Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climatic impacts on winter wheat in Oklahoma and potential applications to climatic and crop yield prediction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Climatic anomalies can pose severe challenges for farmers and resource managers. This is particularly significant with respect to gradually developing anomalies such as droughts. The impact of the 1995–1996 drought on the Oklahoma wheat crop, and the possibility that predictive information might have reduced some of the losses, is examined through a combined modeling approach using climatological data and a crop growth model that takes into account an extensive range of soil, climatic, and plant variables. The results show potential outcomes and also illustrate the point at which all possible climatic outcomes were predicting a significantly low wheat yield. Based on anecdotal evidence of the 1995–1996 drought, which suggested that farmers who planted at different times experienced different yields, the model was run assuming a variety of different planting dates. Results indicate that there is indeed a noticeable difference in the modeled wheat yields given different planting dates. The information regarding effectiveness of planting date can be used in conjunction with current long-range forecasts to develop improved predictions for the current growing season. This approach produces information regarding the likelihood of extreme precipitation events and the impact on crop yield, which can provide a powerful tool to farmers and others during periods of drought or other climatic extremes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Figure 2 is reproduced with permission of the Oklahoma Climatological Survey. For additional information regarding precipitation and temperature anomalies in the state, the reader is directed to http://climate.ocs.ou.edu/rainfall_update.html).

References

  • Andresen JA, Dale RF, Fletcher JJ, Preckel PV (1989) Prediction of county-level corn yields using an energy-crop growth index. J Climate 2:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry TA, Geng W (1995) Climate change effects on United States rice yields and California wheat yields. In: Rosenzweig C, Ritchie J, Jones J, Tsuji G, Hildebrand P (eds) Climate change and agriculture: analysis of potential international impacts (American Society of Agronomy Publication no 59). ASA, Madison, WI, pp 183–206

  • Bristow KL, Campbell GS (1984) On the relationship between incoming solar-radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperature. Agric For Meteorol 31:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brklacich M, Stewart RB (1995) Impacts of climate change on wheat yields in the Canadian Prairies. In: Rosenzweig C, Ritchie J, Jones J, Tsuji G, Hildebrand P (eds) Climate change and agriculture: analysis of potential international impacts (American Society of Agronomy Publication no 59). ASA, Madison, WI, pp 147–163

  • Chipanshi AC, Ripley EA, Lawford RG (1997) Early prediction of spring wheat yields in Saskatchewan from current and historical weather data using the CERES-Wheat model. Agric For Meteorol 84:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPC (1996) Special climate summary 96-2: drought in the Southern Plains and the Southwest. CPC, Washington, DC

  • Duchon CB (1986) Corn yield prediction using climatology. J Clim Appl Meteorol 25:581–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott RL (1996) A look at the drought using the Oklahoma Mesonet. Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster CR, Peterson GA (1996) Early prediction of spring wheat yields in Saskatchewan Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1996) Drought facts. Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Oklahoma City

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom G, Tsuji GY, Jones JW, Singh U, Godwin DC, Pickering NB, Curry RB (1995) Decision support system to study climate change impacts on crop production. In: Rosenzweig C, Ritchie J, Jones J, Tsuji G, Hildebrand P (eds) Climate change and agriculture: analysis of potential international impacts (American Society of Agronomy Publication no 59). ASA, Madison, WI, pp 51–76

  • Hundal SS, Prabhjyot-Kaur (1997) Application of the CERES-Wheat model to yield predictions in the irrigated plains of the Indian Punjab. J Agric Sci 129:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunte LA, Boote KJ (1998) Data for model operation, calibration, and evaluation. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Boston, pp 9–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO, Rosenzweig C, Goldberg R (1996) The effect of changes in daily and interannual climatic variability on CERES-Wheat: a sensitivity study. Clim Change 32:257–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjelde JW, Keplinger K (1998) Using the Southern Oscillation to forecast Texas winter wheat and sorghum crop yields. J Climate 11:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CW (1981) Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation. Water Resour Res 17:182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1998) Soil water balance and plant water stress. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Boston, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT, Singh U, Godwin DC, Bowen WT (1998) Cereal growth, development and yield. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Boston, pp 79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Seino H (1995) Implications of climate change for crop production in Japan. In: Rosenzweig C, Ritchie J, Jones J, Tsuji G, Hildebrand P (eds) Climate change and agriculture: analysis of potential international impacts (American Society of Agronomy Publication no 59). ASA, Madison, WI

  • Späth H-J (1998) The wheat farming system. In: Späth H-J, Thompson GL, Eisenhart H (eds) Oklahoma Resources for Economic Development. Special Publication 98-4. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Norman, OK, pp 73–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Easterling WE (ed) (1999) Making climate forecasts matter. Panel on the human dimensions of seasonal-to-interannual climate variability. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Touré A, Major DJ, Lindwall CW (1995) Comparison of five wheat simulation models southern Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 75:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji GY, Uhera G, Balas G (1994) DSSAT version 3, vols 1–3. University of Hawaii, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (1984) Usual planting and harvesting dates for U.S. field crops, statistical reporting service, Agricultural Handbook Number 628

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Oklahoma Water Resources board and NOAA for providing financial assistance. Also, thanks go to Barbara Gibson, Stephanie Buway, and Mark Shafer for cartographic support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Scott Greene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greene, J.S., Maxwell, E. Climatic impacts on winter wheat in Oklahoma and potential applications to climatic and crop yield prediction. Int J Biometeorol 52, 117–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0104-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0104-9

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy