Patent quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement
Kyle Higham,
Gaétan de Rassenfosse and
Adam Jaffe
Working Papers from Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy
Abstract:
The ‘quality’ of novel technological innovations is extremely variable, and the ability to measure innovation quality is essential to sensible, evidence-based policy. Patents, an often vital precursor to a commercialised innovation, share this heterogeneous quality distribution. A pertinent question then arises: How should we deï¬ ne and measure patent quality? Accepting that different parties have different views of, and different sets of terminologies for discussing this concept, we take a multi-dimensional view of patent quality in this work. We ï¬ rst test the consistency of popular post-grant outcomes that are often used as patent quality measures. Finding these measures to be generally inconsistent, we then use a raft of patent indicators available at the time of grant to dissect the characteristics of different post-grant outcomes. We ï¬ nd broad disagreement in the relative importance of individual characteristics between outcomes and, further, signiï¬ cant variation of the same across technologies within outcomes. We conclude that measurement of patent quality is highly sensitive to both the observable outcome selected and the technology type. Our ï¬ ndings bear concrete implications for scholarly research using patent data and policy discussions about patent quality.
Keywords: Patent; Patent quality; Patent value; Patent citation; Patent policy; Technological impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O30 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 54 pages
Date: 2021-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino, nep-ipr and nep-tid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cdm-repec.epfl.ch/iip-wpaper/WP14.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement (2021) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement (2020) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement (2020) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iip:wpaper:14
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gaétan de Rassenfosse ().