User talk:Samsonite Man

File:Alicia Keys - VH1 Storytellers.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Alicia Keys discography

I don't know where you ever got the idea from that once a song has an article that means we can or should remove notes and extra information from discographies, but this is not the case. Even if that information becomes complex/detailed/what have you in footnotes, we don't remove it from discography articles. You are essentially just blanking valid information. In the case of "Calma", I assume you removed the certifications and Hot 100 peak because the version of the song that charted/what the RIAA database lists does not credit Keys. It's well known that the success of "Calma" on the Hot 100 was aided by the version featuring her and helped it achieve further RIAA Latin certifications, so I don't particularly agree with removing it entirely. Even if you insist on this, I assume another editor will just restore it. Ss112 07:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Request

Please use edit summaries when you edit articles/article talk pages, etc. A useful tool to remind you if you forgot to include a summary like you did here can be found in your user Preferences. Go to the tab "Editing" and check the option to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary)" which prevents you from "publishing" your edit if/when you fail to add an edit summary. Hope that helps. Happy editing! ^Atsme _Talk 📧 19:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

FAC: Love for Sale (Bilal album)

Hi. Could you spare some time and review my nomination of this article? Here is the featured article criteria for guidance, in case you choose to do so. Thank you. isento (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Alicia Keys Rocks New Year's Eve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia Keys Rocks New Year's Eve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Keys Rocks New Year's Eve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Sukkiri moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sukkiri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 15:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sukkiri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sukkiri. Thanks! ASUKITE 15:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukkiri (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukkiri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sukkiri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samsonite Man! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Re: Alicia (album)

Hi. I reverted a large part of your recent edit to the article. The German program video was posted by an uploader that didn't appear to be the original program, while the Japanese program doesn't have an article which suggests to me a lack of notability. The section lists many media events to market the album, so readers get the point without needing to pile on more with sourcing/notability issues, per WP:RSPYT and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Piotr (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Alicia (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Piotr Jr. (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alicia (album), you may be blocked from editing. Piotr Jr. (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

I have repeatedly pinged and referred you to Talk:Alicia (album)#Re: Marketing addition to discuss your contested changes, following WP:BRD. Please respond there and refrain from reverting/edit-warring further. Piotr Jr. (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

This is utter nonsense.Samsonite Man (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Piotr Jr. (talk) 17:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)