Revision as of 02:32, 22 February 2019 edit Grayfell (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 82,127 edits Undid revision 884506634 by 4.34.50.170 (talk) This Wikipedia page is a summary of past consensus, not the place to introduce new, faulty sources and arguments. Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:39, 22 February 2019 edit undo 4.34.50.170 (talk) Undid revision 884506881 by Grayfell (talk) YOU ARE JUST VANDALIZING AT THIS POINT. THERE'S LITERALLY A UNITED STATES COURT WHICH HAS HEARD THE EVIDENCE ON YOUR POSITION AND REJECTED IT WHOLESALE. STOP VANDALIZING. Tag: Undo Next edit →
Line 1,269: \|- class="s-gr" id="Southern_Poverty_Law_Center" \| [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] <small>(SPLC)</small> \| {{/Status\|grnc}} \| 14{{efn\|See these discussions of the Southern Poverty Law Center: {{rsnl\|22\|Southern Poverty Law Center\|1}} {{rsnl\|26\|Southern Poverty Law Center\|2}} {{rsnl\|48\|Southern Poverty Law Center (again) & Rousas John Rushdoony\|3}} {{rsnl\|70\|Southern Poverty Law Center Blog Reliability\|4}} {{rsnl\|127\|Is an SPLC intelligence report a reliable source for information about the men's rights movement?\|5}} {{rsnl\|128\|Southern Poverty Law Center\|6}} {{rsnl\|130\|Southern Poverty Law Center\|7}} {{rsnl\|148\|SPLC & Men's Right: Is this article speaking for the SPLC or Arthur Goldwag?\|8}} {{rsnl\|208\|Southern Poverty Law Center on Debbie Schlussel's Anti-Muslim stance\|9}} {{rsnl\|230\|Southern Poverty Law Center As Source For Labeling Someone a White Supremacist\|10}} {{rsnl\|232\|Is an SPLC report a reliable source for List of Confederate monuments and memorials?\|11}} {{rsnl\|245\|Southern Poverty Law Center\|12}} {{rsnl\|247\|SPLC: not a reliable source\|13}} {{rsnl\|\|Is the SPLC reliable? It is reliable\|14\|active=y}} }} \| {{/Last\|2019\|inprogress=y}} \| The Southern Poverty Law Center is ~~considered~~there ~~generally~~is ~~reliable~~no consensus on ~~[[far-right~~reliability ~~politics]]~~of this organization as a source. As anThis is because SPLC lost a very large defamation lawsuit, paying out over $3m for falsely labeling another advocacy group as a racist hate group. The Southern Poverty Law Center argued that its designations of "racism" and "hate groups" were opinions, not assertions of fact, but the court expressly rejected this. The court expressly ruled that labeling someone racist or a hate group is not an opinion, it's an assertion of fact, and thus subject to defamation. https://pjmedia.com/trending/about-60-organizations-are-considering-a-lawsuit-against-the-splc-following-3m-nawaz-settlement/ There are another 60 defamation lawsuits starting to make their way through the court system against the organization, and another 200 in preparation, all alleging defamation. https://pjmedia.com/trending/update-on-the-60-separate-defamation-lawsuits-against-the-splc-under-consideration/The Southern Poverty Law Center is a [[WP:BIASED\|biased and ~~opinionated~~factually incorrect source]]. ~~The~~Posters ~~organization's~~citing ~~views,~~the ~~especially~~SPLC ~~when~~on ~~labeling~~false ~~[[hate~~designations ~~group]]s~~are NOT protected under any safe harbor laws, ~~should~~and may be ~~properly~~sued ~~attributed~~individually ~~per~~for ~~[[WP:RSOPINION]]~~defamation. Take care to ensure that content from this organization constitutes [[WP:DUE\|due weight]] in the article and conforms to the [[WP:BLP\|biographies of living persons]] policy. \| {{/Uses\|splcenter.org}} \| {{/Alexa\|splcenter.org\|24543}}

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources: Difference between revisions

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.