Skip to main content

Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of UAVs finds application in a variety of fields, among which are the small scale surveys for environmental protection application. In this frame some experimental tests were carried out at Politecnico di Milano to assess metric accuracies of images acquired by UAVs and derived photogrammetric products. A block of 5 strips and 49 photos was taken by fixed wing system SenseFly, carrying a camera Canon Ixus 220HS on a rural area included in an Italian Park. Images are processed through bundle adjustment, automatic DEM extraction and orthoimages production steps with several software packages, with the aim to evaluate their characteristics, capabilities and weaknesses. The software packages tested were Erdas-LPS, EyeDEA (University of Parma), Agisoft Photoscan, Pix4UAV, PhotoModeler Scanner. For the georeferencing of the block 16 pre-signalized ground control points were surveyed in the area through GPS (NRTK survey). Comparison of results is given in terms of differences among orientation parameters and their accuracies. Moreover, comparisons among different digital surface models are evaluated. Furthermore, exterior orientation parameters, image points and ground points coordinates, obtained by the various software packages, were used as initial values in a comparative adjustment made by scientific in-house software. Paper confirms that computer vision software are faster in computation and, even if their main goal is not to pursue high accuracy in points coordinates determination, they seems to produce results comparable to those obtainable with standard photogrammetric approach. Agisoft Photoscan seems in this case to yield the best results in terms of quality of photogrammetric products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barazzetti L, Remondino F, Scaioni M, Brumana R (2010a) Fully automatic UAV image-based sensor orientation. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XXXVIII(1):6

    Google Scholar 

  • Barazzetti L, Scaioni M, Remondino F (2010b) Orientation and 3D modeling from markerless terrestrial images: combining accuracy with automation. Photogramm Rec 25(132):356–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bay H, Ess A, Tuylelaars T, Van Gool (2008) Speeded Robust Features (SURF). Comput Vis Image Underst 110:346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DC (1971) Close-range camera calibration. Photogramm Eng 37(8):855–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomina I, Blazquez M, Molina P, Parés ME, Wis M (2008) Towards a new paradigm for high-resolution low-cost photogrammetry and remote sensing. IAPRS SIS 37(B1):1201–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeiss H, Sauerbier M (2011) Investigation of UAV systems and flight modes for photogrammetric applications. Photogramm Rec 26(136):400–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler M, Bolles R (1981) Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun Assoc Comp Mach 24:81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlani G (1986) Sperimentazione del nuovo programma CALGE dell’ITM. Boll SIFET 2:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser CS (2013) Automatic camera calibration in close range photogrammetry. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 79:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini R, Passoni D, Pinto L, Sona G (2012) Aerial images from an UAV system: 3d modeling and tree species classification in a park area. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XXXIX-B1:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenzdörffer GJ, Engel A, Teichert B (2008) The photogrammetric potential of low-cost UAVs in forestry and agriculture. IAPRS SIS 37(B1):1207–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarbrink RB, Koers E (2006) Helicopter UAV for photogrammetry and rapid response. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, ISPRS Workshop of Inter-Commission WG I/V, Autonomous Navigation, Antwerp, Belgium

  • Hartley R, Zisserman A (2006) Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image feature from scale-invariant key points. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollefeys M, Koch R, Van Gool L (1999) Self-calibration and metric reconstruction inspite of varying and unknown internal camera parameters. IJCV 32(1):7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Re C, Roncella R, Forlani G, Cremonese G, Naletto G (2012) Evaluation of area-based image matching applied to DTM generation with Hirise images. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci I-4:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remondino F, Del Pizzo S, Kersten T, Troisi S (2012) Low-cost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation—a critical overview. Progress in Culturale Heritage Preservation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol.7616, pp 40–54

  • Remondino F, Gruen A, von Schwerin J, Eisenbeiss H, Rizzi A, Giraldi S, Sauerbier M, Richards-Rissetto H (2009) Multi-sensor 3D documentation of the Maya site of Copan. Proceedings of the XXIInd CIPA Symposium

  • Remondino F, Barazzetti L, Nex F, Scaioni M, Sarazzi D (2011) UAV photogrammetry for mapping and 3D modeling—current status and future perspectives. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVIII-1/C22:25–31. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-25-2011

  • Remondino F (2006) Detectors and descriptors for photogrammetric applications. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 36(3):4914

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncella R, Re C, Forlani G (2011) Performance evaluation of a structure and motion strategy in architecture and cultural heritage. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XXXVIII-5(W16):285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecha C, Pylvanainen T, Fua P (2010) Dynamic and scalable large scale image reconstruction. Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR), IEEE Conference on, pp. 406–413

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Riccardo Roncella for providing the software EyeDEA and Terradat company, owned by Paolo Dosso, who performed the flight with SenseFly System.

The project has been sponsored by Regione Lombardia (Italy)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Pagliari.

Additional information

Communicated by: M. Scaioni

Published in the Special Issue Application of Surveying in Land Management with Guest Editors Dr. Marco Scaioni and Dr. Maurício Roberto Veronez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sona, G., Pinto, L., Pagliari, D. et al. Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images. Earth Sci Inform 7, 97–107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-013-0142-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-013-0142-2

Keywords

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy