Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→The I-90 dispute: Reply |
|||
Line 84:
:::What is your ultimate goal? Is it to change the guidelines to allow for more than 10 junctions on longer articles? Or is it to keep the 10 junction guideline, but replace some of the ones currently listed?[[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave|talk]]) 22:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Personaly I'd prefer if we allowed more then ten, especially on highways over 3,000 miles - I feel that the amount of junctions allowed should be somewhat proportional to the length of the road. --[[User:RoadFan294857|RoadFan294857]] ([[User talk:RoadFan294857|talk]]) 22:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::As luck would have it, an IP vandal provided us with a preview of what the infobox would look like with a lot more junctions. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_90&oldid=1233559587] Here the infobox is indeed too long. It's causing stacking on my monitor with the table of contents (yes I still use the "old" skin. I don't like the Vector 2022 makeover) and the state lengths table. But is there an old revision that has, say 11 or 12 junctions we could look at? I'm not opposed to the idea that longer articles could have more junctions. But as I stated in the RFC, as problematic as this has been, we need a rock solid wording to the guideline, as I can guarantee you as soon as we say "ok these articles can have more" we'll have a rush of people adding more junctions to even short highway articles. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave|talk]]) 05:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
{{notelist-talk|refs=
{{efn|name=caveat|'''unless''' such list would exceed ten junctions}}
| |||