Complexity Theory in the Study of Space and Place

Steven Manson and David O'Sullivan
Additional contact information
Steven Manson: Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, 414 Social Sciences Building, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
David O'Sullivan: School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

Environment and Planning A, 2006, vol. 38, issue 4, 677-692

Abstract: Researchers across disciplines apply complexity theory to issues ranging from economic development to earthquake prediction. The breadth of applications speaks to the promise of complexity theory, but there remain a number of challenges to be met, particularly those related to its ontological and epistemological dimensions. We identify a number of key issues by asking three questions. Does complexity theory operate at too general a level to enhance understanding? What are the ontological and epistemological implications of complexity? What are the challenges in modeling complexity? In answering these questions, we argue that, although complexity offers much to the study of place and space, research in these areas has a number of strengths that enhance complexity research.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a37100 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:38:y:2006:i:4:p:677-692

DOI: 10.1068/a37100

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().