Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beheading video (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Military (FWDS) |
Howunusual (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Crime|list of Crime-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Crime|list of Crime-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:I don't understand where you're getting that. The first source you mention discusses the idea a bit, but not much. It is mostly about one particular killing. The others don't discuss "Beheading video" as a general, notable topic in its own right at all. [[User:Howunusual|Howunusual]] ([[User talk:Howunusual|talk]]) 03:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:26, 23 August 2014
AfDs for this article:
- Beheading video (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
1. It is synthesis [1]. None of the sources treat "Beheading video" as a subject in itself, different from "Grey roof" or "Sitting dog." The references are merely media coverage of beheadings that involved videos. 2. It's pretty insensitive, to the point of being a BLP violation, since BLP covers deaths that are very recent and controversial or murders. How would you feel to have a loved one being listed for something like this a week afterwards? Howunusual (talk) 21:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination fixed + reformatted moluɐɯ 22:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Vycl1994 (talk) 22:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- keep the third reference[2] specifically talks about beheading videos used as a tactic in war and terrorism. This [3] also mentions a recent beheading video as a subject. [4] talks about the issue as a form of propaganda. Like it or not, it is a phenomenon of the modern world, a bit like Gibbet cages from antiquity. wrt. BLP, yes it does apply, so we have to be careful, and fix the article if need be. Martin451 00:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand where you're getting that. The first source you mention discusses the idea a bit, but not much. It is mostly about one particular killing. The others don't discuss "Beheading video" as a general, notable topic in its own right at all. Howunusual (talk) 03:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)