Abstract
Large numbers of eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) are modified by SUMO post-translational modifications. Whereas the effect of TF sumoylation on the expression of target genes is largely context-dependent, it is not known whether the modification has a common function in regulating TFs throughout eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight four studies that used genome-wide chromatin-immunoprecipitation analysis (ChIP-seq) to examine whether sumoylation affects the selection of sites on the genome that are bound by human and yeast TFs. The studies found that impairing sumoylation led to deregulated binding-site selection for all four of the examined TFs. Predominantly, compared to wild-type forms, the sumoylation-deficient forms of the TFs bound to numerous additional non-specific sites, pointing to a common role for the modification in restricting TF binding to appropriate sites. Evidence from these studies suggests that TF sumoylation influences binding-site selection by modulating protein–protein interactions with other DNA-binding TFs, or by promoting conformational changes in the TFs that alter their DNA-binding specificity or affinity. I propose a model in which, prior to their sumoylation, TFs initially bind to chromatin with reduced specificity, which leads to spurious binding but also ensures that all functional sites become bound. Once the TFs are bound to DNA, sumoylation then acts to increase specificity and promotes release of the TFs from non-specific sites. The similar observations from these four genome-wide studies across divergent species suggest that binding-site selection is a general and conserved function for TF sumoylation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhter A, Rosonina E (2016) Chromatin association of gcn4 is limited by post-translational modifications triggered by its DNA-binding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 204:1433–1445. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.194134
Bertolotto C, Lesueur F, Giuliano S et al (2011) A SUMOylation-defective MITF germline mutation predisposes to melanoma and renal carcinoma. Nature 480:94–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10539nature10539
Capaldi AP, Kaplan T, Liu Y et al (2008) Structure and function of a transcriptional network activated by the MAPK Hog1. Nat Genet 40:1300–1306. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.235
Chang P-C, Cheng C-Y, Campbell M et al (2013) The chromatin modification by SUMO-2/3 but not SUMO-1 prevents the epigenetic activation of key immune-related genes during Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus reactivation. BMC Genom 14:824. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-824
Cheng C-Y, Chu C-H, Hsu H-W et al (2014) An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example. BMC Genomics 15:S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-S1-S1
Chupreta S, Holmstrom S, Subramanian L, Iniguez-Lluhi JA (2005) A small conserved surface in SUMO is the critical structural determinant of its transcriptional inhibitory properties. Mol Cell Biol 25:4272–4282. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.10.4272-4282.2005
Chymkowitch P, Nguéa AP, Aanes H et al (2015) Sumoylation of Rap1 mediates the recruitment of TFIID to promote transcription of ribosomal protein genes. Genome Res 25:897–906. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.185793.114
Chymkowitch P, Nguéa PA, Enserink JM (2015) SUMO-regulated transcription: challenging the dogma. BioEssays 37:1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500065
Cook KE, O’Shea EK (2012) Hog1 controls global reallocation of RNA Pol II upon osmotic shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 2:1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.003251
Cubenas-Potts C, Matunis MJ (2013) SUMO: a multifaceted modifier of chromatin structure and function. Dev Cell 24:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.11.020
Culyba MJ (2019) Ordering up gene expression by slowing down transcription factor binding kinetics. Curr Genet 65:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-018-0896-7
Filtz TM, Vogel WK, Leid M (2014) Regulation of transcription factor activity by interconnected post-translational modifications. Trends Pharmacol Sci 35:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2013.11.005
Gill G (2005) Something about SUMO inhibits transcription. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2005.07.004
Hendriks IA, Vertegaal ACO (2016) A comprehensive compilation of SUMO proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:581–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.81
Inukai S, Kock KH, Bulyk ML (2017) Transcription factor–DNA binding: beyond binding site motifs. Curr Opin Genet Dev 43:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GDE.2017.02.007
Jin H-J, Kim J, Yu J (2013) Androgen receptor genomic regulation. Transl Androl Urol 2:157–177. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.09.01
Leclerc J, Ballotti R, Bertolotto C (2017) Pathways from senescence to melanoma: focus on MITF sumoylation. Oncogene 36:6659–6667. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.292
Liu HW, Zhang J, Heine GF et al (2012) Chromatin modification by SUMO-1 stimulates the promoters of translation machinery genes. Nucleic Acids Res 40:10172–10186. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks819
Lyst MJ, Stancheva I (2007) A role for SUMO modification in transcriptional repression and activation. Biochem Soc Trans 35:1389–1392. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0351389
Makhnevych T, Sydorskyy Y, Xin X et al (2009) Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks. Mol Cell 33:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.025
Meyer S, Reverchon S, Nasser W, Muskhelishvili G (2018) Chromosomal organization of transcription: in a nutshell. Curr Genet 64:555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0785-5
Miller AJ, Levy C, Davis IJ et al (2005) Sumoylation of MITF and Its Related Family Members TFE3 and TFEB. J Biol Chem 280:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M411757200
Murakami H, Arnheiter H (2005) Sumoylation modulates transcriptional activity of MITF in a promoter-specific manner. Pigment cell Res 18:265–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0749.2005.00234.x
Neyret-Kahn H, Benhamed M, Ye T et al (2013) Sumoylation at chromatin governs coordinated repression of a transcriptional program essential for cell growth and proliferation. Genome Res 23:1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.154872.113
Nguyen NT, Fisher DE (2019) MITF and UV responses in skin: From pigmentation to addiction. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 32:224–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12726
Paakinaho V, Kaikkonen S, Makkonen H et al (2014) SUMOylation regulates the chromatin occupancy and anti-proliferative gene programs of glucocorticoid receptor. Nucleic Acids Res 42:1575–1592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1033
Poukka H, Karvonen U, Janne OA, Palvimo JJ (2000) Covalent modification of the androgen receptor by small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO-1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14145–14150. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14145
Proft M, Struhl K (2002) Hog1 kinase converts the Sko1-Cyc8-Tup1 repressor complex into an activator that recruits SAGA and SWI/SNF in response to osmotic stress. Mol Cell 9:1307–1317
Proft M, Gibbons FD, Copeland M et al (2005) Genomewide identification of Sko1 target promoters reveals a regulatory network that operates in response to osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4:1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.8.1343
Rosonina E, Duncan SMM, Manley JLL (2010) SUMO functions in constitutive transcription and during activation of inducible genes in yeast. Genes Dev 24:1242–1252. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1917910
Rosonina E, Akhter A, Dou Y et al (2017) Regulation of transcription factors by sumoylation. Transcription 8:220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2017.1311829
Shiio Y, Eisenman RN (2003) Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13225–13230. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1735528100
Siggers T, Gordan R (2014) Protein-DNA binding: complexities and multi-protein codes. Nucleic Acids Res 42:2099–2111. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1112
Sri Theivakadadcham VS, Bergey BG, Rosonina E (2019) Sumoylation of DNA-bound transcription factor Sko1 prevents its association with nontarget promoters. PLoS Genet 15:e1007991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007991
Sutinen P, Malinen M, Heikkinen S, Palvimo JJ (2014) SUMOylation modulates the transcriptional activity of androgen receptor in a target gene and pathway selective manner. Nucleic Acids Res 42:8310–8319. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku543
Tian S, Poukka H, Palvimo JJ, Jänne OA (2002) Small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) modification of the glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem J 367:907–911. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20021085
Verger A, Perdomo J, Crossley M (2003) Modification with SUMO. EMBO Rep 4:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor738
Weikum ER, Knuesel MT, Ortlund EA, Yamamoto KR (2017) Glucocorticoid receptor control of transcription: precision and plasticity via allostery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18:159–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.152
Yokoyama S, Woods SL, Boyle GM et al (2011) A novel recurrent mutation in MITF predisposes to familial and sporadic melanoma. Nature 480:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10630
Acknowledgements
Work in my lab is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; Grant number RGPIN-04208–2014) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; Grant number MOP-142282) to E.R. I thank Jennifer Haynes and J. Bryan McNeil for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by M. Kupiec.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosonina, E. A conserved role for transcription factor sumoylation in binding-site selection. Curr Genet 65, 1307–1312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-019-00992-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-019-00992-w