core/ptr/mod.rs
1//! Manually manage memory through raw pointers.
2//!
3//! *[See also the pointer primitive types](pointer).*
4//!
5//! # Safety
6//!
7//! Many functions in this module take raw pointers as arguments and read from or write to them. For
8//! this to be safe, these pointers must be *valid* for the given access. Whether a pointer is valid
9//! depends on the operation it is used for (read or write), and the extent of the memory that is
10//! accessed (i.e., how many bytes are read/written) -- it makes no sense to ask "is this pointer
11//! valid"; one has to ask "is this pointer valid for a given access". Most functions use `*mut T`
12//! and `*const T` to access only a single value, in which case the documentation omits the size and
13//! implicitly assumes it to be `size_of::<T>()` bytes.
14//!
15//! The precise rules for validity are not determined yet. The guarantees that are
16//! provided at this point are very minimal:
17//!
18//! * For memory accesses of [size zero][zst], *every* pointer is valid, including the [null]
19//! pointer. The following points are only concerned with non-zero-sized accesses.
20//! * A [null] pointer is *never* valid.
21//! * For a pointer to be valid, it is necessary, but not always sufficient, that the pointer be
22//! *dereferenceable*. The [provenance] of the pointer is used to determine which [allocation]
23//! it is derived from; a pointer is dereferenceable if the memory range of the given size
24//! starting at the pointer is entirely contained within the bounds of that allocation. Note
25//! that in Rust, every (stack-allocated) variable is considered a separate allocation.
26//! * All accesses performed by functions in this module are *non-atomic* in the sense
27//! of [atomic operations] used to synchronize between threads. This means it is
28//! undefined behavior to perform two concurrent accesses to the same location from different
29//! threads unless both accesses only read from memory. Notice that this explicitly
30//! includes [`read_volatile`] and [`write_volatile`]: Volatile accesses cannot
31//! be used for inter-thread synchronization, regardless of whether they are acting on
32//! Rust memory or not.
33//! * The result of casting a reference to a pointer is valid for as long as the
34//! underlying allocation is live and no reference (just raw pointers) is used to
35//! access the same memory. That is, reference and pointer accesses cannot be
36//! interleaved.
37//!
38//! These axioms, along with careful use of [`offset`] for pointer arithmetic,
39//! are enough to correctly implement many useful things in unsafe code. Stronger guarantees
40//! will be provided eventually, as the [aliasing] rules are being determined. For more
41//! information, see the [book] as well as the section in the reference devoted
42//! to [undefined behavior][ub].
43//!
44//! We say that a pointer is "dangling" if it is not valid for any non-zero-sized accesses. This
45//! means out-of-bounds pointers, pointers to freed memory, null pointers, and pointers created with
46//! [`NonNull::dangling`] are all dangling.
47//!
48//! ## Alignment
49//!
50//! Valid raw pointers as defined above are not necessarily properly aligned (where
51//! "proper" alignment is defined by the pointee type, i.e., `*const T` must be
52//! aligned to `align_of::<T>()`). However, most functions require their
53//! arguments to be properly aligned, and will explicitly state
54//! this requirement in their documentation. Notable exceptions to this are
55//! [`read_unaligned`] and [`write_unaligned`].
56//!
57//! When a function requires proper alignment, it does so even if the access
58//! has size 0, i.e., even if memory is not actually touched. Consider using
59//! [`NonNull::dangling`] in such cases.
60//!
61//! ## Pointer to reference conversion
62//!
63//! When converting a pointer to a reference (e.g. via `&*ptr` or `&mut *ptr`),
64//! there are several rules that must be followed:
65//!
66//! * The pointer must be properly aligned.
67//!
68//! * It must be non-null.
69//!
70//! * It must be "dereferenceable" in the sense defined above.
71//!
72//! * The pointer must point to a [valid value] of type `T`.
73//!
74//! * You must enforce Rust's aliasing rules. The exact aliasing rules are not decided yet, so we
75//! only give a rough overview here. The rules also depend on whether a mutable or a shared
76//! reference is being created.
77//! * When creating a mutable reference, then while this reference exists, the memory it points to
78//! must not get accessed (read or written) through any other pointer or reference not derived
79//! from this reference.
80//! * When creating a shared reference, then while this reference exists, the memory it points to
81//! must not get mutated (except inside `UnsafeCell`).
82//!
83//! If a pointer follows all of these rules, it is said to be
84//! *convertible to a (mutable or shared) reference*.
85// ^ we use this term instead of saying that the produced reference must
86// be valid, as the validity of a reference is easily confused for the
87// validity of the thing it refers to, and while the two concepts are
88// closely related, they are not identical.
89//!
90//! These rules apply even if the result is unused!
91//! (The part about being initialized is not yet fully decided, but until
92//! it is, the only safe approach is to ensure that they are indeed initialized.)
93//!
94//! An example of the implications of the above rules is that an expression such
95//! as `unsafe { &*(0 as *const u8) }` is Immediate Undefined Behavior.
96//!
97//! [valid value]: ../../reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html#invalid-values
98//!
99//! ## Allocation
100//!
101//! <a id="allocated-object"></a> <!-- keep old URLs working -->
102//!
103//! An *allocation* is a subset of program memory which is addressable
104//! from Rust, and within which pointer arithmetic is possible. Examples of
105//! allocations include heap allocations, stack-allocated variables,
106//! statics, and consts. The safety preconditions of some Rust operations -
107//! such as `offset` and field projections (`expr.field`) - are defined in
108//! terms of the allocations on which they operate.
109//!
110//! An allocation has a base address, a size, and a set of memory
111//! addresses. It is possible for an allocation to have zero size, but
112//! such an allocation will still have a base address. The base address
113//! of an allocation is not necessarily unique. While it is currently the
114//! case that an allocation always has a set of memory addresses which is
115//! fully contiguous (i.e., has no "holes"), there is no guarantee that this
116//! will not change in the future.
117//!
118//! Allocations must behave like "normal" memory: in particular, reads must not have
119//! side-effects, and writes must become visible to other threads using the usual synchronization
120//! primitives.
121//!
122//! For any allocation with `base` address, `size`, and a set of
123//! `addresses`, the following are guaranteed:
124//! - For all addresses `a` in `addresses`, `a` is in the range `base .. (base +
125//! size)` (note that this requires `a < base + size`, not `a <= base + size`)
126//! - `base` is not equal to [`null()`] (i.e., the address with the numerical
127//! value 0)
128//! - `base + size <= usize::MAX`
129//! - `size <= isize::MAX`
130//!
131//! As a consequence of these guarantees, given any address `a` within the set
132//! of addresses of an allocation:
133//! - It is guaranteed that `a - base` does not overflow `isize`
134//! - It is guaranteed that `a - base` is non-negative
135//! - It is guaranteed that, given `o = a - base` (i.e., the offset of `a` within
136//! the allocation), `base + o` will not wrap around the address space (in
137//! other words, will not overflow `usize`)
138//!
139//! [`null()`]: null
140//!
141//! # Provenance
142//!
143//! Pointers are not *simply* an "integer" or "address". For instance, it's uncontroversial
144//! to say that a Use After Free is clearly Undefined Behavior, even if you "get lucky"
145//! and the freed memory gets reallocated before your read/write (in fact this is the
146//! worst-case scenario, UAFs would be much less concerning if this didn't happen!).
147//! As another example, consider that [`wrapping_offset`] is documented to "remember"
148//! the allocation that the original pointer points to, even if it is offset far
149//! outside the memory range occupied by that allocation.
150//! To rationalize claims like this, pointers need to somehow be *more* than just their addresses:
151//! they must have **provenance**.
152//!
153//! A pointer value in Rust semantically contains the following information:
154//!
155//! * The **address** it points to, which can be represented by a `usize`.
156//! * The **provenance** it has, defining the memory it has permission to access. Provenance can be
157//! absent, in which case the pointer does not have permission to access any memory.
158//!
159//! The exact structure of provenance is not yet specified, but the permission defined by a
160//! pointer's provenance have a *spatial* component, a *temporal* component, and a *mutability*
161//! component:
162//!
163//! * Spatial: The set of memory addresses that the pointer is allowed to access.
164//! * Temporal: The timespan during which the pointer is allowed to access those memory addresses.
165//! * Mutability: Whether the pointer may only access the memory for reads, or also access it for
166//! writes. Note that this can interact with the other components, e.g. a pointer might permit
167//! mutation only for a subset of addresses, or only for a subset of its maximal timespan.
168//!
169//! When an [allocation] is created, it has a unique Original Pointer. For alloc
170//! APIs this is literally the pointer the call returns, and for local variables and statics,
171//! this is the name of the variable/static. (This is mildly overloading the term "pointer"
172//! for the sake of brevity/exposition.)
173//!
174//! The Original Pointer for an allocation has provenance that constrains the *spatial*
175//! permissions of this pointer to the memory range of the allocation, and the *temporal*
176//! permissions to the lifetime of the allocation. Provenance is implicitly inherited by all
177//! pointers transitively derived from the Original Pointer through operations like [`offset`],
178//! borrowing, and pointer casts. Some operations may *shrink* the permissions of the derived
179//! provenance, limiting how much memory it can access or how long it's valid for (i.e. borrowing a
180//! subfield and subslicing can shrink the spatial component of provenance, and all borrowing can
181//! shrink the temporal component of provenance). However, no operation can ever *grow* the
182//! permissions of the derived provenance: even if you "know" there is a larger allocation, you
183//! can't derive a pointer with a larger provenance. Similarly, you cannot "recombine" two
184//! contiguous provenances back into one (i.e. with a `fn merge(&[T], &[T]) -> &[T]`).
185//!
186//! A reference to a place always has provenance over at least the memory that place occupies.
187//! A reference to a slice always has provenance over at least the range that slice describes.
188//! Whether and when exactly the provenance of a reference gets "shrunk" to *exactly* fit
189//! the memory it points to is not yet determined.
190//!
191//! A *shared* reference only ever has provenance that permits reading from memory,
192//! and never permits writes, except inside [`UnsafeCell`].
193//!
194//! Provenance can affect whether a program has undefined behavior:
195//!
196//! * It is undefined behavior to access memory through a pointer that does not have provenance over
197//! that memory. Note that a pointer "at the end" of its provenance is not actually outside its
198//! provenance, it just has 0 bytes it can load/store. Zero-sized accesses do not require any
199//! provenance since they access an empty range of memory.
200//!
201//! * It is undefined behavior to [`offset`] a pointer across a memory range that is not contained
202//! in the allocation it is derived from, or to [`offset_from`] two pointers not derived
203//! from the same allocation. Provenance is used to say what exactly "derived from" even
204//! means: the lineage of a pointer is traced back to the Original Pointer it descends from, and
205//! that identifies the relevant allocation. In particular, it's always UB to offset a
206//! pointer derived from something that is now deallocated, except if the offset is 0.
207//!
208//! But it *is* still sound to:
209//!
210//! * Create a pointer without provenance from just an address (see [`without_provenance`]). Such a
211//! pointer cannot be used for memory accesses (except for zero-sized accesses). This can still be
212//! useful for sentinel values like `null` *or* to represent a tagged pointer that will never be
213//! dereferenceable. In general, it is always sound for an integer to pretend to be a pointer "for
214//! fun" as long as you don't use operations on it which require it to be valid (non-zero-sized
215//! offset, read, write, etc).
216//!
217//! * Forge an allocation of size zero at any sufficiently aligned non-null address.
218//! i.e. the usual "ZSTs are fake, do what you want" rules apply.
219//!
220//! * [`wrapping_offset`] a pointer outside its provenance. This includes pointers
221//! which have "no" provenance. In particular, this makes it sound to do pointer tagging tricks.
222//!
223//! * Compare arbitrary pointers by address. Pointer comparison ignores provenance and addresses
224//! *are* just integers, so there is always a coherent answer, even if the pointers are dangling
225//! or from different provenances. Note that if you get "lucky" and notice that a pointer at the
226//! end of one allocation is the "same" address as the start of another allocation,
227//! anything you do with that fact is *probably* going to be gibberish. The scope of that
228//! gibberish is kept under control by the fact that the two pointers *still* aren't allowed to
229//! access the other's allocation (bytes), because they still have different provenance.
230//!
231//! Note that the full definition of provenance in Rust is not decided yet, as this interacts
232//! with the as-yet undecided [aliasing] rules.
233//!
234//! ## Pointers Vs Integers
235//!
236//! From this discussion, it becomes very clear that a `usize` *cannot* accurately represent a pointer,
237//! and converting from a pointer to a `usize` is generally an operation which *only* extracts the
238//! address. Converting this address back into pointer requires somehow answering the question:
239//! which provenance should the resulting pointer have?
240//!
241//! Rust provides two ways of dealing with this situation: *Strict Provenance* and *Exposed Provenance*.
242//!
243//! Note that a pointer *can* represent a `usize` (via [`without_provenance`]), so the right type to
244//! use in situations where a value is "sometimes a pointer and sometimes a bare `usize`" is a
245//! pointer type.
246//!
247//! ## Strict Provenance
248//!
249//! "Strict Provenance" refers to a set of APIs designed to make working with provenance more
250//! explicit. They are intended as substitutes for casting a pointer to an integer and back.
251//!
252//! Entirely avoiding integer-to-pointer casts successfully side-steps the inherent ambiguity of
253//! that operation. This benefits compiler optimizations, and it is pretty much a requirement for
254//! using tools like [Miri] and architectures like [CHERI] that aim to detect and diagnose pointer
255//! misuse.
256//!
257//! The key insight to making programming without integer-to-pointer casts *at all* viable is the
258//! [`with_addr`] method:
259//!
260//! ```text
261//! /// Creates a new pointer with the given address.
262//! ///
263//! /// This performs the same operation as an `addr as ptr` cast, but copies
264//! /// the *provenance* of `self` to the new pointer.
265//! /// This allows us to dynamically preserve and propagate this important
266//! /// information in a way that is otherwise impossible with a unary cast.
267//! ///
268//! /// This is equivalent to using `wrapping_offset` to offset `self` to the
269//! /// given address, and therefore has all the same capabilities and restrictions.
270//! pub fn with_addr(self, addr: usize) -> Self;
271//! ```
272//!
273//! So you're still able to drop down to the address representation and do whatever
274//! clever bit tricks you want *as long as* you're able to keep around a pointer
275//! into the allocation you care about that can "reconstitute" the provenance.
276//! Usually this is very easy, because you only are taking a pointer, messing with the address,
277//! and then immediately converting back to a pointer. To make this use case more ergonomic,
278//! we provide the [`map_addr`] method.
279//!
280//! To help make it clear that code is "following" Strict Provenance semantics, we also provide an
281//! [`addr`] method which promises that the returned address is not part of a
282//! pointer-integer-pointer roundtrip. In the future we may provide a lint for pointer<->integer
283//! casts to help you audit if your code conforms to strict provenance.
284//!
285//! ### Using Strict Provenance
286//!
287//! Most code needs no changes to conform to strict provenance, as the only really concerning
288//! operation is casts from `usize` to a pointer. For code which *does* cast a `usize` to a pointer,
289//! the scope of the change depends on exactly what you're doing.
290//!
291//! In general, you just need to make sure that if you want to convert a `usize` address to a
292//! pointer and then use that pointer to read/write memory, you need to keep around a pointer
293//! that has sufficient provenance to perform that read/write itself. In this way all of your
294//! casts from an address to a pointer are essentially just applying offsets/indexing.
295//!
296//! This is generally trivial to do for simple cases like tagged pointers *as long as you
297//! represent the tagged pointer as an actual pointer and not a `usize`*. For instance:
298//!
299//! ```
300//! unsafe {
301//! // A flag we want to pack into our pointer
302//! static HAS_DATA: usize = 0x1;
303//! static FLAG_MASK: usize = !HAS_DATA;
304//!
305//! // Our value, which must have enough alignment to have spare least-significant-bits.
306//! let my_precious_data: u32 = 17;
307//! assert!(align_of::<u32>() > 1);
308//!
309//! // Create a tagged pointer
310//! let ptr = &my_precious_data as *const u32;
311//! let tagged = ptr.map_addr(|addr| addr | HAS_DATA);
312//!
313//! // Check the flag:
314//! if tagged.addr() & HAS_DATA != 0 {
315//! // Untag and read the pointer
316//! let data = *tagged.map_addr(|addr| addr & FLAG_MASK);
317//! assert_eq!(data, 17);
318//! } else {
319//! unreachable!()
320//! }
321//! }
322//! ```
323//!
324//! (Yes, if you've been using [`AtomicUsize`] for pointers in concurrent datastructures, you should
325//! be using [`AtomicPtr`] instead. If that messes up the way you atomically manipulate pointers,
326//! we would like to know why, and what needs to be done to fix it.)
327//!
328//! Situations where a valid pointer *must* be created from just an address, such as baremetal code
329//! accessing a memory-mapped interface at a fixed address, cannot currently be handled with strict
330//! provenance APIs and should use [exposed provenance](#exposed-provenance).
331//!
332//! ## Exposed Provenance
333//!
334//! As discussed above, integer-to-pointer casts are not possible with Strict Provenance APIs.
335//! This is by design: the goal of Strict Provenance is to provide a clear specification that we are
336//! confident can be formalized unambiguously and can be subject to precise formal reasoning.
337//! Integer-to-pointer casts do not (currently) have such a clear specification.
338//!
339//! However, there exist situations where integer-to-pointer casts cannot be avoided, or
340//! where avoiding them would require major refactoring. Legacy platform APIs also regularly assume
341//! that `usize` can capture all the information that makes up a pointer.
342//! Bare-metal platforms can also require the synthesis of a pointer "out of thin air" without
343//! anywhere to obtain proper provenance from.
344//!
345//! Rust's model for dealing with integer-to-pointer casts is called *Exposed Provenance*. However,
346//! the semantics of Exposed Provenance are on much less solid footing than Strict Provenance, and
347//! at this point it is not yet clear whether a satisfying unambiguous semantics can be defined for
348//! Exposed Provenance. (If that sounds bad, be reassured that other popular languages that provide
349//! integer-to-pointer casts are not faring any better.) Furthermore, Exposed Provenance will not
350//! work (well) with tools like [Miri] and [CHERI].
351//!
352//! Exposed Provenance is provided by the [`expose_provenance`] and [`with_exposed_provenance`] methods,
353//! which are equivalent to `as` casts between pointers and integers.
354//! - [`expose_provenance`] is a lot like [`addr`], but additionally adds the provenance of the
355//! pointer to a global list of 'exposed' provenances. (This list is purely conceptual, it exists
356//! for the purpose of specifying Rust but is not materialized in actual executions, except in
357//! tools like [Miri].)
358//! Memory which is outside the control of the Rust abstract machine (MMIO registers, for example)
359//! is always considered to be exposed, so long as this memory is disjoint from memory that will
360//! be used by the abstract machine such as the stack, heap, and statics.
361//! - [`with_exposed_provenance`] can be used to construct a pointer with one of these previously
362//! 'exposed' provenances. [`with_exposed_provenance`] takes only `addr: usize` as arguments, so
363//! unlike in [`with_addr`] there is no indication of what the correct provenance for the returned
364//! pointer is -- and that is exactly what makes integer-to-pointer casts so tricky to rigorously
365//! specify! The compiler will do its best to pick the right provenance for you, but currently we
366//! cannot provide any guarantees about which provenance the resulting pointer will have. Only one
367//! thing is clear: if there is *no* previously 'exposed' provenance that justifies the way the
368//! returned pointer will be used, the program has undefined behavior.
369//!
370//! If at all possible, we encourage code to be ported to [Strict Provenance] APIs, thus avoiding
371//! the need for Exposed Provenance. Maximizing the amount of such code is a major win for avoiding
372//! specification complexity and to facilitate adoption of tools like [CHERI] and [Miri] that can be
373//! a big help in increasing the confidence in (unsafe) Rust code. However, we acknowledge that this
374//! is not always possible, and offer Exposed Provenance as a way to explicit "opt out" of the
375//! well-defined semantics of Strict Provenance, and "opt in" to the unclear semantics of
376//! integer-to-pointer casts.
377//!
378//! [aliasing]: ../../nomicon/aliasing.html
379//! [allocation]: #allocation
380//! [provenance]: #provenance
381//! [book]: ../../book/ch19-01-unsafe-rust.html#dereferencing-a-raw-pointer
382//! [ub]: ../../reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html
383//! [zst]: ../../nomicon/exotic-sizes.html#zero-sized-types-zsts
384//! [atomic operations]: crate::sync::atomic
385//! [`offset`]: pointer::offset
386//! [`offset_from`]: pointer::offset_from
387//! [`wrapping_offset`]: pointer::wrapping_offset
388//! [`with_addr`]: pointer::with_addr
389//! [`map_addr`]: pointer::map_addr
390//! [`addr`]: pointer::addr
391//! [`AtomicUsize`]: crate::sync::atomic::AtomicUsize
392//! [`AtomicPtr`]: crate::sync::atomic::AtomicPtr
393//! [`expose_provenance`]: pointer::expose_provenance
394//! [`with_exposed_provenance`]: with_exposed_provenance
395//! [Miri]: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri
396//! [CHERI]: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/security/ctsrd/cheri/
397//! [Strict Provenance]: #strict-provenance
398//! [`UnsafeCell`]: core::cell::UnsafeCell
399
400#![stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
401// There are many unsafe functions taking pointers that don't dereference them.
402#![allow(clippy::not_unsafe_ptr_arg_deref)]
403
404use crate::cmp::Ordering;
405use crate::intrinsics::const_eval_select;
406use crate::marker::{FnPtr, PointeeSized};
407use crate::mem::{self, MaybeUninit, SizedTypeProperties};
408use crate::num::NonZero;
409use crate::{fmt, hash, intrinsics, ub_checks};
410
411mod alignment;
412#[unstable(feature = "ptr_alignment_type", issue = "102070")]
413pub use alignment::Alignment;
414
415mod metadata;
416#[unstable(feature = "ptr_metadata", issue = "81513")]
417pub use metadata::{DynMetadata, Pointee, Thin, from_raw_parts, from_raw_parts_mut, metadata};
418
419mod non_null;
420#[stable(feature = "nonnull", since = "1.25.0")]
421pub use non_null::NonNull;
422
423mod unique;
424#[unstable(feature = "ptr_internals", issue = "none")]
425pub use unique::Unique;
426
427mod const_ptr;
428mod mut_ptr;
429
430// Some functions are defined here because they accidentally got made
431// available in this module on stable. See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15702>.
432// (`transmute` also falls into this category, but it cannot be wrapped due to the
433// check that `T` and `U` have the same size.)
434
435/// Copies `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes from `src` to `dst`. The source
436/// and destination must *not* overlap.
437///
438/// For regions of memory which might overlap, use [`copy`] instead.
439///
440/// `copy_nonoverlapping` is semantically equivalent to C's [`memcpy`], but
441/// with the source and destination arguments swapped,
442/// and `count` counting the number of `T`s instead of bytes.
443///
444/// The copy is "untyped" in the sense that data may be uninitialized or otherwise violate the
445/// requirements of `T`. The initialization state is preserved exactly.
446///
447/// [`memcpy`]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/string/byte/memcpy
448///
449/// # Safety
450///
451/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
452///
453/// * `src` must be [valid] for reads of `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes.
454///
455/// * `dst` must be [valid] for writes of `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes.
456///
457/// * Both `src` and `dst` must be properly aligned.
458///
459/// * The region of memory beginning at `src` with a size of `count *
460/// size_of::<T>()` bytes must *not* overlap with the region of memory
461/// beginning at `dst` with the same size.
462///
463/// Like [`read`], `copy_nonoverlapping` creates a bitwise copy of `T`, regardless of
464/// whether `T` is [`Copy`]. If `T` is not [`Copy`], using *both* the values
465/// in the region beginning at `*src` and the region beginning at `*dst` can
466/// [violate memory safety][read-ownership].
467///
468/// Note that even if the effectively copied size (`count * size_of::<T>()`) is
469/// `0`, the pointers must be properly aligned.
470///
471/// [`read`]: crate::ptr::read
472/// [read-ownership]: crate::ptr::read#ownership-of-the-returned-value
473/// [valid]: crate::ptr#safety
474///
475/// # Examples
476///
477/// Manually implement [`Vec::append`]:
478///
479/// ```
480/// use std::ptr;
481///
482/// /// Moves all the elements of `src` into `dst`, leaving `src` empty.
483/// fn append<T>(dst: &mut Vec<T>, src: &mut Vec<T>) {
484/// let src_len = src.len();
485/// let dst_len = dst.len();
486///
487/// // Ensure that `dst` has enough capacity to hold all of `src`.
488/// dst.reserve(src_len);
489///
490/// unsafe {
491/// // The call to add is always safe because `Vec` will never
492/// // allocate more than `isize::MAX` bytes.
493/// let dst_ptr = dst.as_mut_ptr().add(dst_len);
494/// let src_ptr = src.as_ptr();
495///
496/// // Truncate `src` without dropping its contents. We do this first,
497/// // to avoid problems in case something further down panics.
498/// src.set_len(0);
499///
500/// // The two regions cannot overlap because mutable references do
501/// // not alias, and two different vectors cannot own the same
502/// // memory.
503/// ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(src_ptr, dst_ptr, src_len);
504///
505/// // Notify `dst` that it now holds the contents of `src`.
506/// dst.set_len(dst_len + src_len);
507/// }
508/// }
509///
510/// let mut a = vec!['r'];
511/// let mut b = vec!['u', 's', 't'];
512///
513/// append(&mut a, &mut b);
514///
515/// assert_eq!(a, &['r', 'u', 's', 't']);
516/// assert!(b.is_empty());
517/// ```
518///
519/// [`Vec::append`]: ../../std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.append
520#[doc(alias = "memcpy")]
521#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
522#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_intrinsic_copy", since = "1.83.0")]
523#[inline(always)]
524#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
525#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_copy_nonoverlapping"]
526pub const unsafe fn copy_nonoverlapping<T>(src: *const T, dst: *mut T, count: usize) {
527 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
528 check_language_ub,
529 "ptr::copy_nonoverlapping requires that both pointer arguments are aligned and non-null \
530 and the specified memory ranges do not overlap",
531 (
532 src: *const () = src as *const (),
533 dst: *mut () = dst as *mut (),
534 size: usize = size_of::<T>(),
535 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
536 count: usize = count,
537 ) => {
538 let zero_size = count == 0 || size == 0;
539 ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(src, align, zero_size)
540 && ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(dst, align, zero_size)
541 && ub_checks::maybe_is_nonoverlapping(src, dst, size, count)
542 }
543 );
544
545 // SAFETY: the safety contract for `copy_nonoverlapping` must be
546 // upheld by the caller.
547 unsafe { crate::intrinsics::copy_nonoverlapping(src, dst, count) }
548}
549
550/// Copies `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes from `src` to `dst`. The source
551/// and destination may overlap.
552///
553/// If the source and destination will *never* overlap,
554/// [`copy_nonoverlapping`] can be used instead.
555///
556/// `copy` is semantically equivalent to C's [`memmove`], but
557/// with the source and destination arguments swapped,
558/// and `count` counting the number of `T`s instead of bytes.
559/// Copying takes place as if the bytes were copied from `src`
560/// to a temporary array and then copied from the array to `dst`.
561///
562/// The copy is "untyped" in the sense that data may be uninitialized or otherwise violate the
563/// requirements of `T`. The initialization state is preserved exactly.
564///
565/// [`memmove`]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/string/byte/memmove
566///
567/// # Safety
568///
569/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
570///
571/// * `src` must be [valid] for reads of `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes.
572///
573/// * `dst` must be [valid] for writes of `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes, and must remain valid even
574/// when `src` is read for `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes. (This means if the memory ranges
575/// overlap, the `dst` pointer must not be invalidated by `src` reads.)
576///
577/// * Both `src` and `dst` must be properly aligned.
578///
579/// Like [`read`], `copy` creates a bitwise copy of `T`, regardless of
580/// whether `T` is [`Copy`]. If `T` is not [`Copy`], using both the values
581/// in the region beginning at `*src` and the region beginning at `*dst` can
582/// [violate memory safety][read-ownership].
583///
584/// Note that even if the effectively copied size (`count * size_of::<T>()`) is
585/// `0`, the pointers must be properly aligned.
586///
587/// [`read`]: crate::ptr::read
588/// [read-ownership]: crate::ptr::read#ownership-of-the-returned-value
589/// [valid]: crate::ptr#safety
590///
591/// # Examples
592///
593/// Efficiently create a Rust vector from an unsafe buffer:
594///
595/// ```
596/// use std::ptr;
597///
598/// /// # Safety
599/// ///
600/// /// * `ptr` must be correctly aligned for its type and non-zero.
601/// /// * `ptr` must be valid for reads of `elts` contiguous elements of type `T`.
602/// /// * Those elements must not be used after calling this function unless `T: Copy`.
603/// # #[allow(dead_code)]
604/// unsafe fn from_buf_raw<T>(ptr: *const T, elts: usize) -> Vec<T> {
605/// let mut dst = Vec::with_capacity(elts);
606///
607/// // SAFETY: Our precondition ensures the source is aligned and valid,
608/// // and `Vec::with_capacity` ensures that we have usable space to write them.
609/// unsafe { ptr::copy(ptr, dst.as_mut_ptr(), elts); }
610///
611/// // SAFETY: We created it with this much capacity earlier,
612/// // and the previous `copy` has initialized these elements.
613/// unsafe { dst.set_len(elts); }
614/// dst
615/// }
616/// ```
617#[doc(alias = "memmove")]
618#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
619#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_intrinsic_copy", since = "1.83.0")]
620#[inline(always)]
621#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
622#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_copy"]
623pub const unsafe fn copy<T>(src: *const T, dst: *mut T, count: usize) {
624 // SAFETY: the safety contract for `copy` must be upheld by the caller.
625 unsafe {
626 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
627 check_language_ub,
628 "ptr::copy requires that both pointer arguments are aligned and non-null",
629 (
630 src: *const () = src as *const (),
631 dst: *mut () = dst as *mut (),
632 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
633 zero_size: bool = T::IS_ZST || count == 0,
634 ) =>
635 ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(src, align, zero_size)
636 && ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(dst, align, zero_size)
637 );
638 crate::intrinsics::copy(src, dst, count)
639 }
640}
641
642/// Sets `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes of memory starting at `dst` to
643/// `val`.
644///
645/// `write_bytes` is similar to C's [`memset`], but sets `count *
646/// size_of::<T>()` bytes to `val`.
647///
648/// [`memset`]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/string/byte/memset
649///
650/// # Safety
651///
652/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
653///
654/// * `dst` must be [valid] for writes of `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes.
655///
656/// * `dst` must be properly aligned.
657///
658/// Note that even if the effectively copied size (`count * size_of::<T>()`) is
659/// `0`, the pointer must be properly aligned.
660///
661/// Additionally, note that changing `*dst` in this way can easily lead to undefined behavior (UB)
662/// later if the written bytes are not a valid representation of some `T`. For instance, the
663/// following is an **incorrect** use of this function:
664///
665/// ```rust,no_run
666/// unsafe {
667/// let mut value: u8 = 0;
668/// let ptr: *mut bool = &mut value as *mut u8 as *mut bool;
669/// let _bool = ptr.read(); // This is fine, `ptr` points to a valid `bool`.
670/// ptr.write_bytes(42u8, 1); // This function itself does not cause UB...
671/// let _bool = ptr.read(); // ...but it makes this operation UB! ⚠️
672/// }
673/// ```
674///
675/// [valid]: crate::ptr#safety
676///
677/// # Examples
678///
679/// Basic usage:
680///
681/// ```
682/// use std::ptr;
683///
684/// let mut vec = vec![0u32; 4];
685/// unsafe {
686/// let vec_ptr = vec.as_mut_ptr();
687/// ptr::write_bytes(vec_ptr, 0xfe, 2);
688/// }
689/// assert_eq!(vec, [0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe, 0, 0]);
690/// ```
691#[doc(alias = "memset")]
692#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
693#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_write", since = "1.83.0")]
694#[inline(always)]
695#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
696#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_write_bytes"]
697pub const unsafe fn write_bytes<T>(dst: *mut T, val: u8, count: usize) {
698 // SAFETY: the safety contract for `write_bytes` must be upheld by the caller.
699 unsafe {
700 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
701 check_language_ub,
702 "ptr::write_bytes requires that the destination pointer is aligned and non-null",
703 (
704 addr: *const () = dst as *const (),
705 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
706 zero_size: bool = T::IS_ZST || count == 0,
707 ) => ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(addr, align, zero_size)
708 );
709 crate::intrinsics::write_bytes(dst, val, count)
710 }
711}
712
713/// Executes the destructor (if any) of the pointed-to value.
714///
715/// This is almost the same as calling [`ptr::read`] and discarding
716/// the result, but has the following advantages:
717// FIXME: say something more useful than "almost the same"?
718// There are open questions here: `read` requires the value to be fully valid, e.g. if `T` is a
719// `bool` it must be 0 or 1, if it is a reference then it must be dereferenceable. `drop_in_place`
720// only requires that `*to_drop` be "valid for dropping" and we have not defined what that means. In
721// Miri it currently (May 2024) requires nothing at all for types without drop glue.
722///
723/// * It is *required* to use `drop_in_place` to drop unsized types like
724/// trait objects, because they can't be read out onto the stack and
725/// dropped normally.
726///
727/// * It is friendlier to the optimizer to do this over [`ptr::read`] when
728/// dropping manually allocated memory (e.g., in the implementations of
729/// `Box`/`Rc`/`Vec`), as the compiler doesn't need to prove that it's
730/// sound to elide the copy.
731///
732/// * It can be used to drop [pinned] data when `T` is not `repr(packed)`
733/// (pinned data must not be moved before it is dropped).
734///
735/// Unaligned values cannot be dropped in place, they must be copied to an aligned
736/// location first using [`ptr::read_unaligned`]. For packed structs, this move is
737/// done automatically by the compiler. This means the fields of packed structs
738/// are not dropped in-place.
739///
740/// [`ptr::read`]: self::read
741/// [`ptr::read_unaligned`]: self::read_unaligned
742/// [pinned]: crate::pin
743///
744/// # Safety
745///
746/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
747///
748/// * `to_drop` must be [valid] for both reads and writes.
749///
750/// * `to_drop` must be properly aligned, even if `T` has size 0.
751///
752/// * `to_drop` must be nonnull, even if `T` has size 0.
753///
754/// * The value `to_drop` points to must be valid for dropping, which may mean
755/// it must uphold additional invariants. These invariants depend on the type
756/// of the value being dropped. For instance, when dropping a Box, the box's
757/// pointer to the heap must be valid.
758///
759/// * While `drop_in_place` is executing, the only way to access parts of
760/// `to_drop` is through the `&mut self` references supplied to the
761/// `Drop::drop` methods that `drop_in_place` invokes.
762///
763/// Additionally, if `T` is not [`Copy`], using the pointed-to value after
764/// calling `drop_in_place` can cause undefined behavior. Note that `*to_drop =
765/// foo` counts as a use because it will cause the value to be dropped
766/// again. [`write()`] can be used to overwrite data without causing it to be
767/// dropped.
768///
769/// [valid]: self#safety
770///
771/// # Examples
772///
773/// Manually remove the last item from a vector:
774///
775/// ```
776/// use std::ptr;
777/// use std::rc::Rc;
778///
779/// let last = Rc::new(1);
780/// let weak = Rc::downgrade(&last);
781///
782/// let mut v = vec![Rc::new(0), last];
783///
784/// unsafe {
785/// // Get a raw pointer to the last element in `v`.
786/// let ptr = &mut v[1] as *mut _;
787/// // Shorten `v` to prevent the last item from being dropped. We do that first,
788/// // to prevent issues if the `drop_in_place` below panics.
789/// v.set_len(1);
790/// // Without a call `drop_in_place`, the last item would never be dropped,
791/// // and the memory it manages would be leaked.
792/// ptr::drop_in_place(ptr);
793/// }
794///
795/// assert_eq!(v, &[0.into()]);
796///
797/// // Ensure that the last item was dropped.
798/// assert!(weak.upgrade().is_none());
799/// ```
800#[stable(feature = "drop_in_place", since = "1.8.0")]
801#[lang = "drop_in_place"]
802#[allow(unconditional_recursion)]
803#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_drop_in_place"]
804pub unsafe fn drop_in_place<T: PointeeSized>(to_drop: *mut T) {
805 // Code here does not matter - this is replaced by the
806 // real drop glue by the compiler.
807
808 // SAFETY: see comment above
809 unsafe { drop_in_place(to_drop) }
810}
811
812/// Creates a null raw pointer.
813///
814/// This function is equivalent to zero-initializing the pointer:
815/// `MaybeUninit::<*const T>::zeroed().assume_init()`.
816/// The resulting pointer has the address 0.
817///
818/// # Examples
819///
820/// ```
821/// use std::ptr;
822///
823/// let p: *const i32 = ptr::null();
824/// assert!(p.is_null());
825/// assert_eq!(p as usize, 0); // this pointer has the address 0
826/// ```
827#[inline(always)]
828#[must_use]
829#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
830#[rustc_promotable]
831#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_null", since = "1.24.0")]
832#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_null"]
833pub const fn null<T: PointeeSized + Thin>() -> *const T {
834 from_raw_parts(without_provenance::<()>(0), ())
835}
836
837/// Creates a null mutable raw pointer.
838///
839/// This function is equivalent to zero-initializing the pointer:
840/// `MaybeUninit::<*mut T>::zeroed().assume_init()`.
841/// The resulting pointer has the address 0.
842///
843/// # Examples
844///
845/// ```
846/// use std::ptr;
847///
848/// let p: *mut i32 = ptr::null_mut();
849/// assert!(p.is_null());
850/// assert_eq!(p as usize, 0); // this pointer has the address 0
851/// ```
852#[inline(always)]
853#[must_use]
854#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
855#[rustc_promotable]
856#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_null", since = "1.24.0")]
857#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_null_mut"]
858pub const fn null_mut<T: PointeeSized + Thin>() -> *mut T {
859 from_raw_parts_mut(without_provenance_mut::<()>(0), ())
860}
861
862/// Creates a pointer with the given address and no [provenance][crate::ptr#provenance].
863///
864/// This is equivalent to `ptr::null().with_addr(addr)`.
865///
866/// Without provenance, this pointer is not associated with any actual allocation. Such a
867/// no-provenance pointer may be used for zero-sized memory accesses (if suitably aligned), but
868/// non-zero-sized memory accesses with a no-provenance pointer are UB. No-provenance pointers are
869/// little more than a `usize` address in disguise.
870///
871/// This is different from `addr as *const T`, which creates a pointer that picks up a previously
872/// exposed provenance. See [`with_exposed_provenance`] for more details on that operation.
873///
874/// This is a [Strict Provenance][crate::ptr#strict-provenance] API.
875#[inline(always)]
876#[must_use]
877#[stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
878#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
879pub const fn without_provenance<T>(addr: usize) -> *const T {
880 without_provenance_mut(addr)
881}
882
883/// Creates a new pointer that is dangling, but non-null and well-aligned.
884///
885/// This is useful for initializing types which lazily allocate, like
886/// `Vec::new` does.
887///
888/// Note that the pointer value may potentially represent a valid pointer to
889/// a `T`, which means this must not be used as a "not yet initialized"
890/// sentinel value. Types that lazily allocate must track initialization by
891/// some other means.
892#[inline(always)]
893#[must_use]
894#[stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
895#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
896pub const fn dangling<T>() -> *const T {
897 dangling_mut()
898}
899
900/// Creates a pointer with the given address and no [provenance][crate::ptr#provenance].
901///
902/// This is equivalent to `ptr::null_mut().with_addr(addr)`.
903///
904/// Without provenance, this pointer is not associated with any actual allocation. Such a
905/// no-provenance pointer may be used for zero-sized memory accesses (if suitably aligned), but
906/// non-zero-sized memory accesses with a no-provenance pointer are UB. No-provenance pointers are
907/// little more than a `usize` address in disguise.
908///
909/// This is different from `addr as *mut T`, which creates a pointer that picks up a previously
910/// exposed provenance. See [`with_exposed_provenance_mut`] for more details on that operation.
911///
912/// This is a [Strict Provenance][crate::ptr#strict-provenance] API.
913#[inline(always)]
914#[must_use]
915#[stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
916#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
917pub const fn without_provenance_mut<T>(addr: usize) -> *mut T {
918 // An int-to-pointer transmute currently has exactly the intended semantics: it creates a
919 // pointer without provenance. Note that this is *not* a stable guarantee about transmute
920 // semantics, it relies on sysroot crates having special status.
921 // SAFETY: every valid integer is also a valid pointer (as long as you don't dereference that
922 // pointer).
923 unsafe { mem::transmute(addr) }
924}
925
926/// Creates a new pointer that is dangling, but non-null and well-aligned.
927///
928/// This is useful for initializing types which lazily allocate, like
929/// `Vec::new` does.
930///
931/// Note that the pointer value may potentially represent a valid pointer to
932/// a `T`, which means this must not be used as a "not yet initialized"
933/// sentinel value. Types that lazily allocate must track initialization by
934/// some other means.
935#[inline(always)]
936#[must_use]
937#[stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
938#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "strict_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
939pub const fn dangling_mut<T>() -> *mut T {
940 NonNull::dangling().as_ptr()
941}
942
943/// Converts an address back to a pointer, picking up some previously 'exposed'
944/// [provenance][crate::ptr#provenance].
945///
946/// This is fully equivalent to `addr as *const T`. The provenance of the returned pointer is that
947/// of *some* pointer that was previously exposed by passing it to
948/// [`expose_provenance`][pointer::expose_provenance], or a `ptr as usize` cast. In addition, memory
949/// which is outside the control of the Rust abstract machine (MMIO registers, for example) is
950/// always considered to be accessible with an exposed provenance, so long as this memory is disjoint
951/// from memory that will be used by the abstract machine such as the stack, heap, and statics.
952///
953/// The exact provenance that gets picked is not specified. The compiler will do its best to pick
954/// the "right" provenance for you (whatever that may be), but currently we cannot provide any
955/// guarantees about which provenance the resulting pointer will have -- and therefore there
956/// is no definite specification for which memory the resulting pointer may access.
957///
958/// If there is *no* previously 'exposed' provenance that justifies the way the returned pointer
959/// will be used, the program has undefined behavior. In particular, the aliasing rules still apply:
960/// pointers and references that have been invalidated due to aliasing accesses cannot be used
961/// anymore, even if they have been exposed!
962///
963/// Due to its inherent ambiguity, this operation may not be supported by tools that help you to
964/// stay conformant with the Rust memory model. It is recommended to use [Strict
965/// Provenance][self#strict-provenance] APIs such as [`with_addr`][pointer::with_addr] wherever
966/// possible.
967///
968/// On most platforms this will produce a value with the same bytes as the address. Platforms
969/// which need to store additional information in a pointer may not support this operation,
970/// since it is generally not possible to actually *compute* which provenance the returned
971/// pointer has to pick up.
972///
973/// This is an [Exposed Provenance][crate::ptr#exposed-provenance] API.
974#[must_use]
975#[inline(always)]
976#[stable(feature = "exposed_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
977#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_exposed_provenance", issue = "144538")]
978#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
979#[allow(fuzzy_provenance_casts)] // this *is* the explicit provenance API one should use instead
980pub const fn with_exposed_provenance<T>(addr: usize) -> *const T {
981 addr as *const T
982}
983
984/// Converts an address back to a mutable pointer, picking up some previously 'exposed'
985/// [provenance][crate::ptr#provenance].
986///
987/// This is fully equivalent to `addr as *mut T`. The provenance of the returned pointer is that
988/// of *some* pointer that was previously exposed by passing it to
989/// [`expose_provenance`][pointer::expose_provenance], or a `ptr as usize` cast. In addition, memory
990/// which is outside the control of the Rust abstract machine (MMIO registers, for example) is
991/// always considered to be accessible with an exposed provenance, so long as this memory is disjoint
992/// from memory that will be used by the abstract machine such as the stack, heap, and statics.
993///
994/// The exact provenance that gets picked is not specified. The compiler will do its best to pick
995/// the "right" provenance for you (whatever that may be), but currently we cannot provide any
996/// guarantees about which provenance the resulting pointer will have -- and therefore there
997/// is no definite specification for which memory the resulting pointer may access.
998///
999/// If there is *no* previously 'exposed' provenance that justifies the way the returned pointer
1000/// will be used, the program has undefined behavior. In particular, the aliasing rules still apply:
1001/// pointers and references that have been invalidated due to aliasing accesses cannot be used
1002/// anymore, even if they have been exposed!
1003///
1004/// Due to its inherent ambiguity, this operation may not be supported by tools that help you to
1005/// stay conformant with the Rust memory model. It is recommended to use [Strict
1006/// Provenance][self#strict-provenance] APIs such as [`with_addr`][pointer::with_addr] wherever
1007/// possible.
1008///
1009/// On most platforms this will produce a value with the same bytes as the address. Platforms
1010/// which need to store additional information in a pointer may not support this operation,
1011/// since it is generally not possible to actually *compute* which provenance the returned
1012/// pointer has to pick up.
1013///
1014/// This is an [Exposed Provenance][crate::ptr#exposed-provenance] API.
1015#[must_use]
1016#[inline(always)]
1017#[stable(feature = "exposed_provenance", since = "1.84.0")]
1018#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_exposed_provenance", issue = "144538")]
1019#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
1020#[allow(fuzzy_provenance_casts)] // this *is* the explicit provenance API one should use instead
1021pub const fn with_exposed_provenance_mut<T>(addr: usize) -> *mut T {
1022 addr as *mut T
1023}
1024
1025/// Converts a reference to a raw pointer.
1026///
1027/// For `r: &T`, `from_ref(r)` is equivalent to `r as *const T` (except for the caveat noted below),
1028/// but is a bit safer since it will never silently change type or mutability, in particular if the
1029/// code is refactored.
1030///
1031/// The caller must ensure that the pointee outlives the pointer this function returns, or else it
1032/// will end up dangling.
1033///
1034/// The caller must also ensure that the memory the pointer (non-transitively) points to is never
1035/// written to (except inside an `UnsafeCell`) using this pointer or any pointer derived from it. If
1036/// you need to mutate the pointee, use [`from_mut`]. Specifically, to turn a mutable reference `m:
1037/// &mut T` into `*const T`, prefer `from_mut(m).cast_const()` to obtain a pointer that can later be
1038/// used for mutation.
1039///
1040/// ## Interaction with lifetime extension
1041///
1042/// Note that this has subtle interactions with the rules for lifetime extension of temporaries in
1043/// tail expressions. This code is valid, albeit in a non-obvious way:
1044/// ```rust
1045/// # type T = i32;
1046/// # fn foo() -> T { 42 }
1047/// // The temporary holding the return value of `foo` has its lifetime extended,
1048/// // because the surrounding expression involves no function call.
1049/// let p = &foo() as *const T;
1050/// unsafe { p.read() };
1051/// ```
1052/// Naively replacing the cast with `from_ref` is not valid:
1053/// ```rust,no_run
1054/// # use std::ptr;
1055/// # type T = i32;
1056/// # fn foo() -> T { 42 }
1057/// // The temporary holding the return value of `foo` does *not* have its lifetime extended,
1058/// // because the surrounding expression involves a function call.
1059/// let p = ptr::from_ref(&foo());
1060/// unsafe { p.read() }; // UB! Reading from a dangling pointer ⚠️
1061/// ```
1062/// The recommended way to write this code is to avoid relying on lifetime extension
1063/// when raw pointers are involved:
1064/// ```rust
1065/// # use std::ptr;
1066/// # type T = i32;
1067/// # fn foo() -> T { 42 }
1068/// let x = foo();
1069/// let p = ptr::from_ref(&x);
1070/// unsafe { p.read() };
1071/// ```
1072#[inline(always)]
1073#[must_use]
1074#[stable(feature = "ptr_from_ref", since = "1.76.0")]
1075#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "ptr_from_ref", since = "1.76.0")]
1076#[rustc_never_returns_null_ptr]
1077#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_from_ref"]
1078pub const fn from_ref<T: PointeeSized>(r: &T) -> *const T {
1079 r
1080}
1081
1082/// Converts a mutable reference to a raw pointer.
1083///
1084/// For `r: &mut T`, `from_mut(r)` is equivalent to `r as *mut T` (except for the caveat noted
1085/// below), but is a bit safer since it will never silently change type or mutability, in particular
1086/// if the code is refactored.
1087///
1088/// The caller must ensure that the pointee outlives the pointer this function returns, or else it
1089/// will end up dangling.
1090///
1091/// ## Interaction with lifetime extension
1092///
1093/// Note that this has subtle interactions with the rules for lifetime extension of temporaries in
1094/// tail expressions. This code is valid, albeit in a non-obvious way:
1095/// ```rust
1096/// # type T = i32;
1097/// # fn foo() -> T { 42 }
1098/// // The temporary holding the return value of `foo` has its lifetime extended,
1099/// // because the surrounding expression involves no function call.
1100/// let p = &mut foo() as *mut T;
1101/// unsafe { p.write(T::default()) };
1102/// ```
1103/// Naively replacing the cast with `from_mut` is not valid:
1104/// ```rust,no_run
1105/// # use std::ptr;
1106/// # type T = i32;
1107/// # fn foo() -> T { 42 }
1108/// // The temporary holding the return value of `foo` does *not* have its lifetime extended,
1109/// // because the surrounding expression involves a function call.
1110/// let p = ptr::from_mut(&mut foo());
1111/// unsafe { p.write(T::default()) }; // UB! Writing to a dangling pointer ⚠️
1112/// ```
1113/// The recommended way to write this code is to avoid relying on lifetime extension
1114/// when raw pointers are involved:
1115/// ```rust
1116/// # use std::ptr;
1117/// # type T = i32;
1118/// # fn foo() -> T { 42 }
1119/// let mut x = foo();
1120/// let p = ptr::from_mut(&mut x);
1121/// unsafe { p.write(T::default()) };
1122/// ```
1123#[inline(always)]
1124#[must_use]
1125#[stable(feature = "ptr_from_ref", since = "1.76.0")]
1126#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "ptr_from_ref", since = "1.76.0")]
1127#[rustc_never_returns_null_ptr]
1128pub const fn from_mut<T: PointeeSized>(r: &mut T) -> *mut T {
1129 r
1130}
1131
1132/// Forms a raw slice from a pointer and a length.
1133///
1134/// The `len` argument is the number of **elements**, not the number of bytes.
1135///
1136/// This function is safe, but actually using the return value is unsafe.
1137/// See the documentation of [`slice::from_raw_parts`] for slice safety requirements.
1138///
1139/// [`slice::from_raw_parts`]: crate::slice::from_raw_parts
1140///
1141/// # Examples
1142///
1143/// ```rust
1144/// use std::ptr;
1145///
1146/// // create a slice pointer when starting out with a pointer to the first element
1147/// let x = [5, 6, 7];
1148/// let raw_pointer = x.as_ptr();
1149/// let slice = ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(raw_pointer, 3);
1150/// assert_eq!(unsafe { &*slice }[2], 7);
1151/// ```
1152///
1153/// You must ensure that the pointer is valid and not null before dereferencing
1154/// the raw slice. A slice reference must never have a null pointer, even if it's empty.
1155///
1156/// ```rust,should_panic
1157/// use std::ptr;
1158/// let danger: *const [u8] = ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(ptr::null(), 0);
1159/// unsafe {
1160/// danger.as_ref().expect("references must not be null");
1161/// }
1162/// ```
1163#[inline]
1164#[stable(feature = "slice_from_raw_parts", since = "1.42.0")]
1165#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_slice_from_raw_parts", since = "1.64.0")]
1166#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_slice_from_raw_parts"]
1167pub const fn slice_from_raw_parts<T>(data: *const T, len: usize) -> *const [T] {
1168 from_raw_parts(data, len)
1169}
1170
1171/// Forms a raw mutable slice from a pointer and a length.
1172///
1173/// The `len` argument is the number of **elements**, not the number of bytes.
1174///
1175/// Performs the same functionality as [`slice_from_raw_parts`], except that a
1176/// raw mutable slice is returned, as opposed to a raw immutable slice.
1177///
1178/// This function is safe, but actually using the return value is unsafe.
1179/// See the documentation of [`slice::from_raw_parts_mut`] for slice safety requirements.
1180///
1181/// [`slice::from_raw_parts_mut`]: crate::slice::from_raw_parts_mut
1182///
1183/// # Examples
1184///
1185/// ```rust
1186/// use std::ptr;
1187///
1188/// let x = &mut [5, 6, 7];
1189/// let raw_pointer = x.as_mut_ptr();
1190/// let slice = ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut(raw_pointer, 3);
1191///
1192/// unsafe {
1193/// (*slice)[2] = 99; // assign a value at an index in the slice
1194/// };
1195///
1196/// assert_eq!(unsafe { &*slice }[2], 99);
1197/// ```
1198///
1199/// You must ensure that the pointer is valid and not null before dereferencing
1200/// the raw slice. A slice reference must never have a null pointer, even if it's empty.
1201///
1202/// ```rust,should_panic
1203/// use std::ptr;
1204/// let danger: *mut [u8] = ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut(ptr::null_mut(), 0);
1205/// unsafe {
1206/// danger.as_mut().expect("references must not be null");
1207/// }
1208/// ```
1209#[inline]
1210#[stable(feature = "slice_from_raw_parts", since = "1.42.0")]
1211#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_slice_from_raw_parts_mut", since = "1.83.0")]
1212#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_slice_from_raw_parts_mut"]
1213pub const fn slice_from_raw_parts_mut<T>(data: *mut T, len: usize) -> *mut [T] {
1214 from_raw_parts_mut(data, len)
1215}
1216
1217/// Swaps the values at two mutable locations of the same type, without
1218/// deinitializing either.
1219///
1220/// But for the following exceptions, this function is semantically
1221/// equivalent to [`mem::swap`]:
1222///
1223/// * It operates on raw pointers instead of references. When references are
1224/// available, [`mem::swap`] should be preferred.
1225///
1226/// * The two pointed-to values may overlap. If the values do overlap, then the
1227/// overlapping region of memory from `x` will be used. This is demonstrated
1228/// in the second example below.
1229///
1230/// * The operation is "untyped" in the sense that data may be uninitialized or otherwise violate
1231/// the requirements of `T`. The initialization state is preserved exactly.
1232///
1233/// # Safety
1234///
1235/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1236///
1237/// * Both `x` and `y` must be [valid] for both reads and writes. They must remain valid even when the
1238/// other pointer is written. (This means if the memory ranges overlap, the two pointers must not
1239/// be subject to aliasing restrictions relative to each other.)
1240///
1241/// * Both `x` and `y` must be properly aligned.
1242///
1243/// Note that even if `T` has size `0`, the pointers must be properly aligned.
1244///
1245/// [valid]: self#safety
1246///
1247/// # Examples
1248///
1249/// Swapping two non-overlapping regions:
1250///
1251/// ```
1252/// use std::ptr;
1253///
1254/// let mut array = [0, 1, 2, 3];
1255///
1256/// let (x, y) = array.split_at_mut(2);
1257/// let x = x.as_mut_ptr().cast::<[u32; 2]>(); // this is `array[0..2]`
1258/// let y = y.as_mut_ptr().cast::<[u32; 2]>(); // this is `array[2..4]`
1259///
1260/// unsafe {
1261/// ptr::swap(x, y);
1262/// assert_eq!([2, 3, 0, 1], array);
1263/// }
1264/// ```
1265///
1266/// Swapping two overlapping regions:
1267///
1268/// ```
1269/// use std::ptr;
1270///
1271/// let mut array: [i32; 4] = [0, 1, 2, 3];
1272///
1273/// let array_ptr: *mut i32 = array.as_mut_ptr();
1274///
1275/// let x = array_ptr as *mut [i32; 3]; // this is `array[0..3]`
1276/// let y = unsafe { array_ptr.add(1) } as *mut [i32; 3]; // this is `array[1..4]`
1277///
1278/// unsafe {
1279/// ptr::swap(x, y);
1280/// // The indices `1..3` of the slice overlap between `x` and `y`.
1281/// // Reasonable results would be for to them be `[2, 3]`, so that indices `0..3` are
1282/// // `[1, 2, 3]` (matching `y` before the `swap`); or for them to be `[0, 1]`
1283/// // so that indices `1..4` are `[0, 1, 2]` (matching `x` before the `swap`).
1284/// // This implementation is defined to make the latter choice.
1285/// assert_eq!([1, 0, 1, 2], array);
1286/// }
1287/// ```
1288#[inline]
1289#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
1290#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_swap", since = "1.85.0")]
1291#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_swap"]
1292pub const unsafe fn swap<T>(x: *mut T, y: *mut T) {
1293 // Give ourselves some scratch space to work with.
1294 // We do not have to worry about drops: `MaybeUninit` does nothing when dropped.
1295 let mut tmp = MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit();
1296
1297 // Perform the swap
1298 // SAFETY: the caller must guarantee that `x` and `y` are
1299 // valid for writes and properly aligned. `tmp` cannot be
1300 // overlapping either `x` or `y` because `tmp` was just allocated
1301 // on the stack as a separate allocation.
1302 unsafe {
1303 copy_nonoverlapping(x, tmp.as_mut_ptr(), 1);
1304 copy(y, x, 1); // `x` and `y` may overlap
1305 copy_nonoverlapping(tmp.as_ptr(), y, 1);
1306 }
1307}
1308
1309/// Swaps `count * size_of::<T>()` bytes between the two regions of memory
1310/// beginning at `x` and `y`. The two regions must *not* overlap.
1311///
1312/// The operation is "untyped" in the sense that data may be uninitialized or otherwise violate the
1313/// requirements of `T`. The initialization state is preserved exactly.
1314///
1315/// # Safety
1316///
1317/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1318///
1319/// * Both `x` and `y` must be [valid] for both reads and writes of `count *
1320/// size_of::<T>()` bytes.
1321///
1322/// * Both `x` and `y` must be properly aligned.
1323///
1324/// * The region of memory beginning at `x` with a size of `count *
1325/// size_of::<T>()` bytes must *not* overlap with the region of memory
1326/// beginning at `y` with the same size.
1327///
1328/// Note that even if the effectively copied size (`count * size_of::<T>()`) is `0`,
1329/// the pointers must be properly aligned.
1330///
1331/// [valid]: self#safety
1332///
1333/// # Examples
1334///
1335/// Basic usage:
1336///
1337/// ```
1338/// use std::ptr;
1339///
1340/// let mut x = [1, 2, 3, 4];
1341/// let mut y = [7, 8, 9];
1342///
1343/// unsafe {
1344/// ptr::swap_nonoverlapping(x.as_mut_ptr(), y.as_mut_ptr(), 2);
1345/// }
1346///
1347/// assert_eq!(x, [7, 8, 3, 4]);
1348/// assert_eq!(y, [1, 2, 9]);
1349/// ```
1350///
1351/// # Const evaluation limitations
1352///
1353/// If this function is invoked during const-evaluation, the current implementation has a small (and
1354/// rarely relevant) limitation: if `count` is at least 2 and the data pointed to by `x` or `y`
1355/// contains a pointer that crosses the boundary of two `T`-sized chunks of memory, the function may
1356/// fail to evaluate (similar to a panic during const-evaluation). This behavior may change in the
1357/// future.
1358///
1359/// The limitation is illustrated by the following example:
1360///
1361/// ```
1362/// use std::mem::size_of;
1363/// use std::ptr;
1364///
1365/// const { unsafe {
1366/// const PTR_SIZE: usize = size_of::<*const i32>();
1367/// let mut data1 = [0u8; PTR_SIZE];
1368/// let mut data2 = [0u8; PTR_SIZE];
1369/// // Store a pointer in `data1`.
1370/// data1.as_mut_ptr().cast::<*const i32>().write_unaligned(&42);
1371/// // Swap the contents of `data1` and `data2` by swapping `PTR_SIZE` many `u8`-sized chunks.
1372/// // This call will fail, because the pointer in `data1` crosses the boundary
1373/// // between several of the 1-byte chunks that are being swapped here.
1374/// //ptr::swap_nonoverlapping(data1.as_mut_ptr(), data2.as_mut_ptr(), PTR_SIZE);
1375/// // Swap the contents of `data1` and `data2` by swapping a single chunk of size
1376/// // `[u8; PTR_SIZE]`. That works, as there is no pointer crossing the boundary between
1377/// // two chunks.
1378/// ptr::swap_nonoverlapping(&mut data1, &mut data2, 1);
1379/// // Read the pointer from `data2` and dereference it.
1380/// let ptr = data2.as_ptr().cast::<*const i32>().read_unaligned();
1381/// assert!(*ptr == 42);
1382/// } }
1383/// ```
1384#[inline]
1385#[stable(feature = "swap_nonoverlapping", since = "1.27.0")]
1386#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_swap_nonoverlapping", since = "1.88.0")]
1387#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_swap_nonoverlapping"]
1388#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_eval_select)] // both implementations behave the same
1389#[track_caller]
1390pub const unsafe fn swap_nonoverlapping<T>(x: *mut T, y: *mut T, count: usize) {
1391 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
1392 check_library_ub,
1393 "ptr::swap_nonoverlapping requires that both pointer arguments are aligned and non-null \
1394 and the specified memory ranges do not overlap",
1395 (
1396 x: *mut () = x as *mut (),
1397 y: *mut () = y as *mut (),
1398 size: usize = size_of::<T>(),
1399 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
1400 count: usize = count,
1401 ) => {
1402 let zero_size = size == 0 || count == 0;
1403 ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(x, align, zero_size)
1404 && ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(y, align, zero_size)
1405 && ub_checks::maybe_is_nonoverlapping(x, y, size, count)
1406 }
1407 );
1408
1409 const_eval_select!(
1410 @capture[T] { x: *mut T, y: *mut T, count: usize }:
1411 if const {
1412 // At compile-time we want to always copy this in chunks of `T`, to ensure that if there
1413 // are pointers inside `T` we will copy them in one go rather than trying to copy a part
1414 // of a pointer (which would not work).
1415 // SAFETY: Same preconditions as this function
1416 unsafe { swap_nonoverlapping_const(x, y, count) }
1417 } else {
1418 // Going though a slice here helps codegen know the size fits in `isize`
1419 let slice = slice_from_raw_parts_mut(x, count);
1420 // SAFETY: This is all readable from the pointer, meaning it's one
1421 // allocation, and thus cannot be more than isize::MAX bytes.
1422 let bytes = unsafe { mem::size_of_val_raw::<[T]>(slice) };
1423 if let Some(bytes) = NonZero::new(bytes) {
1424 // SAFETY: These are the same ranges, just expressed in a different
1425 // type, so they're still non-overlapping.
1426 unsafe { swap_nonoverlapping_bytes(x.cast(), y.cast(), bytes) };
1427 }
1428 }
1429 )
1430}
1431
1432/// Same behavior and safety conditions as [`swap_nonoverlapping`]
1433#[inline]
1434const unsafe fn swap_nonoverlapping_const<T>(x: *mut T, y: *mut T, count: usize) {
1435 let mut i = 0;
1436 while i < count {
1437 // SAFETY: By precondition, `i` is in-bounds because it's below `n`
1438 let x = unsafe { x.add(i) };
1439 // SAFETY: By precondition, `i` is in-bounds because it's below `n`
1440 // and it's distinct from `x` since the ranges are non-overlapping
1441 let y = unsafe { y.add(i) };
1442
1443 // SAFETY: we're only ever given pointers that are valid to read/write,
1444 // including being aligned, and nothing here panics so it's drop-safe.
1445 unsafe {
1446 // Note that it's critical that these use `copy_nonoverlapping`,
1447 // rather than `read`/`write`, to avoid #134713 if T has padding.
1448 let mut temp = MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit();
1449 copy_nonoverlapping(x, temp.as_mut_ptr(), 1);
1450 copy_nonoverlapping(y, x, 1);
1451 copy_nonoverlapping(temp.as_ptr(), y, 1);
1452 }
1453
1454 i += 1;
1455 }
1456}
1457
1458// Don't let MIR inline this, because we really want it to keep its noalias metadata
1459#[rustc_no_mir_inline]
1460#[inline]
1461fn swap_chunk<const N: usize>(x: &mut MaybeUninit<[u8; N]>, y: &mut MaybeUninit<[u8; N]>) {
1462 let a = *x;
1463 let b = *y;
1464 *x = b;
1465 *y = a;
1466}
1467
1468#[inline]
1469unsafe fn swap_nonoverlapping_bytes(x: *mut u8, y: *mut u8, bytes: NonZero<usize>) {
1470 // Same as `swap_nonoverlapping::<[u8; N]>`.
1471 unsafe fn swap_nonoverlapping_chunks<const N: usize>(
1472 x: *mut MaybeUninit<[u8; N]>,
1473 y: *mut MaybeUninit<[u8; N]>,
1474 chunks: NonZero<usize>,
1475 ) {
1476 let chunks = chunks.get();
1477 for i in 0..chunks {
1478 // SAFETY: i is in [0, chunks) so the adds and dereferences are in-bounds.
1479 unsafe { swap_chunk(&mut *x.add(i), &mut *y.add(i)) };
1480 }
1481 }
1482
1483 // Same as `swap_nonoverlapping_bytes`, but accepts at most 1+2+4=7 bytes
1484 #[inline]
1485 unsafe fn swap_nonoverlapping_short(x: *mut u8, y: *mut u8, bytes: NonZero<usize>) {
1486 // Tail handling for auto-vectorized code sometimes has element-at-a-time behaviour,
1487 // see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134946>.
1488 // By swapping as different sizes, rather than as a loop over bytes,
1489 // we make sure not to end up with, say, seven byte-at-a-time copies.
1490
1491 let bytes = bytes.get();
1492 let mut i = 0;
1493 macro_rules! swap_prefix {
1494 ($($n:literal)+) => {$(
1495 if (bytes & $n) != 0 {
1496 // SAFETY: `i` can only have the same bits set as those in bytes,
1497 // so these `add`s are in-bounds of `bytes`. But the bit for
1498 // `$n` hasn't been set yet, so the `$n` bytes that `swap_chunk`
1499 // will read and write are within the usable range.
1500 unsafe { swap_chunk::<$n>(&mut*x.add(i).cast(), &mut*y.add(i).cast()) };
1501 i |= $n;
1502 }
1503 )+};
1504 }
1505 swap_prefix!(4 2 1);
1506 debug_assert_eq!(i, bytes);
1507 }
1508
1509 const CHUNK_SIZE: usize = size_of::<*const ()>();
1510 let bytes = bytes.get();
1511
1512 let chunks = bytes / CHUNK_SIZE;
1513 let tail = bytes % CHUNK_SIZE;
1514 if let Some(chunks) = NonZero::new(chunks) {
1515 // SAFETY: this is bytes/CHUNK_SIZE*CHUNK_SIZE bytes, which is <= bytes,
1516 // so it's within the range of our non-overlapping bytes.
1517 unsafe { swap_nonoverlapping_chunks::<CHUNK_SIZE>(x.cast(), y.cast(), chunks) };
1518 }
1519 if let Some(tail) = NonZero::new(tail) {
1520 const { assert!(CHUNK_SIZE <= 8) };
1521 let delta = chunks * CHUNK_SIZE;
1522 // SAFETY: the tail length is below CHUNK SIZE because of the remainder,
1523 // and CHUNK_SIZE is at most 8 by the const assert, so tail <= 7
1524 unsafe { swap_nonoverlapping_short(x.add(delta), y.add(delta), tail) };
1525 }
1526}
1527
1528/// Moves `src` into the pointed `dst`, returning the previous `dst` value.
1529///
1530/// Neither value is dropped.
1531///
1532/// This function is semantically equivalent to [`mem::replace`] except that it
1533/// operates on raw pointers instead of references. When references are
1534/// available, [`mem::replace`] should be preferred.
1535///
1536/// # Safety
1537///
1538/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1539///
1540/// * `dst` must be [valid] for both reads and writes.
1541///
1542/// * `dst` must be properly aligned.
1543///
1544/// * `dst` must point to a properly initialized value of type `T`.
1545///
1546/// Note that even if `T` has size `0`, the pointer must be properly aligned.
1547///
1548/// [valid]: self#safety
1549///
1550/// # Examples
1551///
1552/// ```
1553/// use std::ptr;
1554///
1555/// let mut rust = vec!['b', 'u', 's', 't'];
1556///
1557/// // `mem::replace` would have the same effect without requiring the unsafe
1558/// // block.
1559/// let b = unsafe {
1560/// ptr::replace(&mut rust[0], 'r')
1561/// };
1562///
1563/// assert_eq!(b, 'b');
1564/// assert_eq!(rust, &['r', 'u', 's', 't']);
1565/// ```
1566#[inline]
1567#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
1568#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_replace", since = "1.83.0")]
1569#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_replace"]
1570#[track_caller]
1571pub const unsafe fn replace<T>(dst: *mut T, src: T) -> T {
1572 // SAFETY: the caller must guarantee that `dst` is valid to be
1573 // cast to a mutable reference (valid for writes, aligned, initialized),
1574 // and cannot overlap `src` since `dst` must point to a distinct
1575 // allocation.
1576 unsafe {
1577 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
1578 check_language_ub,
1579 "ptr::replace requires that the pointer argument is aligned and non-null",
1580 (
1581 addr: *const () = dst as *const (),
1582 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
1583 is_zst: bool = T::IS_ZST,
1584 ) => ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(addr, align, is_zst)
1585 );
1586 mem::replace(&mut *dst, src)
1587 }
1588}
1589
1590/// Reads the value from `src` without moving it. This leaves the
1591/// memory in `src` unchanged.
1592///
1593/// # Safety
1594///
1595/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1596///
1597/// * `src` must be [valid] for reads.
1598///
1599/// * `src` must be properly aligned. Use [`read_unaligned`] if this is not the
1600/// case.
1601///
1602/// * `src` must point to a properly initialized value of type `T`.
1603///
1604/// Note that even if `T` has size `0`, the pointer must be properly aligned.
1605///
1606/// # Examples
1607///
1608/// Basic usage:
1609///
1610/// ```
1611/// let x = 12;
1612/// let y = &x as *const i32;
1613///
1614/// unsafe {
1615/// assert_eq!(std::ptr::read(y), 12);
1616/// }
1617/// ```
1618///
1619/// Manually implement [`mem::swap`]:
1620///
1621/// ```
1622/// use std::ptr;
1623///
1624/// fn swap<T>(a: &mut T, b: &mut T) {
1625/// unsafe {
1626/// // Create a bitwise copy of the value at `a` in `tmp`.
1627/// let tmp = ptr::read(a);
1628///
1629/// // Exiting at this point (either by explicitly returning or by
1630/// // calling a function which panics) would cause the value in `tmp` to
1631/// // be dropped while the same value is still referenced by `a`. This
1632/// // could trigger undefined behavior if `T` is not `Copy`.
1633///
1634/// // Create a bitwise copy of the value at `b` in `a`.
1635/// // This is safe because mutable references cannot alias.
1636/// ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(b, a, 1);
1637///
1638/// // As above, exiting here could trigger undefined behavior because
1639/// // the same value is referenced by `a` and `b`.
1640///
1641/// // Move `tmp` into `b`.
1642/// ptr::write(b, tmp);
1643///
1644/// // `tmp` has been moved (`write` takes ownership of its second argument),
1645/// // so nothing is dropped implicitly here.
1646/// }
1647/// }
1648///
1649/// let mut foo = "foo".to_owned();
1650/// let mut bar = "bar".to_owned();
1651///
1652/// swap(&mut foo, &mut bar);
1653///
1654/// assert_eq!(foo, "bar");
1655/// assert_eq!(bar, "foo");
1656/// ```
1657///
1658/// ## Ownership of the Returned Value
1659///
1660/// `read` creates a bitwise copy of `T`, regardless of whether `T` is [`Copy`].
1661/// If `T` is not [`Copy`], using both the returned value and the value at
1662/// `*src` can violate memory safety. Note that assigning to `*src` counts as a
1663/// use because it will attempt to drop the value at `*src`.
1664///
1665/// [`write()`] can be used to overwrite data without causing it to be dropped.
1666///
1667/// ```
1668/// use std::ptr;
1669///
1670/// let mut s = String::from("foo");
1671/// unsafe {
1672/// // `s2` now points to the same underlying memory as `s`.
1673/// let mut s2: String = ptr::read(&s);
1674///
1675/// assert_eq!(s2, "foo");
1676///
1677/// // Assigning to `s2` causes its original value to be dropped. Beyond
1678/// // this point, `s` must no longer be used, as the underlying memory has
1679/// // been freed.
1680/// s2 = String::default();
1681/// assert_eq!(s2, "");
1682///
1683/// // Assigning to `s` would cause the old value to be dropped again,
1684/// // resulting in undefined behavior.
1685/// // s = String::from("bar"); // ERROR
1686///
1687/// // `ptr::write` can be used to overwrite a value without dropping it.
1688/// ptr::write(&mut s, String::from("bar"));
1689/// }
1690///
1691/// assert_eq!(s, "bar");
1692/// ```
1693///
1694/// [valid]: self#safety
1695#[inline]
1696#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
1697#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_read", since = "1.71.0")]
1698#[track_caller]
1699#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_read"]
1700pub const unsafe fn read<T>(src: *const T) -> T {
1701 // It would be semantically correct to implement this via `copy_nonoverlapping`
1702 // and `MaybeUninit`, as was done before PR #109035. Calling `assume_init`
1703 // provides enough information to know that this is a typed operation.
1704
1705 // However, as of March 2023 the compiler was not capable of taking advantage
1706 // of that information. Thus, the implementation here switched to an intrinsic,
1707 // which lowers to `_0 = *src` in MIR, to address a few issues:
1708 //
1709 // - Using `MaybeUninit::assume_init` after a `copy_nonoverlapping` was not
1710 // turning the untyped copy into a typed load. As such, the generated
1711 // `load` in LLVM didn't get various metadata, such as `!range` (#73258),
1712 // `!nonnull`, and `!noundef`, resulting in poorer optimization.
1713 // - Going through the extra local resulted in multiple extra copies, even
1714 // in optimized MIR. (Ignoring StorageLive/Dead, the intrinsic is one
1715 // MIR statement, while the previous implementation was eight.) LLVM
1716 // could sometimes optimize them away, but because `read` is at the core
1717 // of so many things, not having them in the first place improves what we
1718 // hand off to the backend. For example, `mem::replace::<Big>` previously
1719 // emitted 4 `alloca` and 6 `memcpy`s, but is now 1 `alloc` and 3 `memcpy`s.
1720 // - In general, this approach keeps us from getting any more bugs (like
1721 // #106369) that boil down to "`read(p)` is worse than `*p`", as this
1722 // makes them look identical to the backend (or other MIR consumers).
1723 //
1724 // Future enhancements to MIR optimizations might well allow this to return
1725 // to the previous implementation, rather than using an intrinsic.
1726
1727 // SAFETY: the caller must guarantee that `src` is valid for reads.
1728 unsafe {
1729 #[cfg(debug_assertions)] // Too expensive to always enable (for now?)
1730 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
1731 check_language_ub,
1732 "ptr::read requires that the pointer argument is aligned and non-null",
1733 (
1734 addr: *const () = src as *const (),
1735 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
1736 is_zst: bool = T::IS_ZST,
1737 ) => ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(addr, align, is_zst)
1738 );
1739 crate::intrinsics::read_via_copy(src)
1740 }
1741}
1742
1743/// Reads the value from `src` without moving it. This leaves the
1744/// memory in `src` unchanged.
1745///
1746/// Unlike [`read`], `read_unaligned` works with unaligned pointers.
1747///
1748/// # Safety
1749///
1750/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1751///
1752/// * `src` must be [valid] for reads.
1753///
1754/// * `src` must point to a properly initialized value of type `T`.
1755///
1756/// Like [`read`], `read_unaligned` creates a bitwise copy of `T`, regardless of
1757/// whether `T` is [`Copy`]. If `T` is not [`Copy`], using both the returned
1758/// value and the value at `*src` can [violate memory safety][read-ownership].
1759///
1760/// [read-ownership]: read#ownership-of-the-returned-value
1761/// [valid]: self#safety
1762///
1763/// ## On `packed` structs
1764///
1765/// Attempting to create a raw pointer to an `unaligned` struct field with
1766/// an expression such as `&packed.unaligned as *const FieldType` creates an
1767/// intermediate unaligned reference before converting that to a raw pointer.
1768/// That this reference is temporary and immediately cast is inconsequential
1769/// as the compiler always expects references to be properly aligned.
1770/// As a result, using `&packed.unaligned as *const FieldType` causes immediate
1771/// *undefined behavior* in your program.
1772///
1773/// Instead you must use the `&raw const` syntax to create the pointer.
1774/// You may use that constructed pointer together with this function.
1775///
1776/// An example of what not to do and how this relates to `read_unaligned` is:
1777///
1778/// ```
1779/// #[repr(packed, C)]
1780/// struct Packed {
1781/// _padding: u8,
1782/// unaligned: u32,
1783/// }
1784///
1785/// let packed = Packed {
1786/// _padding: 0x00,
1787/// unaligned: 0x01020304,
1788/// };
1789///
1790/// // Take the address of a 32-bit integer which is not aligned.
1791/// // In contrast to `&packed.unaligned as *const _`, this has no undefined behavior.
1792/// let unaligned = &raw const packed.unaligned;
1793///
1794/// let v = unsafe { std::ptr::read_unaligned(unaligned) };
1795/// assert_eq!(v, 0x01020304);
1796/// ```
1797///
1798/// Accessing unaligned fields directly with e.g. `packed.unaligned` is safe however.
1799///
1800/// # Examples
1801///
1802/// Read a `usize` value from a byte buffer:
1803///
1804/// ```
1805/// fn read_usize(x: &[u8]) -> usize {
1806/// assert!(x.len() >= size_of::<usize>());
1807///
1808/// let ptr = x.as_ptr() as *const usize;
1809///
1810/// unsafe { ptr.read_unaligned() }
1811/// }
1812/// ```
1813#[inline]
1814#[stable(feature = "ptr_unaligned", since = "1.17.0")]
1815#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_read", since = "1.71.0")]
1816#[track_caller]
1817#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_read_unaligned"]
1818pub const unsafe fn read_unaligned<T>(src: *const T) -> T {
1819 let mut tmp = MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit();
1820 // SAFETY: the caller must guarantee that `src` is valid for reads.
1821 // `src` cannot overlap `tmp` because `tmp` was just allocated on
1822 // the stack as a separate allocation.
1823 //
1824 // Also, since we just wrote a valid value into `tmp`, it is guaranteed
1825 // to be properly initialized.
1826 unsafe {
1827 copy_nonoverlapping(src as *const u8, tmp.as_mut_ptr() as *mut u8, size_of::<T>());
1828 tmp.assume_init()
1829 }
1830}
1831
1832/// Overwrites a memory location with the given value without reading or
1833/// dropping the old value.
1834///
1835/// `write` does not drop the contents of `dst`. This is safe, but it could leak
1836/// allocations or resources, so care should be taken not to overwrite an object
1837/// that should be dropped.
1838///
1839/// Additionally, it does not drop `src`. Semantically, `src` is moved into the
1840/// location pointed to by `dst`.
1841///
1842/// This is appropriate for initializing uninitialized memory, or overwriting
1843/// memory that has previously been [`read`] from.
1844///
1845/// # Safety
1846///
1847/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1848///
1849/// * `dst` must be [valid] for writes.
1850///
1851/// * `dst` must be properly aligned. Use [`write_unaligned`] if this is not the
1852/// case.
1853///
1854/// Note that even if `T` has size `0`, the pointer must be properly aligned.
1855///
1856/// [valid]: self#safety
1857///
1858/// # Examples
1859///
1860/// Basic usage:
1861///
1862/// ```
1863/// let mut x = 0;
1864/// let y = &mut x as *mut i32;
1865/// let z = 12;
1866///
1867/// unsafe {
1868/// std::ptr::write(y, z);
1869/// assert_eq!(std::ptr::read(y), 12);
1870/// }
1871/// ```
1872///
1873/// Manually implement [`mem::swap`]:
1874///
1875/// ```
1876/// use std::ptr;
1877///
1878/// fn swap<T>(a: &mut T, b: &mut T) {
1879/// unsafe {
1880/// // Create a bitwise copy of the value at `a` in `tmp`.
1881/// let tmp = ptr::read(a);
1882///
1883/// // Exiting at this point (either by explicitly returning or by
1884/// // calling a function which panics) would cause the value in `tmp` to
1885/// // be dropped while the same value is still referenced by `a`. This
1886/// // could trigger undefined behavior if `T` is not `Copy`.
1887///
1888/// // Create a bitwise copy of the value at `b` in `a`.
1889/// // This is safe because mutable references cannot alias.
1890/// ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(b, a, 1);
1891///
1892/// // As above, exiting here could trigger undefined behavior because
1893/// // the same value is referenced by `a` and `b`.
1894///
1895/// // Move `tmp` into `b`.
1896/// ptr::write(b, tmp);
1897///
1898/// // `tmp` has been moved (`write` takes ownership of its second argument),
1899/// // so nothing is dropped implicitly here.
1900/// }
1901/// }
1902///
1903/// let mut foo = "foo".to_owned();
1904/// let mut bar = "bar".to_owned();
1905///
1906/// swap(&mut foo, &mut bar);
1907///
1908/// assert_eq!(foo, "bar");
1909/// assert_eq!(bar, "foo");
1910/// ```
1911#[inline]
1912#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
1913#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_write", since = "1.83.0")]
1914#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_write"]
1915#[track_caller]
1916pub const unsafe fn write<T>(dst: *mut T, src: T) {
1917 // Semantically, it would be fine for this to be implemented as a
1918 // `copy_nonoverlapping` and appropriate drop suppression of `src`.
1919
1920 // However, implementing via that currently produces more MIR than is ideal.
1921 // Using an intrinsic keeps it down to just the simple `*dst = move src` in
1922 // MIR (11 statements shorter, at the time of writing), and also allows
1923 // `src` to stay an SSA value in codegen_ssa, rather than a memory one.
1924
1925 // SAFETY: the caller must guarantee that `dst` is valid for writes.
1926 // `dst` cannot overlap `src` because the caller has mutable access
1927 // to `dst` while `src` is owned by this function.
1928 unsafe {
1929 #[cfg(debug_assertions)] // Too expensive to always enable (for now?)
1930 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
1931 check_language_ub,
1932 "ptr::write requires that the pointer argument is aligned and non-null",
1933 (
1934 addr: *mut () = dst as *mut (),
1935 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
1936 is_zst: bool = T::IS_ZST,
1937 ) => ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null(addr, align, is_zst)
1938 );
1939 intrinsics::write_via_move(dst, src)
1940 }
1941}
1942
1943/// Overwrites a memory location with the given value without reading or
1944/// dropping the old value.
1945///
1946/// Unlike [`write()`], the pointer may be unaligned.
1947///
1948/// `write_unaligned` does not drop the contents of `dst`. This is safe, but it
1949/// could leak allocations or resources, so care should be taken not to overwrite
1950/// an object that should be dropped.
1951///
1952/// Additionally, it does not drop `src`. Semantically, `src` is moved into the
1953/// location pointed to by `dst`.
1954///
1955/// This is appropriate for initializing uninitialized memory, or overwriting
1956/// memory that has previously been read with [`read_unaligned`].
1957///
1958/// # Safety
1959///
1960/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
1961///
1962/// * `dst` must be [valid] for writes.
1963///
1964/// [valid]: self#safety
1965///
1966/// ## On `packed` structs
1967///
1968/// Attempting to create a raw pointer to an `unaligned` struct field with
1969/// an expression such as `&packed.unaligned as *const FieldType` creates an
1970/// intermediate unaligned reference before converting that to a raw pointer.
1971/// That this reference is temporary and immediately cast is inconsequential
1972/// as the compiler always expects references to be properly aligned.
1973/// As a result, using `&packed.unaligned as *const FieldType` causes immediate
1974/// *undefined behavior* in your program.
1975///
1976/// Instead, you must use the `&raw mut` syntax to create the pointer.
1977/// You may use that constructed pointer together with this function.
1978///
1979/// An example of how to do it and how this relates to `write_unaligned` is:
1980///
1981/// ```
1982/// #[repr(packed, C)]
1983/// struct Packed {
1984/// _padding: u8,
1985/// unaligned: u32,
1986/// }
1987///
1988/// let mut packed: Packed = unsafe { std::mem::zeroed() };
1989///
1990/// // Take the address of a 32-bit integer which is not aligned.
1991/// // In contrast to `&packed.unaligned as *mut _`, this has no undefined behavior.
1992/// let unaligned = &raw mut packed.unaligned;
1993///
1994/// unsafe { std::ptr::write_unaligned(unaligned, 42) };
1995///
1996/// assert_eq!({packed.unaligned}, 42); // `{...}` forces copying the field instead of creating a reference.
1997/// ```
1998///
1999/// Accessing unaligned fields directly with e.g. `packed.unaligned` is safe however
2000/// (as can be seen in the `assert_eq!` above).
2001///
2002/// # Examples
2003///
2004/// Write a `usize` value to a byte buffer:
2005///
2006/// ```
2007/// fn write_usize(x: &mut [u8], val: usize) {
2008/// assert!(x.len() >= size_of::<usize>());
2009///
2010/// let ptr = x.as_mut_ptr() as *mut usize;
2011///
2012/// unsafe { ptr.write_unaligned(val) }
2013/// }
2014/// ```
2015#[inline]
2016#[stable(feature = "ptr_unaligned", since = "1.17.0")]
2017#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_write", since = "1.83.0")]
2018#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_write_unaligned"]
2019#[track_caller]
2020pub const unsafe fn write_unaligned<T>(dst: *mut T, src: T) {
2021 // SAFETY: the caller must guarantee that `dst` is valid for writes.
2022 // `dst` cannot overlap `src` because the caller has mutable access
2023 // to `dst` while `src` is owned by this function.
2024 unsafe {
2025 copy_nonoverlapping((&raw const src) as *const u8, dst as *mut u8, size_of::<T>());
2026 // We are calling the intrinsic directly to avoid function calls in the generated code.
2027 intrinsics::forget(src);
2028 }
2029}
2030
2031/// Performs a volatile read of the value from `src` without moving it.
2032///
2033/// Volatile operations are intended to act on I/O memory. As such, they are considered externally
2034/// observable events (just like syscalls, but less opaque), and are guaranteed to not be elided or
2035/// reordered by the compiler across other externally observable events. With this in mind, there
2036/// are two cases of usage that need to be distinguished:
2037///
2038/// - When a volatile operation is used for memory inside an [allocation], it behaves exactly like
2039/// [`read`], except for the additional guarantee that it won't be elided or reordered (see
2040/// above). This implies that the operation will actually access memory and not e.g. be lowered to
2041/// reusing data from a previous read. Other than that, all the usual rules for memory accesses
2042/// apply (including provenance). In particular, just like in C, whether an operation is volatile
2043/// has no bearing whatsoever on questions involving concurrent accesses from multiple threads.
2044/// Volatile accesses behave exactly like non-atomic accesses in that regard.
2045///
2046/// - Volatile operations, however, may also be used to access memory that is _outside_ of any Rust
2047/// allocation. In this use-case, the pointer does *not* have to be [valid] for reads. This is
2048/// typically used for CPU and peripheral registers that must be accessed via an I/O memory
2049/// mapping, most commonly at fixed addresses reserved by the hardware. These often have special
2050/// semantics associated to their manipulation, and cannot be used as general purpose memory.
2051/// Here, any address value is possible, including 0 and [`usize::MAX`], so long as the semantics
2052/// of such a read are well-defined by the target hardware. The provenance of the pointer is
2053/// irrelevant, and it can be created with [`without_provenance`]. The access must not trap. It
2054/// can cause side-effects, but those must not affect Rust-allocated memory in any way. This
2055/// access is still not considered [atomic], and as such it cannot be used for inter-thread
2056/// synchronization.
2057///
2058/// Note that volatile memory operations where T is a zero-sized type are noops and may be ignored.
2059///
2060/// [allocation]: crate::ptr#allocated-object
2061/// [atomic]: crate::sync::atomic#memory-model-for-atomic-accesses
2062///
2063/// # Safety
2064///
2065/// Like [`read`], `read_volatile` creates a bitwise copy of `T`, regardless of whether `T` is
2066/// [`Copy`]. If `T` is not [`Copy`], using both the returned value and the value at `*src` can
2067/// [violate memory safety][read-ownership]. However, storing non-[`Copy`] types in volatile memory
2068/// is almost certainly incorrect.
2069///
2070/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
2071///
2072/// * `src` must be either [valid] for reads, or it must point to memory outside of all Rust
2073/// allocations and reading from that memory must:
2074/// - not trap, and
2075/// - not cause any memory inside a Rust allocation to be modified.
2076///
2077/// * `src` must be properly aligned.
2078///
2079/// * Reading from `src` must produce a properly initialized value of type `T`.
2080///
2081/// Note that even if `T` has size `0`, the pointer must be properly aligned.
2082///
2083/// [valid]: self#safety
2084/// [read-ownership]: read#ownership-of-the-returned-value
2085///
2086/// # Examples
2087///
2088/// Basic usage:
2089///
2090/// ```
2091/// let x = 12;
2092/// let y = &x as *const i32;
2093///
2094/// unsafe {
2095/// assert_eq!(std::ptr::read_volatile(y), 12);
2096/// }
2097/// ```
2098#[inline]
2099#[stable(feature = "volatile", since = "1.9.0")]
2100#[track_caller]
2101#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_read_volatile"]
2102pub unsafe fn read_volatile<T>(src: *const T) -> T {
2103 // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for `volatile_load`.
2104 unsafe {
2105 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
2106 check_language_ub,
2107 "ptr::read_volatile requires that the pointer argument is aligned",
2108 (
2109 addr: *const () = src as *const (),
2110 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
2111 ) => ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned(addr, align)
2112 );
2113 intrinsics::volatile_load(src)
2114 }
2115}
2116
2117/// Performs a volatile write of a memory location with the given value without reading or dropping
2118/// the old value.
2119///
2120/// Volatile operations are intended to act on I/O memory. As such, they are considered externally
2121/// observable events (just like syscalls), and are guaranteed to not be elided or reordered by the
2122/// compiler across other externally observable events. With this in mind, there are two cases of
2123/// usage that need to be distinguished:
2124///
2125/// - When a volatile operation is used for memory inside an [allocation], it behaves exactly like
2126/// [`write`][write()], except for the additional guarantee that it won't be elided or reordered
2127/// (see above). This implies that the operation will actually access memory and not e.g. be
2128/// lowered to a register access. Other than that, all the usual rules for memory accesses apply
2129/// (including provenance). In particular, just like in C, whether an operation is volatile has no
2130/// bearing whatsoever on questions involving concurrent access from multiple threads. Volatile
2131/// accesses behave exactly like non-atomic accesses in that regard.
2132///
2133/// - Volatile operations, however, may also be used to access memory that is _outside_ of any Rust
2134/// allocation. In this use-case, the pointer does *not* have to be [valid] for writes. This is
2135/// typically used for CPU and peripheral registers that must be accessed via an I/O memory
2136/// mapping, most commonly at fixed addresses reserved by the hardware. These often have special
2137/// semantics associated to their manipulation, and cannot be used as general purpose memory.
2138/// Here, any address value is possible, including 0 and [`usize::MAX`], so long as the semantics
2139/// of such a write are well-defined by the target hardware. The provenance of the pointer is
2140/// irrelevant, and it can be created with [`without_provenance`]. The access must not trap. It
2141/// can cause side-effects, but those must not affect Rust-allocated memory in any way. This
2142/// access is still not considered [atomic], and as such it cannot be used for inter-thread
2143/// synchronization.
2144///
2145/// Note that volatile memory operations on zero-sized types (e.g., if a zero-sized type is passed
2146/// to `write_volatile`) are noops and may be ignored.
2147///
2148/// `write_volatile` does not drop the contents of `dst`. This is safe, but it could leak
2149/// allocations or resources, so care should be taken not to overwrite an object that should be
2150/// dropped when operating on Rust memory. Additionally, it does not drop `src`. Semantically, `src`
2151/// is moved into the location pointed to by `dst`.
2152///
2153/// [allocation]: crate::ptr#allocated-object
2154/// [atomic]: crate::sync::atomic#memory-model-for-atomic-accesses
2155///
2156/// # Safety
2157///
2158/// Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated:
2159///
2160/// * `dst` must be either [valid] for writes, or it must point to memory outside of all Rust
2161/// allocations and writing to that memory must:
2162/// - not trap, and
2163/// - not cause any memory inside a Rust allocation to be modified.
2164///
2165/// * `dst` must be properly aligned.
2166///
2167/// Note that even if `T` has size `0`, the pointer must be properly aligned.
2168///
2169/// [valid]: self#safety
2170///
2171/// # Examples
2172///
2173/// Basic usage:
2174///
2175/// ```
2176/// let mut x = 0;
2177/// let y = &mut x as *mut i32;
2178/// let z = 12;
2179///
2180/// unsafe {
2181/// std::ptr::write_volatile(y, z);
2182/// assert_eq!(std::ptr::read_volatile(y), 12);
2183/// }
2184/// ```
2185#[inline]
2186#[stable(feature = "volatile", since = "1.9.0")]
2187#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_write_volatile"]
2188#[track_caller]
2189pub unsafe fn write_volatile<T>(dst: *mut T, src: T) {
2190 // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for `volatile_store`.
2191 unsafe {
2192 ub_checks::assert_unsafe_precondition!(
2193 check_language_ub,
2194 "ptr::write_volatile requires that the pointer argument is aligned",
2195 (
2196 addr: *mut () = dst as *mut (),
2197 align: usize = align_of::<T>(),
2198 ) => ub_checks::maybe_is_aligned(addr, align)
2199 );
2200 intrinsics::volatile_store(dst, src);
2201 }
2202}
2203
2204/// Align pointer `p`.
2205///
2206/// Calculate offset (in terms of elements of `size_of::<T>()` stride) that has to be applied
2207/// to pointer `p` so that pointer `p` would get aligned to `a`.
2208///
2209/// # Safety
2210/// `a` must be a power of two.
2211///
2212/// # Notes
2213/// This implementation has been carefully tailored to not panic. It is UB for this to panic.
2214/// The only real change that can be made here is change of `INV_TABLE_MOD_16` and associated
2215/// constants.
2216///
2217/// If we ever decide to make it possible to call the intrinsic with `a` that is not a
2218/// power-of-two, it will probably be more prudent to just change to a naive implementation rather
2219/// than trying to adapt this to accommodate that change.
2220///
2221/// Any questions go to @nagisa.
2222#[allow(ptr_to_integer_transmute_in_consts)]
2223pub(crate) unsafe fn align_offset<T: Sized>(p: *const T, a: usize) -> usize {
2224 // FIXME(#75598): Direct use of these intrinsics improves codegen significantly at opt-level <=
2225 // 1, where the method versions of these operations are not inlined.
2226 use intrinsics::{
2227 assume, cttz_nonzero, exact_div, mul_with_overflow, unchecked_rem, unchecked_shl,
2228 unchecked_shr, unchecked_sub, wrapping_add, wrapping_mul, wrapping_sub,
2229 };
2230
2231 /// Calculate multiplicative modular inverse of `x` modulo `m`.
2232 ///
2233 /// This implementation is tailored for `align_offset` and has following preconditions:
2234 ///
2235 /// * `m` is a power-of-two;
2236 /// * `x < m`; (if `x ≥ m`, pass in `x % m` instead)
2237 ///
2238 /// Implementation of this function shall not panic. Ever.
2239 #[inline]
2240 const unsafe fn mod_inv(x: usize, m: usize) -> usize {
2241 /// Multiplicative modular inverse table modulo 2⁴ = 16.
2242 ///
2243 /// Note, that this table does not contain values where inverse does not exist (i.e., for
2244 /// `0⁻¹ mod 16`, `2⁻¹ mod 16`, etc.)
2245 const INV_TABLE_MOD_16: [u8; 8] = [1, 11, 13, 7, 9, 3, 5, 15];
2246 /// Modulo for which the `INV_TABLE_MOD_16` is intended.
2247 const INV_TABLE_MOD: usize = 16;
2248
2249 // SAFETY: `m` is required to be a power-of-two, hence non-zero.
2250 let m_minus_one = unsafe { unchecked_sub(m, 1) };
2251 let mut inverse = INV_TABLE_MOD_16[(x & (INV_TABLE_MOD - 1)) >> 1] as usize;
2252 let mut mod_gate = INV_TABLE_MOD;
2253 // We iterate "up" using the following formula:
2254 //
2255 // $$ xy ≡ 1 (mod 2ⁿ) → xy (2 - xy) ≡ 1 (mod 2²ⁿ) $$
2256 //
2257 // This application needs to be applied at least until `2²ⁿ ≥ m`, at which point we can
2258 // finally reduce the computation to our desired `m` by taking `inverse mod m`.
2259 //
2260 // This computation is `O(log log m)`, which is to say, that on 64-bit machines this loop
2261 // will always finish in at most 4 iterations.
2262 loop {
2263 // y = y * (2 - xy) mod n
2264 //
2265 // Note, that we use wrapping operations here intentionally – the original formula
2266 // uses e.g., subtraction `mod n`. It is entirely fine to do them `mod
2267 // usize::MAX` instead, because we take the result `mod n` at the end
2268 // anyway.
2269 if mod_gate >= m {
2270 break;
2271 }
2272 inverse = wrapping_mul(inverse, wrapping_sub(2usize, wrapping_mul(x, inverse)));
2273 let (new_gate, overflow) = mul_with_overflow(mod_gate, mod_gate);
2274 if overflow {
2275 break;
2276 }
2277 mod_gate = new_gate;
2278 }
2279 inverse & m_minus_one
2280 }
2281
2282 let stride = size_of::<T>();
2283
2284 let addr: usize = p.addr();
2285
2286 // SAFETY: `a` is a power-of-two, therefore non-zero.
2287 let a_minus_one = unsafe { unchecked_sub(a, 1) };
2288
2289 if stride == 0 {
2290 // SPECIAL_CASE: handle 0-sized types. No matter how many times we step, the address will
2291 // stay the same, so no offset will be able to align the pointer unless it is already
2292 // aligned. This branch _will_ be optimized out as `stride` is known at compile-time.
2293 let p_mod_a = addr & a_minus_one;
2294 return if p_mod_a == 0 { 0 } else { usize::MAX };
2295 }
2296
2297 // SAFETY: `stride == 0` case has been handled by the special case above.
2298 let a_mod_stride = unsafe { unchecked_rem(a, stride) };
2299 if a_mod_stride == 0 {
2300 // SPECIAL_CASE: In cases where the `a` is divisible by `stride`, byte offset to align a
2301 // pointer can be computed more simply through `-p (mod a)`. In the off-chance the byte
2302 // offset is not a multiple of `stride`, the input pointer was misaligned and no pointer
2303 // offset will be able to produce a `p` aligned to the specified `a`.
2304 //
2305 // The naive `-p (mod a)` equation inhibits LLVM's ability to select instructions
2306 // like `lea`. We compute `(round_up_to_next_alignment(p, a) - p)` instead. This
2307 // redistributes operations around the load-bearing, but pessimizing `and` instruction
2308 // sufficiently for LLVM to be able to utilize the various optimizations it knows about.
2309 //
2310 // LLVM handles the branch here particularly nicely. If this branch needs to be evaluated
2311 // at runtime, it will produce a mask `if addr_mod_stride == 0 { 0 } else { usize::MAX }`
2312 // in a branch-free way and then bitwise-OR it with whatever result the `-p mod a`
2313 // computation produces.
2314
2315 let aligned_address = wrapping_add(addr, a_minus_one) & wrapping_sub(0, a);
2316 let byte_offset = wrapping_sub(aligned_address, addr);
2317 // FIXME: Remove the assume after <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62502>
2318 // SAFETY: Masking by `-a` can only affect the low bits, and thus cannot have reduced
2319 // the value by more than `a-1`, so even though the intermediate values might have
2320 // wrapped, the byte_offset is always in `[0, a)`.
2321 unsafe { assume(byte_offset < a) };
2322
2323 // SAFETY: `stride == 0` case has been handled by the special case above.
2324 let addr_mod_stride = unsafe { unchecked_rem(addr, stride) };
2325
2326 return if addr_mod_stride == 0 {
2327 // SAFETY: `stride` is non-zero. This is guaranteed to divide exactly as well, because
2328 // addr has been verified to be aligned to the original type’s alignment requirements.
2329 unsafe { exact_div(byte_offset, stride) }
2330 } else {
2331 usize::MAX
2332 };
2333 }
2334
2335 // GENERAL_CASE: From here on we’re handling the very general case where `addr` may be
2336 // misaligned, there isn’t an obvious relationship between `stride` and `a` that we can take an
2337 // advantage of, etc. This case produces machine code that isn’t particularly high quality,
2338 // compared to the special cases above. The code produced here is still within the realm of
2339 // miracles, given the situations this case has to deal with.
2340
2341 // SAFETY: a is power-of-two hence non-zero. stride == 0 case is handled above.
2342 // FIXME(const-hack) replace with min
2343 let gcdpow = unsafe {
2344 let x = cttz_nonzero(stride);
2345 let y = cttz_nonzero(a);
2346 if x < y { x } else { y }
2347 };
2348 // SAFETY: gcdpow has an upper-bound that’s at most the number of bits in a `usize`.
2349 let gcd = unsafe { unchecked_shl(1usize, gcdpow) };
2350 // SAFETY: gcd is always greater or equal to 1.
2351 if addr & unsafe { unchecked_sub(gcd, 1) } == 0 {
2352 // This branch solves for the following linear congruence equation:
2353 //
2354 // ` p + so = 0 mod a `
2355 //
2356 // `p` here is the pointer value, `s` - stride of `T`, `o` offset in `T`s, and `a` - the
2357 // requested alignment.
2358 //
2359 // With `g = gcd(a, s)`, and the above condition asserting that `p` is also divisible by
2360 // `g`, we can denote `a' = a/g`, `s' = s/g`, `p' = p/g`, then this becomes equivalent to:
2361 //
2362 // ` p' + s'o = 0 mod a' `
2363 // ` o = (a' - (p' mod a')) * (s'^-1 mod a') `
2364 //
2365 // The first term is "the relative alignment of `p` to `a`" (divided by the `g`), the
2366 // second term is "how does incrementing `p` by `s` bytes change the relative alignment of
2367 // `p`" (again divided by `g`). Division by `g` is necessary to make the inverse well
2368 // formed if `a` and `s` are not co-prime.
2369 //
2370 // Furthermore, the result produced by this solution is not "minimal", so it is necessary
2371 // to take the result `o mod lcm(s, a)`. This `lcm(s, a)` is the same as `a'`.
2372
2373 // SAFETY: `gcdpow` has an upper-bound not greater than the number of trailing 0-bits in
2374 // `a`.
2375 let a2 = unsafe { unchecked_shr(a, gcdpow) };
2376 // SAFETY: `a2` is non-zero. Shifting `a` by `gcdpow` cannot shift out any of the set bits
2377 // in `a` (of which it has exactly one).
2378 let a2minus1 = unsafe { unchecked_sub(a2, 1) };
2379 // SAFETY: `gcdpow` has an upper-bound not greater than the number of trailing 0-bits in
2380 // `a`.
2381 let s2 = unsafe { unchecked_shr(stride & a_minus_one, gcdpow) };
2382 // SAFETY: `gcdpow` has an upper-bound not greater than the number of trailing 0-bits in
2383 // `a`. Furthermore, the subtraction cannot overflow, because `a2 = a >> gcdpow` will
2384 // always be strictly greater than `(p % a) >> gcdpow`.
2385 let minusp2 = unsafe { unchecked_sub(a2, unchecked_shr(addr & a_minus_one, gcdpow)) };
2386 // SAFETY: `a2` is a power-of-two, as proven above. `s2` is strictly less than `a2`
2387 // because `(s % a) >> gcdpow` is strictly less than `a >> gcdpow`.
2388 return wrapping_mul(minusp2, unsafe { mod_inv(s2, a2) }) & a2minus1;
2389 }
2390
2391 // Cannot be aligned at all.
2392 usize::MAX
2393}
2394
2395/// Compares raw pointers for equality.
2396///
2397/// This is the same as using the `==` operator, but less generic:
2398/// the arguments have to be `*const T` raw pointers,
2399/// not anything that implements `PartialEq`.
2400///
2401/// This can be used to compare `&T` references (which coerce to `*const T` implicitly)
2402/// by their address rather than comparing the values they point to
2403/// (which is what the `PartialEq for &T` implementation does).
2404///
2405/// When comparing wide pointers, both the address and the metadata are tested for equality.
2406/// However, note that comparing trait object pointers (`*const dyn Trait`) is unreliable: pointers
2407/// to values of the same underlying type can compare inequal (because vtables are duplicated in
2408/// multiple codegen units), and pointers to values of *different* underlying type can compare equal
2409/// (since identical vtables can be deduplicated within a codegen unit).
2410///
2411/// # Examples
2412///
2413/// ```
2414/// use std::ptr;
2415///
2416/// let five = 5;
2417/// let other_five = 5;
2418/// let five_ref = &five;
2419/// let same_five_ref = &five;
2420/// let other_five_ref = &other_five;
2421///
2422/// assert!(five_ref == same_five_ref);
2423/// assert!(ptr::eq(five_ref, same_five_ref));
2424///
2425/// assert!(five_ref == other_five_ref);
2426/// assert!(!ptr::eq(five_ref, other_five_ref));
2427/// ```
2428///
2429/// Slices are also compared by their length (fat pointers):
2430///
2431/// ```
2432/// let a = [1, 2, 3];
2433/// assert!(std::ptr::eq(&a[..3], &a[..3]));
2434/// assert!(!std::ptr::eq(&a[..2], &a[..3]));
2435/// assert!(!std::ptr::eq(&a[0..2], &a[1..3]));
2436/// ```
2437#[stable(feature = "ptr_eq", since = "1.17.0")]
2438#[inline(always)]
2439#[must_use = "pointer comparison produces a value"]
2440#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "ptr_eq"]
2441#[allow(ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons)] // it's actually clear here
2442pub fn eq<T: PointeeSized>(a: *const T, b: *const T) -> bool {
2443 a == b
2444}
2445
2446/// Compares the *addresses* of the two pointers for equality,
2447/// ignoring any metadata in fat pointers.
2448///
2449/// If the arguments are thin pointers of the same type,
2450/// then this is the same as [`eq`].
2451///
2452/// # Examples
2453///
2454/// ```
2455/// use std::ptr;
2456///
2457/// let whole: &[i32; 3] = &[1, 2, 3];
2458/// let first: &i32 = &whole[0];
2459///
2460/// assert!(ptr::addr_eq(whole, first));
2461/// assert!(!ptr::eq::<dyn std::fmt::Debug>(whole, first));
2462/// ```
2463#[stable(feature = "ptr_addr_eq", since = "1.76.0")]
2464#[inline(always)]
2465#[must_use = "pointer comparison produces a value"]
2466pub fn addr_eq<T: PointeeSized, U: PointeeSized>(p: *const T, q: *const U) -> bool {
2467 (p as *const ()) == (q as *const ())
2468}
2469
2470/// Compares the *addresses* of the two function pointers for equality.
2471///
2472/// This is the same as `f == g`, but using this function makes clear that the potentially
2473/// surprising semantics of function pointer comparison are involved.
2474///
2475/// There are **very few guarantees** about how functions are compiled and they have no intrinsic
2476/// “identity”; in particular, this comparison:
2477///
2478/// * May return `true` unexpectedly, in cases where functions are equivalent.
2479///
2480/// For example, the following program is likely (but not guaranteed) to print `(true, true)`
2481/// when compiled with optimization:
2482///
2483/// ```
2484/// let f: fn(i32) -> i32 = |x| x;
2485/// let g: fn(i32) -> i32 = |x| x + 0; // different closure, different body
2486/// let h: fn(u32) -> u32 = |x| x + 0; // different signature too
2487/// dbg!(std::ptr::fn_addr_eq(f, g), std::ptr::fn_addr_eq(f, h)); // not guaranteed to be equal
2488/// ```
2489///
2490/// * May return `false` in any case.
2491///
2492/// This is particularly likely with generic functions but may happen with any function.
2493/// (From an implementation perspective, this is possible because functions may sometimes be
2494/// processed more than once by the compiler, resulting in duplicate machine code.)
2495///
2496/// Despite these false positives and false negatives, this comparison can still be useful.
2497/// Specifically, if
2498///
2499/// * `T` is the same type as `U`, `T` is a [subtype] of `U`, or `U` is a [subtype] of `T`, and
2500/// * `ptr::fn_addr_eq(f, g)` returns true,
2501///
2502/// then calling `f` and calling `g` will be equivalent.
2503///
2504///
2505/// # Examples
2506///
2507/// ```
2508/// use std::ptr;
2509///
2510/// fn a() { println!("a"); }
2511/// fn b() { println!("b"); }
2512/// assert!(!ptr::fn_addr_eq(a as fn(), b as fn()));
2513/// ```
2514///
2515/// [subtype]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/subtyping.html
2516#[stable(feature = "ptr_fn_addr_eq", since = "1.85.0")]
2517#[inline(always)]
2518#[must_use = "function pointer comparison produces a value"]
2519pub fn fn_addr_eq<T: FnPtr, U: FnPtr>(f: T, g: U) -> bool {
2520 f.addr() == g.addr()
2521}
2522
2523/// Hash a raw pointer.
2524///
2525/// This can be used to hash a `&T` reference (which coerces to `*const T` implicitly)
2526/// by its address rather than the value it points to
2527/// (which is what the `Hash for &T` implementation does).
2528///
2529/// # Examples
2530///
2531/// ```
2532/// use std::hash::{DefaultHasher, Hash, Hasher};
2533/// use std::ptr;
2534///
2535/// let five = 5;
2536/// let five_ref = &five;
2537///
2538/// let mut hasher = DefaultHasher::new();
2539/// ptr::hash(five_ref, &mut hasher);
2540/// let actual = hasher.finish();
2541///
2542/// let mut hasher = DefaultHasher::new();
2543/// (five_ref as *const i32).hash(&mut hasher);
2544/// let expected = hasher.finish();
2545///
2546/// assert_eq!(actual, expected);
2547/// ```
2548#[stable(feature = "ptr_hash", since = "1.35.0")]
2549pub fn hash<T: PointeeSized, S: hash::Hasher>(hashee: *const T, into: &mut S) {
2550 use crate::hash::Hash;
2551 hashee.hash(into);
2552}
2553
2554#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2555impl<F: FnPtr> PartialEq for F {
2556 #[inline]
2557 fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
2558 self.addr() == other.addr()
2559 }
2560}
2561#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2562impl<F: FnPtr> Eq for F {}
2563
2564#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2565impl<F: FnPtr> PartialOrd for F {
2566 #[inline]
2567 fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> {
2568 self.addr().partial_cmp(&other.addr())
2569 }
2570}
2571#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2572impl<F: FnPtr> Ord for F {
2573 #[inline]
2574 fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering {
2575 self.addr().cmp(&other.addr())
2576 }
2577}
2578
2579#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2580impl<F: FnPtr> hash::Hash for F {
2581 fn hash<HH: hash::Hasher>(&self, state: &mut HH) {
2582 state.write_usize(self.addr() as _)
2583 }
2584}
2585
2586#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2587impl<F: FnPtr> fmt::Pointer for F {
2588 fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
2589 fmt::pointer_fmt_inner(self.addr() as _, f)
2590 }
2591}
2592
2593#[stable(feature = "fnptr_impls", since = "1.4.0")]
2594impl<F: FnPtr> fmt::Debug for F {
2595 fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
2596 fmt::pointer_fmt_inner(self.addr() as _, f)
2597 }
2598}
2599
2600/// Creates a `const` raw pointer to a place, without creating an intermediate reference.
2601///
2602/// `addr_of!(expr)` is equivalent to `&raw const expr`. The macro is *soft-deprecated*;
2603/// use `&raw const` instead.
2604///
2605/// It is still an open question under which conditions writing through an `addr_of!`-created
2606/// pointer is permitted. If the place `expr` evaluates to is based on a raw pointer, then the
2607/// result of `addr_of!` inherits all permissions from that raw pointer. However, if the place is
2608/// based on a reference, local variable, or `static`, then until all details are decided, the same
2609/// rules as for shared references apply: it is UB to write through a pointer created with this
2610/// operation, except for bytes located inside an `UnsafeCell`. Use `&raw mut` (or [`addr_of_mut`])
2611/// to create a raw pointer that definitely permits mutation.
2612///
2613/// Creating a reference with `&`/`&mut` is only allowed if the pointer is properly aligned
2614/// and points to initialized data. For cases where those requirements do not hold,
2615/// raw pointers should be used instead. However, `&expr as *const _` creates a reference
2616/// before casting it to a raw pointer, and that reference is subject to the same rules
2617/// as all other references. This macro can create a raw pointer *without* creating
2618/// a reference first.
2619///
2620/// See [`addr_of_mut`] for how to create a pointer to uninitialized data.
2621/// Doing that with `addr_of` would not make much sense since one could only
2622/// read the data, and that would be Undefined Behavior.
2623///
2624/// # Safety
2625///
2626/// The `expr` in `addr_of!(expr)` is evaluated as a place expression, but never loads from the
2627/// place or requires the place to be dereferenceable. This means that `addr_of!((*ptr).field)`
2628/// still requires the projection to `field` to be in-bounds, using the same rules as [`offset`].
2629/// However, `addr_of!(*ptr)` is defined behavior even if `ptr` is null, dangling, or misaligned.
2630///
2631/// Note that `Deref`/`Index` coercions (and their mutable counterparts) are applied inside
2632/// `addr_of!` like everywhere else, in which case a reference is created to call `Deref::deref` or
2633/// `Index::index`, respectively. The statements above only apply when no such coercions are
2634/// applied.
2635///
2636/// [`offset`]: pointer::offset
2637///
2638/// # Example
2639///
2640/// **Correct usage: Creating a pointer to unaligned data**
2641///
2642/// ```
2643/// use std::ptr;
2644///
2645/// #[repr(packed)]
2646/// struct Packed {
2647/// f1: u8,
2648/// f2: u16,
2649/// }
2650///
2651/// let packed = Packed { f1: 1, f2: 2 };
2652/// // `&packed.f2` would create an unaligned reference, and thus be Undefined Behavior!
2653/// let raw_f2 = ptr::addr_of!(packed.f2);
2654/// assert_eq!(unsafe { raw_f2.read_unaligned() }, 2);
2655/// ```
2656///
2657/// **Incorrect usage: Out-of-bounds fields projection**
2658///
2659/// ```rust,no_run
2660/// use std::ptr;
2661///
2662/// #[repr(C)]
2663/// struct MyStruct {
2664/// field1: i32,
2665/// field2: i32,
2666/// }
2667///
2668/// let ptr: *const MyStruct = ptr::null();
2669/// let fieldptr = unsafe { ptr::addr_of!((*ptr).field2) }; // Undefined Behavior ⚠️
2670/// ```
2671///
2672/// The field projection `.field2` would offset the pointer by 4 bytes,
2673/// but the pointer is not in-bounds of an allocation for 4 bytes,
2674/// so this offset is Undefined Behavior.
2675/// See the [`offset`] docs for a full list of requirements for inbounds pointer arithmetic; the
2676/// same requirements apply to field projections, even inside `addr_of!`. (In particular, it makes
2677/// no difference whether the pointer is null or dangling.)
2678#[stable(feature = "raw_ref_macros", since = "1.51.0")]
2679#[rustc_macro_transparency = "semitransparent"]
2680pub macro addr_of($place:expr) {
2681 &raw const $place
2682}
2683
2684/// Creates a `mut` raw pointer to a place, without creating an intermediate reference.
2685///
2686/// `addr_of_mut!(expr)` is equivalent to `&raw mut expr`. The macro is *soft-deprecated*;
2687/// use `&raw mut` instead.
2688///
2689/// Creating a reference with `&`/`&mut` is only allowed if the pointer is properly aligned
2690/// and points to initialized data. For cases where those requirements do not hold,
2691/// raw pointers should be used instead. However, `&mut expr as *mut _` creates a reference
2692/// before casting it to a raw pointer, and that reference is subject to the same rules
2693/// as all other references. This macro can create a raw pointer *without* creating
2694/// a reference first.
2695///
2696/// # Safety
2697///
2698/// The `expr` in `addr_of_mut!(expr)` is evaluated as a place expression, but never loads from the
2699/// place or requires the place to be dereferenceable. This means that `addr_of_mut!((*ptr).field)`
2700/// still requires the projection to `field` to be in-bounds, using the same rules as [`offset`].
2701/// However, `addr_of_mut!(*ptr)` is defined behavior even if `ptr` is null, dangling, or misaligned.
2702///
2703/// Note that `Deref`/`Index` coercions (and their mutable counterparts) are applied inside
2704/// `addr_of_mut!` like everywhere else, in which case a reference is created to call `Deref::deref`
2705/// or `Index::index`, respectively. The statements above only apply when no such coercions are
2706/// applied.
2707///
2708/// [`offset`]: pointer::offset
2709///
2710/// # Examples
2711///
2712/// **Correct usage: Creating a pointer to unaligned data**
2713///
2714/// ```
2715/// use std::ptr;
2716///
2717/// #[repr(packed)]
2718/// struct Packed {
2719/// f1: u8,
2720/// f2: u16,
2721/// }
2722///
2723/// let mut packed = Packed { f1: 1, f2: 2 };
2724/// // `&mut packed.f2` would create an unaligned reference, and thus be Undefined Behavior!
2725/// let raw_f2 = ptr::addr_of_mut!(packed.f2);
2726/// unsafe { raw_f2.write_unaligned(42); }
2727/// assert_eq!({packed.f2}, 42); // `{...}` forces copying the field instead of creating a reference.
2728/// ```
2729///
2730/// **Correct usage: Creating a pointer to uninitialized data**
2731///
2732/// ```rust
2733/// use std::{ptr, mem::MaybeUninit};
2734///
2735/// struct Demo {
2736/// field: bool,
2737/// }
2738///
2739/// let mut uninit = MaybeUninit::<Demo>::uninit();
2740/// // `&uninit.as_mut().field` would create a reference to an uninitialized `bool`,
2741/// // and thus be Undefined Behavior!
2742/// let f1_ptr = unsafe { ptr::addr_of_mut!((*uninit.as_mut_ptr()).field) };
2743/// unsafe { f1_ptr.write(true); }
2744/// let init = unsafe { uninit.assume_init() };
2745/// ```
2746///
2747/// **Incorrect usage: Out-of-bounds fields projection**
2748///
2749/// ```rust,no_run
2750/// use std::ptr;
2751///
2752/// #[repr(C)]
2753/// struct MyStruct {
2754/// field1: i32,
2755/// field2: i32,
2756/// }
2757///
2758/// let ptr: *mut MyStruct = ptr::null_mut();
2759/// let fieldptr = unsafe { ptr::addr_of_mut!((*ptr).field2) }; // Undefined Behavior ⚠️
2760/// ```
2761///
2762/// The field projection `.field2` would offset the pointer by 4 bytes,
2763/// but the pointer is not in-bounds of an allocation for 4 bytes,
2764/// so this offset is Undefined Behavior.
2765/// See the [`offset`] docs for a full list of requirements for inbounds pointer arithmetic; the
2766/// same requirements apply to field projections, even inside `addr_of_mut!`. (In particular, it
2767/// makes no difference whether the pointer is null or dangling.)
2768#[stable(feature = "raw_ref_macros", since = "1.51.0")]
2769#[rustc_macro_transparency = "semitransparent"]
2770pub macro addr_of_mut($place:expr) {
2771 &raw mut $place
2772}