Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

River basin flood potential inferred using GRACE gravity observations at several months lead time

Nature Geoscience volume 7, pages 588–592 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The wetness of a watershed determines its response to precipitation1,2,3, leading to variability in flood generation4. The importance of total water storage—which includes snow, surface water, soil moisture and groundwater—for the predisposition of a region to flooding is less clear, in part because such comprehensive observations are rarely available. Here we demonstrate that basin-scale estimates of water storage derived from satellite observations of time-variable gravity can be used to characterize regional flood potential and may ultimately result in longer lead times in flood warnings. We use a case study of the catastrophic 2011 Missouri River floods to establish a relationship between river discharge, as measured by gauge stations, and basin-wide water storage, as measured remotely by NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission. Applying a time-lagged autoregressive model of river discharge, we show that the inclusion of GRACE-based total water storage information allows us to assess the predisposition of a river basin to flooding as much as 5–11 months in advance. Additional case studies of flood events in the Columbia River and Indus River basins further illustrate that longer lead-time flood prediction requires accurate information on the complete hydrologic state of a river basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: GRACE water storage anomaly data for March 2011.
Figure 2: Observed river discharge versus GRACE TWSA.
Figure 3: Autoregressive model results.
Figure 4: Autoregressive model performance.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sayama, T., McDonnell, J. J., Dhakal, A. & Sullivan, K. How much water can a watershed store? Hydrol. Process. 25, 3899–3908 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirchner, J. W. Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall-runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backwards. Wat. Resour. Res. 45, W02429 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brutsaert, W. Long-term groundwater storage trends estimated from streamflow records: Climatic perspective. Wat. Resour. Res. 44, W02409 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, L. & Simonovic, S. P. System dynamics model for predicting floods from snowmelt in North American prairie watersheds. Hydrol. Process. 16, 2645–2666 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beven, K. J. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: The Primer 360 (John Wiley, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horton, R. E. Surface Runoff Phenomena, Part 1. Analysis of the Hydrograph (Horton Hydrological Laboratory, Publication 101, Edward Bros, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, F. R. Base flow recessions—A review. Wat. Resour. Res. 4, 973–983 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Appleby, V. C. Recession and the baseflow problem. Wat. Resour. Res. 6, 1398–1403 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wetterhall, F. et al. Forecasters priorities for improving probabilistic flood forecasts. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 10, 2215–2242 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, Y., Liu, S. & Baetz, B. W. Probabilistic rainfall-runoff transformation considering both infiltration and saturation excess runoff generation processes. Wat. Resour. Res. 48, W06513 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Siccardi, F., Boni, G., Ferraris, L. & Rudari, R. A hydrometeorological approach for probabilistic flood forecast. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D05101 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reager, J. T. & Famiglietti, J. S. Global terrestrial water storage capacity and flood potential using GRACE. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L23402 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Famigilietti, J. S. & Rodell, M. Water in the balance. Science 340, 1300 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Ries, J. C., Thompson, P. F. & Watkinse, M. M. GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305, 503–505 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramillien, G., Famiglietti, J. S. & Wahr, J. Detection of continental hydrology and glaciology signals from GRACE: A review. Surv. Geophys. 29, 361–374 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Syed, T. H., Famiglietti, J. S. & Chambers, D. GRACE-based estimates of terrestrial freshwater discharge from basin to continental scales. J. Hydromet. 10, 22–40 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodell, M., Velicogna, I. & Famiglietti, J. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 460, 999–1002 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Famiglietti, J. S. et al. Satellites measure recent rates of groundwater depletion in California’s Central Valley. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L03403 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crowley, J. W., Mitrovica, J. X., Bailey, R. C., Tamisiea, M. E. & Davis, J. L. Land water storage within the Congo Basin inferred from GRACE satellite gravity data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L19402 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spring Flooding Underway, Expected to Worsen through April (NOAA news website, 2011); http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110317_springoutlook.html

  21. US Army Corps of Engineers, Post 2011 Flood Event Analysis of Missouri River (USACE, 2012)

  22. Swenson, S. & Wahr, J. Methods for inferring regional surface-mass anomalies from Gravity recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time-variable gravity. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2193 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wahr, J., Swenson, S. & Velicogna, I. Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L06401 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service: Portland: Columbia River (NWS, 2011); http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?wfo=pqr&gage=vapw1

  25. Natural Hazards: Unusually Intense Monsoon Rains (NASA Earth Observatory, 2010); http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=45177

  26. Rodell, M. et al. The global land data assimilation system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85, 381–394 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the NASA GRACE Science Team, from the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship program, from the University of California Office of the President, Multicampus Research Programs and Initiatives, and from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF3269). We offer a special thanks to S. Swenson of the National Center for Atmospheric Research for GRACE data processing and early discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA

    J. T. Reager, B. F. Thomas & J. S. Famiglietti

  2. Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA

    J. S. Famiglietti

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA

    J. S. Famiglietti

Authors
  1. J. T. Reager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. F. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. S. Famiglietti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.T.R. and J.S.F. conceived the project; J.T.R. designed the study, performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript; B.F.T. advised on methods and interpretation; B.F.T. and J.S.F. assisted in writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. T. Reager.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 5627 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reager, J., Thomas, B. & Famiglietti, J. River basin flood potential inferred using GRACE gravity observations at several months lead time. Nature Geosci 7, 588–592 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2203

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2203

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy