Abstract
Complex policy problems such as climate change that spill over multiple issue areas or jurisdictions often require new policy approaches because sectoral (or territorial) policies are not designed to tackle the issue of policy spillovers. Yet, cross-sectoral policies upset the status quo and invite a political backlash from departments and individuals who fear erosion of their power, authority, budgets, or status. We offer one of the first studies to systematically examine conditions under which tribal governments develop cross-sectoral climate plans. Drawing on an original dataset of 239 tribes, our statistical analysis shows that tribal governments embedded in cross-tribal networks are more likely to develop cross-sectoral climate plans. While developing such policies is costly, the availability of monetary resources does not change tribes’ odds of developing cross-sectoral climate plans. Thus, the role of embeddedness in networks, as opposed to financial capacity, motivates tribes to adopt new policy approaches that are risky and yet more suitable to solve a problem with cross-sectoral spillovers.
Notes
We follow the Native American Journalists Association’s guidance on terminology https://najanewsroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NAJA_Reporting_and_Indigenous_Terminology_Guide.pdf
References
Bang M, Marin A, Medin D (2018) If Indigenous peoples stand with the sciences, will scientists stand with us? Daedalus, The Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 147(2):148–159
Bulkeley H (2013) Cities and climate change. Routledge, New York, NY
Cohen, Felix S (1960) The legal conscience: selected papers. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Cornell, Stephen. E. (1988) Return of the native: American Indian political resurgence. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Cowger TW (1999) The National Congress of American Indians: the founding years. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
Dang, Hanh H., Axel Michaelowa, and Dao D. Tuan. 2003. Synergy of adaptation and mitigation strategies in the context of sustainable development: the case of Vietnam.Climate policy 3(sup1): S81-S96
Dobbin F, Simmons B, Garrett G (2007) The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annu Rev Sociol 33:449–472
Dolšak N, Prakash A (2017) Join the club: how the domestic NGO sector induces participation in the covenant of mayors program. International interactions 43(1):26–47
Grossman Z (2008) Indigenous nations’ responses to climate change. Am Indian Cult Res J 32(3):5–27
Hanna JM (2007) Native communities and climate change: protecting tribal resources as part of national climate policy. A report published by the Natural Resources Law Center, Colorado Law School, University of Colorado
Howell RA, Capstick S, Whitmarsh L (2016) Impacts of adaptation and responsibility framings on attitudes towards climate change mitigation. Clim Chang 136(3–4):445–461
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Keohane RO, Victor DG (2011) The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on politics 9(1):7–23
Krakoff S (2008) American Indians, climate change, and ethics for a warming world. Denv U L Rev 85(865):1–33
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Socio 27:415–444
Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747
Norton-Smith K, Lynn K, Chief K, Cozzetto K, Donatuto J, Redsteer MH, Kruger LE, Maldonado J, Viles C, Whyte KP (2016) Climate change and Indigenous peoples: a synthesis of current impacts and experiences. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-944. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 136 p., 944
Romsdahl RJ, Atkinson L, Schultz J (2013) Planning for climate change across the US Great Plains: concerns and insights from government decision-makers. J Environ Stud Sci 3(1):1–14
Spaans M, Waterhout B (2017) Building up resilience in cities worldwide– Rotterdam as participant in the 100 resilient cities programme. Cities 61:109–116
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs, 2018. “Strengthening tribal communities, sustaining future generations: annual report.” https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/07/f53/DOE-IE-Annual-Report-2018.pdf Accessed August 8, 2019
Wilkins DE, Stark HK (2018) American Indian politics and the American political system. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland
Wilkinson C, The American Indian Resources Institute (2004) Indian tribes as sovereign governments: a sourcebook on federal-tribal history, law and policy, 2nd edn. American Indian Lawyer Training Program, Inc., Oakland, CA
Zilberman D, Zhao J, Heiman A (2012) Adoption versus adaptation, with emphasis on climate change. Ann Rev Resour Econ 4(1): 27–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 55 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, L.E., Dolšak, N., Plog, M.T. et al. Native American tribal governments, cross-sectoral climate policy, and the role of intertribal networks. Climatic Change 160, 35–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02641-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02641-0