Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship/Members

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fatalserpent (talk | contribs) at 01:53, 8 August 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you would like to be a member of Wikipedians against censorship, please add your name at the bottom of this list:

  1. Kaldari 19:57, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Gorgonzilla 21:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zoe 22:46, August 20, 2005 (UTC)--Jarashi 01:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 02:38, 2005 August 21 (UTC)
  5. Redwolf24 Hell yes! (Insert image of autocunnilingus here) (See WP:BEARD for a group trying to censor Jimbo's beard)
  6. Karmafist 04:12, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Kaldari, let's keep this up regardless of what happens with WfD.[reply]
  7. Lomedae 08:20, August 21, 2005 (UTC) Of course.
  8. ral315 15:58, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
  9. I'm not sure this project is such a good idea (polarization and all), but I agree with the aims. ~~ N (t/c) 22:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hipocrite 23:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Wholeheartedly.[reply]
  11. OfficerDibble 10:08, 22 August 2005 (UTC) The fight must go on citizens, do not rest.[reply]
  12. NickGorton 01:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Great idea![reply]
  13. Gateman1997 16:31, 23 August 2005 (UTC) I'm in.[reply]
  14. Oldak Quill 14:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Dmn € Դմն 01:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --ShaunMacPherson 15:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC) When people were trying to delete the auto ######## images without offering justification I knew that a project like this would be necessary and am glad it is now created.[reply]
  17. Serodio 22:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. KrisW6 KrisW6 19:14, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Clawed 03:28, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Brian1979 02:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)Most definitely[reply]
  21. WikidSmaht (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC) Very well. Let us see what we can do.[reply]
  22. Piecraft (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2005 (UTC) I will do my best in light of everything to oppose malevolent censorship.[reply]
  23. JobE6 03:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC) Their wikiproject should have been deleted.[reply]
  24. Groyn88 I support the inclusion of any iota of information which is not absolutely false, malicious, defamatory or directly harmful. Let's create a flexible peoples' encyclopedia which reflects human diversity and freedom of expression.Groyn88 08:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Merovingian {T C @} 08:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC), Why not?[reply]
  26. Purplefeltangel 17:20, 23 October 2005 (UTC) Yup, I'm in both Encyclopedic Merit and this WikiProject . . . why? Because I feel that there is a fine line between "expecting quality" and "censorship" and while we should always expect quality, it should never cross that line.[reply]
  27. Tom 08:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Danny Yee 01:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC) some people consider bare ankles indecent[reply]
  29. Adam Clark(User_Talk) (email) 05:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC) For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The concept of censorship is not only disturbing, but is also dangerous.[reply]
  30. Mushroom 00:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Metta Bubble 11:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jquarry 02:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC) Count me in. There's too many PC N#zis and bubble-wrappers in the world.[reply]
  33. Rogue 9 06:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC) "The attempt to silence a man is the greatest honor you can bestow on him. It means you recognize his superiority to yourself." -- Joseph Sobran[reply]
  34. —BorgHunter (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Absolutely.[reply]
  35. ¿ WhyBeNormal ? 21:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Fantom 18:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kerowyn 10:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Megamix? 03:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Kickboy 02:33, December 25, 2005 (UTC)
  40. Ouuplas 16:55, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Seancdaug 02:24, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Aumakua 09:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC) "When the official organ of a purportedly scientific society plays thought police by censoring scholarly work to appease the politicians, it ceases to deserve the allegiance of a rational mind." -- Paul E. Meehl. (I apply this in a much broader sense: When [anything] plays thought police by censoring scholarly work to appease [anyone] it ceases to deserve the allegiance of a rational mind. May Wikipedia forever avoid that condition.)[reply]
  43. Rainmonger 15:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Useless Fodder 08:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Censorship is the foundation of subjugation.[reply]
  45. Ronline ✉ 08:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC) - It is absolutely draconian and contradictory to attempt to censor Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.[reply]
  46. BostonMA 02:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. The JPS 20:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. CCMichalZ 21:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Werdna648T/C\@ 21:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Zilog Jones 04:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Andux 13:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Madashell 15:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia should include any information that fits into its role as a free encyclopedia, any policy which attempts to censor material on the grounds of "decency" (i.e. personal taste) is contrary to the purported aims of Wikipedia.[reply]
  54. Paul 12:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Brian New Zealand 21:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Agree all the way[reply]
  56. Thryduulf 22:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Copysan 05:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) And Proud of it![reply]
  58. Wisco 14:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC) -- People who want to control words and images want to control thought.[reply]
  59. DrIdiot 19:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC) -- There are enough people in society telling us what we can say and what we can hear. Let wikipedia be free of the shackles of the ambiguous and subjective guidelines of decency.[reply]
  60. Sean (talk || contribs)
  61. dirtyliberal 05:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship has no place in an learning environment. Wikipedia is the ultimate learning environment where the only currency is knowlegde. To tolerate censorship would be to tolerate a cancer growing on ones soul.[reply]
  62. Masonpatriot 06:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Irongaard 08:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC) -- People who do not want to be offended should avoid all forms of mass media and stay inside, rather than trying to force the entire world to conform to thier views.[reply]
  64. MatthewKeys 21:37 16 January 2006 (Pacific) -- We need a place free of censorship. Not everyone can be on a TV show and voice their opinion--but everyone can contribute to Wikipedia and use the Internet.
  65. Dudewheresmypizz4 14:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC) I now realise that censorship is ignorance.[reply]
  66. --ChrisRy5 22:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Support your freedom of speech on Wikipedia!![reply]
  67. Nortonew 06:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship seeks to suppress information. The absence of information is ignorance. Thus censorship seeks to promote ignorance. Wikipedia's mission is directly contrary to the promotion of ignorance.[reply]
  68. Jeff Silvers 19:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship is arbitrary and counter-productive to the ultimate goal of Wikipedia.[reply]
  69. • Dussst • T | C 20:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC) - Freedom of speech is one of our fundamental human rights. Lets ensure it survives on, and applies to, Wikipedia![reply]
  70. Shell 03:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  71. Hermeneus (user/talk) 11:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Noble Skuld the Legend Killer 18:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Ibaranoff24 23:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Gala.martin 00:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia should include any information that fits into its role as a free encyclopedia[reply]
  75. Schultz 15:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC) I support this with all of my heart![reply]
  76. helohe (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Brokenfrog Fully against censorship of relevant content.
  78. Amherst5282 00:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. almightylinuxgod 01:55 Jan 26th 2006 - Wiki for everyone!
  80. DMichel 19:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Censorship does not belong here.[reply]
  81. robsteadman 00:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC) I am appalled that there is censoring going on in some articles and repression of verifiable fact when some editors don;t like it. This is an encyclopedia - it should contain verifiable facts not POV opinions.[reply]
  82. Kelisi 16:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC) There are far too many self-appointed censors here. I have personally undone some of the damage that they have wrought.[reply]
  83. Iamvered 04:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Censorship is a weapon of the small-minded to unfairly control what they cannot understand. Wow, that sounds good. Quote me![reply]
  84. Chairman S. 07:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. --Oz Hutton 16:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. ZoBlitz 04:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ombudsman 09:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Vanky 12:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Halcatalyst 21:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. getcrunkjuicecontribs 19:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. CoderGnome 21:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. REDTURTLE -- 15:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Tomyumgoong 03:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Luis María Benítez 15:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. DanielDemaret 17:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Matt White 20:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Armon 01:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. LordRevan 02:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Moriane 17:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC) What a great group! Sign me up.[reply]
  100. ‣ᓛᖁ♀ᑐ 05:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC) It's been long enough since the initial debacle.[reply]
  101. Cnwb 05:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. OrbitOne 09:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 23:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. rmosler 11:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Frenchman113 01:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. USER-cacophony 20:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Stainedglasscurtain 21:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. • The Giant Puffin • 15:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  110. Ross 17:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Discordance 14:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Kasey54 15:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. The Republican 20:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Zdunne 02:50, 27 Febraury 2006 (UTC)
  115. e-user 06:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Truth and censorship cannot coexist.[reply]
  116. Daniel Morris 14:36, 2 March 2006 (GMT)
  117. user:Richardkselby
  118. User:UKWiki 16.47, 4th March 2006 (GMT)
  119. Wwagner 21:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC) The day you stop learning is the day you die. Censorship is death![reply]
  120. myselfalso 04:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  121. phonzonappy If we dont know the truth, then what do we know? 21:08:36, March 7, 2006
  122. Dee ayche! 22:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Acebrock 20:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)anti censorship, works for me considering the censorship by the government.
  124. Funnybunny 17:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  125. J.A. Terranson 1234H, 12 March 06 - Wikipedia is fast losing it's moral courage, authority, and in the end, it's relevence.
  126. User:Theorb March 13, 2006
  127. VJ Emsi 21:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Hell yes.[reply]
  128. HolokittyNX 08:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC) The justification for this group's existence, based on protracted and logical examination of Wikipedia's goals: DUUUUH! ,,,^..^,,,[reply]
  129. --Nicholas 18:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  130. --Procrastinating@talk2me 21:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Me join -- 127.#.#.1 18:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Zavandi 13:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  133. NeoChrono Ryu 22:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Atul Malaviya 12:45 PM, 22 March 2006 (IST)
  135. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] - 04:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Chebab 17:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Mirlen 02:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:Killswitch Engage2.50 March 2006 (MT)
  139. Ramanpotential 03:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  140. --WhiteRhino 05:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Censorship is the beginning of the age of misunderstanding[reply]
  141. Khatores 01:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC) We don't need anyone to wipe our diapers anymore; censorship is mommyism.[reply]
  142. Loom91 11:03, 29 March 2006 (UTC) We must fight against the attack on humanity called censorship.[reply]
  143. Aldoliel 21:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Information wants to be free[reply]
  144. --Ariel al-Qasid 16:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  145. Why censor things. Our Bodies=Nature. acfan-Talk to me 00:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Noetic Sage 20:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Pc13 07:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Osbus 22:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)- People in support of censorship can go start their own encyclopedia.[reply]
  149. Sfacets 07:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC) / fighting against censorship is a start...[reply]
  150. Samurai Drifter 22:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC) / What kind of idiot would SUPPORT censorship?[reply]
  151. Bubby the Tour G 02:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC) / Bring back the Brian Peppers article!!! And stop letting The Man put down YTMND fans contributions!!![reply]
  152. SteveB 03:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Censorship of the Justin Berry article without a compelling reason strikes me as arbitrary, capricious, and anti-wiki[reply]
  153. Zowayix whatever the time is (UTC)
  154. Oregon Bear 09:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  155. A. Kohler 02:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC) Censorship is against the purpose of the Wikipedia.[reply]
  156. Objectivist-C 23:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC) The only offensive thing is an assault on the truth.[reply]
  157. SURIV 23:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC) "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."[reply]
  158. Switch 17:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Motoma 23:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Richman271 The "sum of all human knowledge" is not possible with censorship 16:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Bgriffin 20:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Southpaw018 10:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) I wish I had the RL time to help fight this fight. Alas, I lend only my voice. I hope it is better than nothing.[reply]
  163. General Eisenhower I like Wikipedia
  164. Terror Island 02:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Hezzy 21:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Vidkun 12:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Meneth 08:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Andy123(talk) 15:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Knucmo2 - Censorship is an unfair monopoly on thought and as a result distorts the decision making process.
  170. Amcfreely 19:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  171. MPN 11:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  172. —porges(talk)
  173. Barneyboo (Talk) 14:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC) - the only way we can make Wikipedia open and aspire to achieving NPOV is with an honest and complete exploration of human knowledge[reply]
  174. _-M o P-_ 07:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC) What is wrong and what is right in terms of vulgarity is based on point of view. Also, to discriminate one type of information against the other would be unencyclopedic.[reply]
  175. --DB0 10:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  176. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 23:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:Galoshes
  178. Nnp 22:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Beno1000 00:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Zippokovich 16:06 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  181. User:Elizmr
  182. User:Dave04
  183. UnDeadGoat 23:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  184. --Michael Johnson 04:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Sushi4u
  186. User:DJac75
  187. Griz 17:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  188. --Fragolino - (Follow the white rabbit!) 19:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Alan 05:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Gyre 06:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC) - I don't know how much help I'll be, but I'm giving my support![reply]
  191. Nowimnthing 12:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Josie dethiers 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Cicero Dog 13:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC) i have been blocked for my right to feedom of speech! Now i shall exercise it yet again![reply]
  194. BurningZeppelin 08:16, 22 May 2006 (EST)
  195. Roberto C. Guión 10:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC) -- Damn right. Censorship makes baby Jesus cry =(.[reply]
  196. Samurai Drifter 04:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship is just... plain... retarded.[reply]
  197. furrykef (Talk at me) 18:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Caprosser 01:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  199. // The True Sora 04:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  200. altobliz 01:29, 29 May 2006 (GMT)
  201. Korinth111 22:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Guinnog 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  203. CAPS LOCK 18:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Prefixcaz 05:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  205. User:Jimmy C--Jimmy C 12:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Let's tell 'em where to shove their censorship....[reply]
  206. Vincentvivi 06:42, 02 June 2006 (GMT)
  207. Gibbsale 8:36, 02 June 2006 (EST)
  208. JoeTalk!WorkEspMail 19:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Zuwiki // talk 05:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Darwin's Pug
  211. .t. 18:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  212. SushiGeek 18:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  213. EMC 20:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  214. InGenX 10:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Warhorus 16:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Ruaraidh-dobson 23:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC) Let's get <bleep> on their <bleep>s![reply]
  217. Karimarie 01:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  218. Flamarande 21:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC) "Freedom of Speech not only means that we have the freedom to say what we like to hear. It also means that other people have the liberty to say things we despise and hate."[reply]
  219. Mwhorn 03:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC) It's all relative. =][reply]
  220. SaturnYoshi 01:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) The FCC is ruining peoples lives.[reply]
  221. Jason Palpatine 22:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  222. MoraSique 06:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  223. jhfireboy 18:02, 9 June 2006 (BST)
  224. jmsevits 05:38, 10 June 2006 (EST)
  225. Moose 09:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  226. James McNally 10:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  227. --Lord Snoeckx 10:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  228. --Ted 14:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Cathryn 14:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC) I'm furious about this userbox deletion business. Are you guys working on this at all, or do I go somewhere else?[reply]
  230. Tal :) 09:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Likewise[reply]
  231. --SigmaX54 03:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  232. Superior1 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Stepan Roucka 15:26, 22 June 2006 (CEST)
  234. Rlk89 23:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Osloboslo 10:37, 26 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  236. —Dananimal 22:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Nqnpipnr 13:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  238. Kane77 22:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  239. Outlyer 00:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  240. Chicadi 23:07, 29 June 2006 (EST)
  241. S.Skinner 19:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Akaces23 01:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  243. Killfest2 Sometime, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  244. --Qwerty qwerty 16:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Jarashi 01:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  246. Disputed one 5:51 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  247. Cipher Destiny
  248. Goodnightmush 12:55, 5 July 2006 (EST)
  249. --Skully Collins 13:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  250. Scienceman123 03:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  251. Wjhonson 01:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC), Fight Religion-based Censorship and the History Nazis! Notability is a guideline, not a requirement.[reply]
  252. Rsquire Rsquire 15:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  253. --Milliteq 07:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Penelope D 02:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  255. --William Pembroke 16:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  256. Blackmissionary 10:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  257. --~VNinja~ 00:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  258. ).m41ku 16:25, 14 July 2006 (PST)
  259. ).User :the pink panther6:07 pm july 15 2006
  260. Sfacets 01:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) -- Keep banging on the walls![reply]
  261. --Neural16:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  262. --Patrick 04:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  263. --Scarlet woman 12:41, 20 July 2006 (CET)
  264. Jum4 10:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC) -- Go GO GOO![reply]
  265. Maraud 22:49, 23 July 2006 (GMT+1)
  266. FaerieInGrey
  267. Kitia 20:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC) I want to join as many wikiprojects as possible![reply]
  268. Funnyfarmofdoom
  269. Hmrox 17:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Dipics 01:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Joel Llewellyn 02:19, 30 July 2006 (BST)
  272. --Kinghajj 01:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  273. --theblackBay -Theblackbay 05:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Please Learn History!. Please Learn about the Bond system! Please understand the Fraud. come to me for info.[reply]
  274. --Davin Bacon is a proud member.--Davin Bacon 00:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  275. Fatalserpent 01:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedians_against_censorship/Members&oldid=68313994"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy