Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 536:
:User is up to seven reverts now. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 02:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
:Furthermore, language contained in the edit {{tq|Posters citing the SPLC on false designations are NOT protected under any safe harbor laws, and may be sued individually for defamation.}} is tantamount to inserting a legal threat into Wikipedia policy pages, which I'm going to treat as simple [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 03:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
: not vandalism. Just a fact. Under the Communications Decency Act, Section 230, individuals are responsible for their own posts on public sites.
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources&diff=884509577&oldid=884509472 "stop vandalising a united states court ruling"], in reference to a ruling which doesn't appear to exist at all, means that Wikipedia editors have an alarming amount of power. I had no idea that Wikipedia's internal guidelines were legally binding! Incidentally, do we have a policy page about Citizens United? Asking for a friend. [[User:Grayfell|Grayfell]] ([[User talk:Grayfell|talk]]) 03:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
: https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2018/06/20/southern-poverty-law-center-pays-3-4m-to-resolve-defamation-case/?slreturn=20190121221850 yeah, it's real.
| |||