APQP
APQP
APQP
Product Quality Planning is a structured method of defining and establishing the steps necessary to assure
that a product satisfies the customer./ Produktqualittsplanung ist eine strukturierte Methode zur
Festlegung und Festlegung der notwendigen Schritte, um sicherzustellen, dass ein Produkt den
Kunden zufrieden stellt.
Some of the benefits of product quality planning are:/ Einige der Vorteile der Produktqualittsplanung
sind:
- To direct resources to satisfy the customer./ Um Ressourcen zu befriedigen, um den Kunden zu
befriedigen.
- To promote early identification of required changes./ Zur frhzeitigen Erkennung der
erforderlichen nderungen
- To avoid late changes. /Um spte nderungen zu vermeiden.
- To provide a quality product on time at the lowest cost./ Um ein Qualittsprodukt pnktlich zu
den niedrigsten Kosten zu liefern.
Definition
Control Plans/ Kontrollplne
Control plans are written descriptions of the systems for controlling parts and processes./
Kontrollplne sind Beschreibungen der Systeme zur Steuerung von Teilen und
Prozessen.
Separate control plans cover three distinct phases: / Separate Kontrollplne decken drei verschiedene
Phasen ab.
Prototype - A description of the dimensional measurements and material and performance tests that will
occur during Prototype build/ Eine Beschreibung der Dimensionsmessungen und Material- und
Leistungsprfungen, die whrend des Prototypenaufbaus auftreten werden
Pre-launch - A description of the dimensional measurements and material and performance tests that will
occur after Prototype and before full Production./ Eine Beschreibung der Mamessungen und Material-
und Leistungsprfungen, die nach Prototyp und vor der vollstndigen Produktion auftreten werden.
Production - A comprehensive documentation of product/process characteristics, process controls, tests,
and measurement systems that will occur during mass production./ Eine umfassende Dokumentation von
Produkt- / Prozessmerkmalen, Prozesskontrollen, Tests und Messsystemen, die bei der
Massenproduktion auftreten werden.
Section 0: Pre-Planning/ Abschnitt 0: Vorplanung
Each section of APQP depends on risk information that has previously been discovered. The information
sharing assures a flow of logical risk discovery and mitigation./ Jeder Abschnitt von APQP hngt von
Risiko-Informationen, die zuvor entdeckt wurde. Der Informationsaustausch sichert einen Fluss der
logischen Risikoentdeckung und -minderung.
Outputs of Section 1:
Outputs of Section 2:
Outputs of Section 3:
Outputs of Section 4:
Outputs of Section 5:
Das Referenzbuch APQP wurde von der Chrysler, Ford, General Motors Supplier Quality Requirements
Task Force erstellt. Es stellt einen Leitfaden dar fr die frhzeitige Planungsphase, Entwicklungsphase bis
hin zur Prozessanalyse und stellt somit eine Richtlinie zur Erstellung von Plnen und Checklisten zur
Verfgung, um sicherzustellen, dass die Produkt- Qualittsvorausplanung vom Lieferanten durchgefhrt
wird
Das APQP Modell besteht aus insgesamt 5 Phasen. Fr jede dieser Phasen sind Eingangs- und
Ausgangsgren definiert. Zum Erreichen der Ergebnisse sind je nach Phase gezielte Ttigkeiten
erforderlich.
Sind wir berhaupt in der Lage unsere Produkte innerhalb der notwendigen und
geforderten Spezifikationen herzustellen? (Prozessfhigkeit)
Knnen wir nachweisen, dass unsere Produkte innerhalb der Spezifikationen produziert
worden sind? (Dokumentation)
Introduction to APQP
What is APQP
Introduction to APQP
Complex products and supply chains present plenty of possibilities for failure, especially when
new products are being launched. Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) is a structured
process aimed at ensuring customer satisfaction with new products or processes.
APQP has existed for decades in many forms and practices. Originally referred to as Advanced
Quality Planning (AQP), APQP is used by progressive companies to assure quality and
performance through planning. Ford Motor Company published the first Advanced Quality
Planning handbook for suppliers in the early 1980s. APQP helped Ford suppliers develop
appropriate prevention and detection controls for new products supporting the corporate quality
effort. With lessons learned from Ford AQP, the North American Automotive OEMs
collectively created the APQP process in 1994 and then later updated in 2008. APQP is intended
to aggregate the common planning activities all automotive OEMs require into one process.
Suppliers utilize APQP to bring new products and processes to successful validation and drive
continuous improvement.
There are numerous tools and techniques described within APQP. Each tool has potential value
when applied in the correct timing. Tools that have the greatest impact on product and process
success are called the Core Tools. The Core Tools are expected to be used for compliance to
IATF 16949. There are five basic Core Tools detailed in separate guideline handbooks, including
Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP). The other Core Tools are:
What is APQP
APQP is a structured approach to product and process design. This framework is a standardized
set of quality requirements that enable suppliers to design a product that satisfies the customer.
The primary goal of product quality planning is to facilitate communication and collaboration
between engineering activities. A Cross Functional Team (CFT), involving marketing, product
design, procurement, manufacturing and distribution, is used in the APQP process. APQP
ensures the Voice of the Customer (VOC) is clearly understood, translated into requirements,
technical specifications and special characteristics. The product or process benefits are designed
in through prevention.
APQP supports the early identification of change, both intentional and incidental. These changes
can result in exciting new innovation supporting customer delight. When not managed well they
translate to failure and customer dissatisfaction. The focus of APQP is utilization of tools and
methods for mitigating the risks associated with change in the new product or process.
APQP - Concurrent Process
Directing resources by defining the vital few items from the trivial many
Promote early identification of change
o Intentional (what is being changed on purpose to bring value to the customer)
o Incidental (environments, customer usage, degradation and interfaces)
Avoid late changes (post release) by anticipating failure and preventing it
o Fewer design and process changes later in the product development process
On-time quality product at lowest cost
Multiple options for mitigating the risk when found earlier
Higher capability of verification and validation of a change
Improved collaboration between Design of the Product and Process
Improved Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFM/A)
Lower cost solutions selected earlier in the process
Legacy capture and reuse, advancement of Tribal Knowledge and standard work creation and
utilization
Late Failure Mode Discovery
Early Failure Mode Discovery
APQP supplements product development processes by adding a focus on risk as a substitute for
failure. This allows the team to take action on the risk instead of having to wait for failure to
occur in testing or worse, in the hands of the customer. APQP utilizes risk based tools that focus
on all aspects of product and process design, service, process quality control, packaging and
continuous improvement. Each application of APQP may be unique to a previous application
because of the percentage of new content, changes to current off-the-shelf technology or past
failure history.
APQP follows a product or process change outside of Product Development and assures the risk
of change is managed successfully by preventing problems created by the change.
Section 0: Pre-Planning
APQP begins with assumptions, concepts and past knowledge. Bookshelf knowledge and
standard work practices are listed as well as areas where significant change is expected. This
section compiles the inputs into Section 1 Plan and Define.
Section 1 links customer expectations, wants, needs and desires to requirements. Plan
Development will assure the output of this section is satisfactory product quality. Resource
planning, process and product assumptions are made. A list of preliminary special characteristics
and design / reliability goals are also established.
Section 3 explores manufacturing techniques and measurement methods that will be used to
bring the design engineers vision into reality. Process Flow Charts, Process Failure Mode and
Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plan Methodology are examples of tools used in this
section.
Validation of the process quality and volume capabilities is the focus of Section 4. Statistical
Process Control (SPC), Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) and Process Capability Studies
are introduced in this section. Product Part Approval Process (PPAP) is ready for submission and
production begins upon approval.
Section 5 explores learnings from the ongoing manufacturing process, RPN reduction, corrective
actions (both internal and external), Eight Disciplines of Problem Solving (8D) and the capture
of information pertinent for future use.
Each section of APQP depends on risk information that has previously been discovered. The
information sharing assures a flow of logical risk discovery and mitigation. The detailed inputs
and outputs for each section are described below:
Outputs of Section 1:
Design Goals
Reliability and Quality Goals
Preliminary Bill of Material (BOM)
Preliminary Process Flow
Preliminary list of Special Characteristics
Product Assurance Plan
Gateway approval
Outputs of Section 2:
Outputs of Section 3:
Outputs of Section 4:
Outputs of Section 5:
Reduced Variation
Improved Customer Satisfaction
Improved Delivery Performance
Effective Use of Lessons Learned
Develop Requirements from Voice of the Customer (VOC) using Quality Function Deployment
(QFD)
Develop a Product Quality Plan integrated into Program / Project Timeline
Translate percentage of new content into Product and Process Assumptions
Product design activities communicating special characteristics or key characteristics to the
process design activity, prior to design release
o This may include new geometry, shape, parts, tighter tolerances and new materials
linking the DFMEA to PFMEA
Develop test plans (DVP&R)
Use of formal Design Review to track progress
Plan, acquire and install appropriate process equipment and tooling based on design tolerances
provided by the product design source
Assembly and Manufacturing personnel communicating suggestions of ways to better assemble
a product (DFM/A)
Establish adequate Quality Controls for Special Characteristics or Key Characteristics features of
a product or parameters of a process, which still risk potential failure
Performing Stability and Capability studies on special characteristics to understand the variation
present and predict future performance with Statistical Process Control (SPC) and Process
Capability (PPK and CPK)
The APQP process begins with the creation of a Product Quality Plan (PQP). The PQP may be
unique for each individual development. During the planning section, a core group of personnel
will review the concept design, process and product assumptions, overall goals of the project and
past failures. After collecting this information, the core team selects tools from each section,
based on the value they may bring when failure prevention is discussed. The PQP is linked to the
project timing plan to aid in program / project management efficiency. The tools and techniques
are selected based on what risk may be present, created by the intentional and incidental change.
Discovering unknown risk is desirable. Each risk is quantified and mitigation actions are
developed and implemented increasing the probability of project success.
The Quality-One approach depicted in the following PQP example is a matrix with calculated
ratios of qualitative tools verses quantitative evidence. Since qualitative tools can be used earlier
in the product development process, Quality-One expects a 3:1 qualitative to quantitative ratio.
The opportunity to discuss potential issues based on change with qualitative tools should be three
times greater than the actual data collected. Observed data collection happens late in Product
Development (PD) and reaction to failure may be required. Discussion of the change, using a
tool and a Cross Functional Team (CFT), often results in discovering and preventing a failure
early in PD. APQP is focused on predicting and preventing failure (80%) and less on detecting it
(20%).
The Cross Functional Team (CFT) in APQP evolves and changes as the process progresses.
Preliminary details required to begin Product Quality Planning are collected by a CFT prior to
project kick-off. This process is typically short and does not involve any product or process
design effort. Aspects of Pre-Planning include:
The CFT adds members as certain disciplines are required. Two examples of team evolution are:
purchasing engagement when make / buy decisions are required and engagement of tool
design resources when prototype and production tooling is required.
APQP is performed using Collaborative Product (Process) Development (CPD). Each CFT
discipline communicates with their counterparts on items which can impact quality, cost or
delivery, either positively or negatively. Special Characteristics are also communicated
between each CFT discipline. The earlier a product or process problem can be found, the less
expensive and work intensive it will be to fix it. Working concurrently per the project timeline,
the team completes the Plan and Design activity:
Each section has inputs, outputs and management gateway reviews. Gateways are timed to
coincide with key decisions impacting project Quality, Cost or Delivery.
Product Part Approval Process (PPAP) highlights the proof or evidence collected through APQP.
Validated results from the first trial run supports the assertion that quality of delivery is expected.
The trial run must represent the production environment, with correct tools, machines, processes,
personnel and conditions that may affect part quality.
PPAP and APQP cannot be separated, as PPAP documents are the result of APQP. PPAP
provides evidence that APQP has been successfully performed. Poor performance in a PPAP or a
rejected sample can be attributed to poor APQP. Deliverables in PPAP are extensions of APQP
Planning. The PPAP elements are listed below, note that many are the same as APQP tools or are
the output results of APQP tools:
APQP, New Product Introduction (NPI), Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) and other Product
Development Processes share goals and development tools. Examples of these tools can be found
in our Core Competencies. APQP is often the Product Development Process that is used as a
default process to support supplier engagement. DFSS is a highly focused effort reserved for
high value requirements or specifications. APQP is broader in scope than DFSS and scalable to
perceived risk each supplier, design or process poses on program success.
An Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) is preparing a new end user product. The product
will follow the OEM NPI. Several of the subsystems and components require supplier
engagement to assure that their expertise is included in product design. APQP will be used to
collaborate with the suppliers.
DFSS will focus on key features that are highly valuable and quite different than past products.
A Six Sigma Black Belt is assigned to follow these features across all communications channels
and groups. The tools used in each of these endeavors are the same. The tools may be used at
differing utilization levels at the Black Belts discretion.
APQP - Plan Do Study Act
APQP - PQP Flow Chart
APQP - PQP Example
PPAP Level Selection