User talk:Tony Sidaway: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Apology: hrmp |
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Image:Wikipe-tan in Santa Costume.png|thumb|left|200px|Wishing you the very best for the season - but with this full bag! --<small> [[User:White Cat/07|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat/07|chi?]]</sup> 17:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)]] |
[[Image:Wikipe-tan in Santa Costume.png|thumb|left|200px|Wishing you the very best for the season - but with this full bag! --<small> [[User:White Cat/07|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat/07|chi?]]</sup> 17:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)]] |
||
<br clear=all/> |
<br clear=all/> |
||
==Request for arbitration== |
|||
I have filed a request for arbitration which involves you. Please see [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Giano_II]]. [[User:John254|John254]] 04:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Apology== |
|||
Im still waiting for an apology from you for these unsubstantiated slurrs and statements (in no paticular order): |
|||
* disruptive editor |
|||
* Why was he unblocked |
|||
* since unblocking he has continued to do everything possible to bring such warfare down on our heads |
|||
* a serious breach of Wikipedia policy (which was clearly premeditated) |
|||
* you posted a link to your attack on the subject's talk page, and then went back several times to rub it in. |
|||
* Ceoil's loutish attacks |
|||
* your acts were premeditated and not made off-the-cuff |
|||
:None of these were factual, and none has the substance of you having "carefully scrutinized the disruptive actions", in you own words, before you posted each singularly. You have a tendancy to pontificate and moralise on on others, so at least you could be accountable for your own smearing of fellow editors. If you think this goes away; no, another error. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 06:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: I have not changed my opinion on the flagrantly disruptive nature of your conduct. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 07:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Very insubstantial answear. So basically what you are saying is that you are ok with making wanton, of the cuf statments about other, real people, but when taken to task you will not engage, or take up on specifics, or have anything to say in your defence, beyond the trivial schoolyard level. Fine; that was my initial impression, I just wanted it to be clear that I knew you knew. Curious though why ''are'' you here: if not substance, if not content; why? [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 07:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:30, 26 December 2007
Merry Christmas
Seasons Greetings