Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 1,470:
 
====Statement by BilledMammal====
Since [[User:Selfstudier|Selfstudier]] requested it, I reviewed some of their and [[User:Iskandar323|Iskandar323]]'s edits from the past month, and found the following tag teaming/mild edit warring:<br>
[[Anti-Defamation League]]:
# {{diff2|1238137021|09:12, 2 August 2024}} Selfstudier added content to the lede
# {{diff2|1238208636|17:45, 2 August 2024}} Iskandar323 restored it
# {{diff2|1238552615|13:59, 4 August 2024}} Selfstudier restored it
[[Golan Heights]]:
# {{diff2|1237770040|11:30, 31 July 2024}} Selfstudier removed content from the lede
# {{diff2|1237990058|14:33, 1 August 2024}} Selfstudier removed it
# {{diff2|1237994459|15:02, 1 August 2024}} Iskandar323 removed it
 
Both have also engaged in POV pushing. This is most obvious with their positions in "massacre" RM's since the start of the war, where they consistently apply different standards.
 
The chart below displays these positions:
* '''S''' means they supported the use of massacre
* '''O''' means they opposed the use of massacre
* '''N''' means they participated but didn't express a position on "massacre"
* Green background means the topic is attacks on Palestinians
* Blue background means the topic is attacks on Israelis
 
{| class="wikitable"
! Article !! Selfstudier !! Iskandar323
|- style="background-color: lightgreen;"
| [[Al-Tabaeen school attack]] || - || '''S'''
|- style="background-color: lightgreen;"
| [[Al-Awda school attack]] || '''N''' || '''S'''
|- style="background-color: lightgreen;"
| [[Engineer's Building airstrike]] || - || '''S'''
|- style="background-color: lightgreen;"
| [[Flour massacre]] (first RM) || '''S''' || '''S'''
|- style="background-color: lightgreen;"
| [[Flour massacre]] (second RM) || - || '''S'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Attack on Holit]] || '''O''' || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Kissufim massacre]] || - || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Nahal Oz attack]] || '''O''' || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Netiv HaAsara massacre]] || - || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Nir Oz attack]] || '''O''' || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Nir Yitzhak attack]] || - || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Nirim attack]] || - || '''O'''
|- style="background-color: lightgreen;"
| [[Tel al-Sultan attack]] || - || '''S'''
|- style="background-color: lightblue;"
| [[Yeshivat Beit Yisrael bombing]] || '''O''' || '''O'''
|}
 
Iskandar323 in particular makes this very clear. For example, at [[Engineer's Building airstrike]] they {{diff2|1221225719|said}}:
{{tqb|But here it is very clear that more than 100 civilians were massacred with narry a shred of evidence of military motive in sight, making "massacre" pretty aptly descriptive.}}
 
While at [[Attack on Holit]] they {{diff2|1209203357|said}}:
{{tqb|The clear majoritarian language for this event in the sources aligns with the proposed move. The arguments against it appear to rely more on independent reasoning over the nature of the event, not the sourcing.}}
 
For attacks against Palestinians, they apply {{tq|independent reasoning}}; for attacks against Israeli's, they say it is inappropriate to do so and we should follow the sources. This can be further seen in [[User_talk:BilledMammal#Talk:Flour_massacre#Requested_move_28_April_2024|this discussion]], where they say there is systematic bias in reliable sources, and we should counter that bias - it's not our place to decide that reliable sources are collectively wrong, and it is POV-pushing to attempt to do so.
 
(I would also like to commend [[User:Vice regent|Vice regent]] for their position in these discussions; they have frequently participated in them and have consistently taken a neutral line.) [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 06:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
 
===Result concerning האופה===
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy