User talk:Watercheetah99
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Check well before reverting!
[edit]Hello Watercheetah99,
I saw you reverted this edit without checking the edit history or warning the editor (me if in case) that you reverted an edit. It will help on future or notify the editor if it is vandalism or section blanking as the case may be. However, your reversion has been undid since the input is already as a subsection in the article. Thanks! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 01:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello there...
[edit]Hey Watercheetah99,
On the Yahaya Bello article, the same user added new information on the article, which is nice. However, there is a 3 revert policy on Wikipedia and I'm not sure if it goes for This user because they have reverted other peoples edits. Should this user be blocked or go along with what they're doing? GoodHue291 (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think they should be blocked. They either are extremely biased or appear to have been paid to add aggrandizing text to the page and remove scandals. Watercheetah99 (talk) 19:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think bias is the case here, and the user should be challenged with it, because bias isn't tolerated on Wikipedia. I saw the user added more information with sources but I'm not sure why they didn't previously. Some of the text is out-of-place too. Are you going to pursue and get them blocked for a day or two? GoodHue291 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably, this kind of POV editing has happened before and I think this is a sockpuppet of another account. Watercheetah99 (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I think so too. It has been sent to ANI for investigation too. I asked the user why they reverted the changes but so far no response. I also asked the Teahouse about the user in a reply. GoodHue291 (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably, this kind of POV editing has happened before and I think this is a sockpuppet of another account. Watercheetah99 (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think bias is the case here, and the user should be challenged with it, because bias isn't tolerated on Wikipedia. I saw the user added more information with sources but I'm not sure why they didn't previously. Some of the text is out-of-place too. Are you going to pursue and get them blocked for a day or two? GoodHue291 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Second Cabinet of Muhammadu Buhari
[edit]
Template:Second Cabinet of Muhammadu Buhari has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Appreciation for your handful and continuous contribution, reverting vandalism especially on Nigerian related articles. It doesn't go unnoticed. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
ECP at Delta State?
[edit]Hello Watercheetah99. I see that the two people who were edit warring on this article have resumed. Would it be reasonable to apply WP:ECP to the article? This would have the effect of removing both of them from the article, for now. The alternative would most likely be blocks. Thanks for any opinion, EdJohnston (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think that would be a smart move. — Watercheetah99 (talk) 07:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)