Jump to content

User talk:MegaSmike46: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 622: Line 622:
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Magical Golden Whip|Magical Golden Whip]] ([[User talk:Magical Golden Whip|talk]]) 23:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Magical Golden Whip|Magical Golden Whip]] ([[User talk:Magical Golden Whip|talk]]) 23:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

== ANI notice ==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 04:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

:Have you paid any attention to the ANI discussion, or the many recent user warnings you have received over the past few days? If not, I strongly urge that you should, because you need to stop "experimenting" and fiddling with templates and redirects when you are beyond your depth, and definitely not without prior discussion first. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 14:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
::Seeing that you have not engaged with any of your talk page messages or the ongoing ANI thread while continuing the same behavior, I have blocked your account. If you are willing to discuss your ongoing behavior with the community, please use {{TL|unblock}}. -- [[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 19:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
:::I made a mistake by handing things myself when I should have negotiated plans with the users. It all began when I decided to help out [[Nicktoons (TV network)|Nicktoons]] because I thought it felt too underdone. After I rebuilt the template, I decided to help the other sub-networks (e. g. [[Boomerang (TV network)|Boomerang]] and [[Disney XD]]). I wanted to simplify the templates to just "[[Template:Boomerang|Boomerang]]" and "[[Template:Disney XD|Disney XD]]" and remove their redirects. However, I didn't realize how many redirects there were (I tried to move the pages too). After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of things. So I didn't respond in the number of days I was off the site. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 22:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

== My apology request ==

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop_x_nuvola.svg|alt=Stop icon|left|40x40px]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Indefinite blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason='' I understand that it was wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates.}}''. &nbsp;[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 19:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)''</div></div>

{{unblock reviewed|I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations.|decline=That's a start, but please tell us in a new request how you will better engage with the community. There also seems to have been some block evasion from looking at this page's edit history that you do not address. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations. Instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. Throughout my time on Wikipedia, I've noticed that most of my disruptions stem from my "original research" without a reliable backup. However, my lack of insight has led to many unfinished drafts and issues with others. So I'm stepping back from it. Currently, I'm planning on clearing information with TV networks. |decline = This doesn't answer the question previously posed to you. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 11:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|reason=I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. So instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. I've realized that many of my disruptions were due to a lack of reliable backup, which led to several unfinished drafts. After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of other things. So I didn't respond for several days offsite. So I won't be making as many drafts or "major edits" to avoid those discussions in the first place. The block evasion likely has something to do with the IP address as I even tried deleting this account at some point. So finally I decided to rectify this matter. I'm sorry.|decline=You've been evading your block. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 03:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|decline=My suggestion is that you best chance of being unblocked is to take the [[WP:SO|standard offer]], and make a fresh unblock request in 6 months time with no logged out edits or edits from other accounts. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 17:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)|I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. So instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. I've realized that many of my disruptions were due to a lack of reliable backup, which led to several unfinished drafts. After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of other things. So I didn't respond for several days offsite. So I won't be making as many drafts or "major edits" to avoid those discussions in the first place. Despite my blocked IP address, I continued making lesser edits and became carried away, thinking I could help. The evasion is likely the overall result. So finally, I decided to rectify this matter. I'm sorry. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 21:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)}}

As the template says in boldface, you shouldn't remove declined unblock requests. I restored it, and also fixed your [[Wikipedia:Substitution|substituted]] unblock request. You shouldn't subst these templates. Actually, it looks like you're habitually removing every decline. If you do it again, I'll remove your ability to edit this page. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 22:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
== Explaining myself ==

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand it is wrong, and I'm sorry I couldn't always respond to community concerns. It was to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. I will help restore articles by bringing citations of lost media. I'm mainly here to clarify things for open sources. I've read the guidelines throughout the months. |decline = As you agree you can't always respond to community concerns, we'll have to leave you blocked. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 21:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)}}

== I want to help ==
{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear administers, Once again, I apologize for my unintentional disruptions on the website. At the time, I had merely started editing sites a year after making an account. The ongoing events that I'd help out and make Wikipedia a more reliable open source. However, I was not used to working in online community groups, but I wanted to help them. There are articles with few editors, such as TV network programming lists. I'm the one who contributed to those articles (e.g. [[Disney XD]], [[Boomerang (TV network)|Boomerang]], [[Nicktoons (American TV channel)|Nicktoons]], [[Cartoonito]], etc.). It's been a while since the incident, and I've made embarrassing mistakes and even violated some terms by using other accounts for fun. I felt no one else would have edited those articles had I not stepped in (e.g. [[List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior (block)|the Disney Junior (block) programming list]]). I understand watchers have often found my edits disruptive before and the trust may be lost. After seeing more participants, I've learned the need to be a team player regardless. Many users have more experience with this website than me and understand Wikipedia is not a blog. I do not enjoy joining controversies, but I promise to contribute to the community's responsibility/cite concerns. Please give me another chance. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 01:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC) |decline = In general I am a great believer in giving blocked editors another chance, but unfortunately this time I don't see any possibility of doing so. I couldn't unblock you myself even if I wanted to, because this is a CheckUser block, and I am not a CheckUser. I could contact a CheckUser and suggest an unblock, or just leave the request open on the chance that a CheckUser will come along and lift the block, but I really think either of those would have about as much chance of success as looking out of my window and waiting for a pig to fly past, for several reasons. Firstly, your unblock request doesn't really seem to indicate sufficient understanding of why you were blocked to stand much chance of being accepted; secondly, no CheckUser has seen fit to lift the block yet, although it's been open for a while; thirdly one checkuser (Yamla) has already indicated that he doesn't think you should be unblocked, and the CheckUser who placed the block has not responded in several days since being alerted to this request; fourthly Yamla has stated that you have evaded your block within the last six months. Your best chance is to wait until at least six months since the last time you evaded the block, and then post an unblock request which both shows a clear understanding of the original reasons for the block and also addresses the issue of block-evasion. In order for such an unblock request to have any reasonable chance of success I strongly recommend re-reading the guide to appealing blocks. [[User:JBW|JBW]] ([[User talk:JBW|talk]]) 15:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)}}

:This is not an unblock request. If you wish to make an unblock request, see [[WP:GAB]]. You'll need to commit to always responding to community concerns in a convincing way (this will be challenging, as you've explicitly stated you are unable to do so) and address your violations of [[WP:SOCK]]. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 21:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
::But, I followed those steps. I was supposed to put this on my talk page. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 04:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
:::You have not followed the instructions in [[WP:GAB]]. Your unblock request is malformed. Please reread and more carefully follow the instructions. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 16:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

What other accounts have you used? [[User:JBW|JBW]] ([[User talk:JBW|talk]]) 20:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

:Just [[SMW456]]. Only once. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 19:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
::What about [[WP:LOUTSOCK|logged-out editing]]? --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 19:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
:::Several times, it awhile for it the catch on. I managed to finish some work through small edits. Most were cited respectably. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 19:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
::::Do you now understand this was inappropriate? Approximately when did you make your last logged-out edit? --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 19:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
:::::Yeah, I realized I'd seen as another troll/disrupter rather an experienced worker. Even if I provide evident resources. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 20:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
{{outdent}}{{Ping|JBW}}I leave this to you. I don't think MegaSmike46 is a good candidate for unblocking but it isn't my call, I've already declined once. This answer only addressed part of the problem, and didn't even do a good job with that. They have evaded their block within the past six months, by the way, but not in the past four. Reminder, {{np|NinjaRobotPirate}} is the blocking admin. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 20:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:04, 24 February 2024

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MegaSmike46. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Aoi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hanna-Barbera, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hanna-Barbera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Just popping by to mention that I have nominated an article you have created, List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito, for deletion. If you think the article should be kept, please provide your opinion on the deletion discussion. Thank you. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Happos Family

Hello, I have moved your recent creation to the draftspace. It is not yet a fully-formed Wikipedia entry and therefore not suitable for mainspace just yet. Please continue to develop at Draft:The Happos Family and submit when considered suitable. Thank you for helping to expand the encyclopedia. Happy editing. Eagleash (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Happos Family.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Happos Family.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Cartoonito. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks I understand now. How’s the draft so far? MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cartoonito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Small world. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just a reminder

The history section you added to Cartoonito is completely unsourced. When adding content, you are technically responsible for providing reliable sources to back it up and that articles should not contain original research. Foxnpichu (talk) 12:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Braceface, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeform.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your article On the Team

Hello, MegaSmike46! It appears one or more of the pages you created, such as On the Team, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.  —FORMALDUDE(talk) 04:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a work in progress, I was just filling in the basic information. There’s more to uncover about this obscure show from Noggin. MegaSmike46 (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. If you'd like, I can help you move the page to draftspace so that you can further edit it without risk of deletion. —FORMALDUDE(talk) 06:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: On the Team (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MarioJump83 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MarioJump83! 09:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, MegaSmike46! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarioJump83! 09:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury19:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What’s does that supposed to mean? MegaSmike46 (talk) 14:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Line Cinema, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ned's Newt

Can you please undo what FilmandTVFan28 did to the Ned's Newt Page SuperBonnyYahya (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That would be unnecessary since the article clearly mentioned a German production company co-producing it with Nelvana. This problem was already cleared on the article talk page. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas & Friends

I've reverted your edit to the article Thomas & Friends. The article doesn't mention Cartoonito at all, so there is no basis for adding Category:Cartoonito original programming. Please add a properly sourced section to the article about Cartoonito, before adding the category. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have misunderstood the purpose of that category. It is for " television programs that have regularly aired their first-run episodes on Cartoonito. It does not list programs which first appeared on a different network" (emphasis added). Since programs like Molang and Thomas & Friends first appeared on other networks, they should not be added to that category. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 21:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MegaSmike46, I just moved the page List of assets owned Warner Bros. Discovery to draft space. As I noted on the talk page previously, the company Warner Bros. Discovery doesn't exist yet and won't exist until the middle of next year. While I think you did a good job of putting together all the assets that will be owned by the company, a lot could happen between now and next year so it's probably not best to speculate in article space what's going to happen with the merger and make assumptions as to what the company will look like after the merger closes (if it does close). If you disagree with this action, you are free to object per WP:DRAFTIFY. Thank you, Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: On the Team (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balto 3: Wings moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Balto 3: Wings, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Countries

Before you decide on reverting Ned's Newt, please read WP:TVLEAD. That IP user who keeps barking you orders failed to read it. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of animation studios owned by Comcast NBCUniversal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MeteoHeroes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MeteoHeroes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 11:33, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can you change replace Jane Seymour was the third queen consort of King Henry VIII of England from their marriage on 30 May 1536 until her death the next year with Jane Seymour was Queen of England from 1536 to 1537 as the third wife of King Henry VIII

August 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dora the Explorer. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 04:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm The Grand Delusion. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 01:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. No matter how plausible the idea is. I just kept that draft in case. It won’t be submitted until confirmation. MegaSmike46 (talk) 03:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter how "plausible" the idea is—it doesn't exist. Creating an article as if it does exist is creating a hoax. Trivialist (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MegaSmike46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of animation studios owned by ViacomCBS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito (Latin American TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mighty Mike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution for split pages

Smile emoji Hi MegaSmike46! Thank you for your contributions. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Alvin and the Chipmunks into another page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 03:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters

Hello MegaSmike46,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 09:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:On the Team

Information icon Hello, MegaSmike46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:On the Team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:COLORADO-FILM.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:COLORADO-FILM.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Warner Bros. Discovery

Template:Warner Bros. Discovery has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Cartoonito original UK Mascots.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cartoonito original UK Mascots.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cartoonito original UK Mascots.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cartoonito original UK Mascots.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your edit

At List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (Latin American TV channel) you added a template, but put <nowiki> tags around it so it didnt actually work as a template. Just wanted to let you know in case you want to do anything about that. In the meantime I've redirected the page to the new article. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 02:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (Latin American TV channel). I'm actually have trouble with the redirecting issues. My goal was to separate the Cartoonito and Boomerang articles but I ran into ridiculous issues. Signed, MegaSmike46 (talk), 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi @MegaSmike46:! Feel free to just reply to my comments on this page. I have copied the other message you left for me. If youre looking to create the article but having trouble with the technical aspects of putting it on wikipedia, try creating a draft page. This link will give you more information about draft pages. Once you have created both pages, you can request them to be moved by an experienced Wikipedian using the instructions at this link. That way you can figure out the pages before messing up the technical parts. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Original research/WP:SYNTH

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CBS Eye Animation Productions

Template:CBS Eye Animation Productions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:On the Team

Hello, MegaSmike46. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "On the Team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Radio Disney into Disney Channel. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables. Thanks! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MegaSmike46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Creativity and Development, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Former Treehouse original programming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cartoon Network, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 03:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mush-Mush & the Mushables (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DarkGlow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DarkGlow20:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Paramount Network (Australian TV channel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nate (chatter) 19:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Care Bears: Unlock the Magic

There should be about 7 more days until Care Bears: Unlock the Magic's TV-Y7 rating changes to TV-Y on Cartoonito. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.140.124 (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeff Bennett, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
OceanHok (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Paramount Network (Australian TV channel)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Paramount Network (Australian TV channel) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Paramount Network (Australian TV channel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nate (chatter) 01:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:DC Entertainment (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 12:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay we’ll just have to wait and see as the company restructures. MegaSmike46 (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WBD Question

Out of curiosity, how come WBD's content distribution/ad sales units are part of the Global Streaming & Interactive division? I've read articles about the recent reshuffle carried out by JB Perrette, and I don't see much relating to the home entertainment distribution/TV distribution units... BiggieSMLZ (talk) 16:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I felt it might join that division as I thought it'd make more sense. After all Content Distribution (Home Media) could correlate with the streaming division as well. I mean WB Interactive was part of WBHE for a time.
I may revert it, but until further confirmation, I guess WBD's Content Distribution will just remain under Warner Bros. Entertainment. MegaSmike46 (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney General Entertainment Content, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Kids.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MeteoHeroes

Information icon Hello, MegaSmike46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MeteoHeroes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables. Thanks! — The Most Comfortable Chair 14:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mush-Mush & the Mushables (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so your saying that there needs more to be more reliable sources. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's two-fold. Content needs to sourced to reliable sources and much of it is still not. For notability, it needs in-depth coverage and that is why I am recommending reviews from reputable critics (two or three reviews with a couple paragraphs or so critiquing the show). As I have stated above, I also recommend trimming it down (removing all the character and episode details along with the Media section as most of it is unsourced or sourced to unreliable sources such as YouTube anyway). S0091 (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MeteoHeroes

Hello, MegaSmike46. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MeteoHeroes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)

Information icon It appears that you copied or moved text from CNN to History of CNN. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll begin with apologizing for causing any corruption or confusion. It will be okay, as this is only the first step of helping the article. I may be sure to restore all citations before taking action.
I plan on rewriting the remaining from c. 2003 onwards. You can help, as a lot of this information requires updates anyway. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at DC Universe Infinite, you may be blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MegaSmike46. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Mush-Mush and the Mushables, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Feel free to redirect to the original article or use WP:G6. Thank you. BangJan1999 23:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MegaSmike46, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Mush Mush And The Mushables, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Feel free to redirect to the original article or use WP:G6. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. BangJan1999 23:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Information icon

Hello MegaSmike46. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MegaSmike46. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MegaSmike46|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 0xDeadbeef 04:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Gargoyles episodes. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. I didn't see any indication within this article that the show specifically aired on Disney television networks. DonIago (talk) 16:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Gargoyles episodes, you may be blocked from editing. I previously informed you your edit was inaccurate, so I don't know why you made it again. Per WP:BRD, if you have a concern, discuss it at the article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 18:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Gargoyles episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I have no idea why you felt it was appropriate to remove Category:Lists of Disney television series episodes from this list, as Gargoyles was a television series produced by Disney, but as the category is currently in dispute but has not been modified thus far, your edit seems highly inappropriate. You really need to stop making unilateral changes and instead collaborate with your fellow editors. DonIago (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mush-Mush & the Mushables (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scrooge200 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Scrooge200 (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022 (1)

Information icon Hello, I'm Toasy Cake Fan 100. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Teamo Supremo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't adding any further information. I'm simply checking and reorganizing the categories. It's one of the several cartoons that switch from airing on ABC kids to Toon Disney. MegaSmike46 (talk) 21:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Six new specials of Care Bears: Unlock the Magic

What date will 6 new specials of Care Bears: Unlock the Magic be released on Cartoonito and HBO Max? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.140.124 (talk) 23:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Disney characters

I have removed this category from the pages for individual characters that you have placed it on as they are in the parent category for the lists category as they are... not lists. Wanted to let you know my reasoning since it seems you reintroduced the category. Thanks! - Purplewowies (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you seek to have a category speedy renamed without going through the full discussion, you need to add an entry at the speedy area of the categories for discussion page for it so that it can be properly opposed, otherwise you haven't actually completely gone through the request process. It's not like a speedy deletion where you just put the template on the page and call it a day. - Purplewowies (talk) 01:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I wasn't sure where to place them at first, so I'm glad you helped out. There's no need for further discussions; I'm just trying to sort things out with Disney Channel. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems you're still having an issue--the problem with what you're doing isn't the template you're using, it's that you're not creating the accompanying entry on the categories for discussion board (either in the speedy area for the speedy template or as a full discussion on the CFD board for the regular CFD template). The templates provide a link to where you need to add the entry and the exact format of the entry you should be adding (that is, some info about what move you're looking to do alongside a place for you to explain your reasoning. You still haven't done that part. - Purplewowies (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive category edits

You really need to at least slow down and at most entirely desist with your Disney-related category edits and find other ways to contribute to the project. It would be concerning enough that you're attempting to make changes without any apparent discussion, much less consensus, but that you've also made malformed edits (including speedy rename requests) more than once indicates that you should be working to gain a better understanding of how categorization works and collaborating with your fellow editors, not trying to make changes simply because you personally feel they're appropriate. If you continue to make inappropriate category-related edits I will have no choice but to report you in an effort to prevent you from making further disruptive edits. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DC Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burbank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Lists of Disney television series episodes, you may be blocked from editing. It is highly disruptive to delete notices of active CfD discussions. DonIago (talk) 17:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving templates

Please be careful when moving templates and adding speedy deletes to redirects. You added a speedy to Template:Live-action theatrical films based on DC Comics but that caused multiple articles that linked to that pages, such as American Splendor (film), to appear in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I made simple typo and just wanted it deleted to avoid confusion of redirects. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. It was a bit confusing. Once all the articles are using the new template the redirects can be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon allegations section

Hi,

Thanks for your many edits on the Nickelodeon article. I see that you removed the section called "Allegations of Child Actor Abuse", and added it to the article Criticism of Paramount Global. I've added the section back to the Nickelodeon article as it is relevant to Nickelodeon company specifically and well-sourced. If you believe there is also a place for it on the Criticism of Paramount Global article too that is fine.

I'm not looking to get into an edit war, so I'd love if you could share your thoughts on this section on Nickelodeon's talk page. Let's work together to keep the Nickelodeon article in good shape and maintain NPOV. Anybar (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Magical Golden Whip

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Nickelodeon § Dan Schneider accusation's here. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of animation studios owned by Comcast NBCUniversal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 09:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Disney Junior, you may be blocked from editing. Nate (chatter) 22:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to FX on Hulu, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please refrain from redirecting/merging articles with enough standalone and well-sourced content without a consensus.Starforce13 22:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I was only trying to make things simpler by joining some of the FX on Hulu to FX. I figured, especially since FX on Hulu is really a hub now.
However, I may have gotten a little too carried away. So ultimately, I added the Hulu-exclusive programs to the FX list and decided to let both main articles be. MegaSmike46 (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it will eventually need to be merged but that will be into the FX Networks article since that's what covers the entire FX brand. With Hulu most likely getting merged into Disney+ by 2024, we'll have a stronger case for the merge then.— Starforce13 23:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, just thinking a little ahead before. Also, although it's a bit off, I think Hulu (& ESPN+) will end up on Disney+ like an ad-tier, so "Hulu originals" will remain intact, but you'll have to access Disney+ with Hulu no longer being standalone. It's just my prediction. MegaSmike46 (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DCAU New Article Feedback

Hello MegaSmike46, the copy editor User:AngusWOOF is reviewing a draft of a new DCAU article I am trying to have published. He has directed me to seek the feedback of people like you who have edited the DCAU page in the past to provide feedback as to whether or not you believe the content I included is something Wikipedia readers interested in the DCAU would find value in. Mainly the copy editing team would like feedback on the table depicting chronological narrative viewing order. I would appreciate it if you can review my inquiry and the draft article and inform if you think the content is of value to those who may be reading about or wanting to watch the DCAU. This will help get the copy editing team the feedback they need to proceed with either an approve or decline decision. Thanks for your feedback.

JGott85


Inquiry to fellow DC Fans based on Copy Editors Feedback:

Talk:DC Animated Universe#Seeking Feedback & Support for New Article dedicated to topic of DCAU Continuity and Canon


Draft Article attempting to be published

Draft:DC Animated Universe (DCAU) Media Continuity, Canonicity, and Viewing Order JGott85 (talk) 01:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MegaSmike46,

Please do not put a CSD tag on a transcluded template because now it appears as if dozens of artices on which the template appears are supposed to be deleted. Please remove all transclusions before tagging a template for speedy deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean like {{ }}? I think that's what you mean, so could you explain a little more? MegaSmike46 (talk) 07:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you changing the redirects on these templates anyway? EvergreenFir (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm changing these redirects because I feel it's becoming too confusing. I think Disney XD should simply have one template titled "Disney XD." I did a similar thing with Template:Boomerang, where I merged them by moving the info from "Template:Boomerang original programming" into that template.
Template:Boomerang's original info was moved to Template:Cartoon Network under Boomerang. I also did a Template:Nicktoons. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but why "Disney XD P"??? That makes no sense. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've cleaned up most of your mess.
If you want to propose moving those templates to {{Disney XD}}, use WT:TV or the template's talk page EvergreenFir (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I was just experimenting with the redirects to see what happens. I thought I could delete some pages by doing that, but I didn't thoroughly read the deletion policies. MegaSmike46 (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Disruptions related to the above section... Magitroopa (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney XD, you may be blocked from editing. There is no reason to remove references that follow the reference policy. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jetix Play. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy