Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Issue of Permanence: Assessing the Effectiveness of Temporary Carbon Storage

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method to quantify the effectiveness of carbon mitigation options taking into account the `permanence' of the emissions reduction. While the issue of permanence is most commonly associated with a `leaky' carbon sequestration reservoir, we argue that this is an issue that applies to just about all carbon mitigation options. The appropriate formulation of this problem is to ask `what is the value of temporary storage?' Valuing temporary storage can be represented as a familiar economic problem, with explicitly stated assumptions about carbon prices and the discount rate. To illustrate the methodology, we calculate the sequestration effectiveness for injecting CO2 at various depths in the ocean. Analysis is performed for three limiting carbon price assumptions: constant carbon prices (assumes constant marginal damages), carbon prices rise at the discount rate (assumes efficient allocation of a cumulative emissions cap without a backstop technology), and carbon prices first rise at the discount rate but become constant after a given time (assumes introduction of a backstop technology). Our results show that the value of relatively deep ocean carbon sequestration can be nearly equivalent to permanent sequestration if marginal damages (i.e., carbon prices) remain constant or if there is a backstop technology that caps the abatement cost in the not too distant future. On the other hand, if climate damages are such as to require a fixed cumulative emissions limit and there is no backstop, then a storage option with even very slow leakage has limited value relative to a permanent storage option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broecker, W. S., Peng, T-H., Ostlund, H. G., and Stuiver, M.: 1985, 'The Distribution of Bomb Radiocarbon in the Ocean', J. Geophys. Res. 90, 6925–6939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broecker, W. S., Sutherland, S., Smithie, W., Peng, T-H., and Ostlund, G.: 1995, 'Oceanic Radiocarbon: Separation of the Bomb and Natural Components', Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, K., Herzog, H. J., and Wickett, M. E.: 2001, 'Predicting and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ocean Carbon Sequestration by Direct Injection', Proceedings of First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington, D.C., 14–17 May 2001 (see www.netl.doe.gov).

  • Caldeira, K., Rau, G. H., and Duffy, P. B.: 1998, 'Predicted Net Efflux of Radiocarbon from the Ocean and Increase in Atmospheric Radiocarbon Content', Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 3811–3814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, K., Wickett, M. E., and Duffy, P. B.: 2002, 'Depth, Radiocarbon and the Effectiveness of Direct CO2 Injection as an Ocean Carbon Sequestration Strategy', Geophys. Res. Lett. 810.1029/2001GL014234.

  • Dickson, A. E.: 1990, 'Thermodynamics of the Dissociation of Boric Acid in Syntheic Sea Water from 273.15 to 298.15 K', Deep-Sea Res. 37, 755–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, M. K., Ziock, H., Rueff, G., Elliott, S., and Smith, W. S.: 2002, 'Extraction of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere through Engineered Chemical Sinkage', ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry Preprints 47(1), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckaus, R.: 1992, 'Comparing the Effects of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Global Warming', Energy J. 13, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J. A., Pitcher, H. M., Barns, D., Baron, R., and Wise, M. A.: 1995, 'Modeling Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Second Generation Model Description', in Klein, L. R. and Fu-Chen, L. (eds.), Modelling Global Change, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 295–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. E., Sato, M., Ruedy R., Lacis, A., and Oinas, V.: 2000, 'Global Warming in the 21st Century: An Alternative Scenario', Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.. 97(18), 9875–9880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. J.: 2001, 'What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration?', Environmental Science and Technology 35(7), 148A–153A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. J., Eliasson, B., and Kaarstad, O.: 2000, 'Capturing Greenhouse Gases', Scient. Amer. 282(2), 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H.: 1931, 'The Economics of Exhaustible Resources', Journal of Political Economy 39, 137–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandlikar, M.: 1995, 'The Relative Role of Trace Gas Emissions in Greenhouse Gas Abatement', Energy Policy 23, 879–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandlikar, M.: 1996 'Indices for Comparing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Integrating Science and Economics', Energy Economics 18, 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, R. C. and Schuler, R. E.: 1998, 'Equity and Discounting in Climate-Change Decisions', in Nordhaus, W.D. (ed.), Economics and Policy Issues in Climate Change, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C., pp. 59–96.

  • Manne, A. and Richels, R.: 1995, 'Merge: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG Reduction Policies', Energy Policy 3(1), 182–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. and Richels, R.: 2001, 'An Alternative Approach to Establishing Trade-Offs among Greenhouse Gases', Nature 410, 675–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G., Fruit, K., and Sedjo, R.: 'Accounting for Sequestered Carbon: The Question of Permanence', Environmental Science & Policy 4, 259–268.

  • Millero, F. J.: 1995, 'The Carbon Dioxide System in the Oceans', Geoch. Cosmch. Acta 59, 661–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, I., Apps, M., Houghton, R., Lashof, D., Makundi, W., Murdiyarso, D., Murray, B., Sombroek, W., and Valentini, R. et al.: 2000, 'Implications of different definitions and generic issues', in Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verado, D. J., and Dokkens, D. J. (eds.), Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K., pp. 53–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D.: 1979, The Efficient Use of Energy Resources, Cowles Foundation Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. and Boyer, J.: 2000, Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U., Schotterer, U., and Gugelmann, A.: 1975, 'A Box Diffusion Model to Study the Carbon Dioxide Exchange in Nature', Tellus 27, 168–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • rev/ghgt5/ghgt5orr.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, D. et al.: 1999, 'Carbon Sequestration Research and Development', Report # DOE/SC/FE-1.

  • Reilly, J. et al.: 2001, 'Uncertainty and Climate Change Assessments', Science 293, 430–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J., Babiker, M., and Mayer, M.: 2001, Comparing Greenhouse Gases, Report No. 77, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA (July). http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/reports.html#pubs

  • Reilly, J., Prinn, R., Harnisch, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Jacoby, H., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Stone, P., Sokolov, A., and Wang, C.: 1999, 'Multigas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol', Nature 401, 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J. and Richards, K.: 1993, 'Climate Change Damage and the Trace Gas Index Issue', Environ. Resour. Econ. 3, 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R. N., Roy, L. N., Vogel, M., Moore, C. P., Pearson, T., Good, C. E., Millero, F. J., and Cambell, D. J.: 1993, 'Determination of the Ionization Constants of Carbonic Acid in Seawater', Mar. Chem. 44, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R.: 1993, 'Comparing Greenhouse Gases for Policy Purposes', Energy J. 14, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegenthaler, U.: 1983, 'Uptake of Excess CO2 by an Outcrop-Diffusion Model of the Ocean', J. Geophys. Res. 27, 3599–3608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., Schellnhuber, H.-J., and Qader Mirza, M. M. et al.: 2001, 'Vulnerability to Climate Change and Reasons for Concern: A Synthesis', in McCarthy, J., Canziani, O., Leary, N., Dokken, D., and White, K. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 913–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J.: 1981, Aquatic Chemistry, 2nd edn., Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • TolR.S.J.: 1999, 'The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions', Energy J. 20(1), 61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. F.: 1974, 'Carbon Dioxide in Water and Seawater: The Solubility of a Non-Ideal Gas', Marine Chemistry 2, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickett, M. E., Caldeira, K., and Duffy, P. B.: 'High-Resolution Simulations of Oceanic Direct-Injection of Anthropogenic CO2 and CFC Uptake', J. Geophys. Res. (Oceans), in press.

  • Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R., and Edmonds, J. A.: 1996, 'Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilization of CO2 Concentrations', Nature 379, 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herzog, H., Caldeira, K. & Reilly, J. An Issue of Permanence: Assessing the Effectiveness of Temporary Carbon Storage. Climatic Change 59, 293–310 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024801618900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024801618900

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy