Talk:Doping in China: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→protect page: Reply |
→Another swimmer scandal that may warrant inclusion: new section |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::What you really shouldn't be doing is mass undoing a vast number of edits all at once and making aggressive accusations towards others. You need to give valid reasoning and address each edit individually if you disagree and give valid reasoning. And smearing others like this, isn't a valid reason. Even if you disagree with right reasoning, you should not edit war as that isn't constructive. Instead both of you should remain calm and go discuss it on talk with valid reasoning instead of doing character attacks. If you have genuine reason to oppose certain info, address that and give reason why you think it's "fake" instead of giving no acceptable reasoning but just ad hominems. [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks] [[Special:Contributions/49.195.14.60|49.195.14.60]] ([[User talk:49.195.14.60|talk]]) 03:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
::What you really shouldn't be doing is mass undoing a vast number of edits all at once and making aggressive accusations towards others. You need to give valid reasoning and address each edit individually if you disagree and give valid reasoning. And smearing others like this, isn't a valid reason. Even if you disagree with right reasoning, you should not edit war as that isn't constructive. Instead both of you should remain calm and go discuss it on talk with valid reasoning instead of doing character attacks. If you have genuine reason to oppose certain info, address that and give reason why you think it's "fake" instead of giving no acceptable reasoning but just ad hominems. [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks] [[Special:Contributions/49.195.14.60|49.195.14.60]] ([[User talk:49.195.14.60|talk]]) 03:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::Hello. You don't seem to be a random IP based on your editing style and familiarity with the Wikipedia community guidelines and policies. Do you have another username or ID? <span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 7px;background:#555">[[User:Normchou|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Normchou'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Normchou|💬]]</sup> 04:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
:::Hello. You don't seem to be a random IP based on your editing style and familiarity with the Wikipedia community guidelines and policies. Do you have another username or ID? <span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 7px;background:#555">[[User:Normchou|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Normchou'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Normchou|💬]]</sup> 04:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Another swimmer scandal that may warrant inclusion == |
|||
See ''The New York Times'' article, "China, Citing Tainted Burgers, Cleared Swimmers in a New Doping Dispute", below. In it, CHINADA said that the source of the banned drug (anabolic steroid) was from hamburgers the athletes consumed.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |author= |date= |title=China, Citing Tainted Burgers, Cleared Swimmers in a New Doping Dispute |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/30/us/politics/china-swimmers-doping-food.html |access-date=3 August 2024 |work=nytimes.com}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite web |author= |date= |title=China says more Chinese swimmers failed doping tests due to tainted hamburgers |url=https://sports.yahoo.com/china-says-more-chinese-swimmers-143621100.html |access-date=3 August 2024 |work=Yahoo Sports}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite web |author= |date= |title=A Chinese Olympic swimmer failed a doping test, but was given a pass after it got blamed on hamburgers: report |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/china-secretly-cleared-athletes-of-doping-over-burger-intake-report-2024-7 |access-date=3 August 2024 |work=Business Insider}}</ref> <span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 7px;background:#555">[[User:Normchou|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Normchou'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Normchou|💬]]</sup> 05:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:27, 3 August 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does this make sense?
In 1992 the number of Chinese swimmers in the top 25 world rankings soared from a plateau of less than 30 to 98, with all but 4 of the 98 swimmers female.
Should this be 'top 250'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.45.52.8 (talk) 12:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Chinese doping in speed skating in 1988
According to these two sources :
- Hersh, Phil (1992-02-11). "Chinese Skater: Medal, No Shame". Chicago Tribune.
- "China: Alles erlaubt". Der Spiegel (in German). 1992-08-03.
The two chinese female speed skaters Ye Qiaobo and Wang Xiuli tested positive and were punished with 18 months suspension and therefore couldn't participate in the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary, Canada. Best regards Migrant (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
protect page
this page has become politically very sensitive, there seems to be a lot of activity of chinese trolls, vandalising pages that are critical of china. Please protect and only let correct edits happen to the page. Johannesvdp (talk) 15:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- What you really shouldn't be doing is mass undoing a vast number of edits all at once and making aggressive accusations towards others. You need to give valid reasoning and address each edit individually if you disagree and give valid reasoning. And smearing others like this, isn't a valid reason. Even if you disagree with right reasoning, you should not edit war as that isn't constructive. Instead both of you should remain calm and go discuss it on talk with valid reasoning instead of doing character attacks. If you have genuine reason to oppose certain info, address that and give reason why you think it's "fake" instead of giving no acceptable reasoning but just ad hominems. [1] 49.195.14.60 (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. You don't seem to be a random IP based on your editing style and familiarity with the Wikipedia community guidelines and policies. Do you have another username or ID? Normchou 💬 04:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- What you really shouldn't be doing is mass undoing a vast number of edits all at once and making aggressive accusations towards others. You need to give valid reasoning and address each edit individually if you disagree and give valid reasoning. And smearing others like this, isn't a valid reason. Even if you disagree with right reasoning, you should not edit war as that isn't constructive. Instead both of you should remain calm and go discuss it on talk with valid reasoning instead of doing character attacks. If you have genuine reason to oppose certain info, address that and give reason why you think it's "fake" instead of giving no acceptable reasoning but just ad hominems. [1] 49.195.14.60 (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Another swimmer scandal that may warrant inclusion
See The New York Times article, "China, Citing Tainted Burgers, Cleared Swimmers in a New Doping Dispute", below. In it, CHINADA said that the source of the banned drug (anabolic steroid) was from hamburgers the athletes consumed.[1][2][3] Normchou 💬 05:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- ^ "China, Citing Tainted Burgers, Cleared Swimmers in a New Doping Dispute". nytimes.com. Retrieved 3 August 2024.
- ^ "China says more Chinese swimmers failed doping tests due to tainted hamburgers". Yahoo Sports. Retrieved 3 August 2024.
- ^ "A Chinese Olympic swimmer failed a doping test, but was given a pass after it got blamed on hamburgers: report". Business Insider. Retrieved 3 August 2024.