Abstract
Switchgrass has long been characterized as an outcrossing species. However, mating behavior of plants in populations grown in the field allowing open pollination has not been documented. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to determine the fertilization mode (i.e., selfing vs. outcrossing) of two self-compatible plants and to assess the mating behavior variability of lowland switchgrass genotypes in populations under field conditions. In Experiment I, two self-compatible genotypes ‘NL94 LYE 16 × 13’ and ‘SL93 7 × 15’ along with two populations were planted with two replications on the OSU Agronomy Research Farm, Stillwater, OK. Sixty-four progeny derived from half-sib seeds of each genotype per replication per year were genotyped with 4 to 20 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In both 2010 and 2011, all progeny plants of the two parents were completely outcrossed exhibiting 100 % self-incompatibility. In Experiment II, two genetically narrow-based (NL94 C2-3 and SL93 C2-3), each having five parents, and two broad-based (NL94 C3 and SL93 C3), each comprising 26 parents, switchgrass populations with three replications were field established at the OSU Cimarron Valley Research Station, Perkins, OK. The DNA samples were isolated from 1700 open-pollinated progeny of 62 seed parents in 2010 and 773 progeny of 42 parents in 2011. Among all the progeny genotyped with eight to 16 SSR markers, only one was identified as a selfed progeny, indicating very little variability in outcrossing behavior under the field conditions. The identification of specific genotypes like NL94 LYE 16 × 13 and SL93 7 × 15 which are self-incompatible in the open field but self-compatible under the controlled conditions potentially enables efficient production of F1 hybrid seed in switchgrass.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langridge P, Baumann U (2008) Self-incompatibility in the grasses. In: Franklin-Tong VE (ed) Self-incompatibility in flowering plants–evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, pp 275–287
Baumann U, Juttner J, Bian XY, Langridge P (2000) Self-incompatibility in the grasses. Ann Bot 85(suppl A):203–209. doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1056
Chapman GP (1990) Reproductive versatility in the grasses. Cambridge Univ Press, New York
Good-Avila SV, Mena-Ali JI, Stephenson AG (2008) Genetic and environmental causes and evolutionary consequences of variations in self-fertility in self incompatible species. In: Franklin-Tong VE (ed) Self-incompatibility in flowering plants–evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–51
Vogel KP (2004) Switchgrass. In: Moser LE, Sollenberger L, Burson B (eds) Warm-season (C4) grasses. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Monograph, Madison, pp 561–588
McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA (2005) Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 28:515–535. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.05.006
Casler MD, Tobias CM, Kaeppler SM, Buell CR, Wang ZY, Cao P, Schmutz J, Ronald P (2011) The switchgrass genome: tools and strategies. Plant Genome 4:273–282
Taliaferro CM, Hopkins AA (1996) Breeding characteristics and improvement potential of switchgrass. In: Cundiff J (ed) Proc. third liquid fuel conference: liquid fuels and industrial products from renewable resources. Nashville, TN, pp 2–9
Martinez-Reyna JM, Vogel KP (2002) Incompatibility systems in switchgrass. Crop Sci 42:1800–1805
Aguirre AA, Studer B, Frei U, Lübberstedt T (2012) Prospects for hybrid breeding in bioenergy grasses. Bioenergy Res 5:10–19. doi:10.1007/s12155-011-9166-y
Martinez-Reyna JM, Vogel KP (2008) Heterosis in switchgrass: spaced plants. Crop Sci 48:1312–1320. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.12.0695
Vogel KP, Mitchell RB (2008) Heterosis in switchgrass: biomass yield in swards. Crop Sci 48:2159–2164. doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0117
Casler M (2012) Switchgrass breeding, genetics, and genomic. In: Monti A (ed) Switchgrass: a valuable biomass crop for energy. Springer-Verlag London Ltd., London, pp 29–53
Liu LL, Wu YQ (2012) Identification of a selfing compatible genotype and mode of inheritance in switchgrass. Bioenergy Res 5:662–668. doi:10.1007/s12155-011-9173-z
Liu LL, Wu YQ (2012) Development of a genome-wide multiple duplex-SSR protocol and its applications for the identification of selfed progeny in switchgrass. BMC Genomics 13:522. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-522
Todd J (2011) Studies of the diversity, inbreeding potential, and sward heritability of switchgrass. Dissertation. Oklahoma State University, Plant and Soil Science Department, Stillwater, OK
Haynes JG, Pill WG, Evans TA (1997) Seed treatments improve the germination and seedling emergence of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). HortSci 32:1222–1226
Liu LL, Wu YQ, Wang YW, Samuels T (2012) A high-density simple sequence repeat-based genetic linkage map of switchgrass. G3 (Bethesda) 2:357–370
Wu YQ, Huang Y (2008) QTL mapping of sorghum resistance to greenbugs by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 117:117–124
Pound FJ (1935) Studies of fruitfulness in cacao. V. conditional self-compatibility and its implications. In: Fourth Annual Report on Cacao Research for 1934. I.C.T.A. Trinidad, pp 17–19
Atwood SS (1942) Genetics of pseudo-self-compatibility and its relation to cross-incompatibility in Trifolium repens. J Agric Res 64:699–709
Townsend CE (1965) Seasonal and temperature effects on self-compatibility in tetraploid alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum L. Crop Sci 5:329–332
Qaraeen AM (1980) Pseudo-compatibility in Tradescantia paludosa. I. Temperature treatment. Hereditas 93:223–229
Emsweller SL, Uhring J (1965) Interaction of temperature and growth regulator in overcoming self-incompatibility in Lilium longiflorum THUNB. Hereditas 52:295–306
Gertz A, Wricke G (1991) Inheritance of temperature-induced pseudo-compatibility in rye. Plant Breed 107:89–96. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1991.tb00535.x
Wilkins P, Thorogood D (1992) Breakdown of self-incompatibility in perennial ryegrass at high temperature and its uses in breeding. Euphytica 64:65–69
Thorogood D, Armstead IP, Turner LB, Humphreys MO, Hayward MD (2005) Identification and mode of action of self-compatibility loci in Lolium perenne L. Hered (Edinb) 94:356–363. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800582
Taliaferro CM, Lamle JT (1997) Cytological analysis of self- incompatibility in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 8:393–400
Posselt UK (1993) Hybrid production in Lolium perenne based on incompatibility. Euphytica 71:29–33
Rotili P, Zannone L (1974) General and specific combining ability in lucerne at different levels of inbreeding and performance of second generation synthetics measured in competitive conditions. Euphytica 23:569–577
Woodfield DR, Bingham ET (1995) Improvement in two-allele autotetraploid populations of alfalfa explained by accumulation of favorable alleles. Crop Sci 35:988–994
Bingham ET (1993) Registration of alfalfa inbred parental line MAG7. Crop Sci 33:1427
Posselt UK (2010) Breeding methods in cross-pollinated species. In: Boller B, Posselt UK, Veronesi F (eds) Fodder crops and amenity grasses. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, pp 39–87
Acknowledgments
We thank Mrs. Pu Feng, Dr. Yalin Huang, Mr. Gary and Mrs. Sharon Williams, Dr. Tim Samuels, Ms. Yiwen Xiang, and Dr. Yunwen Wang for the preparation of the field plots, seedlings, and isolation of DNA samples used in the experiments. The research was supported by the NSF EPSCoR award EPS 0814361, DOT-DOE Sun Grant Initiative award DTOS59-07-T-00053, and Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Linglong Liu and Shuiyi Lu Thames co-first authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Thames, S.L. & Wu, Y. Lowland Switchgrass Plants in Populations Set Completely Outcrossed Seeds Under Field Conditions as Assessed with SSR Markers. Bioenerg. Res. 7, 253–259 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9367-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9367-7