User:Netoholic

Oh my god... I've discovered the antichrist is alive on Wikipedia.

Category:If templates
Category:Boolean templates

Interesting topics:

Logical fallacy

WikiPhilosophy:

Useful pages:

Items I am watching over:

Hilarity ensues

Skateboarding trick
"honk honk here comes the banmobile"
User:Dmn(*) says goodbye in his own special way - Get A Life You Nob (see contribs from Dec 31 2004)
It's important to warn users
"Human should be a disambig page."
I thought the page was using protection!

Ideas

Netoholic's Law

As a wiki discussion grows longer, the probability of an accusation by one user of another acting unilaterally approaches one.

Look, I've made thousands of "unilateral" edits, so probably have you. It's a wiki. Get over it.

Corollary

One can substitute any of the following for "unilaterally", and the law still works -- "against consensus", "mindlessly", "carelessly". Any of these words indicates you might be facing off against a wiki-warrior.

Other wisdom

The opposite of deletionism is not inclusionism; rather, the opposite is contribution.

Wikipedia:Ignore all rules is a paradox. One is expressly failing to "ignore all rules" by citing WP:IAR.
In other words, if you do something and justify it with IAR, you are implicitly acknowledging that there are rules.

<jwales> There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy.

Scratchpad

[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} edit] edit
[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=purge}} purge] purge

Barnstars

**Surreal barnstar**
Phil Sandifer
19:51, 11 Nov 2005

For standing up to the misguided masses (myself included), helping to free Wikipedia from the hidden horrors of conditional meta-templates, I, Lifeisunfair, hereby present the **Barnstar of Diligence** to Netoholic.
David Levy
15:20, 23 Dec 2005