User talk:Dorftrottel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Re: C68-FM-SV/Workshop: new section |
|||
| (165 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[User talk:Everyme]] |
|||
<noinclude><!-- |
|||
In case you wonder, the design of my talk page is basically a simpler version of [[User:Phaedriel]]'s. You're welcome to go ahead and take what you need, but please attribute it to her as a gesture of politeness, ideally accompanied by a link to her page. |
|||
-->{{User:Dorftrottel/talk header}} |
|||
{{TOChidden}}<!-- |
|||
************************ |
|||
* NEW MESSAGES BELOW * |
|||
************************ --></noinclude> |
|||
== Re: C68-FM-SV/Workshop == |
|||
I think I understand - of course a moderate approach to matters is usually recommended and it's mostly down to common sense. After all, policy is written by editors like us and so isn't infallible. In this case it's really up to interpretation of the evidence as to whether lines have been crossed as regards the minimum standards we expect from administrators; policy is there as a guidance for editors to help them stay on the correct side of that line. |
|||
I apologise if I came across as a little confrontational - I'm unused to getting involved in such polarised disputes and I recognise now how it's far too easy to accidentally misinterpret things and see everyone as disagreeing with you, whilst simultaneously pushing too far beyond your position, expecting people to lean back against you (a striking comparison to the case, in fact). |
|||
Thanks for taking the time to talk to me. I know from experience many people ignore IP editors and it's always gratifying to find people who don't treat those of us who choose not to have accounts as second class citizens. Yours, --[[Special:Contributions/129.67.162.133|129.67.162.133]] ([[User talk:129.67.162.133|talk]]) 18:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 20 July 2008
Redirect to: