Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Workshop: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Deceptive remark by Rp2006: replied and notified admin |
|||
Line 897:
:'''Comment by parties:'''
::The specific type of COI here is left intentionally vague. [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 20:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
::So much for assuming good faith. Geogene '''knows''' that whatever remark he '''claims''' I made (with no presented evidence) was "intentionally misleading." And where is it stated that I have a COI with that article? So once again in this Workshop, people are just making up whatever they can imagine to disparage me, and stating it as fact. Why is this allowed? Notifying {{Ping|Johnuniq}} [[User:Rp2006|Rp2006]] ([[User talk:Rp2006|talk]]) 05:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
:'''Comment by others:'''
::
====Rp2006 has attempted to hide his apparent conflict of interest====
5) In the midst of the current GSoW controversy, Rp2006 took steps to try to make one aspect of his apparent COI less obvious.
| |||