Abstract
The present experiment examined the contribution of locomotor response to novelty and prior exposure to amphetamine to rats’ predisposition to self-administer a low dose of the drug. Rats were screened for their locomotor response to a novel environment and divided into high (HR) or low (LR) responders based on whether their locomotor scores were above or below the median activity level of the subject sample. Animals were then pre-exposed to nine daily injections of either saline (1 ml/kg, IP) or amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg. IP). Starting 1 week after pre-exposure, animals in the four different groups (HR pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine; LR pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine) were given the opportunity, in each of ten daily sessions, to lever press for a low dose of amphetamine (10 µg/kg per infusion) in a two lever (active versus inactive) continuous reinforcement operant task. Initial lever press performance revealed no difference in active versus inactive lever pressing between amphetamine and saline pre-exposed animals. However, in agreement with previous reports, with successive test sessions amphetamine pre-exposed rats maintained higher levels of active versus inactive lever pressing for drug while saline pre-exposed rats showed a progressive decrease in the pressing of either lever. Interestingly, this enhanced active lever pressing was observed in HR but not LR rats pre-exposed to amphetamine. In addition, HR saline pre-exposed animals showed initial active versus inactive lever pressing equivalent to that of HR amphetamine pretreated rats but this enhanced responding for drug diminished over days and by the last day of self-administration was indistinguishable from that of LR animals having been pre-exposed either to amphetamine or saline. These findings confirm that prior exposure to amphetamine promotes the subsequent self-administration of the drug and suggest that response to novelty may be a predictor more closely linked to an animal’s propensity to become sensitized to the facilitatory effects of the drug rather than to an animal’s current sensitization state and predisposition to self-administer the drug.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed SH, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Cador M (1993) Controlling in-terindividual differences in the unconditioned response to amphetamine in the study of environment-dependent sensitization. Behav Pharmacol 4: 355–365
Ahmed SH, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Cador M (1995) Social deprivation enhances the vulnerability of male Wistar rats to stressor-and amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Psycho-pharmacology 117: 116–124
Bozarth, MA (1991) The mesolimbic dopamine system as a model reward system. In: Willner P and Scheel-Kriiger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, New York, pp 301–330
Bradberry CW, Gruen RJ, Berridge CW, Roth, RH (1991) Individual differences in behavioral measures: correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39: 887–892
Crippens, D, Camp, DM, Robinson, TE (1993) Basal extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during amphetamine withdrawal: a “no net flux” microdialysis study. Neurosci Lett 164: 145–148
Deminiere JM, Piazza PV, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Experimental approach to individual vulnerability to psychostimulant addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13: 141–147
Deminiere JM, Piazza PV, Guegan G, Abrous N, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H (1992) Increased locomotor response to novelty and propensity to intravenous self-administration in adult offspring or stressed mothers. Brain Res 586: 135–139
Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48: 581–586
Exner M, Clark D (1993) Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach. Behav Pharmacol 4: 47–56
Gaiardi M, Bartoletti M, Bacchi A, Gubellini C, Costa M, Babbini M (1991) Role of repeated exposure to morphine in determining its affective properties: place and taste conditioning studies in rats. Psychopharmacology 103: 183–186
Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53: 191–196
Haney M, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H, Piazza, PV (1995) Social stress increases the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats. Brain Res 698: 46–52
Henry C, Guegant G, Cador M, Arnauld E, Arsaut J, Le Moal M, Demotes-Mainard J (1995) Prenatal stress in rats facilitates amphetamine-induced sensitization and induces long-lasting changes in dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 685: 179–186
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991a) Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 41: 203–210
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991b) Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38: 467–470
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991c) Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 9: 121–128
Hooks MS, Colvin AC, Juncos JL, Justice JB Jr (1992a) Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis. Brain Res 587: 306–312
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ, Justice JB Jr (1992b) Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine injections. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43: 815–823
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Juncos JL, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1994) Individual differences in schedule-induced and conditioned behaviors. Behav Brain Res 60: 199–209
Horger BA, Shelton K, Schenk S (1990) Pre-exposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37: 707–711
Horger BA, Giles MK, Schenk S (1992) Pre-exposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine. Psychopharmacology 107: 271–276
Jodogne C, Marinelli M, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (1994) Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657: 236–244
Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res Rev 16: 223–244
Kirk RE (1968) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif.
Lett BT (1989) Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine. Psychopharmacology 98: 357–362
Paulson PE, Camp DM, Robinson TE (1991) Time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentrations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Psychopharmacology 103:480–492
Paulson PE, Robinson TE (1995) Amphetamine-induced time-dependent sensitization of dopamine neurotransmission in the dorsal and ventral striatum: a microdialysis study in behaving rats. Synapse 19: 56–65
Piazza PV, Le Moal M (1996) Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress, glucocorticoids and dopaminergic neurons. Annu Rev Toxicol 36:359–378
Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511–1513
Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1990) Stress-and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 514: 22–26
Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Mormede P, Simon H (1991a) Individual vulnerability to drug self-administration: action of corticosterone on dopaminergic systems as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. In: Willner P, Scheel-Krüger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, New York, pp 473–495
Piazza PV, Rouge-Pont F, Deminiere JM, Kharouby M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1991b) Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 567: 169–174
Piazza PV, Mittleman G, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Relationship between schedule-induced polydipsia and amphetamine intravenous self-administration, individual differences and role of experience. Behav Brain Res 55: 185–193
Roberts DCS, Richardson NR (1992) Self-administration of psychomotor stimulants using progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement. In: Bolton A, Baker G, We PH (eds) Neurometh-ods, vol 24: animal models of drug addition. Humana Press, Totowa NJ, pp 233–269
Robinson TE (1988) Stimulant drugs and stress: factors influencing individual differences in the susceptibility to sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ, pp 145–173
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247–291
Rouge-Pont F, Piazza PV, Kharouby M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Higher and longer stress-induced increase in dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens of animals predisposed to amphetamine self-administration. A microdialysis study. Brain Res 602:169–174
Schenk S, Lacelle G, Gorman K, Amit Z (1987) Cocaine self-administration in rats influenced by environmental conditions: implications for the etiology of drug abuse. Neurosci Lett 81: 227–231
Shippenberg TS, Heidbreder Ch (1995) Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273: 808–815
Shoaib M, Spanagel R, Stohr T, Shippenberg TS (1995) Strain differences in the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of morphine in rats. Psychopharmacology 117: 240–247
Valadez A, Schenk S (1994) Persistence of the ability of amphetamine pre-exposure to facilitate acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 47: 203–205
Woolverton WL, Cervo, L, Johanson, CE (1984) Effects of repeated methamphetamine administration on methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21: 737–741
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierre, P.J., Vezina, P. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology 129, 277–284 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050191
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050191