Talk:WNEM-DT2: Difference between revisions
TomCat4680 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Its the same entity not something seperate. The reason for deletion should fall under the Wikipedia guideline as a redundant or useless templet. Nearly all of the information on this page is redundent to the WNEM-TV page. The text about WNEM's programming on 5.2 and its cable coverage should be included on the WNEM-TV article. This article also does not site any sources to its information. |
Its the same entity not something seperate. The reason for deletion should fall under the Wikipedia guideline as a redundant or useless templet. Nearly all of the information on this page is redundent to the WNEM-TV page. The text about WNEM's programming on 5.2 and its cable coverage should be included on the WNEM-TV article. This article also does not site any sources to its information. |
||
:Sounds more like a merger proposal to me, as the information in this article will still exist, just as a section of WNEM-TV instead of its own page. Deleting it means it would no longer exist anywhere. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 04:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
:Sounds more like a merger proposal to me, as the information in this article will still exist, just as a section of WNEM-TV instead of its own page. Deleting it means it would no longer exist anywhere. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 04:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
This is dumb, this is the same TV station. None of the other stations on here have seperate pages for there subchannels. This should be deleted. There'd be tons of extra articles out there if we had one for every subchannel. |
|||
:'''Oppose''' They're 2 different entities of WNEM its like merging the chevrolet page into the general motors page![[Aikidockd]]--([[User talk:Aikidockd|talk]]) 20:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
:'''Oppose''' They're 2 different entities of WNEM its like merging the chevrolet page into the general motors page![[Aikidockd]]--([[User talk:Aikidockd|talk]]) 20:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:26, 22 April 2012
 | Michigan Redirect‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Template:TelevisionStationsProject
Image copyright problem with Image:Wnem dt2 mntv.PNG
The image Image:Wnem dt2 mntv.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion and merge with WNEM-TV
This article should be deleted and its information added as a subcatagory to the WNEM-TV page. This is not a seperate entity from WNEM-TV and the subject does not posses any relevance to merit its own seperate page. It has the same physical address, broadcasts at the same frequency, the same owner and has the same personnel as WNEM-TV. This is not like WNEM AM which is a different medium, broadcasting on a diffrent frequency with its own seperate license and history. This article is also written without a single citation, unverifiable and contains non-encyclopedic language. -Wxyzdan
- Make up your mind, do you want to delete it or do you want to merge it? TomCat4680 (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
As said above...
This article should be deleted and its information added as a subcatagory to the WNEM-TV page.
Its the same entity not something seperate. The reason for deletion should fall under the Wikipedia guideline as a redundant or useless templet. Nearly all of the information on this page is redundent to the WNEM-TV page. The text about WNEM's programming on 5.2 and its cable coverage should be included on the WNEM-TV article. This article also does not site any sources to its information.
- Sounds more like a merger proposal to me, as the information in this article will still exist, just as a section of WNEM-TV instead of its own page. Deleting it means it would no longer exist anywhere. TomCat4680 (talk) 04:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
This is dumb, this is the same TV station. None of the other stations on here have seperate pages for there subchannels. This should be deleted. There'd be tons of extra articles out there if we had one for every subchannel.
- Oppose They're 2 different entities of WNEM its like merging the chevrolet page into the general motors page!Aikidockd--(talk) 20:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC)