable, not only wikimedia, should the SETE (copyright holder) decide to sue about the presence of the images on Commons (something which they have already done in France).
D4m1en (talk) 06:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiffel_Tower_at_twilight2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Symac (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Tour Bretagne Nantes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Tour Montparnasse Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coyau (talk) 20:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:William and Kate Oyster card.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Vera (talk) 12:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Galeries Lafayette, Boulevard Haussmann, Paris.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Vera (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Tour Bretagne Nid.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vera (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Basilique St-Nicolas Nantes chapelle Ceferino Giménez Malla.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vera (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Adam Bishop, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hattin or Cresson
We got a message on OTRS about a picture you uploaded several years ago: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hattin.jpg
Whilst it is called "Hattin", the legend seems to refer to the battle of Cresson. Even if they occurred the same year, these are two different battles. Perhaps because of the confusion due to the title, this image is now largely used to illustrate both Hattin and Cresson battle. Do you have a mean to check if it were Hattin or Cresson ? I think this needs to be fixed (both for the title and for the reuse in wikipedias). Thanks Anthere (talk)
- Hi Anthere. The manuscript information given on Commons is correct (Sebastian Mamerot, Les Passages fait Outremer, Bibliothèque nationale, manuscript fr. 5594, fol. 197). That manuscript can be viewed online (from Gallica.bnf.fr, but that chapter talks about both Cresson and Hattin, and the image is not labelled in the text. I'm not sure which battle it depicts, but I will see if I can find any more information about it. Adam Bishop (talk) 12:00, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
DR ...
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
DR ...
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Facultat de Medicina (Montpellier) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sammyday (talk) 12:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Monument des Fusillés Nantes plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Labattblueboy (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Monument des Fusillés Nantes2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Labattblueboy (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Flickrworker (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Anne of Brittany statue Château des ducs de Bretagne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trizek from FR 10:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Philippe Leclerc de Hauteclocque statue Nantes.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
hi adam
hi adam. i am block in en.wiki that you are a admin in this wiki. i was blocked by other user mistake over 3 years ago instead of other user and exist many document in other admin users in report talk page. i had many unblock request but any of them not read and unjustic rule keep on to now. can you help me? i am many document show i havent and vandal edit and report document that show i was blocked instead of other user. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicwiki (talk • contribs) 21:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)