Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martina Steckholzer: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Martina Steckholzer: keep, duh |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Keep''' Big waste of time. Nominator should read WP:ARTIST, especially where it says that being in several permanent collections makes someone notable. The article is only about three or four sentences, one of which talks about her inclusion in permanent collections.[[User:ThatMontrealIP|ThatMontrealIP]] ([[User talk:ThatMontrealIP|talk]]) 22:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Big waste of time. Nominator should read WP:ARTIST, especially where it says that being in several permanent collections makes someone notable. The article is only about three or four sentences, one of which talks about her inclusion in permanent collections.[[User:ThatMontrealIP|ThatMontrealIP]] ([[User talk:ThatMontrealIP|talk]]) 22:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:ARTIST]] 4(d). {{u|ImmortalWizard}} this is going to become a snowball, you might consider withdrawing, to save the time of the other editors from piling on.--[[User:Theredproject|Theredproject]] ([[User talk:Theredproject|talk]]) 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:ARTIST]] 4(d). {{u|ImmortalWizard}} this is going to become a snowball, you might consider withdrawing, to save the time of the other editors from piling on.--[[User:Theredproject|Theredproject]] ([[User talk:Theredproject|talk]]) 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Withdrawal by nominator''' per comments above. <span style="color:orange">'''THE NEW'''</span> [[User:ImmortalWizard|''<span style="color:#964B00">Immortal</span>'''''<span style="color:blue">Wizard</span>''']][[User talk:ImmortalWizard|<span style="color:green;">(chat)</span>]] 16:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:30, 4 March 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Martina Steckholzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG and unsourced BLP THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 09:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:ARTIST, works held by a number of museums/galleries (Saatchi Gallery, Museion, Österreichische Galerie Belvedere), article shows this. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Big waste of time. Nominator should read WP:ARTIST, especially where it says that being in several permanent collections makes someone notable. The article is only about three or four sentences, one of which talks about her inclusion in permanent collections.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:ARTIST 4(d). ImmortalWizard this is going to become a snowball, you might consider withdrawing, to save the time of the other editors from piling on.--Theredproject (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawal by nominator per comments above. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 16:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)