Jump to content

User talk:Jack Sebastian: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Previous account: contact detail
User:Medies: new section
Line 58: Line 58:
== Contact ==
== Contact ==
I would like to discuss matters with you privately. I have a hotmail account. ddbanddtt call yourself jack sebastion so I know you from spam, please. [[User:Ddball|DDB]] ([[User talk:Ddball|talk]]) 23:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
I would like to discuss matters with you privately. I have a hotmail account. ddbanddtt call yourself jack sebastion so I know you from spam, please. [[User:Ddball|DDB]] ([[User talk:Ddball|talk]]) 23:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

== [[User:Medies]] ==

Your comments on my talk page are unwelcome, and I will report you for harassing me if you make any more. Erase this comment once you've read it, if you like. I will not engage you any further. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 04:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:09, 15 March 2011

Sorry for not getting back to you earlier over this - I was quite ill yesterday and I must have missed the discussion on their talkpage on my watchlist. You do appear to have been correct about their response and I'm now struggling to assume good faith with them. However as things have calmed down I'd suggest you both leave it alone for a while - I know the situation isn't ideal for you as you're left with something that you're unhappy with but it seems the easiest way of not blowing this out of all proportion as they seem unlikely to compromise. I do think you could have used slightly better language on their talk page but I also have some sympathy over the alternate account accusations so can understand if you were a bit annoyed. Whereas the talk page comments were effectively a weird sort of content dispute and I think any uninvolved editor could have tried mediating (which is what I did) I think if the outing issue goes further that is likely to require admin intervention so I'd be unable to help. I'm sorry this didn't get resolved better. Dpmuk (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dpmuk, I know you made the best effort, and it was a reasoned one as well. I'm glad you got my point about the user; being right isn't always helpful, as it seems they are now working a little too hard to try and go after me. Not sure what Viriditas's problem is, but unless he gets back to me with info on what admin supposedly knows about my old, retired account, I am not sure how to proceed.
One thing is for sure, though. I am guessing that Viriditas has emailed more details about his suspicions to the user, who I am almost certain isn't going to be able to avoid trying to out me. Since I've never met Viriditas, I am not sure who they are planning in linking me too, but it will be an Outing attempt, which will get the both of them blocked, likely indefinitely. I hope they are smart enough to realize this, but being smart would have meant that this would have never come up; they will likely try to game the system to avoid the appearance of malice. Avoiding them seems a good option, but the users have both now followed me to different articles, which at first seems like stalking, but I'm going to AGF until something untoward happens again.
Again, thanks for trying; I know your heart was in the right place. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

canvasing

If you have evidacen that I have canvased any other users for support I sugest that you produce it. If not I ask you to withdra the accusation and appoligise.Slatersteven (talk) 18:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of two situations exist: either Scotty is stalking my pages or you asked him to intercede via private email. As he has not commented in that particular forum recently, I am inclined to believe that you contacted the other fellow via a largely untraceable method. Of course, if Scotty admits to stalking my edits, I am more than willing to withdraw the suggestion and act appropriately on that info. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So you in fact have no evidacen, just an assumption and are fishing for fishing for confesions. Does it occour to you that he may watch the boards? Slatersteven (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, because he doesn't watch that particular board - until after I submitted the complaint. There is no mention of ScottyBerg in the 'what links here' section of the EW noticeboard. I imagine that has changed now, though, since he has replied. Since Scotty hasn't admitted to stalking my edits, it only leaves one conclusion. Try to stay on target, please. Scotty isn't part of this matter. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I moved your question from WP:AN to the help desk since you're more likely to get useful responses there, and the thread isn't relevant to admins in general so it doesn't belong at AN. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Giftiger wunsch. :) - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You Seem a Fair and Even Handed Editor !!! - A Wikipedia Rarity !!

Jack Sebastian - I hear you are a fair and even handed editor, especially for the Santa Claus article !!!

Are you the article reviewer for Santa Claus ?? Are you also the article reviewer for the Father Frost (Ded Moroz), NORAD Tracks Santa, Yes - Virgina, There is Santa Claus, and other related articles.

Myself and some other associates would like to contribute more, but I hear from other bosrds of some Wikipedia bullies that get you banned for disagreeing with their narrow-mined views.

Thanks - Zedcannon (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page

Hello! Regarding this edit, please note that while you may remove whatever messages you please (including this one), you aren't entitled to unilaterally ban editors from this page or have them blocked for failing to abide by your instructions.
Talk pages are provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to enable communication among editors. If someone uses this page to harass you or otherwise abuses it, you certainly should seek to remedy the situation. But in the absence of a community/ArbCom-imposed editing restriction, no user in good standing may be preemptively prohibited from utilizing this page for its intended purpose. —David Levy 19:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless they repeatedly use the user talk pages to stalk someone, which is the case here. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, harassment and other abuse is unacceptable, and you certainly should report it when it occurs. But only the community or ArbCom may determine that a pattern of misconduct warrants an editing restriction of the sort that you wish to enact. Until such time, the mere act of posting here is not grounds for a block (though specific abuse might be). —David Levy 20:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree but note that he is receiving conflicting info concerning talk page usage which may have attributed to this. And there does seem to be a little wikihounding as this is being done to aggravate.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 03:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Previous account

I have now asked for admin assistance over this [[1]]. I may re-word it to also include Vir in it as well.Slatersteven (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

I would like to discuss matters with you privately. I have a hotmail account. ddbanddtt call yourself jack sebastion so I know you from spam, please. DDB (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on my talk page are unwelcome, and I will report you for harassing me if you make any more. Erase this comment once you've read it, if you like. I will not engage you any further. μηδείς (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy