28 June 2024

• curprev 23:5323:53, 28 June 2024 Gmattdavis talk contribs 21,234 bytes +194 Preliminary report of S500 system destroyed in Crimea by Ukraine. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 23:5223:52, 28 June 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 21,040 bytes −312 Undid revision 1231559403 by Gmattdavis (talk) yet again, unsourced Tag: Undo
• curprev 23:5023:50, 28 June 2024 Gmattdavis talk contribs 21,352 bytes +312 Preliminary report of S500 system destroy in Crimea by Ukraine. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 20:2220:22, 28 June 2024 Neils51 talk contribs m 21,040 bytes −200 replaced: the the → the, typo(s) fixed: $800 million dollars → $800 million Tag: AWB
• curprev 18:4218:42, 28 June 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 21,240 bytes −178 Restored revision 1231505258 by Swatjester (talk): Not reliably sourced Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 18:2718:27, 28 June 2024 Wilibald oplatek talk contribs m 21,418 bytes −1 typo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 18:1618:16, 28 June 2024 Irollinson1 talk contribs 21,419 bytes +179 →Operational history Tag: Reverted
• curprev 17:1617:16, 28 June 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 21,240 bytes −82 Undid revision 1231495237 by 47.154.119.83 (talk) unsourced Tag: Undo
• curprev 16:1016:10, 28 June 2024 47.154.119.83 talk 21,322 bytes +82 →Operational history Tag: Reverted
• curprev 16:0116:01, 28 June 2024 2003:ee:4710:4700:e42e:7c63:2c9b:dd5c talk 21,240 bytes +15 →History: implicit subject replaced. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 June 2024

• curprev 19:4319:43, 25 June 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 21,225 bytes +379 →Operational history: successful ATACMS launches against positions defended by S-500 Tag: Visual edit

24 June 2024

• curprev 06:2806:28, 24 June 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 20,846 bytes −5 Undid revision 1230695917 by 213.127.160.164 (talk) the sources are referring to a design goal, not rumors. Tag: Undo
• curprev 05:2205:22, 24 June 2024 213.127.160.164 talk 20,851 bytes +5 No edit summary Tag: Reverted

21 June 2024

• curprev 14:2514:25, 21 June 2024 Finlay McWalter talk contribs 20,846 bytes 0 →Operational History: MOS:HEADCAPS

15 June 2024

• curprev 14:5014:50, 15 June 2024 XANTHO GENOS 5.5.2024 talk contribs m 20,846 bytes +1 No edit summary

14 June 2024

• curprev 17:4417:44, 14 June 2024 Aardark talk contribs m 20,845 bytes +14 →Operational History
• curprev 00:4300:43, 14 June 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 20,831 bytes +428 ce, added additional source, attributed the claim a little better Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 00:1300:13, 14 June 2024 GrapesRock talk contribs 20,403 bytes −1 →Operational history: "juine" -> "June"
• curprev 00:0000:00, 14 June 2024 Jjmclellan82 talk contribs 20,404 bytes +457 →Design: Update Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 June 2024

• curprev 14:3714:37, 13 June 2024 Citation bot talk contribs 19,947 bytes +316 Altered title. Add: title, date. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by GrapesRock | Category:CS1 errors: dates | #UCB_Category 23/236
• curprev 05:4205:42, 13 June 2024 FavelasMonkey talk contribs m 19,631 bytes +33 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 05:4105:41, 13 June 2024 89.150.160.213 talk 19,598 bytes +4 →Operational history: Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:1805:18, 13 June 2024 2001:999:78c:8a3:39df:4ec5:33d5:bc60 talk 19,594 bytes 0 →Operational history
• curprev 04:4404:44, 13 June 2024 68.144.70.87 talk 19,594 bytes 0 →Operational history
• curprev 04:4304:43, 13 June 2024 Geni talk contribs 19,594 bytes +453 →Operational history: mention claimed Ketch Bridge deployment

4 May 2024

• curprev 19:5719:57, 4 May 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 19,141 bytes +333 The most recent source we have (Oct 2023) explicitly states "There is currently no evidence Russia has developed the S-550."; also de-wikilinking S-550 as it's a redlink
• curprev 19:3319:33, 4 May 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,808 bytes −18 rv -- these edits do not address the underlying concern, which is that it is a state-sponsored propaganda source of questionable reliability, making a dubious claim not supported by factual evidence other than from the primary source; it directly fails the criteria for reliability. It is *NOT* a requirement that a source be listed as a perennially unreliable source for it to be considered unreliable. Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 17:2617:26, 4 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,826 bytes +13 No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 11:4611:46, 4 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,813 bytes +11 No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 11:4411:44, 4 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,802 bytes +30 Now it's reliable and neutral. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 11:3911:39, 4 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,772 bytes −36 It isn't listed as an unreliable source in Wikipedia:reliable sources. Can't just label every Russian source as unreliable. It is used to support a claim, not a statement of fact. That's why it's "Russia claims", and the source is Russian media. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 01:4001:40, 4 May 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,808 bytes +36 Undid revision 1221986653 by 82.0.40.72 (talk) we still denote the unreliability of a questionable source, even if not speaking in wikivoice, so readers can assess credibility for themselves Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 01:3901:39, 4 May 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,772 bytes −100 planned future deployments do not belong in the "No. built" section of the infobox; they can be mentioned in-line in the text, with the appropriate qualifications Tag: Visual edit

3 May 2024

• curprev 05:4305:43, 3 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,872 bytes +39 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:4005:40, 3 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,833 bytes +3 More accurate Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:3905:39, 3 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,830 bytes −165 No edit summary Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:3805:38, 3 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,995 bytes +408 CSIS was for the "10 battalions". Removed that. Pravda actually says "first samples of two S-500s in different modifications have entered service". Janes reports the 1st battalion that entered service in 2021. So this is accurate and up to date. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:2505:25, 3 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,587 bytes −36 That's why it reads "Russia claims". Whether they actually successfully tested it or not is another matter. So in this context, it is perfectly reliable, as the statement says "Russia claims", not "Russia has successfully tested...". Even if it's propaganda, it is still reliable, as it's just a claim (like most things on the military side of Wikipedia). Not a proven fact. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:0805:08, 3 May 2024 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 18,623 bytes +14 Dating maintenance tags: {{Unreliable source?}}
• curprev 04:4804:48, 3 May 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,609 bytes +27 state-sponsored outlets of dubious reliability repeating government claims should be attributed as such.
• curprev 04:4404:44, 3 May 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,582 bytes −328 aligning this with what the sources actually claim -- the Janes reference only claims "one regimental set" of unknown composition; the Pravda source makes no claims about how many are in service, only announcements of what is planned for the future; the CSIS source is outdated from before any were deployed and likewise does not support the claim.

2 May 2024

• curprev 22:4222:42, 2 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,910 bytes +2 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 22:4022:40, 2 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,908 bytes +10 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 22:3922:39, 2 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,898 bytes +272 Forgot about the Izvestia successful S-500 hypersonic test claim. Adding it now. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 10:5510:55, 2 May 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,626 bytes −6 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

27 April 2024

• curprev 23:2623:26, 27 April 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,632 bytes +70 Undid revision 1221101193 by 82.0.40.72 (talk) WP:NPOV -- we should not be obscuring where a system is still in development, or is untested.
• curprev 23:2423:24, 27 April 2024 Swatjester talk contribs 18,562 bytes −42 It is irrelevant how many are planned in any term -- this line on the infobox is asking about number *built.* Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 23:0523:05, 27 April 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,604 bytes +19 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 21:4621:46, 27 April 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,585 bytes −38 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 12:5212:52, 27 April 2024 82.0.40.72 talk 18,623 bytes −23 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit