User talk:Ploutarchos

Previous discussions are archived at /Archive1.--Ploutarchos 16:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issue?

Ploutarchos, is there a problem? Are you mad at me??? --PaxEquilibrium 18:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, why do you say that?--Ploutarchos 08:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were silent. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 13:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Ενταξει, θα φτιαξω ενα αυριο ειδικα για εδω. Καλως σας βρηκα! Helladios 22:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

How do we create articles?

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Clement of Ohrid.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 18:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

I think it would be good to change the colour from turquoise as it's not clear. Please could you do this or show me cheers Tom (talk) 15:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spor la treaba Plutarhule, de la prânz la miezul noptii...

...sau daca preferi, de la zenit la nadir !

Ti-asi fi recunoscator daca ai putea arunca o privire asupra articolului Controversy about national identity in Moldova, creat de mine si modificat de Illythr (si poate de altii, pâna vei citi acest mesaj) si sa intervii cum socotesti mai bine, macar în domeniul formal (Illythr scrie ca referintele cer toate verificare, ce înseamna asta?). Sunt foarte începator pe Wiki englez care pare foarte riguros mai ales pe planul formal, uneori pierzând astfel din vedere evidenta, sau poate înnecând-o în amanunte si citate.

În ceeace priveste Republica Moldova, amanuntele si citatele nu-s fara POV. Majoritatea tind a sustine procesul în curs de re-creare a unei identitati locale, nu ca in Elvetia si Belgia pe baza teritoriala, ceeace nu ar fi cu nimic deranjant (in Elvetia si Belgia identitatea tine de tara si nu împiedica apartenanta culturala si lingvistica la sferele germana, franceza, italiana sau nederlandeza) ci pe o baza izolationiasta si separatista (identitatea tine de proiectul politic de a desparti cu orice pret vorbitorii limbii Daco-Romane din R. Moldova de cei din România, dar nu se atinge de cultura rusa, ucraineana s.a.m.d. din Moldova).

Multumesc pentru orice contributie. Cu bine, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?

Ειναι κανεις εδω? The Cat and the Owl (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 02:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern Roman Empires

A tag has been placed on Eastern Roman Empires requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unlikely neologism

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Constantine ✍ 17:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]