Search

ARCHIVED - Telecom Order CRTC 2005-326

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

 

Telecom Order CRTC 2005-326

  Ottawa, 16 September 2005
 

Bell Canada

  Reference: Tariff Notice 863 (National Services Tariff)
 

Ex parte application

1.

The Commission approves on an interim basis, effective 16 September 2005, the ex parte application1 by Bell Canada, dated 2 September 2005.

2.

In order that the application may be available for public examination consistent with the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the Rules), the company is directed to file with the Commission at procedure@crtc.gc.ca, within two business days, an electronic version of the application2 for the Commission web site. Among other things, the Rules and Telecom Circular CRTC 2005-6 allow interveners to comment, within 25 days, on tariff applications that have been placed on the public record.
  Secretary General
1 An ex parte application is an application that has been filed with the Commission without notice to the public and, as such, is not placed on the public record when initially filed. An ex parte decision is one in which the Commission disposes of an application solely on the basis of the applicant's submissions. Subsection 61(3) of the Telecommunications Act allows the Commission to make an ex parte decision where it considers that the circumstances of the case justify it. In Review of regulatory framework, Telecom Decision CRTC 94-19, 16 September 1994, the Commission set out several considerations to be balanced in any determination to permit ex parte tariff filings, including the public interest in the effective operation of the competitive marketplace and the public interest in an open regulatory process.

2 In Introduction of a streamlined process for retail tariff filings, Telecom Circular CRTC 2005-6, 25 April 2005, the Commission directed the companies to file all tariff applications on an electronic basis.

  This document is available in alternative format upon request, and may also be examined in PDF format or in HTML at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca

Date Modified: 2005-09-16

Date modified:
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy