Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial regression test for ensuring temperature data quality in southern Spain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality assurance of meteorological data is crucial for ensuring the reliability of applications and models that use such data as input variables, especially in the field of environmental sciences. Spatial validation of meteorological data is based on the application of quality control procedures using data from neighbouring stations to assess the validity of data from a candidate station (the station of interest). These kinds of tests, which are referred to in the literature as spatial consistency tests, take data from neighbouring stations in order to estimate the corresponding measurement at the candidate station. These estimations can be made by weighting values according to the distance between the stations or to the coefficient of correlation, among other methods. The test applied in this study relies on statistical decision-making and uses a weighting based on the standard error of the estimate. This paper summarizes the results of the application of this test to maximum, minimum and mean temperature data from the Agroclimatic Information Network of Andalusia (southern Spain). This quality control procedure includes a decision based on a factor f, the fraction of potential outliers for each station across the region. Using GIS techniques, the geographic distribution of the errors detected has been also analysed. Finally, the performance of the test was assessed by evaluating its effectiveness in detecting known errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraha MG, Savage MJ (2008) Comparison of estimates of daily solar radiation from air temperature range for application in crop simulations. Agric For Meteorol 148:401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AEMET (2012) Resumen de extremos climatológicos en España. <http://www.aemet.es/documentos/es/divulgacion/resumen_efemerides/Resumen_extremos.pdf>. Accessed 05.07.15, in Spanish

  • Brunet M, Saladie O, Jones P, Sigro J, Aguilar E, Moberg A, Lister D, Walther A, Lopez D, Almarza C (2006) The development of a new dataset of Spanish Daily Adjusted Temperature Series (SDATS) (1850–2003). Int J Climatol 26:1777–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camillo PJ, Gurney RJ (1984) A sensitivity analysis of a numerical model for estimating evapotranspiration. Water Res Research 12(5):873–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Eischeid JK, Baker CB, Karl T, Diaz HF (1995) The quality control of long-term climatological data using objective data analysis. J Appl Meteor 34:2787–2795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez J, Gavilán P, Berengena J (2009) Sensitivity analysis of a Penman-Monteith type equation to estimate reference evapotranspiration in southern Spain. Hydrol Proc 23:3342–3353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez J, Gavilan P, Garcia-Marin AP (2011a) Data validation procedures in agricultural meteorology. A prerequisite for their use. Adv Science Res 6:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez J, Gavilan P, Giraldez JV (2011b) Guidelines on validation procedures for meteorological data from automatic weather stations. J Hydrol 402:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez J, Padilla F, Gavilán P (2012) Evaluation and regional calibration of solar radiation prediction models in southern Spain. J Irrig and Drainage Eng 138(10):868–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez J, Gavilán P, García-Marín AP, Zardi D (2015) Detection of spurious precipitation signals from automatic weather stations in irrigated areas. Int J Climatol 35:1556–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng S, Hu Q, Qian Q (2004) Quality control of daily meteorological data in China, 1951-2000: a new dataset. Int J Climatol 24:853–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiebrich CA, Morgan CR, McCombs AG, Hall PK, McPherson RA (2010) Quality assurance procedures for mesoscale meteorological data. J Atmos Ocean Technol 27:1565–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandin LS (1988) Complex quality control of meteorological observations. Mon Wea Rev 116:1137–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Marín AP, Estévez J, Medina-Cobo MT, Ayuso-Muñoz JL (2015) Delimiting homogeneous regions using the multifractal properties of validated rainfall data series. J of Hydrol 529:106–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graybeal DY (2006) Relationships among daily mean and maximum wind speeds with application to data quality assurance. Int J Climatol 26:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman NB, Quayler RG (1990) A review of cooperative temperature data validation. J Atmos Ocean Technol 7:334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard KG (2001) Multiple station quality control procedures. Automated weather stations for applications in agriculture and water resources management. In: Hubbard KG, Sivakumar MVK (eds) Tech. Doc. AGM-3 WMO/TD 1074. High Plains Regional Climate Center, Lincoln, NE, p. 248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard KG, You J (2005) Sensitivity analysis of quality assurance using the spatial regression approach. A case study of the maximum/minimum air temperature. J Atmos Ocean Technol 22:1520–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard KG, Goddard S, Sorensen WD, Wells N, Osugi TT (2005) Performance of quality assurance procedures for an applied climate information system. J Atmos Ocean Technol 22:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Field CB, VR Barros DJ, Dokken KJ, Mach MD, Mastrandrea TE, Bilir M, Chatterjee KL, Ebi YO, Estrada RC, Genova B, Girma ES, Kissel AN, Levy S, MacCracken PR, Mastrandrea, White LL (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 1132

  • Ley TW, Hill RW, Jensen DT (1994) Errors in Penman-Wright alfalfa reference evapotranspiration estimates: I. Model sensitivity analyses. Transactions of the ASAE 37(6):1863–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2009) Evaluation of temperature-based global solar radiation models in China. Agric and Forest Meteor 149(9):1433–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood R, Hubbard KG (2002) Effect the time of temperature observation and estimation of daily solar radiation for the Northern Great Plains, USA. Agronomic Journal 94(4):723–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek DW, Hatfield JL (1994) Data quality checking for single station meteorological databases. Agric and Forest Meteor 36:85–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, JE (2003) Data quality: the accuracy dimension. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, p 293

  • PostGIS (2014) http://postgis.refractions.net. Accessed december 2014

  • PostgreSQL (2014) http://www.postgresql.org. Accessed december 2014

  • Reek T, Doty SR, Owen TW (1992) A deterministic approach to the validation of historical daily temperature and precipitation data from the Cooperative Network. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 73:753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivington M, Bellocchi G, Matthews KB, Buchan K (2005) Evaluation of three model estimations of solar radiation at 24 UK stations. Agric For Meteorol 132(3–4):228–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer MA, Fiebrich CA, Arndt DS, Fredrickson SE, Hughes TW (2000) Quality assurance procedures in the Oklahoma Mesonet. J Atmos Ocean Technol 17:474–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinacker R, Mayer D, Steiner A (2011) Data quality control based on self-consistency. Mon Wea Rev 139:3974–3991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade CG (1987) A quality control program for surface meso-meteorological data. J Atmos Ocean Technol 4:435–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WMO (2008) Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation, 7th edn. WMO-8, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, p. 681

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahumensky I (2004) Guidelines on quality control procedures for data from automatic weather stations. WMO-No. 955, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We applied the ‘sequence-determines-credit’ (SDC) approach for the sequence of authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Estévez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Estévez, J., Gavilán, P. & García-Marín, A.P. Spatial regression test for ensuring temperature data quality in southern Spain. Theor Appl Climatol 131, 309–318 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1982-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1982-8

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy