This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of Wikimedia Commons' project scope. Shonyx (talk·contribs) only uploaded this image (that only shows a bare text) just to make remarks against me and other image reviewers questioning the copyright status of their uploads (like some found to be unfree derivative screenshots of Google Street View images and one 90s image coming from a Flickr photographer). An expression of disappointment to cover up questions on their suspected images is an unacceptable behavior and deserves some sanction. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)02:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Shonyx: (kindly log in and don't use IP address in commenting)
If you have problems on strictness of copyright, why don't you lobby at the Philippine Congress to reform Republic Act 8293, as well as request Google to make their Street View images commercially available for everyone? But I am certain that your requests will be denied. Copyright is a right of authors (including photographers and companies that hold copyrights to images they own) who worked hard on producing their images. Certainly Google won't want to apply commercial Creative Commons licensing on Street View images.
We here at Wikimedia Commons only follows copyright rules imposed by copyright laws of all countries, including the Philippine law (Republic Act 8293), as well as copyright restrictions imposed by authors and owners of images that you ripped of, like Google and Karl-Wilhelm Welteke who is the photographer of the 1990s image you stole. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)02:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
See COM:Licensing. Copyright should be an important thing uploaders need to consider before uploading. It's your problem if your sister is "dead" already, that doesn't change the fact that her uploads are very problematic: crops of screenshots of Google Street View images, one stolen image from a Flickr photographer, et cetera. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)03:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
later night, i called their mom and seeing the sister was dead. but im not the murderer, i promise that im not killed her with spears for self defense. then later i check with her mom on cctv cameras but the mom got shot by murderer and luckily, i arrested the murderer and i reported to police. 136.158.60.17803:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your claims of your "sister's death" are inconsistent. First, the userpage User:Shonyx claims she committed suicide. Then you claim she was murdered by a killer last night. How can your claims be believed? Notwithstanding the fact that the involved image files are questionable, some from Google Street View screenshots. How will you defend those images that those are not from Street View? JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)03:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Too much wild claims, but the issue of problematic uploads still persists. Stolen Google Street View images, one 90s image originally from Flickr and from a European photographer, etc.. The two recent out of scope images of texts, including this nominated image, are just made to express disappointment over image reviewers' scrutinies of their problematic uploads. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)03:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: Speedied as they either were reuploads of previously deleted files, or they are blatant copyvios (watermarked images). --Bedivere (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: even though there is camera information but this is very old picture and it is not own work of uploaderYann (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work The text is too simple to have a copyright. Not sure if the stars make it over COM:TOO. Yann (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
In accordance with §9.5. Copyright in Works of Government and International Bodies of Liberia Intellectual Property Act, 2016. Liberia (2016). Retrieved on 2018-11-05. I believe this file to be an infrigement of Liberia Government copyright. A copyright symbol is visible on the Armed Forces of Liberia website. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per the Liberia Intellectual Property act you cited, §9.4., sections b & c Subject Matter Not Protected of Liberia Intellectual Property Act, 2016. Liberia (2016). Retrieved on 2018-11-05.. This file is NOT an infringement of the Liberian government copyright. There is no such copyright symbol visible on the Armed Forces of Liberia website and the artwork that is the Armed Forces of Liberia flag remains in the public domain per Liberian law. This reproduction of the flag does not violate any Liberian law and was done with the express consent of the Liberian government, which I work very closely with. Following the same precedent of the uploaded flag of Liberia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Liberia, which is also uploaded on Wikipedia without any such issue. FURTHERMORE, §9.8. Fair Use sections 1,2,3 of the previously mentioned Liberia Intellectual Property Act, 2016 protects this flag as it is uploaded for the purpose of teaching and information, hence posted on Wikipedia. Furthermore, this is posted for educational purposes, not commercial purposes, and is not posted with the goal of making a profit or lessening the value of the flag as noted in the Liberia Intellectual Property Act. This is unfortunately the result of a petty dispute in which user Buckshot06 decided to remove the flag I had already uploaded, claiming the flag was not cited. After he realized the flag was officially used by the Armed Forces of Liberia, he claimed that I am violating their copyright, which I am clearly not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenraystudios (talk • contribs) 22:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, sections § 9.12. Reproduction and Other Utilization for Teaching and § 9.13. Reproduction by Libraries and Archives clearly define works like this as Fair Use under Liberian law, as this file has been posted on an online library archive for the purposes of education and information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenraystudios (talk • contribs) 22:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Goldenrays, firstly, thankyou for coming to this page - the correct place - to put your points of view.
Should you claim and wish to reproduce Liberian government copyrighted symbols on this website, you need to file a Commons:Volunteer Response Team ticket to declare that the Liberian government has given permission to reproduce the symbol, attaching appropriate official communications from the government - your writings on this website alone will simply not do.
Should you wish to make a claim of Fair Use and upload symbols or artistic works on that basis, you should have read the Commons rules more closely - such claimed Fair Use images can only be uploaded on Wikipedia, not Commons, and must have a detailed Fair Use claim for each page you wish to show the symbol on.
Please read the rules more carefully. I am not here to explain WP or Commons copyright rules to you, I am here to edit articles. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you looked closely at the website you claim you've read, you would see that the copyright symbol is on the website, not the flag nor the image of the flag.
Under Liberian laws, works produced by the government fall under the public domain. As has been shown before.
Furthermore, the Fair Use clause was mentioned in addition to other facts noted in my response to you.
You can edit articles, however, don't be selective with your edits and choose to single out certain edits over others. Especially after changing your reasoning from the flag is not necessary, to it's not cited, to it's now a violation of copyright. Please read more closely. --Goldenraystudios (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you do not engage with and follow the instructions I have repeatedly tried to give you, these files will be deleted.
This page is not about my reasoning for edits to a Wikipedia article, which I have explained to you at my talkpage on Wikipedia.
In that case, if you write a proper Fair Use claim, you may be able to use *that* file in Wikipedia, but not the file you've currently got there, which you have claimed, by uploading it on Commons, that is applicable for all use worldwide under GFDL.
Of course I'm not the "supreme authority for all things Liberia" - wouldn't hope to be. Would direct you to the University of Liberia maybe :) But I do know the copyright restrictions for Wikipedia and Commons, because I've both successfully uploaded files myself used happily, and have had files deleted :( ...!! Buckshot06 (talk) 04:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Speedy keep. Carrefour logo is above the Threshold of originality in the US. Similar images are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Especially the Subway and Nikken logos are good examples. The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter. It's not complicated enough to be above the US standards.
I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain. So your keep rationale does not apply. Also, "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The design of all works listed above bases on File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png, which is the original logo and trademark of Carrefour. Carrefour S.A. is a company which bases in France. Country of origin of the Carrefour logo is France then.
According to Commons:Copyright rules policy: Files uploaded to Commons should be free both in the country of origin (as defined by the Berne Convention) and in the United States of America. Other juridical territories are not involved in the creation of the work.
According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the examples of the Threshold of originality in the United States given above are: OK to upload to Commons, because they are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection and are judged ineligible for copyright protection by a court or similar authority.
According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the Threshold of originality in the France: asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author" and In practice, it depends on the work in question, but this has left the bar quite low for many works where an artistic intent can be shown.
The logo of Carrefour Group presents the design of the same nature which was already judged by the United States Copyright Office as ineligible to be copyrighted. In addition, the logo of Carrefour Group does not show the personality of the author or the artistic intent as required by the French law. Therefore, the copyright for the logo of Carrefour Group does not exist.
Your deletion rationale was a statement Not too simple for copyright. and a link reference to another Deletion Request – Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
The contents of the above reference also consist only of votes and personal opinions without expressing any arguments of legal nature. The above Deletion Request authored by Taivo with a rationale: I think, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. and that statement on the previous similar case on Commons that in my opinion the result was incorrect. The request was closed by Natuur12 with a rationale I agree with Taivo, non basic shapes.
As a response to the above, I posted my vote of speedy keep for this work as I did not see a right rationale to contest the copyright status of this logo just by relying on personal votes. Unlike yours unfortunately, my vote has a rationale with a legal basis.
Regarding the legal jurisdiction of the Carrefour Group headquarters it is difficult for me to understand why you provided Spain as a country which is binding in Threshold of originality to the logo of Carrefour Group. Spain was not the source country of this work and/or the country originally involved in its initial creation or first publication.
If believe that you should include Spain in the copyright scope of the work and did not find information you were interested then you should rather apply the rule of assuming the copyright good status of the file. You just provide as your rationale a statement that I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain.
You responded that So your keep rationale does not apply. Regarding the above this is not right.
You answered me that "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. First, as I stated above I voted speedy keep because your deletion request seems to be likely invalid as it does not contain any specific rationale. By simply stating Not too simple for copyright you do not start the discussion. Also, who is we? General statements that we do that or we do not that which lack any specific disclosure are very misleading, especially when it is written by an admin. You should not do that. Please be more specific and direct. This is also described in Commons:Deletion requests.Added a reference.--Rezonansowy (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, by saying to me that by expressing my vote you are attempting to censor the discussion is likely against my freedom of speech and expression and also against the Community standards and policies like Commons:Assume good faith which says about the assuming good faith standard. Even if you did not intend to you actually did me feel like this. I and everyone else have a right to express any vote or opinion which does not hurt anyone or is not against the law.
@Magog the Ogre, Natuur12, and Taivo: I really appreciate your service as admins on Commons but guys, what are you doing? You seem to completely ignore any standards of merit discussion which always shall include legal and material arguments. You replaced these standards with a showcase of personal opinions and agreements. Such practice lead to performing a wrong decisions and they harm everyone at Wikimedia Commons. I am very tired of dealing with such crap. When even admins do it, it is enough. Pleas stop it and start respecting the Community standards and official policies by relying on merit arguments (like providing the legal basis).
Again, I appreciate your work and service (all of you guys!) and know that you have your own lives but please pay attention to the above...
When creating previous request, I did not realize, that this is big white C on blue and red background. Writing big white C into square in such way, that I do not understand, that this is C in square, clearly shows personality of the author and artistic intent. I agree now, that the logo is too simple for copyright in USA, but probably not in source country France. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. According to com:TOO the threshold for France seems to be "imprint of the personality of the author" and one cannot deny that such a threshold is met with those logo's. Also it’s required that a work is free in the source country and the US. Therefor the US examples are irrelevant. I would also note that fonts can be copyrighted in Europe. Therefor the “it’s just a C-argument” has little merit. I would find it funny to read that company’s cannot hold a copyright over their logo’s but it’s just plain sad honestly. I would recommend that Rezonansowy takes an introduction course about copyright before they accuse others off “completely ignore any standards of merit discussion”. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The logo's of Carrefour are copyrighted. The design is above threshold of originality per COM:TOO France. Therefore these files cannot be hosted on Commons with one of the free licences.
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This logo is also original here in Spain, although its origin is French, I understand. In all the integrated food chains of petrol stations, there are many of these logos. This is the problem. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep the file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg should not be deleted because it is placed in several articles on motorways and highways as part of a CEPSA service area or petrol station integrated with Carrefour Express. The problem is not the rights of the author, but, the problem is that the icon has to appear for the transparency to the drivers. There are several logos of other food chains that are integrated in the petrol station and for this reason, please do not delete the file.
Carrefour 1988.svg was previously deleted (note the blue link among the long list of red links above). I don’t know whether the file’s contents are the same as before, but the file’s log suggests that the original uploader may have returned under a different name. Brianjd (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
In my opinion the screenshots added to the photo do not fall under COM:DM as the covers and the author's photo are the main topic of the photo. However, I would appreciate opinions of others. Ankry (talk) 18:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as this is not an original photo and lacks camera EXIF data, we would need an evidence of free license and authorship for the backgroud photo. Ankry (talk) 18:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
While this file does not have that strict of a copyright, it is still a fair use file owned by roblox corporation and does not belong on the commons Vitorperrut555 (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep: The author of Flickr only deleted the image from his account and did not change the authorization information of the image, so the reason for deletion is not valid. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 10:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This image appears to be a painting for which we do not have proper source or license. It is not educational for the municipality listed in the summary. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/mitroviceeveriut AceDouble (talk) 23:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should keep it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. North Mitrovica has an ethnic Serb majority and the town has refused to work with the Republic of Kosovo. The similar flag File:Flag of North Mitrovica.svg is widely used in Wikipedia (although we don't need both files). Verbcatcher (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/mitroviceeveriut AceDouble (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should keep it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. North Mitrovica has an ethnic Serb majority and the town has refused to work with the Republic of Kosovo. This is widely used in Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem that has never been adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/AceDouble (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, renominated for deletion the day after it was kept. If you disagree with the the result of a deletion decision then you should follow Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions – contact the closing admin on their talk page, at User talk:Strakhov. This repeated request offers nothing significantly new; we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/zubinpotok AceDouble (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should keep it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. Zubin Potok is in a region with an ethnic Serb majority that has some effective autonomy from the Kovosan authorities. This is in use in Russian Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/leposaviq AceDouble (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should have it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. w:en:Leposavić says that the locality has "an ethnic Serb majority that functions largely autonomously from the remainder of ethnic Albanian-majority Kosovo", so that the town may use symbols that are not in official use by Kosovan authorities. The symbol is in use by what claims to be the municipality's website.[1]. It is in use in Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem that has never been adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/AceDouble (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, renominated for deletion the day after it was kept. If you disagree with the the result of a deletion decision then you should follow Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions – contact the closing admin on their talk page, at User talk:Strakhov. This repeated request offers nothing significantly new; we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/leposaviq AceDouble (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem that has never been adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/AceDouble (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, renominated for deletion the day after it was kept. If you disagree with the the result of a deletion decision then you should follow Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions – contact the closing admin on their talk page, at User talk:Strakhov. This repeated request offers nothing significantly new; we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/leposaviq AceDouble (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should have it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. w:en:Leposavić says that the locality has "an ethnic Serb majority that functions largely autonomously from the remainder of ethnic Albanian-majority Kosovo", so that the town may use symbols that are not in official use by Kosovan authorities. The symbol is in use by what claims to be the municipality's website.[2] It is in use in Russian Wikipedia pages. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/zvecan AceDouble (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should keep it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. Zvečan is in a region with an ethnic Serb majority that has some effective autonomy from the Kovosan authorities. This is widely in use in Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/zvecan AceDouble (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should keep it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. Zvečan is in a region with an ethnic Serb majority that has some effective autonomy from the Kovosan authorities. This file is widely in use in Wikipedia. This appears to be a superseded version of File:COA Zvečan.png, but we should keep outdated emblems. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not own work. This is the cover of the sheet music of a song published in 1946. Not old enough to be assumed to be in the public domain in France. BrightRaven (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Artist "Marcel G. LEFRANCQ Marcel G. LEFRANCQ (1916-1974) Marcel G. LEFRANCQ is an artist born in Belgium in 1916 and deceased in 1974." Not able to be kept under this license, it's only 50 years post mortem, Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per de:Versöhnungskirche (Schorndorf), the windows and other artworks in this 1990 German church are works of German artist de:Andreas Felger, who is apparently alive (born in 1935). So they are still protected by copyright, and there is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. So the files should be deleted (they can be restored 70 years after the death of the artist). The only way for us to keep the files is with a COM:VRT permission of the artist/rights holder.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in France. The authors of this work were architects Roger Taillibert (died 2019) and Siavash Teimouri (still alive as of this writing). Unfree architecture, not free for commercial licensing.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/zubinpotok AceDouble (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Given Ervin111899 (talk·contribs)'s problematic uploads as evidenced on their talk page, I doubt these two uploads are their own photos. Very small crops and blurry quality may suggest these are grabbed or taken somewhere. Regular deletion request is made as no results are found in reverse Google Images (via Google Lens) and TinEye searches. These do not appear to match any existing Google Street View imagery of both steel poles.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These medals clearly aren't the uploaders own work and there's zero evidence they are PD in the meantime. So the images should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These medals clearly aren't the uploaders own work and there's zero evidence they are PD in the meantime. So the image should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atoms & not drawn according to MoS guidelines. In addition, the areas around the oxygen atoms have a strange white background. Replaced by various alternatives in Category:Geranyl acetate. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete the metadata of File:Danny Handley live.jpg includes Copyright holder JAKUB STEINBORN. There is a professional photographer of this name,[14] who is unlikely to release these types of images with free licenses. File:Danny Handley Sydney.jpg includes "Photo by Kim Rudner, Sydney Australia 2017", who does not match the uploader's username or the name in the other file. This image was used in a album cover which was released before the upload to Commons.[15]Verbcatcher (talk) 19:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete, risk of copyright violation. The watermarks match this site, where I can't find a free license. Performers on a stage taken from behind are most likely professional performers; freely-licensed photographs are typically taken from the audience area. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no source for the work, or a valid license. In Morocco, the public domain applies after 70 years from the author's death, but in this case, it does not apply. Riad Salih (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete, risk of copyright violation. I cannot find a free license on the band's website. These are the only contributions of the uploader to Commons and to the Wikimedia project. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nomination for deletion because the author deletes or hides the file and therefore it loses its Public Domain category and license. SariRomero (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nomination for deletion because the author deletes or hides the file and therefore it loses its Public Domain category and license. SariRomero (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're wrong. This was released under a Creative Commons license, which cannot be revoked once published (see Commons:Flickr files). The account owner deleted the image, but it was verified after it was uploaded here. Jarould [talk] 17:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nomination for deletion because the author deletes or hides the file and therefore it loses its Public Domain category and license. SariRomero (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nomination for deletion because the author deletes or hides the file and therefore it loses its Public Domain category and license. SariRomero (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nomination for deletion because the author deletes or hides the file and therefore it loses its Public Domain category and license. SariRomero (talk) 17:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 81.41.180.213 as Copyvio (copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: Thomas Monnington died in 1976. This painting is still under copyright until 2047.Converting to DR for easier undeletion. 1933 painting by an author who died in 1976, undelete in 2047. Abzeronow (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment He appears to be an ethical hacker of some note, but since the uploader's account is globally locked, I doubt we can rely on their self-identification as the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete: Risk of copyright violation. This was the logo of PlanetHoster, so it is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. This logo is probably too complex to come under the threshold of originality. For more information see [16]. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 10:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is nothing to suggest that either the Youtube channel nor the news station owns the rights to this drawing by a child ( Trade (talk) 00:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like straight-out copyright infringement, so I think we should delete. I'm not sure how the matter is any different because the artist was a minor. - Jmabel ! talk13:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by JWilz12345 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://en.numista.com/conditions.php states (on images): "The trademarks, logos, slogans, graphics, PHOTOGRAPHS, animations, videos, software solutions and texts and any other content on the Platform, with the exception of the Content published by the Collectors, are the exclusive intellectual property of NUMISTA and may not be reproduced, used or displayed without express authorisation, or otherwise face legal proceedings."Yann (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All those files are tagged with {{PD-AR-Photo}} and are PD in Argentina, but they are not PD in the United States, as they were not PD in Argentina at the time of the URAA date (1996). For that, a photo should have been taken 25 years before, meaning 1970 or earlier. Alfonsín became president in 1983 and was president up to 1989, so none of the photos taken during that time are valid.
Note, by the way, that I named this deletion request as "Raúl Alfonsín" for convenience, but I'm not nominating all the photos in the category, as others are PD for other reasons and may stay. --Cambalachero (talk) 19:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The uploader has also uploaded several other files that look similarly dubious, but there are only so many hours in my day and my patience/stamina is already exhausted, so I leave this work for somebody else.
I'd hope that the uploading process could be improved so that it would detect photographs much smaller than those produced by camera or phone, Google these for matches, and, if matches are found, flag this (or simply reject the attempts at uploading).
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These medals clearly aren't the uploaders own works as claimed and there's zero reason they would qualify as public domain since works by the United Nations are usually copyrighted, except in a few instances that don't apply. So these images should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Virtually identical to slightly better-exposed image – V&SA Dynamometer car at National Railway Museum, Adelaide.jpg – which includes end-of-car detail SCHolar44 (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The metadata credits STEVEN B EKEROVICH, which I assume is not the same person as the uploader. The copyright holder needs to submit a license statement following the steps described at COM:VRTAdeletron 3030 (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not in use, not educationally useful -- we have a collection of images for all of the depicted subjects, except Frédéric Pierre. Outstandingly poor overall quality : out of focus, overexposed, motion blurred, high loss due to JPEG compression. Taken in infringement to the venue's policy regarding filming and photographing live performances; the resulting breach in contract by the photographer/ticket holder is enough to trigger COM:PCP. Webfil (talk) 02:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's more complex than that. There are a number of extracted images of individuals. Either keep all or delete all, because if the extracted images remain, then we'd need this one to track authorship.
{{Image extracted|1=Sylvie Boucher (2016).jpg|2=Michel Charette (2016).jpg|3=François Chénier (2016).jpg|4=Frédéric Pierre (2016).jpg}}
I know Commons doesn't enforce laws against photographing embassies in certain countries, so why would Commons enforce venues' policies prohibiting photography? In both cases, those are non-copyright restrictions. There is a long article about "Frédéric Pierre (acteur)" in French Wikipedia, using this photo plus a photo extracted from this one. Unless we have reason to believe there is copyright violation, I'm not understanding why we shouldn't keep this photo per COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Commons doesn't delete because of venue policies -- if the venue sees this and wants to take action against the photographer, that's their business. It's not a good photo, but it's in scope. Multiple notable people performing together -- documenting a specific event, and one of the only photos we have of some of these people. — Rhododendritestalk | 20:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment There doesn't appear to be a COM:TOO Bangladesh, but I don't believe this logo consists "only of simple geometric shapes or text." The sun with rays and the book might be over their COM:TOO, if we knew what it was. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files from very different sources, if there's a weblink, not one website claims a free license. Images often uploadet with wrong dates, and even if not, the images are not old enough to claim they could be free because of the 70 years post mortem rule. It seems, the uploader thinks, because there's an image to find around the web, it's free. Ans it seems he thinks too, that he's the one to decide, which license such images should have. It ist sad for a lot of these images, but we can not use unfree images.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Undated American photograph that appears to be early 20th Century. Actual source needed to determine its copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Trade: Is the invalidation of one of the rationales enough to discredit the others? Can you otherwise please provide insight on your support for keeping a media depicting four unidentifiable humanoid blobs? Webfil (talk) 20:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Please bring us conclusive evidence, otherwise it should be withdrawn. If you think it might be a copyright infringement file, you can do a Google image search to see if there are any images similar to it. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 11:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The file format of the same content was converted from jpeg to png to make it more impressive, and the value of the old file decreased. 織原美津夫 (talk) 11:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I mistakenly thought any CC license was allowed, but will look into my bad assumption later. If this license is unacceptable, please remove this image and I apologize for my mess Big Money Threepwood (talk) 07:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Photo of a mass produced product in a very generic looking room. (No reason evident nor offered why location would be problematic if identified - if there is some serious problem you don't want to mention here, you can send info via COM:VRT, or perhaps crop the photo.) On Commons since 2021, too long for courtesy deletion without good reason. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I deleted two as copyvios because the source of the photographs is not under a free license either. Fernando Botero died in 2023, so works by him can be undeleted in 2104. (Colombia is 80 years PMA) Abzeronow (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for sharing this important message with me. I aprpeciate it.
Regarding files ""Painting "Monalisa" by artist Fernando Botero"" and "Painting "Una Familia" by artist Fernando Botero", I took photos of these artworks at Botero Museum here in Bogota Colombia. These works of art are part of a large collection of painintgs and sculptures dontated by artist Fernando Botero to the nation of Colombia, more specifically to the Banco de la República (Colombia's central bank, with an extensive history of promoting cultural activities in the country).
Entrance to Botero Museum is completely free and staff at the museum authorize the public in general to take photos of painting and sculptures. Fernando Botero wanted these artworks to be available to all Colombians. That was his gift to the people of his country.
Regarding file "Porta del Paradiso di Fernando Botero a Pietrasanta - May 2021", this fresco was painted by Fernando Botero while living in Italy, so it has not direct relation to his artistic production in the country of Colombia. It was painted in the Misericordia church in Pietrasanta, Lucca, Italy.
Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. I appreciate your kind comments as well.
@Diego Botero P. Thank you for responding. First, artwork that is free to view is not necessarily free to share, reproduce, sell, or modify. Commons can only host images that are free of restrictions. In Colombia, those restrictions remain in place for 70 years after the artist’s death.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The March 2023 replacement of the original file should be deleted. There are supposed to be seven strips below the canton (star area), not six. Also, the stars differ from Mr. Williams concept flag design. I had a personal email from Mr. Williams asking me to restore the original image, but I don’t know how to do that. The flag today does not have the same stripe configuration, so the user may have thought this flag should be consistent with the current flag, but that is incorrect. The version that added a border is fine, but this most recent change is not. Mr. Williams' original article with this image is: Williams, Earl P. Jr. (October 2012). "Did Francis Hopkinson Design Two Flags?" (PDF). NAVA News (216): 7–9. Fran Featherston (talk) 20:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept Non-admin closure. This is a request to restore an earlier version of an image per COM:OVERWRITE. As the replacement is disputed, I have reverted to the previous version. The replacement image was copied from File:Hopkinson Flag.svg and the earlier overwrite created a duplicate file. Both versions are now available for projects to choose their preference. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
To summarize: the original picture is mine. The one used in Commons is a cropped one in order to remove other persons not relevant for the bio purpose. Dserarols (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I did a reverse search on Google with the uploaded picture and there are no matching results. There is no founded reason to not accept the user's reply. In case of doubt and once given an explanation by the user, who seems worried and participative, we should consider Commons:Assume good faith (both regarding copyright and newcomers). That is, imho, maintaining the photo and linking it back to Wikidata. --Xavier D. (Messages) 17:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unless there is an specific reason to suspect a copyvio, I think it's perfectly believable that it's a crop from an own photograph:
L'espatlla d'una altra persona i la distorsió de la cara fan raonable pensar que és un retall d'un racó d'una foto de grup.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment The file was uploaded here on 28 February 2024 but an online search finds it as the background image of the first segment of a YouTube video published on 10 January 2024.[18] The Wikimedia username of the uploader here matches the YouTube username where the video was released. Given the only other reuser I can find online seems to be the same person, I think it is likely to be their own work. However, as it was used in YouTube first, we probably need the uploader to follow the COM:VRT process to confirm the licence. From Hill To Shore (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 16 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free image and source, the license is wrongYann (talk) 09:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I may have understand wrong the PD-Russia, but it is written there : This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym: (b) between January 1, 1943 and January 1, 1954, and the name of the author did not become known during 70 years after publication, counted from January 1 of the year following the year of publication.
This is most probably in the public domain in Russia, however its copyright status in USA is unclear. It would be in the public domain in USA if it was published within 30 days from the publication in Russia, but that's difficult to prove either way. Yann (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok @Yann, according to what I see, considering it was not (I think) in the public domain in 1996, it is not possible to keep it in Commons. Too bad Penastal (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 16 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The entire artificial wetland complex was constructed between 1997 to 2005. It's really unlikely that the Environmental Ecology Center stood completed by or before 1953. ✗plicit13:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It is stated in the permission template that the artist died more than 70 years ago. The artist died in 1985, 39 years ago. There is no sign of a ticket of permission from the copyright owner. Rsteen (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For Commons this license is sufficient because it also states that the work is in the public domain in the USA because it was published before January 1, 1929. Mewa767 (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The Adam and Eve sculpture (first file) is not located in Colombia but in Singapore, where FOP does exist: ‘Freedom of panorama is granted to several types of artistic works in public spaces by Section 265 of the Copyright Act 2021 (Act 22 of 2021). Subsection 1 of the section enumerates works eligible for the Singaporean freedom of panorama: buildings or models of buildings; sculptures situated "other than temporarily" in public spaces or "premises open to the public"’. — Cheers, JackLee–talk–01:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete Website above indicates the copyright of the photo is held by Elena Ramos with no indication of a free licence compatible with COM:L. Uploaded as own work by Poisson lune (talk·contribs) but there is no indication that this is Elena. Permission for the file to be here must be provided through the processes explained at COM:VRT. From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep This isn't a logo, its a flag. The flag is acually based off an already uploaded png and it states that I made the svg but didn't create it originally. It is based off File:Flag of Waco, Texas.jpg which is free domain and has been up and used since 2006. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This image has been updated to a newly adopted flag that contains a trademarked logo. While the original file uploaded may not have been in violation, this one is. WebmasterWacoTX (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Section 2(b) of the Lanham Act expressly forbids trademark protections for flags, coats of arms, or other insignia used by municipalities (or states or the Federal government). Houston already tried doing this and the US Court of Appeals already denied it in 2013. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And, in any case, this is a pending application, filed on Feburary 14, which has not been reviewed. We can certainly take it down pending the challenge, but saying that it is currently trademarked is not accurate. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These 11 files are falsely licensed as public domain. Their author, Jules Imbert, has died in 1964 as per the source plateform imagesdefense.gouv.fr. Also, it is clearly indicated in the notice below the source images that they don't fall under public domain (example). Under French law, these works do not go into the public domain until after 70 years after the author's death.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no reason to believe this photo is CC. The author was also certainly not the person who posted this image. Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling both died well before 2022. Howardcorn33 (talk) 18:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete The "fix" by RAN above was to declare it an anonymous work, date it to around the 1920s, state that it was a scan from an unidentified work and insert the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template. The date appears to be pure guesswork; are we looking at a man around the age of 60, 70 or 90? He is definitely old, but for someone who lived to 98, I am not sure how we can judge how quickly or slowly he appeared to age without reference to other images of him. The grain of the photograph suggests that it may be from a printed work like a newspaper; a declaration of {{Scan}} is not sufficient. If this has been published, there will be a record of whether it was attributed to a photographer at the time. We can't guess and say that it was anonymous solely to get around an unknown source. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, there appears to be some writing in the top right corner. Could that be a signature mark by the photographer? If so, we can't declare it to be anonymous; at most we could say the author is unidentified. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete. Claim of "own work" is implausible; slightly different versions of this map show up all over Facebook and Youtube (e.g. [19], [20], etc). The map itself might be PD-old but we'd need a source to confirm that. Omphalographer (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:DW. Aby korzystać z chronionych PA okładek w "swoich" pracach, musisz mieć pisemną zgodę od ich autora. Żadne Fair use ani polski dozwolony użytek nie działają na Commons Pamulab (talk) 09:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Many of depicted covers are already PD while as for those not PD each of them is not the main subject of the photo, would be of very low resolution if cropped as a new image and blurring it would not make a whole photo useless. Therefore de minimis applies. ~CybularnySpeak?20:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep, but crop it down to the ticket only and delete the old revision. The design beneath the ticket is too complex. ✗plicit06:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep, but crop it down to the ticket only and delete the old revision. The design beneath the ticket is too complex. ✗plicit06:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Risk of copyright violation. This was the logo of Yugoslav Radio Television (JRT), so it is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. This logo is probably too complex to come under the threshold of originality. This logo was not public domain in Yugoslavia because it would have to be published more than 50 years before 1991, i.e. before 1941 (COM:YUGOSLAVIA) - JRT opened in 1956. COM:YUGOSLAVIA says we should then follow the law of the successor state, which should probably be Serbia because JRT was headquartered in Belgrade. The relevant phrase in COM:SERBIA appears to be Copyright on collective works lasts for 70 years from the date of the legal publication of the work. JRT closed in 1992, so this will only be reliably public domain in 2063, unless we can establish an earlier publication. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The image, which has only three simple letters and is modified only with simple arcs, likely does not meet the minimum standards for copyright protection. If it is ultimately removed because it meets copyright-protected criteria, please place it in Category:Undelete in 2063. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 09:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}. In the unlikely event that this simple logo of only text was copyrightable, it would probably be in the public domain anyway as {{PD-SCGGov}} because this was a government organization of Yugoslavia. Serbia and Montenegro was the successor state. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Note that "lack of EXIF" is specifically excluded as a deletion reason per se on the COM:DR page. I doubt it was photographed by the uploader, but "no EXIF" is not a deletion reason by itself, and adding "small size" is also insufficient. I'd argue that it is so small for a 2023 upload that it's clearly suspect, but better proof would be to find the file using TinEye or Google Images. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We also check the account's activity, not all uploads are properly added, (wrong dates, wrong licences sometimes). The image is with a transparent background and is of very poor quality. Considering this level of quality in 2023, I have doubts about it being his own work. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Undated American early 20th Century photograph, likely is public domain, metadata says "copyright status not set". Proper source would be needed to verify its actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
E' in corso uno studio sull'opera in oggetto ed è stata richiesta l'esclusività dell'immagine fino alla pubblicazione del saggio prevista per l'autunno 2024 G.nicolini (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Speedy delete per nominator: 🤦 - THV | ♂ | U | T - 05:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Keep Relevant per w:Astro NJOI and pretty clearly PD-textlogo per COM:TOO Malaysia, if you look at the old Petronas logo that was refused copyright protection. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Carrefour logo is above the Threshold of originality in the US. Similar images are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Especially the Subway and Nikken logos are good examples. The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter. It's not complicated enough to be above the US standards.
Delete all. According to com:TOO the threshold for France seems to be "imprint of the personality of the author" and one cannot deny that such a threshold is met with those logo's. Also it’s required that a work is free in the source country and the US. Therefor the US examples are irrelevant. I would also note that fonts can be copyrighted in Europe. Therefor the “it’s just a C-argument” has little merit. I would find it funny to read that company’s cannot hold a copyright over their logo’s but it’s just plain sad honestly. I would recommend that Rezonansowy takes an introduction course about copyright before they accuse others off “completely ignore any standards of merit discussion”. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Comment COM:INUSE at sw:Orodha ya Mawaziri Wakuu wa Ubelgiji. --Rosenzweig τ 09:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Question Just fix the spelling?? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Oppose. That's why we have license review system ({{Flickrreview}} in this case). Automatic review by FlickreviewR 2 confirmed the license in the same time. (please tag me if there are additional claims to respond to). Mbkv717 (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
