Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive407: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 5 discussion(s) from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring) (bot |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 230:
:::{{u|Slugger O'Toole}}, Specifically, it is you repeatedly returning the article to your preferred version whatever changes I make. You claim to be willing to work on this, but you keep restoring the same version, and are completely obdurate in your insistence on inclusion of a specific Catholic term of art, that requires a piped link because it conflicts with the common meaning, in the lead. Need I remind you that you were already topic-banned from {{la|Knights of Columbus}} for similar [[WP:OWN]]ership behaviour? '''[[user:JzG|Guy]]''' <small>([[user talk:JzG|help!]])</small> 21:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
::::{{u|JzG}}, That is just plain false. As I noted above, you have made a series of edits that have improved the article. I have not changed them. I even accepted your formulation of the disputed sentence, with the one word exception. As demonstrated repeatedly, it is you who have changed the language against consensus. A majority of editors on talk explicitly reject your assessment of it being a "Catholic term of art." Again, if a consensus forms that rejects the use of the word, I will gladly abide by it. To date, there is not one. -- [[User:Slugger O'Toole|Slugger O'Toole]] ([[User talk:Slugger O'Toole|talk]]) 21:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
:::::{{u|Slugger O'Toole}} While not explictly restricted to 3RR only, this forum is primarily designed for simple, short-term cases. I agree with Black Kite's assessment that you would be better served on ANI. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<
::::::{{u|King of Hearts}} and {{u|Black Kite}}, thank you. I don't spend much time on these boards. I'll repost there. -- [[User:Slugger O'Toole|Slugger O'Toole]] ([[User talk:Slugger O'Toole|talk]]) 22:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Line 630:
**I'm not handling this but I will note that Opindia has him for [[User:Schiindler]]'s addition of the word "terrorist", eg[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh&diff=953818958&oldid=953815508]. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 13:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} Also [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ahmedfalah7711&diff=953874442&oldid=953874062 warned] of possibility of topic-ban if the disruption resumes after the current block. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 14:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Ash Salvatore]] reported by [[User:Robertsky]] (Result: Blocked) ==
Line 1,044 ⟶ 990:
*'''Result:''' [[User:Symphony Regalia]] is blocked one week for abuse of process and wasting others' time. He has been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3ASymphony+Regalia blocked previously for edit warring]. On 7 March he filed an unjustified 3RR complaint against another editor and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=944385008&oldid=944383793 was warned]. He still thinks that three reverts is enough to break [[WP:3RR]]. As <s>admin</s> [[User:MarkH21]] has described the complaint above, "this is nonsense." Symphony Regalia has neglected to engage patiently on the article talk page and instead is exhausting everyone's patience here. Previously on 9 March I had [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Symphony_Regalia&diff=944707040&oldid=944597706 warned Symphony Regalia] of the possibility of a [[WP:NOTHERE]] block due to his failure to provide a net benefit to the encyclopedia. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
*:<small>Correction {{ping|EdJohnston}} I’m not an admin! — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 18:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)</small></br> <small>Sorry MarkH21, I corrected my comment. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC) </small>
== [[User:180.231.63.209]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result: one week, partial) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Iris (anatomy)}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|180.231.63.209}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954409072|07:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954408979 by [[Special:Contributions/Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954408945|07:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954408286 by [[Special:Contributions/Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954408539|07:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954408286 by [[Special:Contributions/Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954408183|07:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "more unsourced removed"
# {{diff|oldid=950716842|diff=954407773|label=Consecutive edits made from 07:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC) to 07:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954407726|07:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Deleted some of the unsourced. More needs doing."
## {{diff2|954407773|07:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954408305|07:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "General note: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Iris (anatomy)]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954408611|07:13, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Iris (anatomy)]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954409006|07:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Iris (anatomy)]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954409143|07:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Iris (anatomy)]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
Engaged in Edit warring and ignoring warnings [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 07:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
{{an3|b|one week}}. [[WP:PB|Partial block]]. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 07:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:OyMosby]] reported by [[User:WEBDuB]] (Result: Page protected, Users alerted) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Genocide of Serbs in the Independent State of Croatia}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|OyMosby}}
'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953574764&oldid=953571131]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953591925&oldid=953589816]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953684899&oldid=953683454]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953687399&oldid=953687065]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OyMosby&diff=953687800&oldid=952727479]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OyMosby&diff=prev&oldid=953718412]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia#Background]
Futhermore, user continued [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953897180&oldid=953714762 to make the changes] even though debate was ongoing on talk-page about the Background section, after a warning by two users. All moves are part of a continuous series of nationalist POV editing, which also include [[Genocide denial|minimizing statements of the scale and severity of genocide]] and the [[Holocaust denial|Holocaust]].--[[User:WEBDuB|WEBDuB]] ([[User talk:WEBDuB|talk]]) 16:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
I don’t understand why I am being reported? No edits have been made for days on that article not o mention you continued making edits on the page while and ongoing debate was going on since April 27th yet here you are making more edits on the page:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953656859&oldid=953655385 [1<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953671235&oldid=953656859 [2<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
You had been warned multiple times of 3RR:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WEBDuB&diff=953693344&oldid=953132264 [3<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WEBDuB&diff=902111478&oldid=901541143 [4<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WEBDuB&diff=953728828&oldid=953718410 [5<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
Your removed sourced information from the intro that was already discussed months ago in a conversation on the talk page that you were part of.
What was on talk page in February: You: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=941477927&oldid=936140873 [6<nowiki>]</nowiki>] Consensus was that itnis to stay
What you removed recently: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953115721&oldid=953115057 [7<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
What another user reminded you of the talk that happened months ago: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953130002&oldid=953128171 [8<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
A user {{ping|Peacemaker67}} made it clear to you in February and months later on the talk page that the intro sentence is Ts as per Tomasovich’s book cited. And you still manipulate the sentence or delete it to maximize some narrative or censor the information for some bad faith reason.
I literally said on the talk page “ Doesn’t change or justify the desire for genocide and other disproportionate and disgusting practices that came about with the Ustashe themselves. Removing such info would be wrong.” How am I denying or downplaying anything? You are just trying to spin a narrative on that article.
Lets not forget you repeated attempts to push this edit trying to claim genocide was a essential pillar of “Greater Croatia ideology” [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=952749415&oldid=952317019 [10<nowiki>]</nowiki>] and trying to portray Croatian nationalism as genocidal in nature. You are the one clearly nationalist POV pushing: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953679291&oldid=953678242 [12<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
Or comparing the genocide of Serbs as part of the Holocaust which another user pointed out as incorrect: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=952793508&oldid=952749415 [11<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953897180&oldid=953714762 [9<nowiki>]</nowiki>] I added a sentence from the very same source you posted when you selective included one part without the counter argument presented in the same source. So who here is really trying to downplay, or skew the article or topic?
You also kept adding WWII civl war section that yet another editor had to remove and you added back again. You as well as another editor tag teaming me on the page. Multiple other editors disagreed with your edits as well and your stance on the talk page. Personal attacks against me won’t end well for you.
Not to mention I haven’t edited on the page since you said no changes are to be made until talk is done. And I haven’t. So why days later are you trying to start another issue? Looking at your edit history it is clear that YOU are the nationalist POV pusher. And you accuse ME of minimizing genocide and the Holocaust? How dare you? Where did I ever do that? You however downplayed the genocide waged by the Chetniks in your edit history. Do you even realize what a revolting and serious accusation that is? It makes me hopping mad especially since my grandfather and his brother were sent to a slave labour cam in Germany and narrowly survived. My other grandfather head hunted by Germans and Ustahse. I may have bias towards Partisans (nothing to do with the article though) as both sides of my family had Partisan fighters. So you can sod off with your revolting attacks. I don’t remotely deserve them. I’d like to say more in reaction but will bite my tongue so as to not het in trouble for obscenities.
I don’t see how these disgusting attacks say anything about me. They say everything about you and your pov agenda on Wikipedia. Be being for a balanced neutral article and being against pov edits does not mean I defend the Ustashe or fascist. Typical trollish counter by those with little counter arguments of merit. I hope admins look into your edit history. Trying to get rid of people you disagree with is a bad a low way to go.[[User:OyMosby|OyMosby]] ([[User talk:OyMosby|talk]]) 18:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
:First of all, I have not violated any rule. I didn't change anything after the warning. After that, I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953754919&oldid=953691303 summarized] the issues and launched a debate. Futhermore, I added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953671235&oldid=953656859 here] only sourced material. you mentioned here the warning from June 2019, unrelated to this article.
:This [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953130002&oldid=953128171 edit] was merely a shortening of the too long section. Previously another user suggested shortening it. Basically, I did't remove any information.
:I wrote [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=941477927&oldid=936140873 this comment] because the content of the article really looks like the relativization of genocide. It's unusual for a genocide artivles to mention the victim group's prior wrongdoings to the perpetrators. You didn't give me an example of something similar in other genocide articles.
:The most important, I have written critically about many Serbian politicians, including their nationalist moves. Even some non-Serbian users have criticized me for “neoliberal” changes in te articles about Serbian high officals. Also, I have never removed anything critical from Chetnik articles, nor participated in these discussions.--[[User:WEBDuB|WEBDuB]] ([[User talk:WEBDuB|talk]]) 19:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
::Again, not one place did I “downplay” genocide or the Holocaust. You removed the 6 January and anti-Croat line despite the talk page dialogue that occurred two months ago that you were part of. The lead literaly mentions it was a disproportionate response by the Ustahse. Many artciles go into what makes an organization or person committe the atrocities they didZ as I stated on the talk page the Chetniks article mentions that to at least an extent Chetnik atrocities were a reaction to the Ustashe. Although atrocities carried out in Eastern Bosnian happened before Ustahse activities. And it was explained this many times on the talk page by various editors. You want to shorten the lead yet you added a lot to it. Also you engaged in edit warring and got more than one warning. And yes I was guilty of it too for how many in a day I did when I was getting tag teamed by you and another editor. That was my error. You are not clean here. When you made the last edit on the article asking for the editing to pause while talks occur, I obliged as you can see. And now almost 3 day later you file this nonsense report? Clearly you are doing this to editors who disagree with you. I had partook in the talk section. Like everyone else. I couldn’t care less what you supposedly said about Serbian nationalists. You wouldn’t make the edits you did about Chetniks and on that page if this were true. You made many edits towing the nationalist line or from a nationalist perspective. You are going after users who disagree with you to either intimidate or bully them or hoping to get them blocked. My conscious is clean. Can you say the same? I’m done here. [[User:OyMosby|OyMosby]] ([[User talk:OyMosby|talk]]) 19:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
::: I did not delete that, but reformulated. The essence remained the same. After the warning, I didn't do it again. I summarized the issues and launched a debate. Also I also wrote a message to famous users from articles on the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide, the most studied genocides, to help solve problem as a third neutral side. Futhermore, I copied that sentence about Chetniks as part of a larger text from the article. Not my original contribution. Their crimes and collaborations were listed there, as well. My conscious is clean. I will continue to criticize every nationalism and fascist movements, without violating the rules. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia&diff=953679291&oldid=953678242 This] was the summray of sourced information from the article.--[[User:WEBDuB|WEBDuB]] ([[User talk:WEBDuB|talk]]) 20:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
:::: I linked to where you deleted the crucial information. You also made edits on other pages about Chetniks so don’t say you simply “copied”. You outright denied the information about them on those pages. You conscious is clear after what you accused me of and wrongly reported me for despite me not continuing a conflict on the article? Amazing. Claiming I downplay the Holocaust yet my edits show the opposite when trying add info about Nedic’s regime and collaboration forces in the Holocaust only for nationalists to undo me and downplay the collaboration of Nedic and his supporters [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rescuers_of_Jews_during_the_Holocaust&diff=951907111&oldid=951866611 [13<nowiki>]</nowiki>] or here where clearly I was doing the exact opposite of suppressing or downplaying the Holocaust [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Territory_of_the_Military_Commander_in_Serbia&diff=953128527&oldid=953127038 [14<nowiki>]</nowiki>][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milan_Nedić&diff=953385194&oldid=953374990 [14<nowiki>]</nowiki>][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milan_Nedić&diff=953385194&oldid=953374990 [15<nowiki>]</nowiki>]. Also you admitted to breaking a rule. And have edits focused on Croatia or Croats pages. You don’t seem to criticize “every” nationalist or fascist movement. Whatever. This is just repetitive at this point. Good bye. [[User:OyMosby|OyMosby]] ([[User talk:OyMosby|talk]]) 21:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
I watchlist this article and the recent behaviour hasn't been edifying (part of a recent uptick in editing frequency and edit-warring behaviour on Balkan-related pages between what appear on face value to be Croat and Serb editors or pro-Partisan and pro-Chetnik editors), and the personalisation of the above discussion is poor wikibehaviour bordering on [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. Frankly, the material being changed (per the diffs) is not the same, and there are only two reverts of the same material (the last two relating to Bellamy). I think this can be closed as partially misformed and stale, but both editors need to take on board the imperative to discuss dispassionately on a NPOV basis on the talk page rather than reverting and communicating via edit summaries. Also, where you have been edit-warring yourself it is generally a misjudgement to bring another editor's edit-warring behaviour to this noticeboard, as a [[WP:BOOMERANG]] is highly likely once your own behaviour is examined. If I see any more of this, I'll block myself or bring it to ANI if I consider myself too involved. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 02:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:I would say the editor’s first entry on this page stating baseless accusations of me “playing down genocide scale and severity” and the “Holocaust” along with them claiming “nationalist pov pushing” goes way past the border of personal attacks and way into the red. It was personal, shameful and made me livid. There was a lot I wanted to fire back for that but didn’t go farther and bit my tongue. They never could explain where I denied or downplayed anything. I have proof of them doing these things though. Regardless, in their last article edit they asked that they and I refrain from editing further while discussion goes on and I obliged. Few days later he posts this here. I’m no saint, I broke the revert rule, however I participated in the talk page and didn’t go furthermore with reverts days ago. So don’t see their issue. I walked away only to be dragged back here. [[User:OyMosby|OyMosby]] ([[User talk:OyMosby|talk]]) 03:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
::Most importantly, I had no intention of offending anyone. I'm really sorry about that. I only think it is important to follow the rules, and especially to be careful with such sensitive topics. Best wishes.--[[User:WEBDuB|WEBDuB]] ([[User talk:WEBDuB|talk]]) 12:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:::You wouldn’t have said what you did if that is true but whatever. If following the rules and being careful on sensitive topics are important, than will you report yourself? [[User:OyMosby|OyMosby]] ([[User talk:OyMosby|talk]]) 14:57, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{AN3|p}} – One week, and [[User:WEBDuB]] and [[User:OyMosby]] have been alerted to the Eastern European discretionary sanctions. There has been a talk page discussion but it is not well organized. I suggest opening a [[WP:Request for comment]] to improve the chances of reaching a conclusion. Admin [[User:Peacemaker67]] has provided his own comments about this report. There has been a recent upsurge in nationalist editing about Balkan topics, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editing_and_POV_pushing/point-scoring_in_a_contentious_area as reported on 30 April at ANI]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:95.19.235.124]] reported by [[User:Andreas_Philopater]] (Result: Blocked)==
*'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Anuna De Wever}}
*'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|95.19.235.124}}
Over the past 12 hours, [[User:95.19.235.124]] has been edit-warring on the article about the young Belgian climate activist [[Anuna De Wever]]. They have repeatedly removed sourced content relating to an incident in which she was hounded and threatened by young men brandishing a right-wing version of the Flemish flag, with the claim that the flag is irrelevant to the incident. The press reports about the incident took a very different view (as the sourced material shows). [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anuna_De_Wever&curid=60234921&diff=954414434&oldid=954414213 This diff] is the latest at time of reporting, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anuna_De_Wever&type=revision&diff=954296890&oldid=954296594 this seems to be the first] (about 11 hours earlier), and there is at least one intermediate occasion, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anuna_De_Wever&type=revision&diff=954413471&oldid=954413307 here] (of what I take to be a total of five, but I stopped checking precisely upon ascertaining there had been more than three in the course of 12 hours). I have asked them to take their argument to the talk page, but to no avail. --[[User:Andreas Philopater|Andreas Philopater]] ([[User talk:Andreas Philopater|talk]]) 08:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAndreas_Philopater&type=revision&diff=954416560&oldid=952372092 This] seems to be their response to notification of this discussion. --[[User:Andreas Philopater|Andreas Philopater]] ([[User talk:Andreas Philopater|talk]]) 08:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|31 hours}} —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 19:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Fortuneswheelhouses]] reported by [[User:Ifnord]] (Result: Page protected) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Tamaryn}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Fortuneswheelhouses}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954527915|22:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954527807 by [[Special:Contributions/Ifnord|Ifnord]] ([[User talk:Ifnord|talk]]) resolved"
# {{diff2|954527578|22:13, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954525744 by [[Special:Contributions/Ifnord|Ifnord]] ([[User talk:Ifnord|talk]]) this was resolved"
# {{diff2|954522305|21:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954521343 by [[Special:Contributions/LuK3|LuK3]] ([[User talk:LuK3|talk]]) clarification made"
# {{diff2|954521054|21:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Doesn't use a last name"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954525776|21:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Tamaryn]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954528359|22:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Impending block from Wikipedia */ new section"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
Additionally, user claims to be the subject of that BLP and has admitted to at least two other accounts for the same reverts. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FCrowingfortruth&type=revision&diff=954522053&oldid=954521423] [[User:Ifnord|Ifnord]] ([[User talk:Ifnord|talk]]) 22:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p|72 hours}} —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 23:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Moroccan me]] reported by [[User:M.Bitton]] (Result: semiprotected) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Pastilla}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Moroccan me}}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pastilla&oldid=953841518]
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pastilla&type=revision&diff=954261551&oldid=953841518]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pastilla&type=revision&diff=954354354&oldid=954345685]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pastilla&type=revision&diff=954354999&oldid=954354725]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pastilla&type=revision&diff=954355663&oldid=954355126]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moroccan_me&diff=prev&oldid=954355261]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [[User_talk:M.Bitton#Pastilla]]
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
The "new" user is clearly ignoring what the sources say and trying to push their POV in this article and [[Seffa]] too. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 00:57, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{an3|n}}: you've left the ''Previous version reverted to'' parameter blank, so it's not immediately obvious if the earliest diff is a revert or just a bold edit. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 01:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|El C}} I have added it. Please note that the user is ignoring what this important reliable[https://themaydan.com/2019/11/bastila-and-the-archives-of-unwritten-things/] source says (it's cited in the article). [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 01:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:::{{re|M.Bitton}} you basically included the ''Previous version reverted to'' as a revert — that should not be. In any case, your earliest purported revert looks like it is just a bold edit. Edits that are not interspersed by other edits don't count. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 01:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:::: Comment: There isn't at the moment any violation of 3RR, but looking at the sources, Moroccan me is indeed misrepresenting them. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 01:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
::::: {{re|Black Kite|El C}} Now we have another "new" editor ([[Special:Contributions/Sara.alaoui.23]]) who appeared out of nowhere to remove the content that I added and misrepresent the source as they wish. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 01:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:::::: {{re|El C}} We're obviously dealing with an edit warrior here since they reverted your edit too. Please protect the page to stop this complete disregard for what the sources say. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 02:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:::::::Sorry, {{u|M.Bitton}} had to step out. Also managed to protect the wrong article, somehow. Now dealt with. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 02:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
::::::::{{re|El C}} Thank you. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 23:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
{{an3|n}}: [[User:Moroccan me|Moroccan me]], please just use this existing report to provide any necessary documentation. Thank you. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 01:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:220.240.101.203]] reported by [[User:Informationdude420]] (Result: Blocked) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Kundanika Kapadia}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|220.240.101.203}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
{{cot|1=Click to view diffs. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC) }}
# {{diff2|954307768|19:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307608 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307592|19:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307546 by [[Special:Contributions/Diamond Blizzard|Diamond Blizzard]] ([[User talk:Diamond Blizzard|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307523|19:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307480 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307465|19:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307433 by [[Special:Contributions/Diamond Blizzard|Diamond Blizzard]] ([[User talk:Diamond Blizzard|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307373|19:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307348 by [[Special:Contributions/Diamond Blizzard|Diamond Blizzard]] ([[User talk:Diamond Blizzard|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307270|19:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307241 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307204|19:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307167 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307142|19:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954307092 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954307059|19:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306997 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306962|19:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306915 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306902|19:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306834 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306784|19:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306717 by [[Special:Contributions/Informationdude420|Informationdude420]] ([[User talk:Informationdude420|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306665|18:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306630 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306584|18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306543 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306507|18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306476 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306455|18:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid 3rr violation"
# {{diff2|954306369|18:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306329 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306300|18:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Actually you removed useful info"
# {{diff2|954306227|18:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306197 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306153|18:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306076 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954306045|18:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954306006 by [[Special:Contributions/Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954305850|18:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Stop it."
# {{diff2|954305775|18:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954305718 by [[Special:Contributions/Informationdude420|Informationdude420]] ([[User talk:Informationdude420|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954305651|18:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954305626 by [[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:2407:9F00:4865:58DE:7DC5:6E65|2604:2000:2407:9F00:4865:58DE:7DC5:6E65]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:2407:9F00:4865:58DE:7DC5:6E65|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954305503|18:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954305445 by [[Special:Contributions/Informationdude420|Informationdude420]] ([[User talk:Informationdude420|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954305196|18:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Your edit sure is."
# {{diff2|954305061|18:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954304931 by [[Special:Contributions/HickoryOughtShirt?4|HickoryOughtShirt?4]] ([[User talk:HickoryOughtShirt?4|talk]])"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954305397|18:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on [[:Kundanika Kapadia]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954305592|18:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Vandalism on [[:Kundanika Kapadia]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954306684|18:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Vandalism on [[:Kundanika Kapadia]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
{{cob}}
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
: I blocked the IP since the edits are clearly vandalism. [[User:HickoryOughtShirt?4|HickoryOughtShirt?4]] ([[User talk:HickoryOughtShirt?4|talk]]) 19:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Informationdude420}}, next time, just list at [[WP:AIV|AIV]] — that will spare you from compiling all these diffs for naught. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 01:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:65.128.171.67 ]] reported by [[User:Epinoia]] (Result: Blocked) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Janine Lindemulder}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|65.128.171.67}}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Janine_Lindemulder&diff=next&oldid=950394666]
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Janine_Lindemulder&type=revision&diff=954475038&oldid=954473714]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Janine_Lindemulder&diff=954466374&oldid=954465150]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Janine_Lindemulder&diff=954464945&oldid=954464909]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Janine_Lindemulder&diff=954464705&oldid=954464471]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A65.128.171.67&type=revision&diff=954477686&oldid=954465829]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJanine_Lindemulder&type=revision&diff=954473553&oldid=954443059]
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
- also attempted to resolve dispute on user talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:65.128.171.67] - user has been unreponsive and keeps re-adding unsourced material to [[WP:BLP|BLP]] - [[User:Epinoia|Epinoia]] ([[User talk:Epinoia|talk]]) 16:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b}} – 48 hours. The user is trying to claim that a variety of musicians are bass players but with no sources. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:2A00:23C5:AE88:A500:E9FF:B39A:F777:46F]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result: Semi) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Economy of Scotland}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|2A00:23C5:AE88:A500:E9FF:B39A:F777:46F}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
{{cot|1=Click to view diffs. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC) }}
# {{diff2|954509001|20:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Tourism */ section moved into 'services' section to improve structure"
# {{diff|oldid=954505579|diff=954508871|label=Consecutive edits made from 19:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC) to 20:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954507381|19:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Agriculture and forestry */ renamed as section included fishing - moved in other sections on other primary industries to improve ordering."
## {{diff2|954507530|19:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Mineral Extraction */ broken source fixed"
## {{diff2|954508659|20:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Financial services */ renamed main header to 'services sector' and moved in software and tourism sections to improve overall structure."
## {{diff2|954508730|20:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Services Sector= */ removed errant = from title"
## {{diff2|954508871|20:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Natural resources */ content moved into primary sector to improve structure of page."
# {{diff|oldid=954504722|diff=954505440|label=Consecutive edits made from 19:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC) to 19:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954505361|19:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Financial services */ moved Tourism sector, renamed from Financial services to Services sector"
## {{diff2|954505440|19:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Tourism */ moved into Service sector section"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954504780|19:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "General note: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Economy of Scotland]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954505611|19:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Economy of Scotland]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954508984|20:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Economy of Scotland]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954509105|20:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Removal of content, blanking on [[:Economy of Scotland]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
{{cob}}
;<u>Comments:</u>
This IP editor is continuously engaged in 'section blanking' and 'edit warring' [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 20:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
*'''Result:''' Page semiprotected one month. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Garsixfour]] reported by [[User:Horse Eye Jack]] (Result: Indefinite block) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Milk tea}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Garsixfour}}
'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milk_tea&diff=954554147&oldid=954096907] "politics ≠ popular culture and has nothing to do with the drink"
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milk_tea&diff=954554536&oldid=954554240] "No one is 'stalking' your edits."
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milk_tea&diff=954554986&oldid=954554687] “as per BRD, the sources are questionable and are politically charged in violation of NPOV. I don't see how an article about a drink has anything to with politics. If you have issues with the revert, use the talk page. Edit warring is disruptive. Thanks."
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milk_tea&diff=954555626&oldid=954555098] "The "Milk Tea Alliance" is an online phenomena that has nothing to do with the actual drink. No such alliance exists in the real world and as such does not meet any notability."
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [link]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [diff]
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
Since 01:27 today they’ve only edited articles that I created or removed text I added, not sure whats going on here but its weird and uncomfortable in addition to being a 3rr violation. [[User:Horse Eye Jack|Horse Eye Jack]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye Jack|talk]]) 02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|c}} Has there been any communication with them? I don't see where a warning about 3RR has been given. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 02:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
::I took the “edit warring is disruptive” in the edit summary to indicate familiarity with the general concept, looks like they were a sock anyway. [[User:Horse Eye Jack|Horse Eye Jack]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye Jack|talk]]) 02:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
*User has been blocked indefinitely by a checkuser. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 02:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:105.107.0.215]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result:Blocked 24 hours ) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Lounès Matoub}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|105.107.0.215}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954572602|04:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954572269|04:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954571966|04:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff|oldid=945933765|diff=954566371|label=Consecutive edits made from 03:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC) to 03:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954563739|03:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|954566059|03:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|954566371|03:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954566726|03:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "General note: Unconstructive editing on [[:Kabyle people]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954571684|04:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Idir]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954571905|04:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Vandalism on [[:Idir]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954572029|04:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Vandalism on [[:Lounès Matoub]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954572385|04:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Only warning: Vandalism on [[:Lounès Matoub]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
This is clearly a vandalizing account now engaged in edit warring [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 04:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
* {{AN3|b|24 hours}} [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 04:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:1.46.111.166]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result:Blocked) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Local area network}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|1.46.111.166}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff|oldid=954563726|diff=954566704|label=Consecutive edits made from 03:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC) to 03:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954566276|03:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|954566352|03:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|954566589|03:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|954566704|03:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954563139|03:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954566857|03:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Only warning: Vandalism on [[:Local area network]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
This user is engaged in vandalism and edit warring [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 03:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b}} – 31 hours by [[User:Glen]] for vandalism. For details see the filter log. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:1.46.111.166]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result: Blocked) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|IEEE 802.11}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|1.46.111.166}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954569621|04:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff|oldid=954569423|diff=954569502|label=Consecutive edits made from 04:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC) to 04:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954569459|04:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|954569502|04:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954569398|04:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954566857|03:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Only warning: Vandalism on [[:Local area network]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954568483|03:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954568807|03:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Vandalism. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954569535|04:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Vandalism on [[:IEEE 802.11]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
The user is not stopping, request to block this vandalizing account [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 04:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b}} – 31 hours by [[User:Glen]] for vandalism. For details see the filter log. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Andigen1]] reported by [[User:TParis]] (Result: Blocked) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Michael_Moore}} <br />
'''Users being reported:'''<br />{{userlinks|Andigen1}}<br />{{userlinks|139.179.105.91 }}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [diff preferred, link permitted]
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Moore&diff=954411433&oldid=954142426]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Moore&diff=954474485&oldid=954468050]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Moore&diff=954479050&oldid=954476312]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Moore&diff=954485296&oldid=954479276]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Moore&diff=954612827&oldid=954514860]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' N/A
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
* I think it's very clear under the [[WP:DUCK]] test that this IP and user are the same person. Block rationale could be any of the following: [[WP:3RR]], [[WP:SOCK]], [[WP:NOTHERE]].--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 15:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:*'''Result:''' The acccount and the IP are both blocked for sockpuppetry. Notice the similarity of their edit summaries and their edit filter logs. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Bloom6132]] reported by [[User:M.Bitton]] (Result: 24 hours) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Idir}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Bloom6132}}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&oldid=954591543]
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&type=revision&diff=954620140&oldid=954619568] Here they reverted [[Special:Contributions/41.220.151.161]] who reverted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&diff=next&oldid=954611823 their addition]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&type=revision&diff=954662161&oldid=954651125]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&type=revision&diff=954664695&oldid=954663369]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&type=revision&diff=954665138&oldid=954664949]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bloom6132&diff=prev&oldid=954664032] and here's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bloom6132&diff=prev&oldid=954664596 their acknowledgment] that they have read it.
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [diff]
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
Clear case of [[WP:BOOMERANG]] here. The reporting user was introducing factual errors and historical inaccuracies to the article in question. [[Idir]] was born in 1949, and [[French Algeria]] lasted until 1962. He is clear on his intent to violate [[WP:NPOV]] and seems to edit and revert with a political agenda. —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 17:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
I tried to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AM.Bitton&type=revision&diff=954666353&oldid=954354976 warn him] not to introduce incorrect information, but of course I was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AM.Bitton&type=revision&diff=954667360&oldid=954666353 reverted]. Because to him, facts to not matter. —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 17:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:Obviously the editor doesn't understand what NPOV means, ignoring what the overwhelming cited RS say and edit warring ('''reverting two editors''') over their prefer version. Warning them not to edit war was a waste of time. As since we're talking about agendas, I wonder what's behind [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Idir&diff=next&oldid=954614238 their addition] of France's portal to an article about an Algerian singer. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 17:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:One more thing, '''they are also lying''' about their so-called warning which was issued 10 minutes after my last edit. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 17:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}}. However, he is actually correct that NPOV would mean stating he was born in France, which Algeria was an integral part of at the time. Reliable sources often misname places of birth with their current names/nations (like [https://www.knesset.gov.il/mk/eng/mk_eng.asp?mk_individual_id_t=493 this]). [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 19:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
::{{re|Number 57}} Unfortunately, it's not that simple since the official name of the colonized country at the time was Algeria and French laws did not apply to the indigenous people (the Algerians) who weren't considered French. That's why, in part, I wrote the name of the country without linking to the country (the other being to comply with the infobox guideline). This is a complicated issue, but for the sake of peace, I will link "Algeria" in the infobox to the "French Algeria" article, even though it played no part in who Idir was or what he's notable for. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 20:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:::It is that simple. He was born in France, which is what should be stated as his place of birth. I would strongly advise against making the change suggested. [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 20:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:FobTown]] reported by [[User:MarkH21]] (Result: Declined procedurally, per the recommendation of the reporter) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in mainland China}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|FobTown}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954560078|02:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff|oldid=954457956|diff=954501344|label=Consecutive edits made from 19:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC) to 19:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954499872|19:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954457956 by [[Special:Contributions/Mx. Granger|Mx. Granger]] ([[User talk:Mx. Granger|talk]]) cover-up was part of the covert PPE purchase"
## {{diff2|954501344|19:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "the problem with the rewriting of the Bild quote is that it misses why the editor called it a Trojan horse"
# {{diff2|954376519|02:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Bild editorial, United Front Work Department (UFWD)"
# {{diff2|954074400|15:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} "Bild editor Julian Reichelt"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
{{diff2|944366423|48 hour block for edit warring}}
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
Back-and-forth edit warring between FobTown and {{u|Mx. Granger}}, following a recent EW block on FobTown for previous COVID-19 related edit warring. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 02:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:It isn't edit warring if you compare the last edits. We came to a concensus on Africans in Guangzhou[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_in_mainland_China&type=revision&diff=953496872&oldid=953490580], the United Front buying up of PPE[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_in_mainland_China&type=revision&diff=954542199&oldid=954501344], and I agreed to {{u|Mx. Granger}} request not to make Bild editorial a standalone paragraph.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_in_mainland_China&type=revision&diff=954560078&oldid=954542777]
::In all four linked reverts, you repeatedly added back a quote that Mx. Granger repeatedly removed and repeatedly moved a paragraph that Mx. Granger moved back. That’s still edit warring. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 15:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:::I see that {{u|Mx. Granger}} just removed FobTown’s edit {{diff2| 954654912|again}} while this AN3 report is pending. Both of you appear to be edit warring. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 16:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
::::Hi [[User:MarkH21|MarkH21]]. I didn't realize this discussion had been started (the previous ping didn't work). I'll self-revert while the discussion continues. —[[User:Mx. Granger|Granger]] ([[User talk:Mx. Granger|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Mx. Granger|contribs]]) 16:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
::::To clarify my [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_in_mainland_China&type=revision&diff=954658191&oldid=954607993 most recent edits] – these were an effort to find a compromise by replacing the low-quality Bild source with reliable sources reporting substantively the same information (as well as various other cleanup, copyediting, and expansion). While I don't believe this compromise-seeking constitutes edit-warring on my part, I've self-reverted as a gesture of good faith and to allow for discussion. —[[User:Mx. Granger|Granger]] ([[User talk:Mx. Granger|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Mx. Granger|contribs]]) 16:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
: I would also note that [[User:MarkH21]] has a somewhat checkered history of being involved in disputes, although I am not reporting [[User:MarkH21]] at this time. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MarkH21#Your_incessant_harassment_and_demands_about_'references'][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:CaradhrasAiguo_reported_by_User:Symphony_Regalia_(Result:_Filer_blocked)] [[User:FobTown|FobTown]] ([[User talk:FobTown|talk]]) 15:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
::I reported you here as an uninvolved party. Your ''ad hominem'' (with links to a new editor being upset at having their unreferenced content removed/tagged + another editor being blocked for disruptive editing) are tangential and have no substance. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 15:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
{{u|Mx. Granger}} and I have remained civil so far, and while we are not using the talk page, we are working towards compromise wording. Thus it is interesting that an uninvolved party [[User:MarkH21]] went straight to filing this report, first accusing myself and then {{u|Mx. Granger}} of edit warring, without even bothering to mediate nor warn either of us. [[User:FobTown|FobTown]] ([[User talk:FobTown|talk]]) 16:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:I saw back-and-forth reverts on a page on my watchlist, with the same quote and paragraph being repeatedly removed and added into the article without discussion. I saw that you have a very recent block from edit warring on COVID-19 articles. One can assume that you are aware of the edit warring policy. On Mx. Granger’s part, there’s some semblance of trying to revise and address through edit summaries, something that is utterly lacking in your reverts like {{diff2|954560078|this}} and {{diff2|954376519|this}}. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 16:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
*'''Nominator comment''': Since Mx. Granger has opened a [[Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in mainland China#Bild editorial|talk page discussion]] and the edit warring has ceased for now, I think that this AN3 report can be closed as a final warning ''if'' FobTown acknowledges the [[WP:EW|edit warring policy]] and refrains from unexplained reverts to reintroduce their preferred paragraphs in the future, with a preference to use the talk page in the future.{{pb}}Also, a reminder to all parties that there are [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019|general sanctions for COVID-19 articles]] in place. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 17:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
*:Agreed that this can be closed without sanctions. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=954652429 FobTown's "checkered history" remark] is particularly distasteful and nonsensical, though. <span style="color: #8B0000">Caradhras</span>Aiguo (<small>[[User talk:CaradhrasAiguo|leave language]]</small>) 20:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|d}} procedurally, per the recommendation of the reporter [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:JjlPierpoint]] reported by [[User:Flix11]] (Result: Page protected) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Freeman Dyson}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|JjlPierpoint}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff|oldid=954205605|diff=954212686|label=Consecutive edits made from 06:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC) to 07:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|954210409|06:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Climate change */Corrected factual misinformation and provided citations to corroborate the corrections."
## {{diff2|954212686|07:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Climate change */Fixed typo"
# {{diff2|954205179|06:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Climate change */Misstatement of position corrected and citation inserted to substantiate the correction."
# {{diff2|954202313|05:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Climate change */Corrected misstatement of his views on climate change and added link to video interview of Dyson confirming the accuracy of the correction."
# {{diff2|954155381|23:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} "Corrected mischaracterization of his view on Co2 contribution to climate change and included video interview clip of him stating his views."
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954203691|05:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "General note: Unconstructive editing on [[:Freeman Dyson]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954205631|06:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Freeman Dyson]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
User has made many attempts to justify their edits. They are being reverted without communication or explanation, which is a form of [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|pe}} - User has made attempts to justify their edits at every turn, while the reverting and reporting user has apparently made no attempt whatsoever to even explain their reverting or communicate in any way. With all due deference to an editor with 80k edits and a relatively clean block log, I'd be more inclined to boomerang the reporter. No worries though, disagreements happen, please just focus on discussion going forward. [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:FullSendNelk]] reported by [[User:Dmartin969]] (Result: Stale) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Steve Deleonardis}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|FullSendNelk}}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steve_Deleonardis&oldid=953284701]
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|954203381|01:51, 2020 May 1(UTC)}}
# {{diff2|954203429|01:54, 2020 May 1(UTC)}}
# {{diff2|954203927|02:04, 2020 May 1(UTC)}}
# {{diff2|954205505|02:14, 2020 May 1(UTC)}}
# {{diff2|954208374|02:32, 2020 May 1(UTC)}}
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' {{diff2|954207102|Being involved in an edit war can result...}}
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' {{diff2|954207366|Talk:Steve Deleonardis§criticism}}
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> User has only made edits on this page blanking the criticism section, and has been unresposive to talk page messages. Full disclosure I did make more than three reverts that I beleived to fall under [[WP:3RRNO]], but hve decided to ask here before going further. <br />
*{{AN3|s}} [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Mushuukyou]] reported by [[User:Alexbrn]] (Result: Warned user(s)) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Circumcision}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Mushuukyou}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954182968|03:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954122270|20:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954018061|07:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954017920|07:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954017218|07:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} ""
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954018025|07:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Circumcision]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
*{{AN3|w}} - Stale edit war at this point, but user issued formal AE DS notice. If this continues in any capacity, please report them to me directly, or to [[WP:AE]], so they can be banned from the subject area. I would take the step now without hesitation if not for the "awareness criteria". Best, [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Soroushia]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result: Blocked) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Crash Landing on You}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Soroushia}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954748278|03:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954747639|03:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954746576|03:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|954433031|11:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954747903|03:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on [[:Crash Landing on You]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954748714|03:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Crash Landing on You]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
The user is not only edit warring but also involving into [[WP:SOCK]].
See the similarity of edit of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crash_Landing_on_You&type=revision&diff=954748907&oldid=954748685] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crash_Landing_on_You&type=revision&diff=954748140&oldid=954747976] [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 03:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b}} — [[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]] <small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 03:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Amkgp]] reported by [[User:Toddst1]] (Result: Warned) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Crash Landing on You}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Amkgp}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954749371|03:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/Soroushia|Soroushia]] ([[User talk:Soroushia|talk]]) to last revision by Amkgp ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954749106|03:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/Soroushia|Soroushia]] ([[User talk:Soroushia|talk]]) to last revision by Amkgp ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954748685|03:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/Soroushia|Soroushia]] ([[User talk:Soroushia|talk]]) to last revision by Amkgp ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954748140|03:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/79.127.1.103|79.127.1.103]] ([[User talk:79.127.1.103|talk]]) to last revision by Amkgp ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|954747841|03:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/Soroushia|Soroushia]] ([[User talk:Soroushia|talk]]) to last revision by HeartGlow30797 ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
#{{diff2|954748240|03:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "May 2020 We are getting on the verge of edit warring, please confer the Talk page for a resolution."
<br>{{Comment}} This was the request/invitation from the fellow editor {{u|HeartGlow30797}}(as we were both involved in reverting un-sourced data inclusion at that moment) for a resolution against vandalism.
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&diff=prev&oldid=954747903]
<br>{{Comment}} It's the warning given by me to stop adding un-sourced information without references, as per [[WP:CITE]]. [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 17:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
;<u>Comments:</u>
See report above. These edits were not exempt from 3RR. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 14:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Toddst1}}, I prevented edit warring by [[Soroushia]] on the page "[[Crash Landing on You]]" by placing the level-wise warnings after every revert and finally reporting after level-4 warning as evident/proof from the notices at [[User_talk:Soroushia]]. As a result, the user [[Sorooshia]] was blocked for vandalism and edit warring. The reports are available at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Soroushia_reported_by_User:Amkgp_(Result:_Blocked)]] and [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Soroushia]]. The decision to report to [[WP:SPI]] and [[WP:AN/3]] was taken after a consensus see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crash_Landing_on_You&diff=prev&oldid=954752733 here]] . With due respect I find [[Toddst1]] is attacking me using false accusation without any reason or there must be a misunderstanding regarding this issue only. I am reverting that are inappropriate as per guidelines to stop vandalism [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 14:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:::{{u|JJMC89}}, {{u|Oshwah}}, {{u|El_C}}, {{u|MelanieN}} and {{u|ToBeFree}} I fee I am being attacked. This may be an attempt to defame my image in Wikipedia community according to my limited understanding. Please help. [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 14:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
::::I am very strict regarding to vandalism and I do report and thereafter actions are taken if found justifiable by the Administrators. {{u|Toddst1}} you can see from the previous reports posted above (if still available). You even thanked once for many of my anti-vandalism works including handling [[WP:DOY]] issues after warning and rectifying my mistakes recently. It seems that {{u|Toddst1}} is eager in defaming/blocking. I request the administrators to help me though this may not be the correct forum to do so, but I have no proof except this. Thank you. [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 14:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
{{an3|w}}. Please do not mass ping admins — that is inappropriate. An admin will attend to the report in due time. Amkgp is not being "defamed," as they claim, this is a proper report, one which shows that they violated 3RR in a manner [[WP:3RRNO|not exempt]] from that policy. They are cautioned to do better next time by observing 3RR and reporting any edit warring violations, instead, before they exceed a bright line rule. Noting the promotional nature of the edit they reverted, however. As for Toddst1, they are an editor in good standing. Any violations that are attributed to them require documentation —otherwise, it's an [[WP:ASPERSIONS|aspersion]]— which this isn't really the venue (use ANI instead, but beware the [[WP:BOOMERANG|boomerang]]). [[User:El_C|El_C]] 15:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|El C}}, OK, But how did I violate when I reported those diffs mentioned as a valid 3RR violations proofs for edit warring by [[Soroushia]]? Edit warring was initiated by [[Soroushia]] clearly mentioned in the comments and in BLOCK notice at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Soroushia]] and [[User_talk:Soroushia]] respectively. Thank you. [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 15:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
::Just a note: I placed the edit warring today [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Soroushia_reported_by_User:Amkgp_(Result:_Blocked)]] after a discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crash_Landing_on_You&diff=prev&oldid=954752733 Talk:Crash_Landing_on_You#Resolve_Dispute]. Thank you [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 15:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
::I attempted to facilitate a discussion on the [[Talk:Crash Landing on You|talk page]] after reverting the same edit two times from two different users. After 10 minutes of no reply from the pinged parties involved, I placed a warning on their respective talk pages warning them that I would call for admin intervention, including Amkgp_'s. Amkgp_ then accused of sock-puppetry and reported them. An admin banned both accounts for edit-warring, and I closed the discussion leaving the article as it was before the edit-war.
== User:祖正石 reported by I dream of horses (Result: Blocked) ==
;Page: {{Page links|Gravitational wave}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|祖正石}}
;Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gravitational_wave&diff=prev&oldid=954584049
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
{{diff2|954883649|12:00, May 4, 2020|Undid revision 954883304 by Deacon Vorbis}}
{{diff2|954885819|12:15, May 4, 2020|Undid revision 954884471 by Deacon Vorbis}}
{{diff2|954887706|12:26, May 4, 2020|Undid revision 954886696 by TwoTwoHell}}
{{diff2|954889208|12:35, May 4, 2020|Undid revision 954888793 by Deacon Vorbis}}
{{diff2|954896919|12:38, May 4, 2020|you can write now rubbish trump}}
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
{{diff2|954888855|12:33, May 4, 2020|Warning: Edit warring on Gravitational wave. (TW)}}
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on talk page:
{{diff2|954902257|13:51, May 4, 2020|Adding reverts subsection}}
;<u>Comments:</u>
It seems that the tradition to ending edit wars is to compromise on the '''article''' talk page; however, I think the comment from {{U|Newty23125}} fits the [[WP:IAR|spirit of the rule]]. [[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] [[User talk:I dream of horses|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/I dream of horses|(c)]] Remember to {{[[Template:ping|ping]]}} me after replying off my [[User talk:I dream of horses|talk page]] 22:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC) (fixed template at 22:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC))
*{{AN3|b|72 hours}} [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 01:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:186.170.127.72]] reported by [[User:Ed6767]] (Result: Blocked 31 hrs) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|God of War: Ascension}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|186.170.127.72}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|954940179|02:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954939837 by [[Special:Contributions/Ed6767|Ed6767]] ([[User talk:Ed6767|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954939781|02:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954939675 by [[Special:Contributions/Ed6767|Ed6767]] ([[User talk:Ed6767|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954939588|02:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954939540 by [[Special:Contributions/Suffusion of Yellow|Suffusion of Yellow]] ([[User talk:Suffusion of Yellow|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954939517|02:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954939435 by [[Special:Contributions/Ed6767|Ed6767]] ([[User talk:Ed6767|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954939386|02:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954939088 by [[Special:Contributions/Ed6767|Ed6767]] ([[User talk:Ed6767|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954938984|02:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954938754 by [[Special:Contributions/Ed6767|Ed6767]] ([[User talk:Ed6767|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954938710|02:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954938325 by [[Special:Contributions/ToeFungii|ToeFungii]] ([[User talk:ToeFungii|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954938232|02:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954937947 by [[Special:Contributions/ToeFungii|ToeFungii]] ([[User talk:ToeFungii|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954937865|02:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954937754 by [[Special:Contributions/Suffusion of Yellow|Suffusion of Yellow]] ([[User talk:Suffusion of Yellow|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954937698|02:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954937055 by [[Special:Contributions/Suffusion of Yellow|Suffusion of Yellow]] ([[User talk:Suffusion of Yellow|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954937033|02:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954936875 by [[Special:Contributions/LuK3|LuK3]] ([[User talk:LuK3|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954936851|02:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954936207 by [[Special:Contributions/LuK3|LuK3]] ([[User talk:LuK3|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954936184|02:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954936021 by [[Special:Contributions/LuK3|LuK3]] ([[User talk:LuK3|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954936004|02:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954935921 by [[Special:Contributions/LuK3|LuK3]] ([[User talk:LuK3|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954935898|02:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954935764 by [[Special:Contributions/Zman9600|Zman9600]] ([[User talk:Zman9600|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954935733|02:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954935665 by [[Special:Contributions/Zman9600|Zman9600]] ([[User talk:Zman9600|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954935614|02:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954935389 by [[Special:Contributions/Zman9600|Zman9600]] ([[User talk:Zman9600|talk]])"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
Upmost priority please. clearly troll only. wasting all our time constantly undoing then rollback [[User:Ed6767|Ed6767]] ([[User talk:Ed6767|talk]]) 02:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|31 hrs}} [[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 02:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:89.205.129.220]] reported by [[User:Grandthinker]] (Result: Blocked and protected ) ==
'''Page:''' {{page links|Baruch_Spinoza|<!-- Baruch Spinoza -->}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{user links|89.205.129.220|<!-- 89.205.129.220 -->}}
'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=953574603&oldid=953574323]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=953575861&oldid=953575714]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=953577876&oldid=953577675]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=953577434&oldid=953577240]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=953578357&oldid=953578116]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:89.205.129.220]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABaruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=954958000&oldid=954915082#Dutch_or_Portuguese?]
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
the user carries on involving himself in other edit warring and now he start to call "idiots" the other users as you can see in the same page's Revision history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&action=history Besides, there are a whole section of discussion on the talk page that the user reported did not pay attention by viewing the majority of other users have a different position. Here is the section in the page's talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABaruch_Spinoza&type=revision&diff=954958000&oldid=954915082#Dutch_or_Portuguese?
: Blocked IP for continuing edit war and fugly protected page for 2 days. IP was previously blocked on 89.205.133.87. See rest of 89.205.128.0/17 as well. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 06:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Sangdeboeuf]] reported by [[User:EditSafe]] (Result: Page protected – consider dispute resolution) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Toxic_masculinity}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Sangdeboeuf}}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&oldid=954722784
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&oldid=954597895
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&oldid=954707070
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&oldid=954715784
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&oldid=954722784
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [link]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Toxic_masculinity
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
It takes two to edit-war. This user is ignoring [[WP:BRD]] and trying to force contentious material into the lead section ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&diff=954579673&oldid=951125502 Diff 1] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&type=revision&diff=954703996&oldid=954601349 Diff 2] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&diff=954713977&oldid=954713023 Diff 3] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&type=revision&diff=954722574&oldid=954717594 Diff 4]) and disruptively tag the article ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_masculinity&diff=954729446&oldid=954729012 Diff 5]) by insisting NPOV means including [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Toxic_masculinity&oldid=954725744#%22Criticism%22_in_lead "both sides of the argument"]. Do not reward this blatant attempt at gaming 3RR to overturn both [[WP:GEVAL]] and [[WP:ONUS]]; I suggest an immediate [[WP:BOOMERANG]]. —[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 00:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
: I am trying to increase the neutrality of the article by adding cited information, with the intention of removing bias from the article, not "forc[ing] contentious material into the lead section" as [[User:Sangdeboeuf]] claims. My edits have repeatedly been undone, and I have explained my point thoroughly in the discussion section. I admit to having initially misspoke in the discussion article, which [[User:Sangdeboeuf]] continues to quote, but I clarified my point as a reply to the discussion, which [[User:Sangdeboeuf]] seems to have ignored. Further, I added a tag to inform readers that a dispute is ongoing - which it is - and did not insert this tag disruptively, as [[User:Sangdeboeuf]] has claimed. [[User:EditSafe|EditSafe]] ([[User talk:EditSafe|talk]]) 01:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|pe}} [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 01:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
*Note that when temporary full protection expires, the protection is lifted entirely. As this article is under an AE protection, the full protection is indefinite to prevent this. The full protection must be lifted manually so that the AE EC protection is restored rather than being inadvertently lifted. This may be done by pinging me once the protection is no longer necessary; otherwise, I will lift it at my discretion. Thanks, [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:: Hello [[user:Swarm]], thanks for your input and page protection. Just one though: wouldn't it make sense to leave the tag in place while the page is protected, to let viewers know that a dispute is ongoing? That was my whole purpose with placing the tag. [[User:EditSafe|EditSafe]] ([[User talk:EditSafe|talk]]) 02:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:::We do not and cannot "take sides". Reverting to a [[WP:STABLE|stable version]] is not a judgment call. It is nothing but a procedural reversion to the pre-dispute revision. [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 02:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
{{re|Swarm}} Can you briefly explain why the 3RR violation was ignored? I don't see any of the exemptions mentioned at [[WP:3RRNO]] here.--[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]] ([[User talk:Pudeo|talk]]) 07:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:WilliamJE]] reported by [[User:Northamerica1000]] (Result: 2 weeks, partial) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|WilliamJE}}
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=next&oldid=954961366 diff]
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955034986&oldid=955031572 diff]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955045209&oldid=955040079 diff]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955045856&oldid=955045726 diff]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955050870&oldid=955050413 diff]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955051458&oldid=955051249 diff]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WilliamJE&diff=955051262&oldid=955050904 diff], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WilliamJE&diff=955051602&oldid=955051262 diff], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WilliamJE&diff=955052367&oldid=955052093 diff]
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
* The Delsort talk page was not used, but the matter has been discussed on my talk page ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Northamerica1000&diff=955051733&oldid=955051279 diff]) and on WilliamJE's talk page ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WilliamJE&oldid=955052480 link]). I hesitate to start a third discussion about the same matter on another page, although I will if others advise to do so.
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
* This user has engaged in [[WP:OWNERSHIP]] actions on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America]] page for quite some time now. I and another user, {{u|CJK09}} both disagree with the user's personal stance regarding the subject that was recently listed at the page ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955040079&oldid=955034986 diff], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955045726&oldid=955045209 diff], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/United_States_of_America&diff=955051249&oldid=955050870 diff]), but the user has continued to revert, five times now. These rapid-fire reversions constitute overt edit warring. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 18:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
{{an3|b|2 weeks}}. [[WP:PB|Partial block]]. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 18:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Rambo Apocalypse]] reported by [[User:The4lines]] (Result: one week, partial) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Racial views of Donald Trump}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Rambo Apocalypse}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|955015305|14:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|955009255|13:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Restored NPOV in lead, POV in the rest of the article, so I've re-added the POV tag. Other users have expressed concerns over POV (see Talk), not legitimate to remove it because a user disagrees."
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rambo_Apocalypse]
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump]
;<u>Comments:</u>
The page is Under the 1RR Rule [[User:The4lines|The4lines]] |||| <sup>([[User talk:The4lines|You Asked?]]) ([[special:Contributions/The4lines|What I have Done.]])</sup> 14:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Made every effort on the talk page to establish consensus, gained agreement from two people, no disagreement, made edits which addressed concerns made by other editors and they were reverted.
Another user noted that the article had POV issues, I concurred and added a POV tag. Someone else removed it without gaining consensus, so I re-added it, twice. I'm not entirely familiar with the wikipedia rules because there are so many of them, so I'm not sure what the hell I'm supposed to do to be honest. All I'm trying to do is ensure that the article gives appropriate weight to facts - i.e. the facts of what Trump has said and the fact that the NPOV status of the article is disputed. [[User:Rambo Apocalypse|Rambo Apocalypse]] ([[User talk:Rambo Apocalypse|talk]]) 14:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Rambo Apocalypse}}, I drew your attention to the 1RR restriction, and to the 24-hour BRD restriction, and advised you on my talk page to self-revert before anyone noticed what you'd done. You refused to do that, so here we are. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 14:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
::{{u|Girth Summit}}I'm not going to hide in the hope that nobody notices something I've done. If I broke the rule then I broke it. The changes I made to the article were in accordance with proposals I made on the talk page, they took into account the concerns of those users who disagreed with me re: length. The POV issue is a point of fact and should not have been removed in the first place. I don't know how to report people for removing POV wrongly, I tried to look it up but it seemed ungodly complex and I don't have the time to learn all these procedures.
::As I alluded to on your talk page, the worst they can do is block me, and there's no disadvantage to being blocked if people will revert my edits anyway. It's not going to break my heart if I get banned from Wikipedia. [[User:Rambo Apocalypse|Rambo Apocalypse]] ([[User talk:Rambo Apocalypse|talk]]) 15:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
:::{{u|Rambo Apocalypse}}, the point is that I gave you the chance to un-break the rule. Nobody minds if an editor breaks the rules because they didn't know about them, provided they're willing to undo their action and abide by them afterwards. There are ways to go about discussing a change in an article without edit warring about it; if you're going to edit in a subject area like this, you need to be willing to abide by the rules. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 15:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
::::{{u|Girth Summit}} I don't even know if I did break the rule. The re-adding of the POV tag was the only direct reverting I did, the others were either reverts after a month following no response other than agreement on the talk page, and an attempt to include it while ensuring that concerns over length were met. I thought re-adding POV would be one of the exceptions since it's so clearly true.
::::In any case, if deleting a POV tag because you don't agree with it is in accordance with the rules then the rules are not worth paying attention to. The nature of a POV dispute is that some people will disagree, removing it within hours like you did is absurd. I did try to discuss the change in the article, I did everything I could, but I hit a brick wall, now I have people trying trying to batter me into submission with regulations.
::::The truth is that there are a large number of editors on that page who are so convinced that Donald Trump is a racist that they want every paragraph of it to be pushing that narrative as much as possible, and anything which goes against it to be relegated as low as possible. They want the opinions of people who agree with them to trump his words. Maybe there are better ways to deal with it but I don't know what they are, the process is too opaque. [[User:Rambo Apocalypse|Rambo Apocalypse]] ([[User talk:Rambo Apocalypse|talk]]) 15:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
:::::Friendly advice: This is not a good place to attack editors. (As if any place is.) [[WP:AGF]] [[User:Objective3000|O3000]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 15:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
::::::There's a limit to how much good faith one can assume. I've tried very, very hard, but when people are removing facts, not responding to legitimate points, then reverting edits and trying to get people banned it's very difficult, if not impossible. [[User:Rambo Apocalypse|Rambo Apocalypse]] ([[User talk:Rambo Apocalypse|talk]]) 18:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
{{an3|b|one week}}. [[WP:PB|Partial block]]. If they are to engage the article talk page while blocked, {{u|Rambo Apocalypse}} is reminded to conduct themselves with due moderation, or further sanctions may be applied (including but not limited to a sitewide block). [[User:El_C|El_C]] 18:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:JimKaatFan]] reported by [[User:Sulfurboy]] (Result: ) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Henry Masterson III}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|JimKaatFan}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|955104083|00:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 955100033 by [[Special:Contributions/SamHolt6|SamHolt6]] ([[User talk:SamHolt6|talk]]) see talk page, you've already violated a bunch of wikipedia policies, all to remove a template that doesn't need to be removed"
# {{diff2|955083288|21:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 955083114 by [[Special:Contributions/Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) according to [[Help:Maintenance_template_removal#When_to_remove]], message should not be removed without consensus"
# {{diff2|955072410|20:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 955070858 by [[Special:Contributions/Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) I guess next step is just go straight to a deletion discussion?"
# {{diff2|955063611|19:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "probably not notable"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|955106509|00:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Henry_Masterson_III]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
# {{diff2|955073729|20:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Notability tag */ Spelling/grammar/punctuation/typographical correction"
# {{diff2|955075564|20:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Notability tag */ Replying to JimKaatFan (using [[w:en:User:Enterprisey/reply-link|reply-link]])"
# {{diff2|955082950|21:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Notability tag */ Replying to JimKaatFan (using [[w:en:User:Enterprisey/reply-link|reply-link]])"
# {{diff2|955084100|21:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Notability tag */ Replying to JimKaatFan (using [[w:en:User:Enterprisey/reply-link|reply-link]])"
# {{diff2|955084532|21:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Notability tag */ Replying to JimKaatFan (using [[w:en:User:Enterprisey/reply-link|reply-link]])"
# {{diff2|955095385|23:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Notability tag */ Replying to JimKaatFan (using [[w:en:User:Enterprisey/reply-link|reply-link]])"
;<u>Comments:</u>
User and I had a disagreement about the placement of a notability tag. I reverted once stating why on the TP per [[WP:CYCLE]]. I reverted a last time with the edit summary recommending it be taken to AfD. After the second revert, I sought a third opinion to build consensus here [[User_talk:SamHolt6#Third_opinoin]]. {{u|SamHolt6}} agreed the tag should be removed and to take it to AfD if they have an issue. Instead of taking it to AfD or discussing it further at all, user immediately reverted Sam's edit and then further removed stuff from the page. I sent a warning for 3RR as they had committed a third revert. Users response was to send me back a warning and ignore the request to undo their most recent revert. It doesn't seem any recommendation or course of action will satisfy this user. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 00:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
: The first diff that Sulfurboy lists above, {{diff2|955063611|19:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}}, is not a revert. It was the notability tag that I added to alert editors that the sourcing for this article was extremely weak. On the template's page, it says in plain English, "If you find an article that is tagged as having notability concerns, and you are certain that enough in-depth, independent sources have been published about the subject to overcome any notability issues, then you may remove this tag." Sulfurboy did not find any in-depth, independent sources, but removed the tag anyway. The template's page then says "If the template is re-added, please do not edit war over it." Obviously, he continued to edit war over it.
: He then attempted to circumvent the rules on edit-warring by pretending to ask for a third opinion - except he didn't ask for a third opinion in line with the procedures at [[Wikipedia:Third opinion]] - he contacted an editor that he had worked with before, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SamHolt6&diff=955092660&oldid=955090642 here]. I looked this up because this didn't seem right to me, and sure enough, there's a policy against it - [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]]. He attempted to frame his canvassing as a good-faith attempt to ask for a 3rd opinion, which it clearly wasn't. Lastly, the "friendly editor" that he contacted did ANOTHER removal of the notability template, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Masterson_III&diff=955100033&oldid=955083288 here]. The whole process was apparently geared towards goading me into this discussion about edit warring - and yes, it worked, because here I am. My apologies for it getting this far, but I let my emotions get the better of me when Sulfurboy told me "It'll be a good learning experience for you" in his condescending way. Either way, the bullying and the maneuvering are pretty petty. [[User:JimKaatFan|JimKaatFan]] ([[User talk:JimKaatFan|talk]]) 00:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:203.54.187.246]] reported by [[User:Amkgp]] (Result: Blocked) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Tiger Leaping Gorge}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|203.54.187.246}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|955143360|05:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Geography */"
# {{diff2|955142425|05:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Geography */"
# {{diff|oldid=955142088|diff=955142259|label=Consecutive edits made from 04:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC) to 04:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|955142252|04:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Geography */"
## {{diff2|955142259|04:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Geography */"
# {{diff2|955142070|04:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Geography */"
# {{diff2|955142002|04:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Geography */"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|955142179|04:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Tiger Leaping Gorge]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|955142515|05:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Vandalism on [[:Tiger Leaping Gorge]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
# {{diff2|955142569|05:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Tiger Leaping Gorge]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
The IP user is constantly vandalizing article even after multiple warnings and a 3RR warning. This IP account was blocked recently. [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 05:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
* {{AN3|b|3 months}} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 06:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:David Bani]] reported by [[User:Doug Weller]] (Result: Blocked indef) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Ten Lost Tribes}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|David Bani}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|955158579|07:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Speculation regarding other ethnic groups */"
# {{diff2|955151988|06:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Speculation regarding other ethnic groups */"
# {{diff2|955116021|01:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Speculation regarding other ethnic groups */"
# {{diff2|955110777|01:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Speculation regarding other ethnic groups */"
# {{diff2|955097479|23:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* References */"
# {{diff2|955070525|20:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Speculation regarding other ethnic groups */"
# {{diff2|955061570|19:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Speculation regarding other ethnic groups */"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|955145883|05:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Ten Lost Tribes]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
I think he's also reinserted the copyvio, I need to check. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 09:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
:He has, despite my warning. It's unequivocal copyvio from [http://www.jewsofchina.org/the-lost-tribes-of-israel-who-came-to-china here]. I'm probably within my rights to indef this guy, but maybe better from someone else. [[WP:NOTHERE]] [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 09:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|indef}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 14:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:70.51.208.217]] reported by [[User:Peacemaker67]] (Result: Blocked) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Battle of Loznica (1941)}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|70.51.208.217}}
;Previous version reverted to:
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|955123255|02:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 955073382 by [[Special:Contributions/Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User talk:Peacemaker67|talk]])"
# {{diff2|954995212|11:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 954740506 by [[Special:Contributions/ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]])"
;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|954773446|07:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Adding of unsourced material and changing wording of sourced material */ new section"
# {{diff2|954773697|07:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)}} "/* Battle of Loznica (1941) is covered by discretionary sanctions */ new section"
# {{diff2|955073249|20:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on [[:Battle of Loznica (1941)]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])"
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
;<u>Comments:</u>
This is a continuation of the IP inserting unsourced POV material into a para of a contentious Balkans article which is reliably sourced. I have attempted to discuss this on the IP's talk page, have alerted them to DS, and also warned them about edit-warring, but they have refused to engage at all, and just continue to edit-war. Earlier diffs are [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Loznica_(1941)&diff=prev&oldid=954740129] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Loznica_(1941)&diff=prev&oldid=954566274]. Thanks. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 04:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b}} – 24 hours by [[User:Glen]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
== [[User:Kazemita1]] reported by [[User:MA Javadi]] (Result: ) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Maryam Rajavi}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Kazemita1}}
'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954729186&oldid=954456372 00:36, 4 May 2020]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954400159&oldid=954089992 05:38, 2 May 2020]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954028774&oldid=953947978 08:51, 30 April 2020]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maryam_Rajavi&diff=953831769&oldid=951199260 08:07, 29 April 2020]
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954088957&oldid=953947826] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954263063&oldid=954207574]
Cautioned user on article's talk page that his edits were controversial and needed consensus. User has been slowly edit-warring instead.
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Maryam_Rajavi#Maryam_Rajavi_trip_to_UK]
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
Kazemita1 is trying to add a controversial edit without first trying to reach consensus. Kazemita1 was recently indefinitely blocked for edit warring and sockpupetry in [[People's Mujahedin of Iran]] (an article connected to this current one), but that was changed to 3 months after [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kazemita1#unblock_request_2 he stated he would better conduct himself]. - [[User:MA Javadi|MA Javadi]] ([[User talk:MA Javadi|talk]]) 09:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1028#Kazemita1_block_changed_from_indef_to_3_months a recent ANI discussion] about Kazemita1. It is arguable that his indefinite block should be restored. I'll ping the last two admins who may be familiar with him, [[User:El_C]] and [[User:RoySmith]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:::Many of the edits shown above are not even reverts. For example, my [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maryam_Rajavi&type=revision&diff=954729186&oldid=954456372 last edit] on that article (first shown above) was simply a past version of the article proposed by user HistoryOfIran, that at least 3 users seemed to be OK with (me, Pahlevun and HistorOfIran). That is a relative consensus given the number of active editors in the article at the time (5). Moreover, none of the users that actually reverted my edits ever stated any reason for their objection towards inclusion of some of the contents. For example, MA Javadi, or Barca never say why including "*[[List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom]]" in the "See also" section is a problem and yet they blankly removed it from the article.[[User:Kazemita1|Kazemita1]] ([[User talk:Kazemita1|talk]]) 15:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
::::I did reply to your query [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954884378&oldid=954839111], and so did [[user:HistoryofIran|HistoryofIran]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954827155&oldid=954826281]. There was never a "relative consensus" as [[user:BarcrMac|Barca]] also informed you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954456003&oldid=954399608]. - [[User:MA Javadi|MA Javadi]] ([[User talk:MA Javadi|talk]]) 16:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
::::::HistoryOfIran's statement was after my edit! At the time of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maryam_Rajavi&diff=prev&oldid=954729186 my edit] 3 versus 2 agreed with that version of the article. The same is true about your response; it is after the conflict. --[[User:Kazemita1|Kazemita1]] ([[User talk:Kazemita1|talk]]) 17:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
:::::::Kazemita: prior to your last edits, it was explained why your edits were controversial and that you needed to discuss your edits and stop edit warring:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954088957&oldid=953947826] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954263063&oldid=954207574][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryam_Rajavi&diff=954456003&oldid=954399608] - [[User:MA Javadi|MA Javadi]] ([[User talk:MA Javadi|talk]]) 19:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
| |||