User talk:TheAlienMan2002: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Please read [[WP:PA]] because your message clearly violates it, and you don't have proof whatsoever of this "AI-generated" stuff, there's no ground to stand on. [[User:TheAlienMan2002|TheAlienMan2002]] ([[User talk:TheAlienMan2002#top|talk]]) 20:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC) |
:Please read [[WP:PA]] because your message clearly violates it, and you don't have proof whatsoever of this "AI-generated" stuff, there's no ground to stand on. [[User:TheAlienMan2002|TheAlienMan2002]] ([[User talk:TheAlienMan2002#top|talk]]) 20:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
::it's hard not to accuse you of it, while you're doing it. and that is in no way a personal attack. ltb[[user:ltbdl/d|<span style="color:orange">d</span>]]<nowiki>l</nowiki> ([[user talk:ltbdl|talk]]) 05:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC) |
::it's hard not to accuse you of it, while you're doing it. and that is in no way a personal attack. ltb[[user:ltbdl/d|<span style="color:orange">d</span>]]<nowiki>l</nowiki> ([[user talk:ltbdl|talk]]) 05:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::@[[User:Ltbdl|Ltbdl]] '''It is a personal attack.''' Or at least an attack based on my vocabulary. But nontheless you cannot accuse someone of something without verifying. If I said to you "Oh, your message 'it's hard not to accuse you of it, while you're doing it. and that is in no way a personal attack' is Ai-Generated" would I be telling the truth? No of course not, because theres no '''proof''' or '''validation''' that you used an AI, just like there's no proof that I did use an AI, (which I never ever used in the first place). |
|||
:::I find your accusation and this whole conversation right now, to be irksome. It's your right to state your opinion on the matter, that's why I kept your message. Your point of view for this has no lead, no proof, no evidence, just accusations and your asseveration on me saying I have Ai generated message is just, absurd, and rude, too. |
|||
:::Familiar yourself with other people using vocabulary words that you, do not understand, please. Please be wise on your messages because the more i read them the more I think you're being an egotistical presumptuous human being. [[User:TheAlienMan2002|TheAlienMan2002]] ([[User talk:TheAlienMan2002#top|talk]]) 12:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Reversion at [[Alpha Omega Alpha]] == |
== Reversion at [[Alpha Omega Alpha]] == |
||
Revision as of 12:42, 3 October 2023
Good morning/afternoon to the fellow editors.
This is my talk page, feel free to leave a message at my talk page.
Sometimes my archives mess up, so if it happens let me know please.
:It's important to read WP:TPNO before posting stuff on my talk page.
ARCHIVES LIST https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheAlienMan2002/Archive_N
Do not post "AI"-generated inanity
You seem to be making a habit of posting "AI"-generated inanity in various places on Wikipedia. This behavior is unambiguously disruptive; if you do not cease, you may be blocked from editing. --JBL (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- JBL Please do not, in any circumstances accuse me of using "Ai-generated" messsages. I just have erudite conversations sometimes and mostly I try my best and word things out as I can.
- Please read WP:PA because your message clearly violates it, and you don't have proof whatsoever of this "AI-generated" stuff, there's no ground to stand on. TheAlienMan2002 (talk) 20:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- it's hard not to accuse you of it, while you're doing it. and that is in no way a personal attack. ltbdl (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Ltbdl It is a personal attack. Or at least an attack based on my vocabulary. But nontheless you cannot accuse someone of something without verifying. If I said to you "Oh, your message 'it's hard not to accuse you of it, while you're doing it. and that is in no way a personal attack' is Ai-Generated" would I be telling the truth? No of course not, because theres no proof or validation that you used an AI, just like there's no proof that I did use an AI, (which I never ever used in the first place).
- I find your accusation and this whole conversation right now, to be irksome. It's your right to state your opinion on the matter, that's why I kept your message. Your point of view for this has no lead, no proof, no evidence, just accusations and your asseveration on me saying I have Ai generated message is just, absurd, and rude, too.
- Familiar yourself with other people using vocabulary words that you, do not understand, please. Please be wise on your messages because the more i read them the more I think you're being an egotistical presumptuous human being. TheAlienMan2002 (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- it's hard not to accuse you of it, while you're doing it. and that is in no way a personal attack. ltbdl (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Reversion at Alpha Omega Alpha
Hi! Just checking to see if [1] this was an error. I didn't want to just roll it back without checking with you. Joyous! Noise! 20:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it was an error because i accidentally clicked the "restore revision" button instead of the undo button. Unless if I did click the undo button. You reverted the revision the same time as I did so it mixed up the edits. TheAlienMan2002 (talk) 21:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. I think we tried to revert the edit at the same time and I was a microsecond ahead of you. If it helps, I reverted a Cluebot edit accidentally, less than an hour ago. Sometimes the fingers just get twitchy. Joyous! Noise! 21:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Your meticulous and detailed editing of Wikipedia is truly commendable. Thank you. TheAlienMan2002 (talk) 23:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. I think we tried to revert the edit at the same time and I was a microsecond ahead of you. If it helps, I reverted a Cluebot edit accidentally, less than an hour ago. Sometimes the fingers just get twitchy. Joyous! Noise! 21:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)