User talk:Count Iblis

Reply

If you disagree with the delisting of the article, then perhaps you should renominate it for an FLC. If someone had given a sign that they were adressing concerns, then it would have been left open, but nobody did so it was delisted. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Ray's Rules

I have a list of ten rules as a reminder on my office wall. One is "don't waste your time arguing with an idiot." Apply liberally to affected areas. Raymond Arritt (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I'm the author of the article Myrzakulov equations and I'm not the author of these equations. But I would like ask you to keep this my article. Ngn 92.46.65.69 (talk) 18:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

my responce

My responce to your "solution" to "combat pedophillia" is to ban all illegeal sites in the USA. The "explict images of underage person(s)" is illegeal and against USA , and International laws. Did you at least read the ANI discussion on the subject of it. Just looking illegeal, its the same thing if someone saw the images at their work , its illegel and wrong. Why would Wikipedia host illegeal images. Their violating USA Laws. And you Count your pro-pedo because you support. SHAME ON YOU . You have been warned.--Rio de oro (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

It is an absolutely bloody outrageous personal attack to call someone pro pedo simply because they disagree with you. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 11:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

RfC

I've started drafting a user conduct RfC that you might be interested in here. If you'd like to participate in drafting it, please feel free. Cla68 (talk) 03:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)