User talk:Spshu

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Spshu reported by User:Electricburst1996 (Result: ). Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 19:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

You and Vjmlhds are both warned for edit warring per the closure of the WP:AN3 report. I assume you will try to get consensus on the talk page before making further template edits. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Recent Edit to DuckTales

Let me get this off my chest, by saying that I don't approve of what you just did, except for removing additional cast members; that I don't have an issue with. Didn't you check what I had rewritten Production out as, before you went in? Have you checked to find out if any other article for a TV show has a line that begins "'Programme Name' is an 'Nationality' Syndicated 'Genre(s)' programme"? I hardly have seen any article on a show stating this in the beginning of its lead. And what is so wrong about using Small format for some text in Infoboxs? I hardly see an issue for this at all... GUtt01 (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

On second thoughts, apart from going in to clean up some issues with your edits, such as citations that don't work per both WP:V and WP:RS, I won't argue the issue on infobox format, after checking a few other programme articles. Still, you could have worked around my version of Production, if you wanted to, rather than revert back to your version. GUtt01 (talk) 21:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Listen, let's not let this get in the way of our editing. Maybe I should have done my best to review your edit and correct mistakes in the first place, rather than reverting it. I suppose there were some areas you were correct to do, but I have to admit, you did leave in some editing mistakes within. Could you take time to read how the article looks at the moment and see what you think of its presentation? GUtt01 (talk) 07:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

I just want to let you know, that I want to apologize for causing you any troubles with this article. Please take time to read what I wrote on the article's talk page. GUtt01 (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Inspire Brands

I don't really feel like opening a DRV, but if you look at the sources provided this is a multibillion dollar company covered by reliable sources therefore passes WP:NCORP also there a concept call consensus through editing both me and SportsFan007 (talk · contribs) have edited this article as a mainspace concept. I understand notability and WP:IAR. Please I kindly ask you reopen a second AfD, this article would not be deleted if I or Cunard (talk · contribs) engaged in the prior AfD. This is notable I don't believe there is a snowball's chance in hell that this will be deleted with an AfD that has more participation. Also

Inspire Brands has new information since the 29 July 2018 AfD closure:

On August 16, 2018, The Wendy's Company announced that it sold its 12.3% stake in Inspire Brands back to Inspire Brands for $450 million, which includes a 38% premium over its stake most recent valuation.

On September 25, 2018, Inspire Brands announced that it was buying Oklahoma City-based Sonic Drive-In for $2.3 billion. The firm expects that the acquisition should be completed by the end of the year.

There may be enough new information that {{db-repost}} does not apply. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 23:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

SportsFan007 has been opposed by me and an IP editor. SportsFan has also improperly removed discussion regarding a split/new AFD. Indicating these events occur nor that it is a multibillion dollar company make it pass NCORP. Spshu (talk) 23:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you did remove the split discussion - "13:51, 10 October 2018‎ SportsFan007 (→‎Should the section Inspire Brands be split off?)". Spshu (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

This company owns Buffalo Wild Wings, Rusty Taco, Sonic Drive-In and Arby's it is a multi-billion dollar company Arby's is not the correct redirect. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 00:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

This company owns Buffalo Wild Wings, Rusty Taco, Sonic Drive-In and Arby's it is a multi-billion dollar company Arby's is not the correct redirect. I was unaware you and SportsFan007 had a history I understand differences occur, but please keep it on the talk pages, this is among the most notable companies out there Forbes, NRN, and CNN. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 00:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Valoem, and... So? You are suggesting that it is inheriting notability by naming all its units; sorry but WP:INHERITORG indicates that this is not allowed. First you indicate WP:ORGSIG by the size of the company (multibillion dollar company), which isn't allowed and by additional events with out showing that those events's sources are not significant coverage of Inspire Brands.

Your CNN source still partly refers to Inspire as Arby's: "Well, Arby's owner is about to get beefier: It's buying hamburger joint Sonic for $2.3 billion." As does the Forbes article "The Evolution Of Arby's: From Neighborhood Chain To Food Industry Powerhouse" and "With its recent acquisition of Buffalo Wild Wings and the subsequent launch of its new multi-brand restaurant company – Inspire Brands – Arby’s is doing just that." NRN is a niche news source and I don't see where this has any significate coverage of Inspire.

Contest the speedy deletion instead of removing them from the article. Spshu (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@Spshu: Arby's and Inspire Brands are separate entities, and separate entities being on the same page makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. SportsFan007 (talk) 03:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)SportsFan007

So what that is not the standard for separate articles. Why doesn't it make sense? They are related entities. Go to the tak page at Arby's. Spshu (talk) 14:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Spshu. Thank you for your work on Hale, Michigan. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GTC Wireless

The article GTC Wireless has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)