Talk:2020–2022 catalytic converter theft ring/GA1

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CommissarDoggo (talk | contribs) at 11:09, 28 October 2024 (Operation Heavy Metal: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 11 days ago by CommissarDoggo in topic GA Review

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: CommissarDoggo (talk · contribs) 21:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 03:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


This looks interesting. I'll review shortly. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Per below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Issues have been fixed IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I spot-checked some of the more used sources as well as some random ones and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2c. it contains no original research. IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall assessment.
The only reason that the lead has sources is because of Its dismantlement in 2022 was described as the first known interdiction of such a criminal scheme, which didn't appear to fit anywhere else at the time, however I'll take a peek around at the Aftermath section as it should fit in there nicely. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
As for how short it is, I'll mess about with it and see how much it can be expanded, as there's definitely plenty to go in. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Visually the lead looks much better already but I will do a more thourough read through later. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thank you. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lead

  • generated $545 million Is that the amount they sold it for or the value of what they sold? Could you clarify? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Strangely I don't believe any sources actually stated definitively whether it was the actual value that they sold it for or the damages. Just based on the wording of the sources used I'd say it's revenue generated, as I believe that's the wording used in the DoJ releases, but I'll go back into the sources and try to find some clarity. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • with the majority earned through the DG Auto Parts corporation Is this the company they sold the converters to? If so could you specify that? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
    ...Strangely enough I don't actually know where I got that from, I'll clarify it. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • The money earned would then be divided between the owners of the company I may be overthinking but was the money divided between the owners of DG Auto Parts or the criminal group? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Nah you're not overthinking, it is a bit weirdly worded. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • The investigation began in late 2020 and early 2021 in Oklahoma during a wave of catalytic converter thefts in Tulsa. What prompted the investigation? Was it the stolen converters? If so maybe reword to reflect that. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
    The investigation was prompted by the wave of catalytic converter thefts, however weirdly enough I can't find the exact reason why I worded it like that in the main body, but I'm fairly certain it came from source 17; "Oklahoma, like the rest of the country, had been experiencing an astonishing rise in thefts of the devices...The officers called in a lieutenant who’d been working with the FBI to investigate the wave of thefts...The case might have ended there. But in the months before the traffic stop, as the police tried to get a handle on the theft problem," Regardless, I'll reword it to reflect the source better and to clarify things. CommissarDoggoTalk? 10:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Your changes to the lead so far have made a lot of improvement, thank you! IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • By September, a team of investigators had linked Curtis Cores, a company owned by Tyler Curtis then suspected of buying and selling stolen catalytic converters, with DG Auto Parts, a company in Freehold, New Jersey, which was a recipient of the stolen catalytic converters, owned by Navin and Tinu Khanna. This is a really long and somewhat hard-to-follow sentence. Could you rephrase a bit? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Background

Initial investigation

Dismantling the state theft rings

Sting operations at DG Auto Parts

Operation Heavy Metal

Aftermath

Overall

What an interesting article. I really enjoyed doing this review. I hope the amount of feedback I gave hasn't been discouraging at all. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly throughout this review. I believe with some very minor tweaks regarding prose this article meets GAC. IntentionallyDense (talk) 01:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy