Outburst (mining): Difference between revisions
Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Removed accessdate with no specified URL. | You can use this tool yourself. Report bugs here. |
→Outburst management: Drilling and blasting|Grunching |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Where standard gas drainage techniques are ineffectual, mine operators have a number of options. These may include: |
Where standard gas drainage techniques are ineffectual, mine operators have a number of options. These may include: |
||
* Remote mining - mining is carried out by remote control. |
* Remote mining - mining is carried out by remote control. |
||
* Grunching - refers to the sequential drilling, blasting and loading out of the coal face, as opposed to the conventional mechanised method of mining. |
* [[Drilling and blasting|Grunching]] - refers to the sequential drilling, blasting and loading out of the coal face, as opposed to the conventional mechanised method of mining. |
||
* Induction shotfiring - using a charge (explosive) to test the face and induce an outburst if one is imminent. The explosion would have the effect of fracturing the face and relieving the stress on the face, transferring it deeper into the seam. |
* Induction shotfiring - using a charge (explosive) to test the face and induce an outburst if one is imminent. The explosion would have the effect of fracturing the face and relieving the stress on the face, transferring it deeper into the seam. |
||
* Not mining that part of the seam - after all, lives are worth more than coal |
* Not mining that part of the seam - after all, lives are worth more than coal |
Revision as of 08:13, 22 August 2019
This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2009) |
An outburst is the sudden and violent ejection of coal, gas and rock from a coal face and surrounding strata in an underground coal mine. When outbursts occur, they can be very serious events, possibly even resulting in fatalities.
Effects of outbursts
Outbursts may range in severity from being barely noticeable, to causing the destruction of an entire mining panel, and throwing pieces of machinery weighing tens of tonnes several metres. An outburst at Tahmoor Colliery, in New South Wales, Australia in June 1985 involved the ejection of 350 tonnes of coal and rock and over 3000 cubic metres of gas, resulting in one fatality.[1] Another outburst at the nearby South Bulli Colliery in 1991 resulted in three fatalities, and yet another outburst at Westcliff Colliery in January 1994 involved 300 tonnes of coal and rock and resulted in one fatality.
Predisposing factors
Several factors predispose certain coal seams to being outburst-prone. These include:
- Coal seam gas content (measured in m3 per tonne) - generally, for a given coal seam gas composition, the higher the gas content, the higher the risk
- Geological structures, in particular faults, dykes and mylonite (reddish brown powdered coal) zones
- Coal permeability (the less permeable the coal seam, the more prone to outbursts)
- Coal seam gas composition - for a given coal seam gas content (in m3 per tonne), the seam will be much more susceptible to outbursts if the coal seam gas is predominantly carbon dioxide, as opposed to the case where the coal seam gas is predominantly methane.
- The compressive strength of coal - high strength coal seams appear to be more prone to outbursts. This may be because low strength coal tends to deform in and around the face area as mining occurs, resulting in stress relaxation (see below).
- The stress regime at the face - high stress on and around the mining face can have the effect of closing up the cleats and pores in the coal seam. This can result in a steep coal seam gas pressure gradient into the seam, (as opposed to a low stress environment where the coal seam gas drains freely into the face area, resulting in a low seam gas pressure gradient). As mining progresses, this pressure can be violently released, resulting in an outburst.
The statistical results show that the primary factor in coal and gas outbursts is crustal stress (P), followed by sturdiness coefficient (f). The coal seam gas content (W) affect affects coal and gas outbursts as the least important factor.[2]
Outburst management
Outburst management primarily focuses on the prevention of outbursts by pre-draining the gas from coal seams prior to mining. The aim of gas drainage is to lower the gas content of the seam below a certain threshold value, at which time it is considered safe to mine the seam. [1] These threshold values should vary depending on the coal seam and coal measure being mined. Since the introduction of threshold values, not a single fatality due to an outburst has been recorded in Australia.
Gas drainage is achieved by drilling boreholes into the seam in advance of mining. Gas liberated from the seam into the boreholes is transported out of the mine via a pipe range.
Where standard gas drainage techniques are ineffectual, mine operators have a number of options. These may include:
- Remote mining - mining is carried out by remote control.
- Grunching - refers to the sequential drilling, blasting and loading out of the coal face, as opposed to the conventional mechanised method of mining.
- Induction shotfiring - using a charge (explosive) to test the face and induce an outburst if one is imminent. The explosion would have the effect of fracturing the face and relieving the stress on the face, transferring it deeper into the seam.
- Not mining that part of the seam - after all, lives are worth more than coal
Mining under "bomb squad" or outburst conditions is no longer considered acceptable, since this method still presents a fatal risk to at least one miner. "Bomb squad" refers to a special set of operating conditions that would be adopted when it was anticipated that an outburst could occur. Under "bomb squad" conditions, the following working methods would apply:
- Minimal manning at the face - particularly during the cutting of coal, only one man at a time was allowed at the face (the continuous miner driver)
- Armoured cabins were built on continuous mining machines - these cabins were thought to be able to protect the operator in the event of an outburst. This was subsequently proven to be wrong.
- Operators wore full-face masks, connected to a compressed air supply - once again, this was ineffectual in preventing fatalities from occurring.
See also
References
- ^ "Legislative Assembly Hansard – 12 April 1994". Hansard & House Papers. Parliament of New South Wales. 12 April 1994. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
- ^ Shi, Xianzhi; Song, Dazhao; Qian, Ziwei (2017-07-06). "Classification of coal seam outburst hazards and evaluation of the importance of influencing factors". Open Geosciences. 9 (1): 295–301. doi:10.1515/geo-2017-0024. ISSN 2391-5447.
Further reading
- "Rapid decompression and desorption induced energetic failure in coal". Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 7 (3): 345–350. June 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.01.004.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|authors=
ignored (help) • see: $1. Introduction and background.