Abstract
In this study, we assessed six Oklahoma streams for Enterococcus sediment and water concentrations along with water quality, sediment, hydrologic and geographical factors. We also conducted a microcosm experiment from two stream sediments to evaluate Enterococcus survivability under stable laboratory conditions. Stream sites exhibited common relationships between Enterococcus and other environmental factors, including significant correlations to antecedent dry period, Escherichia coli, impervious area, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity. These correlations were found for Enterococcus in both water and sediment. Specifically for Enterococcus in sediment, concentrations were also significantly correlated to turbidity and sediment percent organic matter, but not to hydrological conditions. Conversely, concentrations of Enterococcus in water exhibited significant moderate correlations to precipitation, antecedent dry period, drainage area, impervious area, and discharge, as well as streambed particle size. High variability between geographical attributes and stream conditions increased uncertainties and relationships between Enterococcus concentrations in the stream among most factors. However, when grouping sites by similar watershed and sediment characteristics, strong significant relationships for water-quality parameters and Enterococcus concentrations in water and sediment were observed. The microcosm study indicated that sediment Enterococcus concentrations for two streams with contrasting sediment properties were stable, except for a considerable increase between day 0 and day 1, with no decay shown for a 31 day period. Collectively, our field and laboratory results revealed that Enterococcus can survive for extended periods under both dynamic and stable sediment and water conditions, and that environmental factors can be used to characterize freshwater streams and rivers for Enterococcus concentrations in freshwater streams and rivers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anderson KL, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ (2005) Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(6):3041–3048. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.6.3041-3048.2005
Badgley BD, Nayak BS, Harwood VJ (2010) The importance of sediment and submerged aquatic vegetation as potential habitats for persistent strains of enterococci in a subtropical watershed. Water Res 44(20):5857–5866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.005
Baird R et al (2012) Standard methods for the analysis of water and wastewater (22nd edn.) Section 9223B and 2540D: Washington, D.C. American Public Health Association, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation
Ball DF (1964) Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. J Soil Sci 15:84–92
Boehm AB, Sassoubre LM (2014) Enterococci as indicators of environmental fecal contamination. In: Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection [Internet]. Massachusetts eye and ear infirmary. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK190421/. Accessed 12 Aug 2022
Bojarczuk A, Jelonkiewicz Ł, Lenart-Boroń A (2018) The effect of anthropogenic and natural factors on the prevalence of physicochemical parameters of water and bacterial water quality indicators along the river Białka, southern Poland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(10):10102–10114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1212-2
Bradshaw JK, Snyder BJ, Oladeinde A, Spidle D, Berrang ME, Meinersmann RJ, Oakley B, Sidle RC, Sullivan K, Molina M (2016) Characterizing relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, microbial source tracking markers, and associated waterborne pathogen occurrence in stream water and sediments in a mixed land use watershed. Water Res 101:498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.014
Brinkmeyer R, Amon RMW, Schwarz JR, Saxton T, Roberts D, Harrison S, Ellis N, Fox J, DiGuardi K, Hochman M, Duan S, Stein R, Elliott C (2015) Distribution and persistence of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in stream bed and bank sediments from two urban streams in Houston, TX. Sci Total Environ 502:650–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.071
Brock FV, Crawford KC, Elliott RL, Cuperus GW, Stadler SJ, Johnson HL, Eilts MD (1995) The Oklahoma Mesonet: a technical overview. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 12:5–19
Byappanahalli MN, Nevers MB, Korajkic A, Staley ZR, Harwood VJ (2012) Enterococci in the environment. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76(4):685–706. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00023-12
Chen HJ, Chang H (2014) Response of discharge, TSS, and E. coli to rainfall events in urban, suburban, and rural watersheds. Environ Sci 16(10):2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00327F
Cloutier DD, McLellan SL (2017) Distribution and differential survival of traditional and alternative indicators of fecal pollution at freshwater beaches. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02881-16
Chithra SV, Nair MH, Amarnath A, Anjana NS (2015) Impacts of impervious surfaces on the environment. Int J Eng Sci Invention 4(5):27–31
Christian L, Epps T, Diab G, Hathaway J (2020) Pollutant concentration patterns of in-stream urban stormwater runoff. Water 12(9):2534. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092534
Devane ML, Moriarty E, Weaver L, Cookson A, Gilpin B (2020) Fecal indicator bacteria from environmental sources; strategies for identification to improve water quality monitoring. Water Res 185:116204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116204
Dila DK, Corsi SR, Lenaker PL, Baldwin AK, Bootsma MJ, McLellan SL (2018) Patterns of host-associated fecal indicators driven by hydrology, precipitation, and land use attributes in great lakes watersheds. Environ Sci Technol 52(20):11500–11509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01945
Economy LM, Wiegner TN, Strauch AM, Awaya JD, Gerken T (2019) Rainfall and streamflow effects on estuarine Staphylococcus aureus and fecal indicator bacteria concentrations. J Environ Qual 48(6):1711–1721. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2019.05.0196
Garbrecht J, Van Liew M et al (2004) Trends in precipitation, streamflow, and evapotranspiration in the Great Plains of the United States. J Hydrol Eng 9(5):360–367
Garzio-Hadzick A, Shelton DR, Hill RL, Pachepsky YA, Guber AK, Rowland R (2010) Survival of manure-borne E. coli in streambed sediment: effects of temperature and sediment properties. Water Res 44(9):2753–2762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.011
Grant SB, Litton-Mueller RM, Ahn JH (2011) Measuring and modeling the flux of fecal bacteria across the sediment-water interface in a turbulent stream. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009460
Haller L, Amedegnato E, Poté J, Wildi W (2009) Influence of freshwater sediment characteristics on persistence of fecal indicator bacteria. Water Air Soil Pollut 203(1):217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0005-0
Helsel DR, Hirsch RM, Ryberg KR, Archfield SA, Gilroy EJ (2020) Statistical methods in water resources: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 4, chap. A3, 458 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4a3
Holcomb DA, Stewart JR (2020) Microbial indicators of fecal pollution: recent progress and challenges in assessing water quality. Curr Environ Health Rep 7(3):311–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00278-1
Ibekwe AM, Lesch SM, Bold RM, Leddy MB, Graves AK (2011) Variations of indicator bacteria in a large urban watershed. Trans ASABE 54:10
Islam MMM, Hofstra N, Islam MdA (2017) The Impact of environmental variables on Faecal indicator bacteria in the Betna River Basin. Bangladesh Environ Processes 4(2):319–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0239-6
Jin G, Englande AJ, Bradford H, Jeng H-W (2004) Comparison of E. coli, Enterococci, and Fecal Coliform as indicators for Brackish water quality assessment. Water Environ Res 76(3):245–255. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143004X141807
Kim M, Wuertz S (2015) Survival and persistence of host-associated Bacteroidales cells and DNA in comparison with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus in freshwater sediments as quantified by PMA-qPCR and qPCR. Water Res 87:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.014
Korajkic A, Wanjugi P, Brooks L, Cao Y, Harwood VJ (2019) Persistence and decay of fecal microbiota in aquatic habitats. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 83(4):e00005-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00005-19
Litton RM, Ahn JH, Sercu B, Holden PA, Sedlak DL, Grant SB (2010) Evaluation of chemical, molecular, and traditional markers of Fecal contamination in an effluent dominated urban stream (world). American Chemical Society, ACS Publications. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101092g
McPherson RA, Fiebrich C, Crawford KC, Elliott RL, Kilby JR, Grimsley DL, Martinez JE, Basara JB, Illston BG, Morris DA, Kloesel KA, Stadler SJ, Melvin AD, Sutherland AJ, Shrivastava H (2007) Statewide monitoring of the mesoscale environment: a technical update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 24:301–321
Myers EM, Juhl AR (2020) Particle association of Enterococcus sp. increases growth rates and simulated persistence in water columns of varying light attenuation and turbulent diffusivity. Water Res 186:116140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116140
ODEQ (Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality). (2020) Water Quality in Oklahoma 2020 Integrated Report. https://www.deq.ok.gov/water-quality-division/watershed-planning/integrated-report/. Accessed 25 June 2022
Odonkor ST, Ampofi JK (2013) Escherichia coli as an indicator of bacteriological quality of water: an overview. Microbiol Res 4:1–11
Ogram A, Castro H, Chauhan A (2007) Methods of soil microbial community analysis, p 652–662. In: Hurst CJ, Crawford RL, Garland JL, Lipson DA, Mills AL, Stetzenbach LD (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology, 3rd edn. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555815882.ch53
OWRB (Oklahoma Water Resources Board) (2017) Oklahoma water quality standards. Oklahoma administrative Code 785:45. oar.state.ok.us. Accessed 25 June 2022
OWRB (Oklahoma Water Resources Board). (2020) Status of Water Quality Monitoring in Oklahoma 2019–2020. https://www.owrb.ok.gov/quality/monitoring/StatusReport.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2022
Petersen F, Hubbart JA (2020) Advancing understanding of land use and physicochemical impacts on fecal contamination in mixed-land-use watersheds. Water 12(4):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041094
Piorkowski GS, Jamieson RC, Hansen LT, Bezanson GS, Yost CK (2014) Characterizing spatial structure of sediment E. coli populations to inform sampling design. Environ Monitor Assess 186(1):277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3373-2
Phillips MC, Solo-Gabriele HM, Reniers AJHM, Wang JD, Kiger RT, Abdel-Mottaleb N (2011) Pore water transport of Enterococci out of beach sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 62(11):2293–2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.049
R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 12 Aug 2022
Schmidt SK, Scow KM (1997) Use of soil bioreactors and microcosms in bioremediation research. In: Hurst CJ, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD, Walter MV (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology. Published by ASM Press, Washington, D.C, pp 822–829
Smith SJ, Esralew RA (2010) StreamStats in Oklahoma—drainage-basin characteristics and peak-flow frequency statistics for ungaged streams (Report No. 2009–5255; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20095255
Staley C, Dunny GM, Sadowsky MJ (2014) Chapter four—environmental and animal-associated Enterococci. In: Sariaslani S, Gadd GM (Eds) Advances in Applied Microbiology (Vol. 87, pp. 147–186). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800261-2.00004-9
Stephenson GR, Rychert RC (1982) Bottom sediment: a reservoir of Escherichia coli in rangeland streams. Rangeland Ecol Manag/j Range Manag Archiv 35(1):119–123
Stocker MD, Rodriguez-Valentín JG, Pachepsky YA, Shelton DR (2016) Spatial and temporal variation of fecal indicator organisms in two creeks in Beltsville. Maryland Water Quality Res J 51(2):167–179. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2016.044
Stocker MD, Smith JE, Hernandez C, Macarisin D, Pachepsky Y (2019) Seasonality of E. coli and Enterococci concentrations in creek water, sediment, and periphyton. Water Air Soil Poll 230(9):223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4263-1
Suter E, Juhl A, O’Mullan G (2011) Particle association of Enterococcus and total bacteria in the lower hudson River Estuary, USA. J Water Resour Proect. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2011.310082
Teixeira P, Salvador D, Brandão J, Ahmed W, Sadowsky MJ, Valério E (2020) Environmental and adaptive changes necessitate a paradigm shift for indicators of fecal contamination. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.ERV-0001-2019
Tiwari A, Kauppinen A, Pitkänen T (2019) Decay of Enterococcus faecalis, Vibrio cholerae and MS2 coliphage in a laboratory mesocosm under brackish beach conditions. Front Public Health 7:269
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1986) Bacteriological Water Quality Criteria for Marine and Fresh Recreational Waters. EPA- 440/5-84-002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Cincinnati, OH, USA
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2010) Sampling and Consideration of Variability (Temporal and Spatial) for Monitoring of Recreational Waters. EPA-823-R-10-005 US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2012) Recreational Water Quality Criteria. Office of Water 820-F-12-058. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/rwqc2012.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2022
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (2014) National field manual for the collection of water-quality data: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chaps. A1-A10. http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A
Zhang X, Zhi X, Chen L, Shen Z (2020) Spatiotemporal variability and key influencing factors of river fecal coliform within a typical complex watershed. Water Res 178:115835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115835
Zimmer-Faust AG, Thulsiraj V, Marambio-Jones C, Cao Y, Griffith JF, Holden PA, Jay JA (2017) Effect of freshwater sediment characteristics on the persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and genetic markers within a Southern California watershed. Water Res 119:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.028
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge contributions from research assistants at the Oklahoma Water Survey: Julie Bahr, Paul Baumann, Hannah Curtis, Alejandra Hernandez-Santana, Derek Kendzor, Kassidy Long, Jacob McDoulett, and Yvette Wiley.
Funding
This research was partially funded by a USGS 104(b) project—2020 OK198B and through research funding provided by the Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of Oklahoma to the Oklahoma Water Survey at the University of Oklahoma.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to study conception and design; GMG and RST: collected and analyzed data; JRV: provided project oversight; GMG wrote the manuscript; all authors edited and reviewed manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Graves, G.M., Vogel, J.R. & Tanner, R.S. Investigation of environmental factors on Enterococcus survival in Oklahoma streams. Aquat Sci 85, 34 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-023-00933-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-023-00933-3