Jump to content

Talk:International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

[edit]

The sourcing for this entry needs work, but one problematic reference in particular is Haq, M. Zahurul (5 August 2011). M.N. Schmitt, Louise Arimatsu, T. McCormack, ed. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law - 2010 (1st ed.). Springer. p. 463. ISBN 978-9067048101. I can't access the publication, but there are only 400 pages in the book, so clearly something is inaccurate about this reference. Bangabandhu (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bangabandhu: I may have access to the source; I'll check this weekend. If I don't, the extremely helpful folks at Resource Request can almost certainly get it. They won't email a whole eBook, but if you describe what you're trying to verify they'll search the source and try to identify the page(s) it came from. Worldbruce (talk) 01:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. Didn't know that resource existed, it could be very useful. I'll go ask them about the reference now. Bangabandhu (talk) 07:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EU resolutions of support

[edit]

Currently, the entry reads: "The EU has passed three resolutions supporting the trials" which is sourced to this article. That article doesn't cite the resolutions by name, referencing a Peter Custers. I would like to know what the three resolutions were, if they exist. I suspect that the characterization of the EU's view in this article is more accurate. The EU didn't provide a wholesale endorsement to or support of the ICT, but recognized that the Bangladeshi people had prioritized it. Would welcome more sources, as I think this is problematic as it currently stands. From this 2010 Economist article - "The United Nations and Western governments are wary of lending support to a tribunal unless it conforms to international standards of due process" which does not fit with the existence of three EU resolutions in support. Bangabandhu (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Ashrafuz Zaman Khan not listed among the "Accused and Verdicts"? He was convicted on 3 Nov 2013 along with Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.212.120 (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy