Talk:Kosovo Serbs: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:51, 26 July 2021

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Serbia Start‑class High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Kosovo Start‑class

	Kosovo Serbs is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ethnic groups Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Sources

A Serbian newspaper can't be used for claims related to interethnic issues. It's WP:POV and a tabloid which regularly publishes the official narrative of the Serbian government isn't WP:RS. There are international organizations which monitor human rights issues.--Maleschreiber (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, WP:EXCEPTIONAL says that strong claims need strong sourcing. Furthermore, Serbian and Albanian newspapers should be very carefully used in such issues of the Kosovo-Serbia conflict. They in large parts misinterpret the news, and in some cases even create them. In the past on other articles fake news sourced to "Politika" were reverted by various editors. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, many Balkan newspapers are inherently unreliable.--Maleschreiber (talk) 22:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Figures

I have seen that a consensus already exists for infobox figures [1]. WalterII's edit contradicts the newer sources and provides an impossible scenario. We should keep the consensus figures as agreed by many active users already. Uniacademic (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Reverts on the Article

@User:Pipsally

Please explain your recent Revert here.

Your excuse "Edit-Warring" does not seem to be visible after my research.

Please adjust a Example, which speaks for your Argument, with your explaination.

If anybody wants to add something to this discussion, feel free for it.

Best Regards,

--InNeed95 (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About 2/3 of the edits since the stable version I restored have be reversions or removal of established sourced content. Make the case for whatever changes you want made, get consensus and there's no problem.Pipsally (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Pipsally

As I said, I checked the revision history. For me it is not visible, that a Edit-Warring is occuring.

Please adjust a Example with your Explaination, so I and possibly other users, can understand the reason of your edit.

Please refrain from using excuses, which can be literally reflected to your own behaviour.

--InNeed95 (talk) 19:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained above. All I have done is restore the stable version. Establish consensus for whatever changes you wish you be made and they will be done as appropriate. Pipsally (talk) 19:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:44, 26 July 2021 edit InNeed95 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 616 edits →Recent Reverts on the Article: Respond. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:51, 26 July 2021 edit undo Pipsally (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,163 edits →Recent Reverts on the Article Next edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:

	--[[User:InNeed95\|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95\|talk]]) 19:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)		--[[User:InNeed95\|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95\|talk]]) 19:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
			:I have explained above. All I have done is restore the stable version. Establish consensus for whatever changes you wish you be made and they will be done as appropriate. [[User:Pipsally\|Pipsally]] ([[User talk:Pipsally\|talk]]) 19:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:51, 26 July 2021

Sources

Figures

Recent Reverts on the Article

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.