Skip to main content

Pre-harvest foliar application of Prohexadione-Ca and gibberellins modify canopy source-sink relations and improve quality and shelf-life of ‘Bing’ sweet cherry

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research evaluated the potential of gibberellins (GA), and Prohexadione-Ca (PCa) to affect sweet cherry (Prunus avium) fruit size and quality. The results demonstrate the ability of ostensibly counter-acting plant growth regulators to significantly improve sweet cherry cv ‘Bing’ fruit size, fruit quality and postharvest characteristics compared to the current commercial application of GA3 alone. In 2008, we found that the combination of GA3 or GA4/7 (30 mg l−1) with PCa (150 mg l−1) applied to entire 3-year-old limbs 30 days after anthesis increased fruit size and improved fruit quality in ‘Bing’. In 2009, we investigated the effect of application timing in larger-scale field trials, comparing treatments made at 30 or 37 days after anthesis, on fruit quality, storability and sensory attributes after storage. Treatment with PCa + GA3 or PCa + GA4/7 delayed fruit maturity by about 7 days compared to the untreated control. Both the first and second applications of PCa + GA4/7 resulted in 35–40% fruit being ≥10 g, compared with only 20% in the control. PCa + GA3 treatment also showed greater potential for improving fruit storability by maintaining fruit firmness, sweetness, and consumer appeal than PCa + GA4/7. PCa alone or in combination with GAs inhibited current shoot growth and delayed fruit coloring development. After 30 days of 4°C storage, fewer than 5% fruit from untreated trees were rated as healthy and marketable, compared to 50 and 30% fruit from PCa + GA3 treatment applied at 30 or 37 days after anthesis, respectively. In conclusion, preharvest foliar application of PCa + GA3 at the onset of Stage II of fruit development shows potential to affect canopy source-sink relations and improved quality and shelf life of ‘Bing’ sweet cherries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chauvin MA, Whiting MD, Ross CF (2009) The influence of harvest time on sensory properties and consumer acceptance of sweet cherries. HortTechnology 19:748–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi C, Wiersma PA, Toivonen P, Kappel F (2002) Fruit growth, firmness and cell wall hydrolytic enzyme activity during development of sweet cherry fruit treated with gibberellic acid (GA3). J Hort Sci Biotech 77:615–621

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton M, Biasi WV, Agar IT, Southwick SM, Mitcham EJ (2003) Postharvest quality of ‘Bing’ cherries following preharvest treatment with hydrogen cyanamide, calcium ammonium nitrate, or gihherellic acid. HortScience 38:407–411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton M, Biasi WV, Agar IT, Southwick SM, Mitcham EJ (2006) Sensory quality of ‘Bing’ sweet cherries following preharvest treatment with hydrogen cyanamide, calcium ammonium nitrate, or gibberellic acid. HortScience 41:745–748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cline JA, Trought M (2007) Effect of gibberellic acid on fruit cracking and quality of Bing and Sam sweet cherries. Can J Plant Sci 87:545–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies PJ (ed) (2004) Plant hormones: biosynthesis, signal transduction, action!. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawood ZA (1986) Studies into fruit splitting and quality of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumL.), and grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Ph.D thesis. Department of Horticulture, Wye College, University of London, Wye, UK. 256

  • Elfving D, Whiting MD, Lang GA, Visser DW (2004) Growth and flowering responses of sweet cherry cultivars to Prohexadione-Calcium and ethephon. Acta Hort 636:122–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfving DC, Visser DB, Lang GA (2005) Effects of Prohexadione-Calcium and ethephon on growth and flowering of ‘Bing’ sweet cherry. Acta Hort 667:439–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Facteau TJ (1986) Effects of calcium, GA on cherries studied. Good Fruit Grower 37:27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Facteau TJ, Rowe KE, Chestnut NE (1985) Firmness of sweet cherry following multiple applications of gibberellic acid. J Am Soc Hort Sci 110:775–777

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Facteau TJ, Rowe KE, Chestnut NE (1989) Flowering in sweet cherry in response to application of gibberellic acid. Sci Hort 38:239–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedden P, Kamiya Y (1997) Gibberellin biosynthesis: enzymes, genes and their regulation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:431–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hisamatsu T, Koshioka M, Kubota S, King RW (1998) Effect of gibberellin A4 and GA biosynthesis inhibitors on growth and flowering of stock [Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br.]. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 67:537–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz S, López Camelo AF, Yommi A, Godoy C (2003) Application of gibberellic acid to ‘Sweetheart’ sweet cherries: effects on fruit quality at harvest and during cold storage. Acta Hort 628:311–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappel F, MacDonald RA (2002) Gibberellic acid increases fruit firmness, fruit size and delays maturity of ‘Sweetheart’ sweet cherry. J Am Pomol Soc 56:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappel F, MacDonald RA (2007) Early gibberellic acid sprays increase firmness and fruit size of ‘sweetheart’ sweet cherry. J Am Pomol Soc 61:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupferman EM (1989) Cherry warehouse survey shows value of GA use. Good Fruit Grower 40:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenahan OM, Whiting MD (2006) Physiological and horticultural effects of sweet cherry chemical blossom thinners are variable. HortScience 41:1547–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenahan OM, Whiting MD, Elfving DC (2006) Gibberellic acid inhibits floral bud induction and improve ‘Bing’ sweet cherry fruit quality. HortScience 41:654–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenahan OM, Whiting MD, Elfving DC (2008) Gibberellic acid is a potential sweet cherry crop load management tool. Acta Hort 795:513–516

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Looney NE (1996) Principles and practice of plant bioregulator usage in cherry production. In: Webster AD, Looney NE (eds) Cherries: crop physiology, production and uses. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 279–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Looney NE, Lidster PD (1980) Some growth regulator effects on fruit quality, mesocarp composition, and susceptibility to postharvest surface marking of sweet cherries. J Am Soc Hort Sci 105:130–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Patrick SB, Gordon B, June MT (2001) Metabolism of gibberellins A1 and A3 in fruits and shoots of Prunus avium. Phytochemistry 56:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama I, Miyazawa T, Kobayashi M, Kamiya Y, Abe H et al (1990) Effects of a new plant growth regulator prohexadione calcium (BX-112) on shoot elongation caused by exogenously applied gibberellins in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 31:195–200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nes WD, Venkatramesh M (1999) Enzymology of phytosterol transformations. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 34:81–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead JW, Iezzoni A, Whiting MD (2007) Genotypic differences in sweet cherry fruit size result from differences in fruit cell number. J Am Soc Hort Sci 132:697–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkaya O, Dündar Ö, Küden A (2006) Effect of preharvest gibberellic acid treatments on postharvest quality of sweet cherry. J Food Agric Environ 4:189–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Proebsting EL, Carter GH, Mills HH (1973) Quality improvement in canned ‘Rainier’ cherries (P. avium L.) with gibberellic acid. J Am Soc Hort Sci 98:334–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher W (2000) Growth retardants: Effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:501–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher W, Speakman JB, Evans RR, Evans JR, Rommelt S (1998) Prohexadione-Ca—a new plant growth regulator for apple with interesting biochemical features. In Proc. Annu. Meet. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am., 25th, ed. WE Shafer, pp. 113–118. LaGrange: Plant Growth Regul Soc Am

  • Ross CF, Chauvin MA, Whiting MD (2009) Firmness evaluation of sweet cherries by a trained and consumer sensory panel. J Text Stud 40:554–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MD, Lang GA (2004) Bing sweet cherry on the dwarfing rootstock Gisela 5: crop load affects fruit quality and vegetative growth but not net co2 exchange. J Am Soc Hort Sci 129:407–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MD, Ophardt D (2005) Comparing novel sweet cherry crop load management strategies. HortScience 40:1271–1275

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MD, Lang GA, Ophardt D (2005) Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience 40:582–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Tanabe K, Tani H, Nakajima H, Mori M, Sakuno E (2007a) Biologically active gibberellins and ABA in fruit of two late-maturing Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) cultivars with contrasting fruit size. J Am Soc Hort Sci 132:452–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Itai A, Yoshida M (2007b) Role of gibberellins in increasing sink demand in Japanese pear fruit during rapid fruit growth. Plant Growth Regul 52:161–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caixi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Whiting, M. Pre-harvest foliar application of Prohexadione-Ca and gibberellins modify canopy source-sink relations and improve quality and shelf-life of ‘Bing’ sweet cherry. Plant Growth Regul 65, 145–156 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-011-9584-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-011-9584-z

Keywords

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy