User talk:SD0001
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This user doesn't subscribe to mass messages. Instead they prefer to read them off other users' talk pages!
Congratulations
[edit]On your election as a new admin! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Plantaest (talk) 13:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both! – SD0001 (talk) 13:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Congrats! Andre🚐 22:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
List of Wikipedians by GA/FA views
[edit]Hi SD0001 (and congrats on your recent adminship)! I just wanted to follow up about Wikipedia:Bot_requests/Archive_84#Bot_to_maintain_lists_of_Wikipedians_by_good_article/featured_article_views, as I still think it'd be a nice thing to have! Any chance it'd be possible to create this list? Sdkb talk 05:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdkb It's a busy month for me. Probably next month! (Belated congrats on your adminship too! By the way, and I really mean this, you have a lot of great technical ideas about improving the project. You should learn to code. It's the one thing that improves productivity many times over. I'd suggest starting with Python.) – SD0001 (talk) 07:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I learned some Python back in college, but I've never put in the effort to re-learn it and other coding languages. I think you're probably right, as that is often a bottleneck! Sdkb talk 19:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
2025 AFC Beach Soccer Asian Cup
[edit]Hello. I see you reversed my move of this article to draft space because I had not given a reason. I chose a reason in reason dropdown menu; it is certainly not clear that the "other reason" field must be filled in unless "other reason" is selected in the reason dropdown. I apologise if I should have done, though I note I have performed a number of similar moves without it being a problem in the past. I will write something in the free text reason field in the future.
I did post a message to the creating editor's talk page with the reason, which is that it's completely unsourced. And as a newly written article, better off incubating in draftspace. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 18:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Christmas
[edit]Promotion
[edit]Hello, Hope you're good. What to do when the Name of creator looks same as the created draft or article, like this one you declined to delete Draft:Faheem Ul Islam created by User:Faheemulislam1. A response will help me, Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I see you've already placed {{uw-autobiography}} on the user talk page, which is appropriate. But the COI is not a deletion reason by itself. Although the draft is promotional and unlikely to be accepted via AfC without several rounds of revisions even if it's notable, I don't think it's egregious enough to meet WP:G11. – SD0001 (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SD0001 Thank you for the clarifications. Taabii (talk) 16:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
G13s
[edit]Hello SD! Is there a reason you are not deleting the G13 noms I made? The reason you are declining or removing the g13 speedy tag does not appear to be valid per WP:G13. Are you trying to preserve them just as a dummy edit will do? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Anyone can remove a G13 tag with a dummy edit. I have deleted the pages you nominated which didn't look likely to be ever accepted through AfC. – SD0001 (talk) 13:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I sometimes delay deleting promising drafts that are due to expire. But, generally, if the draft creator is no longer actively editing, it's highly unlikely that another editor will stumble upon an old draft and work on improving it. So, unless you, yourself, want to work on a draft article that is going to be CSD G13, it doesn't make a lot of sense to delay deleting an expiring draft. This is also because, if an editor wants to return and continue to work on a draft, it can easily be restored by making a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
DYK helper needs fixes
[edit]Hi. There have been several unresolved fixes at User talk:SD0001/DYK-helper, some years old. Two of them (including mine) would help benefit the use of QPQs with multiple linked articles. You may wanna respond to them as soon as possible. ミラP@Miraclepine 03:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)