Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadows of P'Jem: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''', no valid deletion argument presented. Lack of references is not a valid reason to delete as we'd be deleting articles by the bucket fulls. [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] ([[User talk:Cburnett|talk]]) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', no valid deletion argument presented. Lack of references is not a valid reason to delete as we'd be deleting articles by the bucket fulls. [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] ([[User talk:Cburnett|talk]]) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''': Isn't there a centralised policy on episodes by now? If there isn't then '''Keep'''. I don't see why we should disappoint the 60% of our readership that's Trekkies. (Sorry, Trekkers.) [[User:Relata refero|Relata refero]] ([[User talk:Relata refero|talk]]) 18:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:32, 5 February 2008
AfDs for this article:
- Shadows of P'Jem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A non-notable TV episode, has been tagged for references for over 5 months. Article is just a an indepth plot reprise with no real world notability. Pollytyred (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolutely no citations. --DerRichter (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- The episode itself is a primary source. Cburnett (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT#OR. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You don't know what original research is. Cburnett (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid deletion argument presented. Lack of references is not a valid reason to delete as we'd be deleting articles by the bucket fulls. Cburnett (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Isn't there a centralised policy on episodes by now? If there isn't then Keep. I don't see why we should disappoint the 60% of our readership that's Trekkies. (Sorry, Trekkers.) Relata refero (talk) 18:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)