Talk:Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Fluoborate (talk | contribs) |
||
(43 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{On this day|date1=2008-10-13|oldid1=244902990|date2=2009-10-13|oldid2=319564877|date3=2010-10-13|oldid3=390525087|date4=2018-10-13|oldid4=863764213|date5=2019-10-13|oldid5=920948834|date6=2020-10-13|oldid6=983226065|date7=2022-10-13|oldid7=1115758795}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
||
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = n |
{{WikiProject Aviation| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = n |
||
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =y |
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =y |
||
| b3 <!--Structure --> =y |
| b3 <!--Structure --> =y |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y |
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y |
||
|Accident-task-force=yes}} |
|Accident-task-force=yes}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Death |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Disaster management |
{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Rugby union |
{{WikiProject Rugby union|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject South America |
{{WikiProject South America|importance=low |
||
|Argentina=yes|Argentina-importance=low |
|Argentina=yes|Argentina-importance=low |
||
|Chile=yes|Chile-importance=low}} |
|Chile=yes|Chile-importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Uruguay|topic=hist}} |
{{WikiProject Uruguay|importance=Mid|topic=hist}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
{{On this day|date1=2008-10-13|oldid1=244902990|date2=2009-10-13|oldid2=319564877|date3=2010-10-13|oldid3=390525087|date4=2018-10-13|oldid4=863764213|date5=2019-10-13|oldid5=920948834|date6=2020-10-13|oldid6=983226065}} |
|||
| algo = old(365d) |
|||
{{Archives|root=Talk:Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571}} |
|||
| archive = Talk:Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| counter = 2 |
|||
==Names== |
|||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
Seeing the passenger list, the names shown in the film corresponds. But there are not Federico Aranda and Alberto Artuna... Changed names ? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.10.37.176|87.10.37.176]] ([[User talk:87.10.37.176|talk]]) 19:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
}} |
|||
:That's correct, but this is the case for most people involved in the crash, precisely ALL the people that died but some relatives of survivors (such as the mother and sister of Parrado and the wife of Methol). One of them is for example Marcelo Perez who in the movie is Balbi. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.37.45.44|93.37.45.44]] ([[User talk:93.37.45.44|talk]]) 18:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=120}} |
|||
{{Top 25 Report|Dec 31, 2023 (24th)|Jan 7 2024 (2nd)|ranks=yes}} |
|||
==Aircrew== |
|||
This is an excellent article; informative and a good read. Well done all around. One detail still puzzles me, though. Did any of the aircrew survive the crash? I assume that they were all killed in the impact, but the article doesn't mention the fates of all the people on the aircraft, it only lists the fate of a few. The opening of the "Hard decisions" section almost seems to imply that at least the co-pilot survived (it mentions the survivors having knowledge of the co-pilot's assertion that the plane had passed Curico, although this could also have been overheard from the cabin or indeed broadcast over the tannoy), but otherwise the aircrew vanish from the storyline early on and are not mentioned later. Was there an official enquiry into the crash? -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] ([[User talk:Ashley Pomeroy|talk]]) 13:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I have not done a complete review of the article, but I can answer your questions. You are right about the pilots--one died and the other other was near death and kept on saying they passed Curico, although that was incorrect. He died shortly afterwards. In the film, I know they found empty wine or liquor bottles in the cockpit, which made them think that may have been responsible for the crash, but I can't remember if that was in the book, and just something they put in the film. |
|||
::A mechanic lived for a while and kept on telling the survivors that if they found the tail and the batteries, they could radio for help. This was incorrect as well. |
|||
::It looks like this needs to be incorporated in the article, so your questions are helpful. |
|||
::I highly recommend the Read book first and if you're still interested, then the Parrado book. --[[User:Omarcheeseboro|Omarcheeseboro]] ([[User talk:Omarcheeseboro|talk]]) 15:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Hotel Termas Sosneado?== |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
''In actuality, the plane had crashed inside Argentina and just a few miles west of an abandoned hotel named the Hotel Termas Sosneado.'' |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
Where was this? Is the site still there today? --[[Special:Contributions/98.232.181.201|98.232.181.201]] ([[User talk:98.232.181.201|talk]]) 07:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
The name of the hotel is the "Termas del Flaco". It was closed during the time of the accident but according to Piers Paul Reads book "Alive" it had a plentiful supply of food stored away. It is open today <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.209.220.36|90.209.220.36]] ([[User talk:90.209.220.36|talk]]) 22:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I have to correct you; Termas del Flaco are in Chile, on the west of the Andes, while the Hotel Termas Sosneado is in Argentina on the east side of the Andes, a few miles from the crash point. Please refer to the image that is embedded in the article about the way of Parrado and Canessa: |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alive-andes-2.jpg |
|||
As you can see the Termas Sosneado id depicted on the right of the crash point. |
|||
Instead Termas del Flaco is the place just on the wes of the Andes which is reached by the unpaved route passing through La Rufina <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.37.42.90|93.37.42.90]] ([[User talk:93.37.42.90|talk]]) 19:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
The Hotel Termas Sosneado was closed in 1953, almost 20 years before the Andes crash, and was allowed to fall into ruin quite soon afterward. I am not sure where Piers Paul Read got his information about it being well-stocked with supplies (how? The furniture and accoutrements were all stripped away by vandals over the years) so it is a bit of a mystery what supplies might have been there, if any. After the improvement of the road in the 1960's, cars could drive up to the site of the ruins, and campers, hikers and trekkers did stop there and enjoy the hot springs. |
|||
Here's a link with photos of the hotel when it was in operation and some of the ruins today. |
|||
http://www.taringa.net/posts/imagenes/1750340/Hotel-Abandonado,-Termas-del-Sosneado,-Mendoza,--Arg_.html |
|||
If anyone can find a reliable source with information on the status of the hotel in 1972 it would be a useful addition to the article. |
|||
[[User:Palisadesk|Palisadesk]] ([[User talk:Palisadesk|talk]]) 22:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Crash Site Co-ordinates?== |
|||
It seems there may be a slight discrepancy regarding the actual co-ordinates of the crash site. Given the map for the crash site and the co-ordinates, Google Maps place these co-ordinates in the Cile side of the continent, and not the Argentina side. However, the crash landing map and the 'trek' map both indicate a bowl-like feature on the mountain where the fuselage was located which correspond within the Google Maps coordinates, but this could also just be co-incidence. Can someone please tell me what the exact location is, and where on Google Maps to look? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/196.34.172.200|196.34.172.200]] ([[User talk:196.34.172.200|talk]]) 12:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I don't see this discrepancy. If you follow the link and go to: |
|||
http://mapper.acme.com/?ll=-34.765,-70.286389&z=15&t=Hmarker0=-34.765,-70.286389,Uruguayan%20Air%20Force%20Flight%20571 |
|||
you'll see that the place of the crash is on the right (east) od the Chile-Argentina border (the white line; i.e. in Argentina <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.37.45.44|93.37.45.44]] ([[User talk:93.37.45.44|talk]]) 18:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I agree there is something wrong with the coordinates as they are now (34°45′54″S 70°17′11″W). This has the crash site at the bottom of a valley, when all the pics clearly indicate it's on a slope. Perhaps someone mistakenly put in the location of a present-day memorial site or man-made marker. -[[User:Rolypolyman|Rolypolyman]] ([[User talk:Rolypolyman|talk]]) 17:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
If you examine the crash site photograph (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Crash_site.JPG), note the shelf of snow above the rock formation in the distance, above and slightly to the right of the cross, and also the series of rocks exposed in the snow in the distance to the right of the cross. You can spot these in the sat image to the left (West) of the marker. The caption on the image of the memorial indicates it was "taken looking west" - I'll take that to be "westerly", since if it was due west, it would have been 200m or so north of the specified coordinates. In any event, the general depression area indicated by the coordinates would seem to correspond to the phototograph well enough. Results for web searches for crash site photos include a sidelong image of the fuselage with mountains off in the distance (at http://novelthought.org/miracle-in-the-andes/ though I cannot confirm authenticity), which also appear consistent with the position indicated by the GPS coordinates if you are facing East (implying the fuselage was facing North, with the markings facing Westerly). Dropping into Google earth, if face East from the marked location, you can see the mountains in the distance matching up with those in the background of the colour fuselage photo. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.101.89.243|75.101.89.243]] ([[User talk:75.101.89.243|talk]]) 23:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== "unauthorized" == |
|||
The article mentions that certain articles, books, etc., were "unauthorized" and does this in a pejorative fashion. As I understand freedom of the press, nobody owns the news. While there are "unauthorized" biographies, they pertain to individual people with publicity rights, and they are, after all, legal. If something was written by somebody who had been trespassing, the entry onto the land in question may be unauthorized, but the term should not be extended to the publication. Thus, I think the use of "unauthorized" should be deleted. If there is a specific biography, it might be described as unauthorized by a certain person, but that's about it. |
|||
--[[User:Piledhigheranddeeper|Piledhigheranddeeper]] ([[User talk:Piledhigheranddeeper|talk]]) 21:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I did... --[[Special:Contributions/181.164.97.184|181.164.97.184]] ([[User talk:181.164.97.184|talk]]) 05:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==Reason for Cleanup Tag?== |
|||
I'd be happy to help clean up the page if it looks to informal, but I don't see anything that's too terrible, am I just missing it?[[User:Altairantares|Altairantares]] ([[User talk:Altairantares|talk]]) 18:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Sequence of events == |
|||
At the end of the first paragraph in the "Hard decisions" section, it is said that Numa Turcatti died before starting the expedition. Then the article goes on to tell things in a way that seems to follow the course of events, but then at the end of the "The sleeping bag" section, Turcatti is then mentioned again as being alive. This needs to get sorted out somehow. --[[User:UKER|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER|talk]]) 14:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::There were a couple of "expeditions". If memory serves, Turcatti went on the first one where they barely got anywhere. He died before the main (successful) expedition with Nando and Roberto. --[[User:CutOffTies|CutOffTies]] ([[User talk:CutOffTies|talk]]) 14:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::I can understand what you say, but the article is not clear in that regard. I'll see to rephrase it when I get the time. --[[User:UKER|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER|talk]]) 16:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::Yeah, I'm not saying the article is right. If you don't have it, I can look at the Piers Paul Reed book to try to get it right. --[[User:CutOffTies|CutOffTies]] ([[User talk:CutOffTies|talk]]) 16:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/130.76.24.28|130.76.24.28]] ([[User talk:130.76.24.28|talk]]) 05:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)== Walk down the mountain? == |
|||
Can somebody explain to me why they didn't just walk downhill, untill they reached el sosneado e.g.? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.208.113.245|84.208.113.245]] ([[User talk:84.208.113.245|talk]]) 18:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::There are many mountains there.. walking downhill from one mountain would simply mean you have to climb another one. --[[User:CutOffTies|CutOffTies]] ([[User talk:CutOffTies|talk]]) 15:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
You might as well ask; "Why didn't they sprout wings and fly back to Uruguay?" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.40.15.91|92.40.15.91]] ([[User talk:92.40.15.91|talk]]) 22:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: Neither of these comments are true unless you are walking down to an endorrheic basin. You can always just walk down (othrwise it would fill with water untill it overflowed creating a lake and river) --[[Special:Contributions/84.208.113.245|84.208.113.245]] ([[User talk:84.208.113.245|talk]]) 03:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Because they thought they were closer to the Chilean side. The pilots thought they were over Curico which was why they turned north thinking they were headed toward Santiago. But they goofed up and turned while they were still in the Planchon pass and headed directly into the Andes which was why they crashed. The copilot mentioned this before he died so they all through they were just a few miles from Chile; that is why they headed east. 02:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.17.243.76|70.17.243.76]] ([[User talk:70.17.243.76|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
They went west, to Chile, not east. I think that the original poster above has a valid point. They were not appropriately skeptical of the incorrect information from the co-pilot, who had just demonstrated that he did not know where they were, by flying into a mountain. Had they discounted his dying declaration, they surely would have gone downhill, to the east. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/208.53.195.38|208.53.195.38]] ([[User talk:208.53.195.38|talk]]) 21:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
You have to remember how disorientating the whole thing must have been. If you crash (pretty much in the centre of the Andes like they did) and your friends are dead, you have no food, and the low temperatures are enough to kill you, you're not going to have a epiphany about which direction is best to simply "just walk down hill". This would have lead them to Mountains they would have had to climb anyway. Not to mention they needed to wait until the temperatures improved (along with getting the sleeping bag together) before they could attempt to walk out of their. These were clever young men, if it was simply a case of walking downhill they would have done so. Had they immediately set off downhill the moment they crashed they would have died of exposure. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.41.157.1|92.41.157.1]] ([[User talk:92.41.157.1|talk]]) 00:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Just to reiterate the original question, is anybody aware of a more detailed discussion of the hike downhill from the crash site, following the water, and eventually to the east? On Google Maps that hike almost seems easy, whereas the actual hike that took place looks very difficult. Going downhill is never the wrong thing to do. Going uphill may be a very bad idea. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/61.69.26.172|61.69.26.172]] ([[User talk:61.69.26.172|talk]]) 12:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Walking downhill is often the wrong thing to do if it leads you to a lake or to a cliff which you're unable to ascend/descend. [[User:Jim Michael|Jim Michael]] ([[User talk:Jim Michael|talk]]) 12:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::I suggest that anyone wondering about this question read the Piers Paul Read book "Alive". It should answer your questions. Also, talk pages are for improving the article, not for forum type discussion. --[[User:CutOffTies|CutOffTies]] ([[User talk:CutOffTies|talk]]) 13:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::If the answer is in the book, we can add it, sourced, to the article. This also implies that the question is relevant to the subject. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 21:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:: A Mexican mountaineer, Ricardo Pena, led an expedition for National Geographic to retrace Parrado and Canessa's trek out. He has also led expeditions to the crash site from the east - in 2010, to film for a documentary on the History Channel. In that documentary he discusses the fact that Canessa did indeed see a road to the east from the top of the mountain they climbed, but states that had they actually gone east, they would probably have been unable to cross the Atuel River at that time of year -- it is wide, cold and very fast-flowing. They had no equipment to enable them to cross and would not have successfully reached help on the Argentine side. So yes, the route is easier in theory but would have been impassible to them in 1972. The documentary is entitled "I Am Alive" and could be the source for information about the route, though National Geographic Adventure magazine had an article about it which may also include those details. I don't have a copy unfortunately. |
|||
* As a matter of fact, three of them did walk down the valley for a day and a half. They saw nothing but huge mountains and no end to the snow, and they almost froze to death in the process. They believed that going east would lead them deeper into the Andes mountains. It would have been insanely stupid to abandon their only shelter and only source of food to walk blindly into the middle of the Andes mountains simply because it goes downhill. [[User:KevinLuna|KevinLuna]] ([[User talk:KevinLuna|talk]]) 17:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*I have just reviewed the geography including a virtual journey with google earth and I have to say: To go west, *up* the mountain, is surely one of the dumbest decision ever. It's unthinkable that people would prefer this way. Because of the "green valleys of Chile". How stupid is that? [[User:DrOliverBrausch|DrOliverBrausch]] ([[User talk:DrOliverBrausch|talk]]) 11:27, 1 September 2019 (UTC) |
|||
I read an article in a mountaineering magazine about a team that retraced the path that the footballers took to find rescue. When the team gained some altitude above the crash site they could clearly see a road bed down below, there was a photo of the road that they took from that point. After the trip was over they asked one of the original survivors why they didn't just go down west to the road. The answer was that the self appointed "leader" declared that "It could not be a road because he knew where they were," and so they continued their hellish ascent and 38 mile descent. I think that there is a good lesson there to be learned about leaders and followers. Unfortunately I cannot find the original article. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/130.76.24.28|130.76.24.28]] ([[User talk:130.76.24.28#top|talk]]) 04:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->I'm back after reviewing google earth and watching this interesting video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skrPS4icHrc on a twelve mile horseback expedition you can pay for if you are too soft to hike. The so called river is just a stream and crossed easy by the riders but they didn't show where. The basin is an easy talus slope down to a gentle valley floor and I can guarantee you if a horse can do I can. It look about one thousand times easier than climbing over the Andes! |
|||
Here's a picture of the road visible from where they crossed the mountains; https://www.alpineexpeditions.net/uploads/3/4/3/4/34343030/327893_orig.jpg <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/120.17.136.37|120.17.136.37]] ([[User talk:120.17.136.37#top|talk]]) 06:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Tail number== |
|||
Anyone know the tail number of the aircraft involved. Once found and referenced, it can be added to the [[list of aircraft by tail number]]. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 15:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
The fin (tail) number was T-571. There are photos of the aircraft showing the tail number but it is also confirmed in the link to the Aviation Safety Network report on the crash (see link under External links). I don't know how to add it to the List of Aircraft by Tail Number. The plane had a twin, tail number T-572, which was retired a few years ago and was used in the filming of Arijon's documentary. |
|||
[[User:Palisadesk|Palisadesk]] ([[User talk:Palisadesk|talk]]) 18:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== "Date" in accident summary == |
== "Date" in accident summary == |
||
In the infobox, is it really worth noting the date when the last survivors were rescued? The actual ''accident'' (or crash), which this article mainly is about, occurred on October 13 (although the initial survivors were fighting for their lives a couple of months), so I suggest removing "December 23". [[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">'''''Mid'''''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contribs]]) 12:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC) |
In the infobox, is it really worth noting the date when the last survivors were rescued? The actual ''accident'' (or crash), which this article mainly is about, occurred on October 13 (although the initial survivors were fighting for their lives a couple of months), so I suggest removing "December 23". [[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">'''''Mid'''''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contribs]]) 12:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
:The movie actually states the date. Was December 12th. Rescued December 22nd. [[Special:Contributions/142.163.28.81|142.163.28.81]] ([[User talk:142.163.28.81|talk]]) 07:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Line 138: | Line 38: | ||
I want this get fixed up to be eligible for included in the Selected Anniversaries this year which is the 40th anniversary |
I want this get fixed up to be eligible for included in the Selected Anniversaries this year which is the 40th anniversary |
||
== "Crash" - Ground Collision Alarm == |
|||
==Correcting the Parrado-Canessa trail== |
|||
In section "Finding help" There was a faulty map and description of Nando Parrado and Roberto Canessa's trail. I corrected the map and the description in the text. The earlier map shows a trail beginning in the North direction, which is wrong, and impossible. Parrado moved towards the West, and reaching the crest of the crater-like valley there was only one valley they could climb down into. This valley lead first west for 2 miles, then northwest for 1 mile, until they reached a bigger valley they could follow in the southwest direction. The two maps the earlier map used as references show this clearly. I also moved the starting point slightly to a position which is shown as the position of the fuselage on most maps of this accident. (I did not have an SVG-editor so I made a .png version. Feel free to make an .svg version which is correct.) Study the maps at http://toolserver.org/~geohack/geohack.php?pagename=1972_Andes_flight_disaster¶ms=34_45_54_S_70_17_11_W_type:landmark and you will see that I am right. |
|||
Note that climbing towards the west from the airplane wreck there is a mile long crest which lead them into a certain valley, no matter where on that crest they arrived after climbing up the rock wall. To get into another valley they must have gone in a direction far from due west. You can also study the movie |
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sILm8VM-fec&feature=related I Am Alive: Surviving The Andes Plane Crash made by History Channel. About 20% from the end of the movie the trail toward the west is shown on a map. |
|||
It is not believable, that a ground collision alarm sounded just before the crash. |
|||
If you study topographical maps of the area you will realize that if they had climbed towards southwest they could have followed a high mountain ridge for a mile to be able to descend into the valley where the upper part of Rio Azufre is situated. This would have been practically impossible, and their story says that they started descending directly from the point where they reached the crest. To climb towards the north out of the crater, which the earlier map showed would have meant that they would have needed to move far north inside the crater to even start to climb, so this is very unlikely and does not fit with their story. They climbed towards the west and because of that they must have descended into the valley to the west, which is shown in my version of the map. |
|||
Terrain awareness and warning systems initial development took place in 1971 or right after that. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrain_awareness_and_warning_system |
|||
It is much more plausible, that it was a stall alarm, or some other alarm sounding. |
|||
In the article, this fact is attributed to source [4], which should be checked. |
|||
In one of the maps in the list above an arrow towards the east is called "the easy way out". Luckily they did not try moving down into the valley in the east. If they had done that they would have faced a big river with a road on the other side of the river. But nobody used that road. The Sosneado Thermal hotel several miles down that road was a stone ruin and they would have had to walk in deep snow for many weeks or more along the river to even have a chance to see people on the other side of the river. They would have died if they had chosen that direction. Fortunately they chose the only direction, west, which made it possible for them to get out of there alive. [[User:Roger491127|Roger491127]] ([[User talk:Roger491127|talk]]) 19:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== PLEASE REMOVE THE WORD CANNABLISM...ITS INACCURATE AND DISRESPECTFUL == |
|||
At http://www.viven.com.uy/571/eng/FotosIneditas.asp you can see a good photo of the crash site valley, as seen from east-northeast, in the summer, so there is very little snow. In this photo you can clearly see the east-west ridge in the middle of the valley, dividing the valley in a southern part, to the left in the photo, and a northern part. Straight ahead you can see a very high part of the crest surrounding the crash site, so high that it was a bad choice for climbing out of there. To the right of that top there is a lower section of the crest, direction due west, which is where Parrado and Canessa climbed out of the valley. To the left of the top you see the south side of the crest, where the airplane lost the wings and the tail part. From that point you see a steep downhill which is where the fuselage sled down in the deep snow. It came to rest at the bottom of the south part of the valley, south of the ridge in the middle of the valley, placed exactly in the way of the avalanche which killed many of them. The avalanche followed the same path as the fuselage down into the valley, hitting the open back end of the fuselage. If Parrado and Canessa had climbed out of the valley in direction north as the earlier image showed they would have had to first climb the ridge dividing the valley, and move down its north side, which is very steep as you can see in this photo, to a point much lower than the fuselage, and then they would have had to walk a long way upwards towards the north, to the right in the photo, before they could begin climbing the north wall of this valley. It would have taken them more than a week to reach the northern crest, which is what the earlier drawing showed as their exit from the valley. This would have been stupid and it is not consistent with their story, moving in the direction west, and is not supported by any maps except for the drawing I corrected and replaced. It is not even supported by the two maps referred to in the description of the earlier image. Those maps show the trail I show in my map. [[User:Roger491127|Roger491127]] ([[User talk:Roger491127|talk]]) 08:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
These men did not kill anyone to eat. Scientifically its anthrophaghy...please for the love of science and truth and respect for the men who survived this remove that word. Cannablism is intentional killing for the act of eating... these men likend it to the taking of communion... and agreed to share their bodies in the event of their death so that some may live. Ive never heard such courageous stories of survival.. i would hope that i live my life with half the dignity these men have shown throughout their entire lives.. [[Special:Contributions/2603:6010:C000:422A:6D5F:5D31:68E0:3D64|2603:6010:C000:422A:6D5F:5D31:68E0:3D64]] ([[User talk:2603:6010:C000:422A:6D5F:5D31:68E0:3D64|talk]]) 01:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I have now made a SVG version of the map with the correct escape route. |
|||
:Agree that this is a courageous story of survival. But with respect your definition of cannibalism is not correct: |
|||
After 5 hours work with installing Inkscape, and learning how to use it, and I needed to use another browser to upload the image, I have succeeded. The "derivative works uploader" did not seem to work so I used "Upload a new version of this file" on the page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Volcan-tinguiririca.svg. instead. |
|||
:* Oxford Dictionary: "The practice of eating human flesh, normally either out of dire need or for ceremonial purposes."[https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095546319;jsessionid=E1513594C3143CECE356CB0C0AA7B88C#:~:text=The%20practice%20of%20eating%20human,need%20or%20for%20ceremonial%20purposes.] |
|||
:* Merriam-Webster: "the usually ritualistic eating of human flesh by a human being"[https://www.britannica.com/topic/cannibalism-human-behaviour] |
|||
:*Cambridge dictionary: "the eating of human flesh by another human being"[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/cannibalism] |
|||
:On that basis I'd say the term "cannibalism" is a appropriately used. They ate human flesh from dead passengers, out of dire need. No credible source suggests they deliberately killed people to eat, and neither does this article make that claim. -- [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 04:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Image of the survivors being rescued == |
|||
By the way, if you google for a file named 002103212323.kmz and download it, and you get the free program Google Earth and install it you can doubleclick on the file 002103212323.kmz and that starts the program Google Earth and you are placed in the Valley de las Lagrimas and you can look around and move around. There is a marker on the edge of the west mountain wall which shows you where Parrado and Canessa moved down into the next valley. I used this program to walk the same way they walked to the place where they met the huaso who got them help. I did this yesterday and it was very interesting, but it took me one hour to walk the same way as they did in 10 days. [[User:Roger491127|Roger491127]] ([[User talk:Roger491127|talk]]) 14:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Please add the image of the survivors being rescued to the article! |
|||
== The one who refused == |
|||
See: AVIATION SAFETY NETWORK - Photo of Fairchild FH-227D T-571 |
|||
Who was it that after surviving the initial days by eating flesh refused to eat anymore and died of starvation? It was either Arturo Nogueira (died 34th day) or Rafael Echavarren (died 37th day). There are no more details in the article on these both. [[User:Jay|Jay]] ([[User talk:Jay|talk]]) 08:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: Ok, it doesn't seem to be either. As per [http://www.viven.com.uy/571/eng/historia.asp this site], Arturo Nogueira died due to the inflammation of the wounds on his legs, and as per [http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=27339245 this], Rafael Echavarren succumbed to his injuries. But the ''I Am Alive'' documentary did talk about such a person who died of starvation after choosing not to eat the flesh. [[User:Jay|Jay]] ([[User talk:Jay|talk]]) 08:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::The link above on Rafael Echavarren also says "he was the only victim of the crash to be removed from the mountain; his father personally recovered his son's body to bring him home to Uruguay for burial." This is significant that can be added to the article if we have a reliable source. [[User:Jay|Jay]] ([[User talk:Jay|talk]]) 09:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
At: https://aviation-safety.net/photo/6095/Fairchild-FH-227D-T-571 |
|||
:::You're thinking of Numa Turcatti. He died on Day 60 from an infected sore on his leg that his body could not fight because he was not eating enough. [[User:KevinLuna|KevinLuna]] ([[User talk:KevinLuna|talk]]) 17:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Note: This photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License so OK for use by Wikipedia. |
|||
== Investigation == |
|||
Was there an official investigation conducted into the crash? I do see a similar question [http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/1446296/#menu1 here], but no info on an official investigation. If there was no investigation, why didn't it happen? [[User:Jay|Jay]] ([[User talk:Jay|talk]]) 09:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks! :-) |
|||
== Recreating the hike == |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/181.92.162.185|181.92.162.185]] ([[User talk:181.92.162.185|talk]]) 03:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I thought I remember hearing somewhere that people have made it a "thing" to try and recreate the hike that the young men went on to find help. Anyone else hear of this or do I have that mixed up with something else?[[User:Zdawg1029|Zdawg1029]] ([[User talk:Zdawg1029|talk]]) 02:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
: WP policy prohibits [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Watermarks,_credits,_titles,_and_distortions use of images] with credits. — [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk to me]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |what I've done]])</sup> 23:03, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
You might be thinking of the many fans of Krakauer's ''Into the Wild'' who make a pilgrimage along the Stampede Trail near Healy, Alaska to the "Magic Bus" where Chris McCandless died of starvation in 1992.See http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/18/alaska-into-the-wild-chris-mccandless-bus-mystic-hiker Or, you could be thinking of a regular journey led by Eduardo Strauch and Ricardo Pena to the crash site, starting in Mendoza, Argentina, and traveling overland on horseback. see http://www.alpineexpeditions.net/andes-survivors-expedition.html <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Palisadesk|Palisadesk]] ([[User talk:Palisadesk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Palisadesk|contribs]]) 15:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::The image is licensed under: "CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 DEED - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported" and may therefore be edited to remove the credits from the image as long as the credits are preserved in the image caption or perhaps even only in the image repository. |
|||
== Duplicate page spotted == |
|||
::See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/#ref-indicate-changes |
|||
New pages feed shows an article called [[The story of the plane crash in the Andes, 1972]]. I have requested that the article be merged into this one as it contains information on the same event. (Please let me know if I did anything wrong.) Thank you. [[User:Jsaur|Jsaur]] ([[User talk:Jsaur|talk]]) 15:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::Also a similar image is already in Wikimedia Commons, see: |
|||
Never mind, it was speedily deleted. Please ignore this! [[User:Jsaur|Jsaur]] ([[User talk:Jsaur|talk]]) 20:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/kk/5/5e/Resquie_andes.jpg |
|||
::or: |
|||
::https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%82:Resquie_andes.jpg |
|||
::English translation, see: https://kk-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%82:Resquie_andes.jpg?_x_tr_sl=kk&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp |
|||
== This Article Is Horribly Written == |
|||
::Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/181.91.16.243|181.91.16.243]] ([[User talk:181.91.16.243|talk]]) 00:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
This article, it's titles most particularly, is entirely inappropriately written, almost like a novel and not at all like an encyclopaedic entry. The article could do with being written from a more factual standpoint and a general tidying up. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.4.161.176|80.4.161.176]] ([[User talk:80.4.161.176|talk]]) 04:21, 17 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Incorrect elevation data in flight/ crash description == |
|||
== Plagiarism == |
|||
the section,"high mountains with peaks of 25,000 to 26,000 feet (7,600 to 7,900 m) were almost at the limit of the FH-227D's maximum operational ceiling of 28,000 feet (8,500 m)" has incorrect data. The highest mountain in South America is Aconcagua, at 6980m, so these referenced peak heights are wrong. [[Special:Contributions/37.10.74.188|37.10.74.188]] ([[User talk:37.10.74.188|talk]]) 23:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Most of the summary of this article is lifted word for word from a Daily Mail article published on the 40th anniversary of the accident http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217141/I-eat-piece-friend-survive-Torment-1972-Andes-plane-crash-survivor-haunted-ordeal-40-years-later.html[[Special:Contributions/2602:306:B80A:C260:20D8:4E1F:B4F9:6233|2602:306:B80A:C260:20D8:4E1F:B4F9:6233]] ([[User talk:2602:306:B80A:C260:20D8:4E1F:B4F9:6233|talk]]) 19:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Fixed, thanks. — [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk to me]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |what I've done]])</sup> 20:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:You're right that a few sentences appear to be very similar to the Daily Mail piece, so I took a look at the page history, and those two sentences date back to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1972_Andes_flight_disaster&oldid=261116606 the end of the year 2008], more than 4 years prior to when the Daily Mail article was published. It appears that we didn't plagiarize them, but perhaps the Daily Mail [[WP:CLOP|closely paraphrased]] us! [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 23:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Miles trekked 38 or 24? == |
||
In the first part of the article it is said they trekked 38 miles (61km) but later on in the description of the picture is is said 38km. Which one is correct? [[Special:Contributions/93.42.65.62|93.42.65.62]] ([[User talk:93.42.65.62|talk]]) 14:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:The two are technically interchangeable, but human beings are at the top of the food chain, and therefore not a source of food, so "flesh" better conveys the ''in extremis'' nature of what the survivors had to do. In fact, one of them told a doctor "human flesh" when he was asked what he had last eaten before they were rescued.[[User:TH1980|TH1980]] ([[User talk:TH1980|talk]]) 00:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:This was discussed a while back at {{section link|#Distance_walked?}}, but I agree it needs to be clarified again or still. <span class="nowrap">–[[User:CWenger|CWenger]]</span> ([[User talk:CWenger|<span style="font-family:Webdings;"><big>^</big></span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/CWenger|<span style="font-family:Webdings;"><big>@</big></span>]]) 02:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Fictional TV show == |
|||
== I can’t edit but body text survivors is wrong == |
|||
"The Thirteenth Reunion", an episode of the 1980 TV series ''[[Hammer House of Horror]]'', was probably loosely inspired by this incident. Not sure how this works out in terms of [[WP:TRIVIA]] though. [[User:Muzilon|Muzilon]] ([[User talk:Muzilon|talk]]) 23:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, |
|||
== Why can not the site be located by Black box (The flying record equipment) please? == |
|||
2 people can't trek out and then return to a remaining 16 survivors when there were only 16 survivors in total. |
|||
Can someone correct (it is the final bit of the introduction). |
|||
Not sure if it is at the end too - forgot to look. |
|||
All the best. [[User:Martinsnos|Martinsnos]] ([[User talk:Martinsnos|talk]]) 20:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{fixed}} to 14. <span class="nowrap">–[[User:CWenger|CWenger]]</span> ([[User talk:CWenger|<span style="font-family:Webdings;"><big>^</big></span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/CWenger|<span style="font-family:Webdings;"><big>@</big></span>]]) 22:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
It was a military aircraft, so unknown in that time and place if it was so equipped. — [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk to me]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |what I've done]])</sup> 03:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::If I may. Gustavo Zerbino in the list of survivors is not listed as a rugby player, but his Wikipedia page says he was. [[Special:Contributions/93.42.71.114|93.42.71.114]] ([[User talk:93.42.71.114|talk]]) 09:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{fixed}}. <span class="nowrap">–[[User:CWenger|CWenger]]</span> ([[User talk:CWenger|<span style="font-family:Webdings;"><big>^</big></span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/CWenger|<span style="font-family:Webdings;"><big>@</big></span>]]) 15:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Trivia section needs rewrite == |
||
Re: [[MOS:TRIVIA]], this section needs a re-write, as well as sources for [[WP:RS]].-[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
What on EARTH happened to this article?? It used to be my favorite article on this website... written very concisely, like an encyclopedia should, yet conveyed a good amount of information. Somebody must have rewritten it fairly recently, and now the whole thing is fraught with spelling and grammar errors, weird prose, a lack of links, and garbled language. Am I the only one who sees this?? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:SaltedSturgeon|SaltedSturgeon]] ([[User talk:SaltedSturgeon#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SaltedSturgeon|contribs]]) 06:11, 23 August 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
===References in popular culture=== |
|||
== Distance walked? == |
|||
In addition, the event has received mentions in many other works. |
|||
====Books==== |
|||
I'm just a random reader from Germany, but in the section "Find help", the text reads "Unknown to them, they had hiked about 59 kilometres (37 mi) over 10 days." However the map next to this text carries the caption "They trekked 24 kilometres (15 mi) over 10 days." This seems to me to be some error in multiple conversions km<>mi, and looking at the reference (1) and the ES-wikipedia-article I am none the wiser... Any help finding the real distance would be great! |
|||
*[[Stephen King]] (1977). ''[[The Shining (novel)|The Shining]]''. King references the crash in his book set at an isolated hotel in the [[Rocky Mountains]] during its harsh winter months. Wendy develops a fear of the hotel's elevator, specifically of being trapped inside with no one else around to save them, and Jack Torrance speculates that "she could see them growing thinner and weaker, starving to death. Or perhaps dining on each other the way those rugby players had." |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/80.146.191.221|80.146.191.221]] ([[User talk:80.146.191.221|talk]]) 16:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
: Thanks for the comment. I found two sources that reported 38 and 40 miles, and modified it accordingly. — [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk to me]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |what I've done]])</sup> 04:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== |
====Television==== |
||
*The incident is mentioned in the 1978 survival film ''[[Cyclone (1978 film)|Cyclone]]''. |
|||
How did they eat raw, frozen human flesh? [[User:Jim Michael|Jim Michael]] ([[User talk:Jim Michael|talk]]) 12:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*The ''[[The Simpsons]]'' episode "[[Fear of Flying (The Simpsons)|Fear of Flying]]" features [[Homer Simpson]] renting [[Alive (1993 film)|the 1993 film adaptation]], as well as [[Hero (1992 film)|Hero]] and [[Fearless (1993 film)|Fearless]]. |
|||
*The incident is mentioned in a 2011 horror film ''[[The Divide (2011 film)|The Divide]]''. |
|||
*The ''[[Rick and Morty]]'' episode "[[The Vat of Acid Episode]]" parodies the events of the crash and the subsequent survival efforts. The number 571 can be seen on the side of the plane. |
|||
*In the ''[[Rocko's Modern Life]]'' episode "Tickled Pinky", Rocko is listing several dangerous activities he and Pinky have engaged in. The last item on the list is "flying over The Andes with a Brazilian soccer team". |
|||
*The incident was the basis for the [[Showtime (TV network)|Showtime]] series ''[[Yellowjackets (TV series)|Yellowjackets]]''. |
|||
*The 2021 Bengali web series ''[[Robindronath Ekhane Kawkhono Khete Aashenni]]'' loosely portrays the incident. |
|||
*The incident is mentioned in the [[HBO]] limited series ''[[Station Eleven (miniseries)|Station Eleven]]''. Episode 7, "Goodbye My Damaged Home". |
|||
*The incident is mentioned in the ''[[Psych]]'' episode "High Top Fade-Out." |
|||
====Music==== |
|||
- Apparently they chewed it to soften it. They also could have used the metal seat backs, which they used to melt snow and make water. — [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk to me]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |what I've done]])</sup> 03:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*[[Thomas Dolby]]'s debut LP, ''[[The Golden Age of Wireless]]'', contained the instrumental "The Wreck of the Fairchild", loosely based on the incident. This was excised from the first US release but restored on the 2009 remastered collector's edition CD. |
|||
*''Miracle in the Andes'', composed and created by musician [[Adam Young (American musician)|Adam Young]], is a musical score comprising 10 tracks that tell the story of the Andes flight disaster through song.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ayoungscores.com/scores/miracle-in-the-andes/ |title=Miracle in the Andes |website=Adam Young Scores |language=en-US |access-date=11 October 2018 |archive-date=11 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181011214549/https://www.ayoungscores.com/scores/miracle-in-the-andes/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
*Punk band [[Charged GBH|GBH]] included a graphic account of the experiences of the passengers on the Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 in their song "Passenger on the Menu" (1982).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://genius.com/Gbh-passenger-on-the-menu-lyrics |title=Passenger on the Menu |publisher=Genius |access-date=11 October 2018 |archive-date=11 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181011214744/https://genius.com/Gbh-passenger-on-the-menu-lyrics |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
*The event is referenced in the song "The Plot Sickens", by the American metalcore band [[Ice Nine Kills]], which appears on their 2015 album ''[[Every Trick in the Book]]''.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.loudersound.com/features/the-stories-behind-ice-nine-kills-every-trick-in-the-book-album |title=The stories behind Ice Nine Kills' Every Trick In The Book album |magazine=Metal Hammer |publisher=[[Louder Sound]] |date=4 November 2016 |access-date=11 October 2018 |archive-date=19 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220319202258/https://www.loudersound.com/features/the-stories-behind-ice-nine-kills-every-trick-in-the-book-album |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
*There is a song titled "Snowcapped Andes Crash" in [[Melody's Echo Chamber]]'s [[Melody's Echo Chamber (album)|self-titled 2012 album]]. |
|||
{{reflist}} [[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Error Re: Meeting With The Muleteers == |
|||
== Elevation of the wreckage/fuselage? == |
|||
The article states: |
|||
As of 2024-07-13, the article says the fuselage came to rest at "3,570 metres (11,710 ft)", and the nearest citation is several sentences later. The citation is Claudio Caputti (2012), which actually gives a '''different''' elevation/altitude for the fuselage, it says "3675 mts snm", i.e. 3,675 metros (meters) sobre el nivel del mar (snm). It gives this number twice. A December 1972 NYT article also seems to use this slightly higher number. The source for Caputti and the NYT seem to be the Argentine military, but it's not entirely clear. I can't actually find a reliable source saying "3,570 meters", but this figure is repeated very frequently on the internet without a source cited. I'm tempted to change the altitude to match the only citation on that paragraph, but I'm reluctant because the lower number is more prevalent across the web. [[User:Fluoborate|Fluoborate]] ([[User talk:Fluoborate|talk]]) 21:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
"Sergio Catalán, a Chilean arriero (muleteer), read the note and gave them a sign that he understood. He shouted, "Tomorrow!" which Parrado and Canessa heard." |
|||
:This article already references an article "NG (National Geographic) Expedition I" by Peña and Vlahos that seems to have taken place in 2005. They started with maps from survivors and Chilean and Argentine authorities, then they actually explored the route. They implicitly brought along a GPS device, and they report the elevations along the way. They found the fuselage at 12,020 feet, which is 3,664 meters. This is quite close to the other reported altitude. |
|||
This is incorrect. As noted in the sources cited in this section, Catalan called out "Tomorrow!" the day before, when Parrado and Canessa saw him and tried to call to him. They did not exchange notes until the next day.[[User:TH1980|TH1980]] ([[User talk:TH1980|talk]]) 23:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:I |
:The citation for NG Expedition I is a mess, I should add the cite-web template. This is a note to myself or any other editor if I don't get around to it. [[User:Fluoborate|Fluoborate]] ([[User talk:Fluoborate|talk]]) 22:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Nando Parrado's book says "12,000 feet", so I'm going to start editing the article in places where it 100% does not cite the altitude in the text, or where the citation doesn't match the figure in this article. [[User:Fluoborate|Fluoborate]] ([[User talk:Fluoborate|talk]]) 13:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 20 July 2024
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 13, 2008, October 13, 2009, October 13, 2010, October 13, 2018, October 13, 2019, October 13, 2020, and October 13, 2022. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
"Date" in accident summary
[edit]In the infobox, is it really worth noting the date when the last survivors were rescued? The actual accident (or crash), which this article mainly is about, occurred on October 13 (although the initial survivors were fighting for their lives a couple of months), so I suggest removing "December 23". HeyMid (contribs) 12:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- The movie actually states the date. Was December 12th. Rescued December 22nd. 142.163.28.81 (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
needs attention
[edit]I want this get fixed up to be eligible for included in the Selected Anniversaries this year which is the 40th anniversary
"Crash" - Ground Collision Alarm
[edit]It is not believable, that a ground collision alarm sounded just before the crash. Terrain awareness and warning systems initial development took place in 1971 or right after that. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrain_awareness_and_warning_system It is much more plausible, that it was a stall alarm, or some other alarm sounding.
In the article, this fact is attributed to source [4], which should be checked.
PLEASE REMOVE THE WORD CANNABLISM...ITS INACCURATE AND DISRESPECTFUL
[edit]These men did not kill anyone to eat. Scientifically its anthrophaghy...please for the love of science and truth and respect for the men who survived this remove that word. Cannablism is intentional killing for the act of eating... these men likend it to the taking of communion... and agreed to share their bodies in the event of their death so that some may live. Ive never heard such courageous stories of survival.. i would hope that i live my life with half the dignity these men have shown throughout their entire lives.. 2603:6010:C000:422A:6D5F:5D31:68E0:3D64 (talk) 01:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agree that this is a courageous story of survival. But with respect your definition of cannibalism is not correct:
- On that basis I'd say the term "cannibalism" is a appropriately used. They ate human flesh from dead passengers, out of dire need. No credible source suggests they deliberately killed people to eat, and neither does this article make that claim. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Image of the survivors being rescued
[edit]Please add the image of the survivors being rescued to the article!
See: AVIATION SAFETY NETWORK - Photo of Fairchild FH-227D T-571
At: https://aviation-safety.net/photo/6095/Fairchild-FH-227D-T-571
Note: This photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License so OK for use by Wikipedia.
Thanks! :-)
181.92.162.185 (talk) 03:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- WP policy prohibits use of images with credits. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 23:03, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- The image is licensed under: "CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 DEED - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported" and may therefore be edited to remove the credits from the image as long as the credits are preserved in the image caption or perhaps even only in the image repository.
- Also a similar image is already in Wikimedia Commons, see:
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/kk/5/5e/Resquie_andes.jpg
- or:
- https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%82:Resquie_andes.jpg
- Thanks! 181.91.16.243 (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect elevation data in flight/ crash description
[edit]the section,"high mountains with peaks of 25,000 to 26,000 feet (7,600 to 7,900 m) were almost at the limit of the FH-227D's maximum operational ceiling of 28,000 feet (8,500 m)" has incorrect data. The highest mountain in South America is Aconcagua, at 6980m, so these referenced peak heights are wrong. 37.10.74.188 (talk) 23:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed, thanks. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 20:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Miles trekked 38 or 24?
[edit]In the first part of the article it is said they trekked 38 miles (61km) but later on in the description of the picture is is said 38km. Which one is correct? 93.42.65.62 (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- This was discussed a while back at § Distance walked?, but I agree it needs to be clarified again or still. –CWenger (^ • @) 02:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
I can’t edit but body text survivors is wrong
[edit]Hi, 2 people can't trek out and then return to a remaining 16 survivors when there were only 16 survivors in total. Can someone correct (it is the final bit of the introduction). Not sure if it is at the end too - forgot to look. All the best. Martinsnos (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed to 14. –CWenger (^ • @) 22:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- If I may. Gustavo Zerbino in the list of survivors is not listed as a rugby player, but his Wikipedia page says he was. 93.42.71.114 (talk) 09:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. –CWenger (^ • @) 15:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- If I may. Gustavo Zerbino in the list of survivors is not listed as a rugby player, but his Wikipedia page says he was. 93.42.71.114 (talk) 09:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Trivia section needs rewrite
[edit]Re: MOS:TRIVIA, this section needs a re-write, as well as sources for WP:RS.-Classicfilms (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
References in popular culture
[edit]In addition, the event has received mentions in many other works.
Books
[edit]- Stephen King (1977). The Shining. King references the crash in his book set at an isolated hotel in the Rocky Mountains during its harsh winter months. Wendy develops a fear of the hotel's elevator, specifically of being trapped inside with no one else around to save them, and Jack Torrance speculates that "she could see them growing thinner and weaker, starving to death. Or perhaps dining on each other the way those rugby players had."
Television
[edit]- The incident is mentioned in the 1978 survival film Cyclone.
- The The Simpsons episode "Fear of Flying" features Homer Simpson renting the 1993 film adaptation, as well as Hero and Fearless.
- The incident is mentioned in a 2011 horror film The Divide.
- The Rick and Morty episode "The Vat of Acid Episode" parodies the events of the crash and the subsequent survival efforts. The number 571 can be seen on the side of the plane.
- In the Rocko's Modern Life episode "Tickled Pinky", Rocko is listing several dangerous activities he and Pinky have engaged in. The last item on the list is "flying over The Andes with a Brazilian soccer team".
- The incident was the basis for the Showtime series Yellowjackets.
- The 2021 Bengali web series Robindronath Ekhane Kawkhono Khete Aashenni loosely portrays the incident.
- The incident is mentioned in the HBO limited series Station Eleven. Episode 7, "Goodbye My Damaged Home".
- The incident is mentioned in the Psych episode "High Top Fade-Out."
Music
[edit]- Thomas Dolby's debut LP, The Golden Age of Wireless, contained the instrumental "The Wreck of the Fairchild", loosely based on the incident. This was excised from the first US release but restored on the 2009 remastered collector's edition CD.
- Miracle in the Andes, composed and created by musician Adam Young, is a musical score comprising 10 tracks that tell the story of the Andes flight disaster through song.[1]
- Punk band GBH included a graphic account of the experiences of the passengers on the Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 in their song "Passenger on the Menu" (1982).[2]
- The event is referenced in the song "The Plot Sickens", by the American metalcore band Ice Nine Kills, which appears on their 2015 album Every Trick in the Book.[3]
- There is a song titled "Snowcapped Andes Crash" in Melody's Echo Chamber's self-titled 2012 album.
- ^ "Miracle in the Andes". Adam Young Scores. Archived from the original on 11 October 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
- ^ "Passenger on the Menu". Genius. Archived from the original on 11 October 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
- ^ "The stories behind Ice Nine Kills' Every Trick In The Book album". Metal Hammer. Louder Sound. 4 November 2016. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
Classicfilms (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Elevation of the wreckage/fuselage?
[edit]As of 2024-07-13, the article says the fuselage came to rest at "3,570 metres (11,710 ft)", and the nearest citation is several sentences later. The citation is Claudio Caputti (2012), which actually gives a different elevation/altitude for the fuselage, it says "3675 mts snm", i.e. 3,675 metros (meters) sobre el nivel del mar (snm). It gives this number twice. A December 1972 NYT article also seems to use this slightly higher number. The source for Caputti and the NYT seem to be the Argentine military, but it's not entirely clear. I can't actually find a reliable source saying "3,570 meters", but this figure is repeated very frequently on the internet without a source cited. I'm tempted to change the altitude to match the only citation on that paragraph, but I'm reluctant because the lower number is more prevalent across the web. Fluoborate (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- This article already references an article "NG (National Geographic) Expedition I" by Peña and Vlahos that seems to have taken place in 2005. They started with maps from survivors and Chilean and Argentine authorities, then they actually explored the route. They implicitly brought along a GPS device, and they report the elevations along the way. They found the fuselage at 12,020 feet, which is 3,664 meters. This is quite close to the other reported altitude.
- The citation for NG Expedition I is a mess, I should add the cite-web template. This is a note to myself or any other editor if I don't get around to it. Fluoborate (talk) 22:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nando Parrado's book says "12,000 feet", so I'm going to start editing the article in places where it 100% does not cite the altitude in the text, or where the citation doesn't match the figure in this article. Fluoborate (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2018)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2019)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2020)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2022)
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class Aviation accident articles
- Aviation accident task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class rugby union articles
- Low-importance rugby union articles
- WikiProject Rugby union articles
- C-Class South America articles
- Low-importance South America articles
- C-Class Argentine articles
- Low-importance Argentine articles
- WikiProject Argentina articles
- C-Class Chile articles
- Low-importance Chile articles
- WikiProject Chile articles
- WikiProject South America articles
- C-Class Uruguay articles
- Mid-importance Uruguay articles
- Uruguay (history) articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Aviation articles needing attention