Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Barth: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|Authors]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|Businesspeople]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 00:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|Authors]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|Businesspeople]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 00:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
*I lean toward '''delete'''; but I'm wondering if his textbook "has made a significant impact in the area of higher education" per [[WP:NACADEMIC]] #4 (although the discussion under that bullet point suggest that meeting notability through that path requires "''several'' books that are widely used as textbooks"). This is an area of academic law not within my experience, so I will refrain from an actual [[WP:!VOTE|!vote]]. [[User:TJRC|TJRC]] ([[User talk:TJRC|talk]]) 00:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
*I lean toward '''delete'''; but I'm wondering if his textbook "has made a significant impact in the area of higher education" per [[WP:NACADEMIC]] #4 (although the discussion under that bullet point suggest that meeting notability through that path requires "''several'' books that are widely used as textbooks"). This is an area of academic law not within my experience, so I will refrain from an actual [[WP:!VOTE|!vote]]. [[User:TJRC|TJRC]] ([[User talk:TJRC|talk]]) 00:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. We are thankful to the [[WP:SPA|kamikaze account]] who created and posted up this text, just as we're thankful to Mr Barth himself for supplying his photographic portrait. If only the text could be worthy of inclusion! It is not, due to our subject's notable lack of [[WP:NPERSON|independent notability]]. We check the article and [[WP:BEFORE|we search]] for [[WP:RS|sources]] but, alas, nothing of substance do we manage to scare up. All we catch are routine listings in trade media, such as [https://www.hospitalityleaderonline.com/doc/hospitality-law-know-what-to-expect-in-a-pers-0001 this]; [[WP:PROMO|online brochures]], such as [https://hospitalitylawyer.com/?id=35 this]; a bunch of [[WP:DEADLINK|expired links]], e.g. [http://hospitalitylawyer.com/downloads/GC2012_brochure.pdf here], [https://worldchefs.org/wacs2010/en/news/news.php?cat=wacs&id=3318 here], [http://www.cvent.com/events/EventInactive.aspx?e=4e3f1346-6f7a-4c7f-9bbd-b1f61320c3b5 here]; and a few [[advertorial]]s. And [[WP:NACADEMIC]] is spectacularly failed. -[[User:The Gnome|The Gnome]] ([[User talk:The Gnome|talk]]) 14:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:27, 24 April 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stephen Barth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable lawyer/keynote speaker. Lack WP:GNG-style direct and in-depth coverage. DepreciateAppreciate (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 19. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law, and Texas. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Businesspeople. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I lean toward delete; but I'm wondering if his textbook "has made a significant impact in the area of higher education" per WP:NACADEMIC #4 (although the discussion under that bullet point suggest that meeting notability through that path requires "several books that are widely used as textbooks"). This is an area of academic law not within my experience, so I will refrain from an actual !vote. TJRC (talk) 00:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. We are thankful to the kamikaze account who created and posted up this text, just as we're thankful to Mr Barth himself for supplying his photographic portrait. If only the text could be worthy of inclusion! It is not, due to our subject's notable lack of independent notability. We check the article and we search for sources but, alas, nothing of substance do we manage to scare up. All we catch are routine listings in trade media, such as this; online brochures, such as this; a bunch of expired links, e.g. here, here, here; and a few advertorials. And WP:NACADEMIC is spectacularly failed. -The Gnome (talk) 14:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)